{"id":212356,"date":"2019-03-25T10:30:15","date_gmt":"2019-03-25T05:00:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=212356"},"modified":"2019-03-29T10:22:35","modified_gmt":"2019-03-29T04:52:35","slug":"del-hc-fir-under-s-498-a-ipc-quashed-in-light-of-mediated-settlement-between-complainant-and-in-laws","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/del-hc-fir-under-s-498-a-ipc-quashed-in-light-of-mediated-settlement-between-complainant-and-in-laws\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | FIR under S. 498-A IPC quashed in light of mediated settlement between complainant and in-laws"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court:<\/strong> Sunil Gaur, J. allowed a petition for quashing an FIR filed under Sections 498-A and 406 read with Section 34 IPC and the proceedings arising therefrom.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The quashing\u00a0of FIR was sought on the basis of mediated settlement reached at between the parties. The complainant was present in the Court and she was identified by the Assistant Sub-Inspector on the basis of her identity proof. She submitted that the dispute between\u00a0the parties had been amicably resolved vide mediated settlement dated 20-3-2018 and the terms thereof had been fully acted upon. She affirmed the contents of her affidavit filed in support of the present petition and submitted that now no dispute with the petitioners survive and therefore, the proceedings arising out of the FIR in question may be brought to an end.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court relied on the Supreme Court decision in <em>Parbatbhai Aahir\u00a0<\/em>v.\u00a0<em>State of Gujarat<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0e4b2LW7\">(2017) 9 SCC 641<\/a> wherein the parameters for exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIRs\/complainants were reiterated. Allowing the petition, the Court stated,\u00a0<strong>&#8220;Since the subject matter of this FIR is essentially matrimonial, which now stands mutually and amicably settled between parties, therefore, continuance of proceedings arising out of the FIR in question would be an exercise in futility.&#8221;\u00a0<\/strong>The petitioners were directed to deposit costs of Rs 25,000 with the Prime Minister&#8217;s National Relief Fund. [Vipin Mittal v. State, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ok92S3f9\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Del 7635<\/b><\/a>, decided on 15-3-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: Sunil Gaur, J. allowed a petition for quashing an FIR filed under Sections 498-A and 406 read with Section <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34507,3067,34508,13021,31299],"class_list":["post-212356","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-amicably-resolved","tag-FIR","tag-matrimonial","tag-section-482-crpc","tag-section-498-a-ipc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Del HC | FIR under S. 498-A IPC quashed in light of mediated settlement between complainant and in-laws | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/del-hc-fir-under-s-498-a-ipc-quashed-in-light-of-mediated-settlement-between-complainant-and-in-laws\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | FIR under S. 498-A IPC quashed in light of mediated settlement between complainant and in-laws\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: Sunil Gaur, J. allowed a petition for quashing an FIR filed under Sections 498-A and 406 read with Section\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/del-hc-fir-under-s-498-a-ipc-quashed-in-light-of-mediated-settlement-between-complainant-and-in-laws\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-25T05:00:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-29T04:52:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/del-hc-fir-under-s-498-a-ipc-quashed-in-light-of-mediated-settlement-between-complainant-and-in-laws\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/del-hc-fir-under-s-498-a-ipc-quashed-in-light-of-mediated-settlement-between-complainant-and-in-laws\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | FIR under S. 498-A IPC quashed in light of mediated settlement between complainant and in-laws | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-25T05:00:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-29T04:52:35+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/del-hc-fir-under-s-498-a-ipc-quashed-in-light-of-mediated-settlement-between-complainant-and-in-laws\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/del-hc-fir-under-s-498-a-ipc-quashed-in-light-of-mediated-settlement-between-complainant-and-in-laws\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/del-hc-fir-under-s-498-a-ipc-quashed-in-light-of-mediated-settlement-between-complainant-and-in-laws\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | FIR under S. 498-A IPC quashed in light of mediated settlement between complainant and in-laws\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | FIR under S. 498-A IPC quashed in light of mediated settlement between complainant and in-laws | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/del-hc-fir-under-s-498-a-ipc-quashed-in-light-of-mediated-settlement-between-complainant-and-in-laws\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | FIR under S. 498-A IPC quashed in light of mediated settlement between complainant and in-laws","og_description":"Delhi High Court: Sunil Gaur, J. allowed a petition for quashing an FIR filed under Sections 498-A and 406 read with Section","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/del-hc-fir-under-s-498-a-ipc-quashed-in-light-of-mediated-settlement-between-complainant-and-in-laws\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-25T05:00:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-29T04:52:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/del-hc-fir-under-s-498-a-ipc-quashed-in-light-of-mediated-settlement-between-complainant-and-in-laws\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/del-hc-fir-under-s-498-a-ipc-quashed-in-light-of-mediated-settlement-between-complainant-and-in-laws\/","name":"Del