{"id":212354,"date":"2019-03-25T09:30:36","date_gmt":"2019-03-25T04:00:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=212354"},"modified":"2019-03-28T15:20:23","modified_gmt":"2019-03-28T09:50:23","slug":"bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21\/","title":{"rendered":"Bom HC | Order of preventive detention quashed for deprivation of detenue’s fundamental right under Art. 21"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Bench of Sunil B. Shukre and Pushpa V. Ganedliwal, JJ. quashed a preventive detention order passed against the petitioner\u00a0and set him at liberty observing, inter alia, that he was deprived of his fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n

The petitioner was preventively detained pursuant to the impugned order passed by the District Magistrate, Wardha. \u00a0Yogesh V. Nayyar, Advocate for the petitioner challenged the said order on various counts. Per contra, Nitin Rode, Additional Public Prosecutor supported the order of preventive detention.<\/p>\n

The High Court perused the record and was of the view that the impugned order became highly suspect in eyes of law as the DM, while passing the impugned\u00a0order, took into consideration the fact that the petitioner was indulging himself in sale\u00a0of liquor containing about 20.60% of ethyl alcohol. This, according to the Court, ought to be ignored in the facts and circumstances of the case at hand. Moreover, it was noted that the representation made by the petitioner under Section 10 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders\u00a0and Dangerous\u00a0Persons Act, 1981 was not considered by the Advisory Board. According to the Court,\u00a0“This would mean that a valuable right available to the petitioner has been taken away from him. After all, right to liberty is a fundamental right enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India and although this right is subject to reasonable restriction and can also be temporarily taken away in accordance with the procedure established by law, needless to say, the procedure has to be reasonable and the procedure prescribed for restricting this right has also to be followed in letter and spirit. If that is not done, there would be a deprivation of the fundamental\u00a0right of the petitioner without following the procedure established by law. This is what has happened in the present case and, therefore, in our view, this is a compounding factor to what is seen by us already\u00a0as an unjustifiable impugned order, making the impugned order as completely vulnerable in law.”\u00a0<\/strong>Holding as such, the Court allowed the petition and set the petitioner at liberty. [Amir Khan Nasib Khan Pathan v. State of Maharashtra, 2019 SCC OnLine Bom 494<\/b><\/a>, dated 15-03-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Bench of Sunil B. Shukre and Pushpa V. Ganedliwal, JJ. quashed a preventive detention order passed against the petitioner\u00a0and <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[13681,9881,34506],"class_list":["post-212354","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-21","tag-fundamental-right","tag-order-of-preventive-detention"],"yoast_head":"\nBom HC | Order of preventive detention quashed for deprivation of detenue's fundamental right under Art. 21 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bom HC | Order of preventive detention quashed for deprivation of detenue's fundamental right under Art. 21\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Bench of Sunil B. Shukre and Pushpa V. Ganedliwal, JJ. quashed a preventive detention order passed against the petitioner\u00a0and\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-25T04:00:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-28T09:50:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21\/\",\"name\":\"Bom HC | Order of preventive detention quashed for deprivation of detenue's fundamental right under Art. 21 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-25T04:00:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-28T09:50:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bom HC | Order of preventive detention quashed for deprivation of detenue’s fundamental right under Art. 21\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bom HC | Order of preventive detention quashed for deprivation of detenue's fundamental right under Art. 21 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bom HC | Order of preventive detention quashed for deprivation of detenue's fundamental right under Art. 21","og_description":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Bench of Sunil B. Shukre and Pushpa V. Ganedliwal, JJ. quashed a preventive detention order passed against the petitioner\u00a0and","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-25T04:00:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-28T09:50:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21\/","name":"Bom HC | Order of preventive detention quashed for deprivation of detenue's fundamental right under Art. 21 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2019-03-25T04:00:36+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-28T09:50:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/bom-hc-order-of-preventive-detention-quashed-for-deprivation-of-detenues-fundamental-right-under-art-21\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bom HC | Order of preventive detention quashed for deprivation of detenue’s fundamental right under Art. 21"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":204488,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/29\/an-order-of-preventive-detention-passed-without-supplying-the-relevant-materials-to-the-detenue-is-illegal\/","url_meta":{"origin":212354,"position":0},"title":"An order of preventive detention passed, without supplying the relevant materials to the detenue, is illegal","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Rashid Ali Dar, J., allowed a petition filed against the order of District Magistrate, Anantnag, under Section 8 of the J&K Public Safety Act, whereby the petitioner was placed under preventive detention. The main issue that arose before the Court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":331577,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/jk-high-court-cautions-authorities-against-misuse-of-preventive-detention-powers-at-cost-of-mocking-the-constitution-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":212354,"position":1},"title":"J&K High Court cautions authorities against misusing Preventive Detention powers at cost of mocking the Constitution","author":"Ritu","date":"September 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThere is no iota of doubt that the preventive detention of the petitioner is a sheer abuse of jurisdiction of preventive detention under the Jammu & Kashmir Public Safety Act, 1978.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214835,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/j-detention-order-quashed\/","url_meta":{"origin":212354,"position":2},"title":"J&K HC | Preventive detention order when accused already in custody cuts down the roots of State Act affecting the course of legal procedure; detention order quashed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: In this petition filed before Rashid Ali Dar, J., an order passed by District Magistrate, Baramulla was challenged whereby detenu was ordered to be taken into preventive custody under Section 8 of the J&K Public Safety Act. Petitioner\u2019s custody in the police for the offences\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216115,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/26\/jk-hc-preventive-detention-an-invasion-to-personal-liberty-guaranteed-under-article-21-therefore-order-must-be-passed-after-following-procedural-safeguards\/","url_meta":{"origin":212354,"position":3},"title":"J&K HC | Preventive detention: An invasion to personal liberty guaranteed under Art. 21 \u2013 therefore order must be passed after following procedural safeguards","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Rashid Ali Dar, J. set aside the detention order passed by respondent 2-District Magistrate, Baramulla and ordered the detenu to be released from preventive custody. In the present case, the petitioner had challenged a detention order passed by respondent 2 whereby the petitioner was taken\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":202965,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/law-of-preventive-detention-a-tool-to-be-used-sparingly\/","url_meta":{"origin":212354,"position":4},"title":"Law of preventive detention: A tool to be used sparingly","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of H.K. Hanjura, J., allowed a Writ Petition filed against the order of detention passed by the respondent authorities. The petitioner was already in custody in connection with a criminal case and this formed the basis for passing of a detention\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":245760,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/19\/law-of-preventive-detention\/","url_meta":{"origin":212354,"position":5},"title":"MP HC | Law of preventive detention is an exception to fundamental right to personal liberty under Art. 21 of Constitution and therefore has to be strictly construed; Court allows petition challenging preventive detention","author":"Editor","date":"March 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Sheel Nagu and Anand Pathak, JJ., allowed a petition which was filed challenging the order of preventive detention passed by the District Magistrate detaining the petitioner for a period of three months by invoking the provisions of Section 3(3) of the National\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212354","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212354"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212354\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212354"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212354"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212354"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}