{"id":212382,"date":"2019-03-26T10:05:21","date_gmt":"2019-03-26T04:35:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=212382"},"modified":"2019-03-28T15:21:50","modified_gmt":"2019-03-28T09:51:50","slug":"ph-hc-compassionate-allowance-under-rule-41-of-central-civil-services-pension-rules-1972-not-a-matter-of-right","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ph-hc-compassionate-allowance-under-rule-41-of-central-civil-services-pension-rules-1972-not-a-matter-of-right\/","title":{"rendered":"P&#038;H HC | Compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 not a matter of right"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Punjab and Haryana High Court: <\/strong>A petition was filed before a Division Bench of Rajiv Sharma and Kuldip Singh, JJ. seeking quashing of impugned order where compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 was rejected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Facts of the case were that petitioner was removed from the post of Principal in Kendriya Vidyalaya and was alleged for being absent for an unjustified period. He had gone abroad without attaining no objection certificate from the authority. Departmental proceedings were held and charge sheet was filed against him.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioner submitted that he was 69 years old and was suffering from various ailments. He contended that he was dismissed on clumsy grounds and his meritorious service was ignored and thus he was entitled to a compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of the Rules. This Rule was applicable if the case deserved special consideration, the authority can sanction compassionate allowance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court was of the view that on account of dismissal from service, his past service was forfeited and he was not granted pensionary benefits. The authorities had considered his misconduct a suggestion of his disloyalty to his duty and organization. Court observed that compassionate allowance under Rule 41 cannot be claimed as a matter of right and is under the discretion of authorities. The authorities after considering the same decided not to grant compassionate allowance to him. Therefore, there was no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order. Therefore, this petition was dismissed. [S.C. Sharma v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5H2O1twI\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine P&amp;H 282<\/b><\/a>, decided on 19-03-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab and Haryana High Court: A petition was filed before a Division Bench of Rajiv Sharma and Kuldip Singh, JJ. seeking quashing <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34514,34515],"class_list":["post-212382","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-compassionate-allowance","tag-rule-41-of-central-civil-services-pension-rules-1972"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>P&amp;H HC | Compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 not a matter of right | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ph-hc-compassionate-allowance-under-rule-41-of-central-civil-services-pension-rules-1972-not-a-matter-of-right\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P&amp;H HC | Compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 not a matter of right\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A petition was filed before a Division Bench of Rajiv Sharma and Kuldip Singh, JJ. seeking quashing\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ph-hc-compassionate-allowance-under-rule-41-of-central-civil-services-pension-rules-1972-not-a-matter-of-right\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-26T04:35:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-28T09:51:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ph-hc-compassionate-allowance-under-rule-41-of-central-civil-services-pension-rules-1972-not-a-matter-of-right\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ph-hc-compassionate-allowance-under-rule-41-of-central-civil-services-pension-rules-1972-not-a-matter-of-right\/\",\"name\":\"P&H HC | Compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 not a matter of right | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-26T04:35:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-28T09:51:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ph-hc-compassionate-allowance-under-rule-41-of-central-civil-services-pension-rules-1972-not-a-matter-of-right\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ph-hc-compassionate-allowance-under-rule-41-of-central-civil-services-pension-rules-1972-not-a-matter-of-right\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ph-hc-compassionate-allowance-under-rule-41-of-central-civil-services-pension-rules-1972-not-a-matter-of-right\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P&#038;H HC | Compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 not a matter of right\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P&H HC | Compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 not a matter of right | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ph-hc-compassionate-allowance-under-rule-41-of-central-civil-services-pension-rules-1972-not-a-matter-of-right\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P&H HC | Compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 not a matter of right","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A petition was filed before a Division Bench of Rajiv Sharma and Kuldip Singh, JJ. seeking quashing","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ph-hc-compassionate-allowance-under-rule-41-of-central-civil-services-pension-rules-1972-not-a-matter-of-right\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-26T04:35:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-28T09:51:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ph-hc-compassionate-allowance-under-rule-41-of-central-civil-services-pension-rules-1972-not-a-matter-of-right\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ph-hc-compassionate-allowance-under-rule-41-of-central-civil-services-pension-rules-1972-not-a-matter-of-right\/","name":"P&H HC | Compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 not a matter of right | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-03-26T04:35:21+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-28T09:51:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ph-hc-compassionate-allowance-under-rule-41-of-central-civil-services-pension-rules-1972-not-a-matter-of-right\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ph-hc-compassionate-allowance-under-rule-41-of-central-civil-services-pension-rules-1972-not-a-matter-of-right\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/26\/ph-hc-compassionate-allowance-under-rule-41-of-central-civil-services-pension-rules-1972-not-a-matter-of-right\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P&#038;H HC | Compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 not a matter of right"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":269598,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/05\/delhi-high-court-allows-mercy-petition-filed-by-widow-of-a-deceased-dismissed-employee-seeking-compassionate-allowance-in-view-of-r-41-of-ccs-pension-rules-1972\/","url_meta":{"origin":212382,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court allows mercy petition filed by widow of a deceased\/dismissed employee seeking &#8216;compassionate allowance&#8217; in view of R. 41 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972","author":"Editor","date":"July 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench of Suresh Kumar Kait and Saurabh Banerjee, JJ. granted compassionate allowance to widow of Late Naik Krishanpal Singh \u2018the petitioner who worked as a Guard at CISF and was dismissed from service on certain grounds. The allowance was granted as the case of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":333173,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/17\/del-hc-grants-compassionate-allowance-wife-deceased-dismissal-absenteeism-ccs-pension-rules-1972-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":212382,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court grants compassionate allowance to wife of deceased despite dismissal for absenteeism under CCS Pension Rules","author":"Arunima","date":"October 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court observed that once the employee had already suffered dismissal from service on account of unauthorized absence, that sin stood expiated and was no longer a relevant consideration while assessing his case for grant of compassionate allowance.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343256,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-rejects-pension-plea-police-officer\/","url_meta":{"origin":212382,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Qualifying service lost significance due to dismissal\u2019; Punjab and Haryana HC rejects pension plea of police officer dismissed from service in 1999","author":"Editor","date":"March 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf pension was extended on the basis of length of service, the order of dismissal or removal from service would become meaningless.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219922,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/24\/government-amends-rule-54-of-central-civil-services-pension-rules-1972\/","url_meta":{"origin":212382,"position":3},"title":"Government amends Rule 54 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"On the death of a Government servant while in service, the family is entitled to a family pension in accordance with Rule 54 of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972. The family pension was payable at an enhanced rate of 50% of the pay last drawn for a period\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":359384,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/08\/state-information-commissioner-entitled-to-same-post-retirement-benefits-as-chief-secretary-gauhati-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":212382,"position":4},"title":"\u2018State Information Commissioner entitled to Chief Secretary-Level post-retirement benefits\u2019; 10-year qualifying service not mandatory under S. 16(5) RTI Act: Gauhati HC","author":"Editor","date":"September 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court observed that by virtue of Section 16(5) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 , a deeming fiction is created to the advantage of the State Information Commissioner, who would be paid similar salary and postretiral benefits as that of Chief Secretary.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"State Information Commissioner post-retirement benefits","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/State-Information-Commissioner-post-retirement-benefits.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/State-Information-Commissioner-post-retirement-benefits.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/State-Information-Commissioner-post-retirement-benefits.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/State-Information-Commissioner-post-retirement-benefits.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272001,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/20\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-second-wife-entitled-to-family-pension-only-when-personal-law-of-deceased-employee-allows-bigamy\/","url_meta":{"origin":212382,"position":5},"title":"Himachal Pradesh High Court | Second Wife entitled to family pension only when personal law of deceased employee allows Bigamy","author":"Editor","date":"August 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: In a petition related to family pension, Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J has held that the second wife of a deceased employee is not entitled to family pension under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 unless the personal law of the deceased employee allows more than\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Himachal Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212382","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212382"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212382\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212382"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212382"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212382"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}