{"id":212459,"date":"2019-03-27T18:00:12","date_gmt":"2019-03-27T12:30:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=212459"},"modified":"2019-03-30T13:13:39","modified_gmt":"2019-03-30T07:43:39","slug":"raj-hc-state-directed-to-consider-grant-of-exemption-from-test-to-petitioner-on-basis-of-parity-with-other-employees","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/raj-hc-state-directed-to-consider-grant-of-exemption-from-test-to-petitioner-on-basis-of-parity-with-other-employees\/","title":{"rendered":"Raj HC | State directed to consider grant of exemption from test to petitioner on basis of parity with other employees"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Rajasthan High Court<\/strong>: The Bench of Goverdhan Bardhar and Mohammad Rafiq, JJ. disposed of a petition filed by the petitioner challenging the order of termination of his services with the direction to the petitioner to submit a representation to the Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel for giving exemption to the petitioner on the condition of proving his proficiency in computer work on the ground that a similar exemption was accorded to one of his colleagues.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner had challenged the validity of Rule 9 of the Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependants of Deceased Government Servant Rules, 1996 which required those appointed on compassionate ground to pass a typing test. The counsel for the petitioner, Mr Om Prakash Sheoran, submitted that ever since the petitioner was appointed on the post, the typewriters had become obsolete and he had been continuously working on computer and acquired proficiency in the computer work. Thus insistence of the respondents to qualify the typing test was wholly unjustified. Further, it was submitted that the respondents had accorded different treatment to another employee. Act of the respondents were discriminatory being violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court without going into the argument as to validity of Rule 6 and 9 of the Rules of 1996, considered that the petitioner had rendered services of more than 8 years and on the argument of discrimination on the basis of exemption accorded to another employee, directed the petitioner to submit a representation to the Principal Secretary for according similar exemption to the petitioner on the condition of proving his proficiency in computer work. If eventually, the respondents were persuaded to accord exemption after considering his proficiency in computer work, the petitioner would be entitled to notional benefits and not actual benefits for the intervening period. [Manoj Kumar Sharma v. State of Rajasthan, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/L50ZpsaG\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Raj 270<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 27-02-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rajasthan High Court: The Bench of Goverdhan Bardhar and Mohammad Rafiq, JJ. disposed of a petition filed by the petitioner challenging the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2649,34547,34548],"class_list":["post-212459","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-exemption","tag-proficiency-in-computer-work","tag-rule-9-of-rajasthan-compassionate-appointment-of-dependants-of-deceased-government-servant-rules-1996"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Raj HC | State directed to consider grant of exemption from test to petitioner on basis of parity with other employees | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/raj-hc-state-directed-to-consider-grant-of-exemption-from-test-to-petitioner-on-basis-of-parity-with-other-employees\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raj HC | State directed to consider grant of exemption from test to petitioner on basis of parity with other employees\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: The Bench of Goverdhan Bardhar and Mohammad Rafiq, JJ. disposed of a petition filed by the petitioner challenging the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/raj-hc-state-directed-to-consider-grant-of-exemption-from-test-to-petitioner-on-basis-of-parity-with-other-employees\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-27T12:30:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-30T07:43:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/raj-hc-state-directed-to-consider-grant-of-exemption-from-test-to-petitioner-on-basis-of-parity-with-other-employees\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/raj-hc-state-directed-to-consider-grant-of-exemption-from-test-to-petitioner-on-basis-of-parity-with-other-employees\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC | State directed to consider grant of exemption from test to petitioner on basis of parity with other employees | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-27T12:30:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-30T07:43:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/raj-hc-state-directed-to-consider-grant-of-exemption-from-test-to-petitioner-on-basis-of-parity-with-other-employees\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/raj-hc-state-directed-to-consider-grant-of-exemption-from-test-to-petitioner-on-basis-of-parity-with-other-employees\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/raj-hc-state-directed-to-consider-grant-of-exemption-from-test-to-petitioner-on-basis-of-parity-with-other-employees\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raj HC | State directed to consider grant of exemption from test to petitioner on basis of parity with other employees\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC | State directed to consider grant of exemption from test to petitioner on basis of parity with other employees | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/raj-hc-state-directed-to-consider-grant-of-exemption-from-test-to-petitioner-on-basis-of-parity-with-other-employees\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raj HC | State directed to consider grant of exemption from test to petitioner on basis of parity with other employees","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: The Bench of Goverdhan Bardhar and Mohammad Rafiq, JJ. disposed of a petition filed by the petitioner challenging the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/raj-hc-state-directed-to-consider-grant-of-exemption-from-test-to-petitioner-on-basis-of-parity-with-other-employees\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-27T12:30:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-30T07:43:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/raj-hc-state-directed-to-consider-grant-of-exemption-from-test-to-petitioner-on-basis-of-parity-with-other-employees\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/raj-hc-state-directed-to-consider-grant-of-exemption-from-test-to-petitioner-on-basis-of-parity-with-other-employees\/","name":"Raj