{"id":212404,"date":"2019-03-26T13:30:05","date_gmt":"2019-03-26T08:00:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=212404"},"modified":"2019-03-28T15:23:06","modified_gmt":"2019-03-28T09:53:06","slug":"ori-hc-substantive-evidence-of-witnesses-recorded-in-court-cannot-by-itself-be-the-basis-of-bail-petition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ori-hc-substantive-evidence-of-witnesses-recorded-in-court-cannot-by-itself-be-the-basis-of-bail-petition\/","title":{"rendered":"Ori HC | Substantive evidence of witnesses recorded in court cannot by itself be the basis of bail petition"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Orissa High Court:<\/strong> The Bench of Dr A.K. Mishra, J., dismissed an application filed under Section 439 CrPC for a successive bail to release the petitioner. The earlier bail petition was rejected considering the nature and gravity of accusations and stage of trial in a case involving tender fixing. Mr Asok Mohanty, Senior Counsel for the petitioner submitted that after rejection of bail, six witnesses had already been examined and none of them had implicated the accused-petitioner. It was further submitted that if the statements under Section 161 CrPC were seen, the non-disclosure of the complicity of accused-petitioner in the Court would be a pre-trial punishment. Also, another co-accused person had already been released on bail. Additional Standing Counsel, Mr S. Dash opposed the bail stating that certain witnesses were declared hostile and the threat perception to the witnesses could not be ruled out. Further, the present petitioner could not have been said to be in a similar footing as the co-accused person who was released on bail had no criminal antecedent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held that substantive evidence of some witnesses recorded in the court during trial cannot be the basis to maintain a successive bail petition when other evidence by prosecution is to be brought. Added to that, the present petitioner did not stand in a similar footing as the co-accused person who has already been released on bail. The Court, considering the gravity of allegations, accusations and threat perception which were still available to the witnesses, rejected the application. [Batu v. State Of Odisha, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/LMm5T4eN\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Ori 124<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 14-03-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Orissa High Court: The Bench of Dr A.K. Mishra, J., dismissed an application filed under Section 439 CrPC for a successive bail <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[24244,34520,34519,27744],"class_list":["post-212404","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bail-petition","tag-criminal-antecedent","tag-evidence-of-witness","tag-section-439-crpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Ori HC | Substantive evidence of witnesses recorded in court cannot by itself be the basis of bail petition | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ori-hc-substantive-evidence-of-witnesses-recorded-in-court-cannot-by-itself-be-the-basis-of-bail-petition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ori HC | Substantive evidence of witnesses recorded in court cannot by itself be the basis of bail petition\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Orissa High Court: The Bench of Dr A.K. Mishra, J., dismissed an application filed under Section 439 CrPC for a successive bail\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ori-hc-substantive-evidence-of-witnesses-recorded-in-court-cannot-by-itself-be-the-basis-of-bail-petition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-26T08:00:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-28T09:53:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ori-hc-substantive-evidence-of-witnesses-recorded-in-court-cannot-by-itself-be-the-basis-of-bail-petition\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ori-hc-substantive-evidence-of-witnesses-recorded-in-court-cannot-by-itself-be-the-basis-of-bail-petition\/\",\"name\":\"Ori HC | Substantive evidence of witnesses recorded in court cannot by itself be the basis of bail petition | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-26T08:00:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-28T09:53:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ori-hc-substantive-evidence-of-witnesses-recorded-in-court-cannot-by-itself-be-the-basis-of-bail-petition\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ori-hc-substantive-evidence-of-witnesses-recorded-in-court-cannot-by-itself-be-the-basis-of-bail-petition\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ori-hc-substantive-evidence-of-witnesses-recorded-in-court-cannot-by-itself-be-the-basis-of-bail-petition\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ori HC | Substantive evidence of witnesses recorded in court cannot by itself be the basis of bail petition\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ori HC | Substantive evidence of witnesses recorded in court cannot by itself be the basis of bail petition | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ori-hc-substantive-evidence-of-witnesses-recorded-in-court-cannot-by-itself-be-the-basis-of-bail-petition\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ori HC | Substantive evidence of witnesses recorded in court cannot by itself be the basis of bail petition","og_description":"Orissa High Court: The Bench of Dr A.K. Mishra, J., dismissed an application filed under Section 439 CrPC for a successive