{"id":212531,"date":"2019-03-28T13:30:37","date_gmt":"2019-03-28T08:00:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=212531"},"modified":"2019-03-30T12:33:39","modified_gmt":"2019-03-30T07:03:39","slug":"ker-hc-review-against-petition-pertaining-to-rights-of-forest-dwellers-maintainable-where-petition-disposed-of-without-considering-all-prayers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/28\/ker-hc-review-against-petition-pertaining-to-rights-of-forest-dwellers-maintainable-where-petition-disposed-of-without-considering-all-prayers\/","title":{"rendered":"Ker HC | Review against petition pertaining to rights of forest dwellers maintainable where petition disposed of without considering all prayers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Kerala High Court: <\/strong>The Division Bench of Hrishikesh Roy, CJ and A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J. allowed withdrawal of a writ appeal opining that since the same pertained to rights of forest dwellers, the proper course would be a review against the writ petition which was disposed of hastily.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The present case pertained to rights of traditional forest dwellers. Mr K.S. Madhusoodanan, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that while many reliefs were sought in the petition filed for rights of forest dwellers, and the counsel therein was making submission before the learned Judge only for interim relief, the entire case was disposed of without enabling the appellant (petitioner in the said writ petition) to make submission on other prayers. Thus, the Court had no opportunity to deal with other ten substantial prayers in the writ petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In such circumstances, Mr Madhusoodanan submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present appeal so that a review petition could be filed before the writ court for fresh consideration of the matter particularly when, neither the State nor the Central Government had occasion to file any counter affidavit in the writ petition. His submission was that when important rights for traditional forest dwellers is being espoused in the writ proceedings, it would be appropriate if prayers are considered after the counter affidavit(s) are placed on record, indicating the stand of the State and the Central Government.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the aforesaid submissions, the Court dismissed the instant appeal as not pressed, and granted the appellant the liberty to file a review petition. [Adivasi Kanikkar Samyuktha Sangham v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/sisTywu6\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Ker 817<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 08-03-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of Hrishikesh Roy, CJ and A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J. allowed withdrawal of a writ appeal opining <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34569,2897,34570],"class_list":["post-212531","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-forest-dwellers","tag-Review","tag-rights"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Ker HC | Review against petition pertaining to rights of forest dwellers maintainable where petition disposed of without considering all prayers | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/28\/ker-hc-review-against-petition-pertaining-to-rights-of-forest-dwellers-maintainable-where-petition-disposed-of-without-considering-all-prayers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ker HC | Review against petition pertaining to rights of forest dwellers maintainable where petition disposed of without considering all prayers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of Hrishikesh Roy, CJ and A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J. allowed withdrawal of a writ appeal opining\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/28\/ker-hc-review-against-petition-pertaining-to-rights-of-forest-dwellers-maintainable-where-petition-disposed-of-without-considering-all-prayers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-28T08:00:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-30T07:03:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/28\/ker-hc-review-against-petition-pertaining-to-rights-of-forest-dwellers-maintainable-where-petition-disposed-of-without-considering-all-prayers\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/28\/ker-hc-review-against-petition-pertaining-to-rights-of-forest-dwellers-maintainable-where-petition-disposed-of-without-considering-all-prayers\/\",\"name\":\"Ker HC | Review against petition pertaining to rights of forest dwellers maintainable where petition disposed of without considering all prayers | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-28T08:00:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-30T07:03:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/28\/ker-hc-review-against-petition-pertaining-to-rights-of-forest-dwellers-maintainable-where-petition-disposed-of-without-considering-all-prayers\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/28\/ker-hc-review-against-petition-pertaining-to-rights-of-forest-dwellers-maintainable-where-petition-disposed-of-without-considering-all-prayers\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/28\/ker-hc-review-against-petition-pertaining-to-rights-of-forest-dwellers-maintainable-where-petition-disposed-of-without-considering-all-prayers\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ker HC | Review against petition pertaining to rights of forest dwellers maintainable where petition disposed of without considering all prayers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ker HC | Review against petition pertaining to rights of forest dwellers maintainable where petition disposed of without considering all prayers | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/28\/ker-hc-review-against-petition-pertaining-to-rights-of-forest-dwellers-maintainable-where-petition-disposed-of-without-considering-all-prayers\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ker HC | Review against petition pertaining to rights of forest dwellers maintainable where petition disposed of without considering all prayers","og_description":"Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of Hrishikesh Roy, CJ and A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J. allowed withdrawal of a writ appeal opining","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/28\/ker-hc-review-against-petition-pertaining-to-rights-of-forest-dwellers-maintainable-where-petition-disposed-of-without-considering-all-prayers\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-28T08:00:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-30T07:03:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/28\/ker-hc-review-against-petition-pertaining-to-rights-of-forest-dwellers-maintainable-where-petition-disposed-of-without-considering-all-prayers\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/28\/ker-hc-review-against-petition-pertaining-to-rights-of-forest-dwellers-maintainable-where-petition-disposed-of-without-considering-all-prayers\/","name":"Ker