HC | State directed to consider grant of exemption from test to petitioner on basis of parity with other employees | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-03-27T12:30:12+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-30T07:43:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/raj-hc-state-directed-to-consider-grant-of-exemption-from-test-to-petitioner-on-basis-of-parity-with-other-employees\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/raj-hc-state-directed-to-consider-grant-of-exemption-from-test-to-petitioner-on-basis-of-parity-with-other-employees\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/raj-hc-state-directed-to-consider-grant-of-exemption-from-test-to-petitioner-on-basis-of-parity-with-other-employees\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raj HC | State directed to consider grant of exemption from test to petitioner on basis of parity with other employees"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":165094,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/25\/ward-claiming-compassionate-appointment-must-establish-wholly-dependent-deceased-government-servant\/","url_meta":{"origin":212459,"position":0},"title":"Ward claiming compassionate appointment must establish that she was \u201cwholly dependent\u201d on deceased government servant","author":"Saba","date":"October 25, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: A writ petition was preferred by the petitioners to question the constitutional validity of Rule 2(c) of the Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Servants Rules, 1996 (the Rules of 1996). As per the petitioner, her father Yagyadutt Sharma died while in service of State\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":251675,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/23\/compassionate-appointment-5\/","url_meta":{"origin":212459,"position":1},"title":"[Compassionate Appointment] Raj HC | Denial of compassionate appointment on fathering third child? Court analyzes Rules of Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Servant","author":"Editor","date":"July 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Dinesh Mehta, J., dismissed a petition which was filed aggrieved by the denial of compassionate appointment by communication dated 07-01-2020, as he had fathered a third child after the cut-off date i.e. 01-06-2002. The petitioner\u2019s father was working with the respondent \u2013 department and had died in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":233898,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/raj-hc-no-more-than-two-children-compulsory-criteria-for-dependents-to-seek-appointment-to-government-services-on-compassionate-grounds\/","url_meta":{"origin":212459,"position":2},"title":"Raj HC | \u2018No more than two children\u2019 compulsory criteria for dependents to seek appointment to Government services on compassionate grounds","author":"Editor","date":"August 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Sangeet Lodha and Rameshwar Vyas, JJ. dismissed the Special Appeal by upholding the decision of the Single Judge. The present case is an appeal preferred against the judgment of a Single Judge Bench wherein the division bench upheld the former\u2019s verdict. The facts\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":275581,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/14\/rajasthan-high-court-directs-state-to-consider-compassionate-appointment-for-son-born-from-second-wife-of-the-deceased\/","url_meta":{"origin":212459,"position":3},"title":"Rajasthan High Court directs State to consider compassionate appointment for son born from second wife of the deceased","author":"Editor","date":"October 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Rajasthan High Court: In a case filed by the second wife (petitioner 1) of deceased who was a class IV employee in the respondent-department, challenging rejection order, rejecting his son (petitioner 2) for compassionate appointment, Kuldeep Mathur, J., held that consideration under Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/rajasthan_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/rajasthan_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/rajasthan_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/rajasthan_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/rajasthan_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260043,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/compassionate-appointment-is-not-a-matter-of-right-but-subject-to-policy-changes\/","url_meta":{"origin":212459,"position":4},"title":"HP HC | Compassionate appointment is not a matter of right but subject to policy changes; appointment rightly rejected to son as mother is already employed with PWD","author":"Editor","date":"January 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of Sabina and Satyen Vaidya JJ. dismissed the petition on grounds of non-interference. \u00a0The facts of the case are such that the father of the petitioner was working as a T-Mate with the respondent department and had died while in service, on 03-03-2007.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256135,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/27\/does-engagement-of-elder-brother-creates-any-impediment-in-considering-the-claim-for-appointment-on-compassionate-grounds\/","url_meta":{"origin":212459,"position":5},"title":"Utt HC | Does engagement of elder brother creates any impediment in considering the claim for appointment on compassionate grounds? Court answers","author":"Editor","date":"October 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Sharad Kumar Sharma, J., allowed a writ petition which was filed praying for quashing of order passed by respondent and seeking to appoint petitioner on a suitable post on compassionate grounds. Petitioner\u2019s father who was the confirmed employee and was working as class IV employee, as Anusevak\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212459","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212459"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212459\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212459"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212459"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212459"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}