bail","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ori-hc-substantive-evidence-of-witnesses-recorded-in-court-cannot-by-itself-be-the-basis-of-bail-petition\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-26T08:00:05+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-28T09:53:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ori-hc-substantive-evidence-of-witnesses-recorded-in-court-cannot-by-itself-be-the-basis-of-bail-petition\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ori-hc-substantive-evidence-of-witnesses-recorded-in-court-cannot-by-itself-be-the-basis-of-bail-petition\/","name":"Ori HC | Substantive evidence of witnesses recorded in court cannot by itself be the basis of bail petition | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-03-26T08:00:05+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-28T09:53:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ori-hc-substantive-evidence-of-witnesses-recorded-in-court-cannot-by-itself-be-the-basis-of-bail-petition\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ori-hc-substantive-evidence-of-witnesses-recorded-in-court-cannot-by-itself-be-the-basis-of-bail-petition\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ori-hc-substantive-evidence-of-witnesses-recorded-in-court-cannot-by-itself-be-the-basis-of-bail-petition\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ori HC | Substantive evidence of witnesses recorded in court cannot by itself be the basis of bail petition"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":185504,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/02\/bail-denied-due-pendency-recording-evidence-complainant-witnesses\/","url_meta":{"origin":212404,"position":0},"title":"Bail denied due to pendency of recording of evidence of the complainant witnesses","author":"Saba","date":"February 2, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Budihal R.B., J., decided a criminal petition filed under Section 439 of CrPC, wherein bail was denied to the petitioner-accused in light of the fact that evidence of complainant witnesses was yet to be recorded. The petitioner was co-accused in a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":260658,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/27\/bail-7\/","url_meta":{"origin":212404,"position":1},"title":"Kar HC | Bail order not containing cogent reasons liable to be set aside for non-application of mind","author":"Editor","date":"January 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: H.P. Sandesh J. allowed the petition and set aside the bail granted by the Trial Court on the file of V Additional District and Sessions Judge. \u00a0The facts of the case are such that accused 1 has been prosecuted for the offence punishable under Sections 376(2), 506\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":233326,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/04\/hp-hc-comprehensive-principles-laid-down-for-considering-matters-relating-to-rigors-of-s-37-of-ndps-act-while-granting-bail-under-s-439-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":212404,"position":2},"title":"HP HC | Comprehensive principles laid down for considering matters relating to rigors of S. 37 of NDPS Act, while granting bail under S. 439 CrPC","author":"Editor","date":"August 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":230250,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/30\/hp-hc-gravity-of-offence-alone-is-no-parameter-for-rejection-of-bail-under-s-439-crpc-object-and-test-for-grant-of-bail-restated\/","url_meta":{"origin":212404,"position":3},"title":"HP HC | Gravity of offence alone is no parameter for rejection of bail under S. 439 CrPC; Object and test for grant of bail restated","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court:\u00a0Sandeep Sharma , J., allowed the bail petition stating that object of the bail is to secure the attendance of the accused in the trial and the proper test to be applied in the solution of the question whether bail should be granted or refused is whether\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":247022,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/bail-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":212404,"position":4},"title":"[Human Trafficking] HP HC | A woman accused cannot claim her entitlement for bail only for her womanhood, but discretion has been given to Court; Bail granted","author":"Editor","date":"April 13, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Vivek Singh Thakur, J., granted regular bail on grounds that she is a mother of an infant child dependent upon her breasts feeding. The facts of the case are such that the victim left home for school and did not return. On her father contacting school\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":151104,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/23\/mere-delay-in-concluding-the-trial-by-itself-is-not-a-ground-for-bail\/","url_meta":{"origin":212404,"position":5},"title":"Mere delay in concluding the trial by itself is not a ground for bail","author":"Saba","date":"August 23, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While passing the order in a criminal petition filed under Section 439 of CrPC praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail, a Single Judge Bench comprising of Rathnakala, J. rejected the petition holding that mere delay by itself will not entitle the accused for bail. The petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212404","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212404"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212404\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212404"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212404"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212404"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}