HC | FIR under S. 498-A IPC quashed in light of mediated settlement between complainant and in-laws | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-03-25T05:00:15+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-29T04:52:35+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/del-hc-fir-under-s-498-a-ipc-quashed-in-light-of-mediated-settlement-between-complainant-and-in-laws\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/del-hc-fir-under-s-498-a-ipc-quashed-in-light-of-mediated-settlement-between-complainant-and-in-laws\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/del-hc-fir-under-s-498-a-ipc-quashed-in-light-of-mediated-settlement-between-complainant-and-in-laws\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | FIR under S. 498-A IPC quashed in light of mediated settlement between complainant and in-laws"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":207695,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-quashed-in-light-of-divorce-and-settlement-between-parties\/","url_meta":{"origin":212356,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | FIR under Section 498-A IPC quashed in light of divorce and settlement between parties","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 7, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0The Bench of Sunil Gaur, J. quashed an FIR filed against the petitioners for offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 406 and 34 IPC. Petition was filed seeking quashing of the FIR on the basis of mediated settlement between the parties. Jitender Gupta and Deepak Rohilla, Advocates representing the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":210280,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/del-hc-continuity-of-proceedings-in-case-where-fir-is-off-shoot-of-matrimonial-discord-is-exercise-in-futility\/","url_meta":{"origin":212356,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Continuity of proceedings in case where FIR is off-shoot of matrimonial discord is exercise in futility","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 19, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Sunil Gaur, J., allowed a petition filed by a husband seeking quashing of an FIR registered for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 406 and 34 IPC. Quashment was sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement dated 12-5-2017 reached between the parties. The wife, who was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":292810,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/22\/delhi-high-court-issues-guidelines-for-drafting-settlement-agreements-in-matrimonial-disputes-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":212356,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court issues guidelines for drafting a Settlement Agreement in matrimonial disputes of criminal nature; Directs agreements to be prepared in Hindi too","author":"Arunima","date":"May 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court observed that an inadequately drafted agreement will be one that fails to include essential elements such as the name of all the relevant parties, the terms outlining the conditions of settlement, and the consequences in the event of non-compliance or breach.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207474,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/01\/party-cannot-be-allowed-to-wriggle-out-of-a-mediated-settlement-unless-vitiated-by-misrepresentation\/","url_meta":{"origin":212356,"position":3},"title":"Party cannot be allowed to wriggle out of a mediated settlement unless vitiated by misrepresentation","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Bench of Sunil Gaur, J. quashed an FIR registered against the petitioners for offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 406 and 34 IPC along with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The petitioners who were represented by Sumit Nandvani, Advocate sought quashing of the FIR\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":268073,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/in-matrimonial-offences-quashing-is-welcome-as-it-shows-that-parties-have-decided-to-put-an-end-to-the-lis-as-well-as-to-the-misery\/","url_meta":{"origin":212356,"position":4},"title":"In matrimonial offences, quashing is welcome as it shows that parties have decided to put an end to the lis as well as to the misery they undergo: Del HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Stating that, cases under Section 376 of Penal Code, 1860 should not be quashed and should not be taken as a crime against the society at large, Swarana Kanta Sharma, J., expressed that, in peculiar circumstances, where the complainant states that her future depends on quashing of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":194515,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/29\/criminal-proceedings-quashed-in-light-of-amicable-settlement-between-parties\/","url_meta":{"origin":212356,"position":5},"title":"Criminal proceedings quashed in light of amicable settlement between parties","author":"Saba","date":"March 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ajay Mohan Goel, J., allowed a criminal petition filed by the accused-petitioner praying for quashing of FIR registered under Sections 353 and 506 IPC as well as the consequential proceedings arising therefrom. The petitioner submitted that the issue which led\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212356","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212356"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212356\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212356"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212356"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212356"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}