HC | Review against petition pertaining to rights of forest dwellers maintainable where petition disposed of without considering all prayers | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-03-28T08:00:37+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-30T07:03:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/28\/ker-hc-review-against-petition-pertaining-to-rights-of-forest-dwellers-maintainable-where-petition-disposed-of-without-considering-all-prayers\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/28\/ker-hc-review-against-petition-pertaining-to-rights-of-forest-dwellers-maintainable-where-petition-disposed-of-without-considering-all-prayers\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/28\/ker-hc-review-against-petition-pertaining-to-rights-of-forest-dwellers-maintainable-where-petition-disposed-of-without-considering-all-prayers\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ker HC | Review against petition pertaining to rights of forest dwellers maintainable where petition disposed of without considering all prayers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":214869,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/20\/hp-hc-sub-divisional-officer-does-not-have-the-authority-to-process-claims-of-other-traditional-forest-dwellers\/","url_meta":{"origin":212531,"position":0},"title":"HP HC | Sub Divisional Officer does not have the authority to process claims of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 20, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of Surya Kant, CJ. and Sandeep Sharma, J. addressed grievances raised by the petitioners and directed the authority to take necessary action. The instant matter relates to an order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer (Civil) Gohar, whereby it had turned down the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310826,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/05\/uhc-takes-suo-motu-cognizance-of-illegal-felling-of-trees-in-jungle-areas-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":212531,"position":1},"title":"Uttaranchal HC takes suo motu cognizance of illegal felling of trees in jungle areas of Kaladhungi to Bajpur; directs State to take action against erring officials","author":"Simranjeet","date":"January 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNo committee was ever constituted to determine as to who will be the actual traditional forest dwellers or a Scheduled Tribe, who can be protected by the rights conferred upon them by the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"uttaranchal high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/uttaranchal-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/uttaranchal-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/uttaranchal-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/uttaranchal-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218043,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/guj-hc-pil-against-slum-rehabilitation-scheme-rejected-as-it-was-creating-undue-hurdle-for-the-slum-dwellers\/","url_meta":{"origin":212531,"position":2},"title":"Guj HC | PIL against slum rehabilitation scheme rejected as it was creating undue hurdle for slum-dwellers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 13, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: A Division Bench of S.R. Brahmbhatt and A.P. Thaker, JJ. dismissed a PIL filed by the petitioner. The applicant filed a PIL in the Court and the following was prayed for: The Court should declare the action of the respondent authorities in proposing the implementation of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":211100,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/28\/sc-stays-order-for-forced-eviction-of-more-than-1-000-000-forest-dwellers\/","url_meta":{"origin":212531,"position":3},"title":"SC stays order for forced eviction of more than 1, 000, 000 forest dwellers","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court:\u00a0After the Centre sought stay on the order which directed the forced eviction of more than 1,000,000 tribals and other forest-dwelling households from forestlands across 16 states on February 13, 2019, the Court has put a stay on the said order and has asked the concerned States to submit\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":369915,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/ph-hc-sets-aside-rejection-of-flat-allotment-to-jhuggi-dwellers\/","url_meta":{"origin":212531,"position":4},"title":"&#8216;Right to housing is a fundamental right&#8217;: Punjab and Haryana HC sets aside rejection of jhuggi dwellers&#8217; claims under Small Flats Scheme, 2006","author":"Editor","date":"December 16, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the case at hand, the Chandigarh Housing Board rejected jhuggi dwellers\u2019 claim for allotment of flat under the Chandigarh Small Flats Scheme, 2006 without giving them opportunity to be heard.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"flat allotment to jhuggi dwellers","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/flat-allotment-to-jhuggi-dwellers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/flat-allotment-to-jhuggi-dwellers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/flat-allotment-to-jhuggi-dwellers.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/flat-allotment-to-jhuggi-dwellers.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283036,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/03\/rehabilitation-cannot-rejected-jhuggi-dwellers-only-on-the-ground-that-their-names-are-not-in-the-voter-list-delhi-high-court-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":212531,"position":5},"title":"Rehabilitation cannot be rejected to jhuggi dwellers only on the ground that their names are not in the voter list: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"February 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court held that rehabilitation could not be rejected to jhuggi dwellers only on the ground that their names were not in the voter list and the Court further held that the Appellate Authority would have to consider all other documents as well before arriving at a conclusion\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212531","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212531"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212531\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212531"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212531"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212531"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}