{"id":212457,"date":"2019-03-27T17:00:45","date_gmt":"2019-03-27T11:30:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=212457"},"modified":"2019-03-29T15:56:58","modified_gmt":"2019-03-29T10:26:58","slug":"mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\/","title":{"rendered":"MP HC | Violation of Court orders deserves no sympathy, protection recalled"},"content":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court: <\/strong>This interlocutory application was filed before the Bench of Atul Sreedharan, J.<\/p>\n

Facts of the case were that an order was passed where the petitioner was ordered to be evicted from the residential accommodation provided to the petitioner subject to petitioner\u2019s paying rent of the premises as per rules. With respect to the above order, an interlocutory application was filed in this case in order to recall the said order.<\/p>\n

It was submitted before Court that petitioner was residing in the official accommodation but had not complied with that part of the order by virtue of which petitioner was required to pay the rent as per rules. It was also alleged that the petitioner started depositing money only after filing of this application for recall of the order. Further submission was made that petitioner even after the passing of the order was residing in the official accommodation but was not paying the rent as per rules.<\/p>\n

High Court was of the view that petitioner had violated the orders of this Court which does not deserve sympathy and thus the protection given to petitioner was recalled and the respondents were given the liberty to evict petitioner from the premises in accordance with law. [V.S. Sikirvar v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine MP 487<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 19-03-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court: This interlocutory application was filed before the Bench of Atul Sreedharan, J. Facts of the case were that <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":172684,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34545,34546,29244,7811],"class_list":["post-212457","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-court-orders","tag-interlocutory-application","tag-protection","tag-violation"],"yoast_head":"\nMP HC | Violation of Court orders deserves no sympathy, protection recalled | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP HC | Violation of Court orders deserves no sympathy, protection recalled\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This interlocutory application was filed before the Bench of Atul Sreedharan, J. Facts of the case were that\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-27T11:30:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-29T10:26:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/27\\\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/27\\\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"MP HC | Violation of Court orders deserves no sympathy, protection recalled\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-27T11:30:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-29T10:26:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/27\\\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":232,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/27\\\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Court Orders\",\"interlocutory application\",\"protection\",\"violation\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/27\\\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/27\\\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/27\\\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\\\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC | Violation of Court orders deserves no sympathy, protection recalled | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/27\\\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/27\\\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-27T11:30:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-29T10:26:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/27\\\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/27\\\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/27\\\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/12\\\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/27\\\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP HC | Violation of Court orders deserves no sympathy, protection recalled\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC | Violation of Court orders deserves no sympathy, protection recalled | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP HC | Violation of Court orders deserves no sympathy, protection recalled","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This interlocutory application was filed before the Bench of Atul Sreedharan, J. Facts of the case were that","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-27T11:30:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-29T10:26:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"MP HC | Violation of Court orders deserves no sympathy, protection recalled","datePublished":"2019-03-27T11:30:45+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-29T10:26:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\/"},"wordCount":232,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","keywords":["Court Orders","interlocutory application","protection","violation"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\/","name":"MP HC | Violation of Court orders deserves no sympathy, protection recalled | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","datePublished":"2019-03-27T11:30:45+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-29T10:26:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/mp-hc-violation-of-court-orders-deserves-no-sympathy-protection-recalled\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP HC | Violation of Court orders deserves no sympathy, protection recalled"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":313235,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/06\/cal-hc-affirms-rejection-of-section-311-crpc-application-due-to-bar-on-criminal-revision-under-section-3972-crpc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":212457,"position":0},"title":"Calcutta High Court affirms rejection of Section 311 CrPC application due to bar on criminal revision under Section 397(2) CrPC","author":"Ritu","date":"February 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court observed that Section 311 of the CrPC provides wide discretionary powers to courts for summoning, examining, or recalling witnesses if their evidence is essential to a just decision.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":87261,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/23\/petitioner-admonished-for-filing-frivolous-interlocutory-application-of-sexual-harassment-by-an-opponent\/","url_meta":{"origin":212457,"position":1},"title":"Petitioner admonished for filing frivolous interlocutory application of sexual harassment by an opponent","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 23, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the matter where the petitioner, who had filed a PIL pertaining to the challenge to the Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules of 2001, framed under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, had alleged sexual harassment by one of the opponents, the Court said that the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319608,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/06\/mp-hc-rejects-plea-to-participate-in-ongoing-asi-survey-of-bhojshala-temple-kamal-maula-mosque-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":212457,"position":2},"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court rejects man\u2019s plea to participate in ongoing ASI Survey of Bhojshala Temple-Kamal Maula Mosque","author":"Ritu","date":"April 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court, vide order 11-03-2024, directed ASI survey of the complex stating that it is Constitutional and statutory obligation of the ASI to have a scientific survey.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272272,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/25\/punjab-haryana-high-court-allowsaccused-in-matrimonial-dispute-to-travel-to-australia-for-employment-purpose\/","url_meta":{"origin":212457,"position":3},"title":"Punjab & Haryana High Court allows accused in matrimonial dispute to travel to Australia for employment purpose","author":"Editor","date":"August 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab & Haryana High Court: Suvir Sehgal, J. while dismissing the petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code against the order passed by Judicial Magistrate, granted permission to the accused travel to Australia for a period of six months to take up employment on the ground that the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310324,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/cal-hc-upholds-mandatory-injunction-directs-demolition-in-violation-of-restraint-order-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":212457,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Court has power to grant mandatory injunctions at interlocutory stage\u2019; Calcutta High Court directs demolition in violation of injunction order","author":"Ritu","date":"December 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court reiterated that the court, in exercising equitable jurisdiction, has the power to remedy wrongful acts, especially when there is a violation of a restraint order.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282356,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/24\/interlocutory-order-in-one-case-cannot-be-treated-as-precedent-for-cancellation-of-bail-of-accused-in-other-cases-supreme-court-legal-resear\/","url_meta":{"origin":212457,"position":5},"title":"Interlocutory order in one case cannot be treated as precedent for cancellation of bail of accused in other cases: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"January 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court has ordered that the Rajasthan High Court's impugned order being interlocutory in nature, shall not be treated as precedent for cancellation of bail granted to the petitioner in other cases, and the question of law was kept open to be decided in an appropriate case.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-181.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212457","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212457"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212457\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/172684"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212457"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212457"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212457"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}