{"id":212249,"date":"2019-03-18T16:00:04","date_gmt":"2019-03-18T10:30:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=212249"},"modified":"2019-03-26T10:32:20","modified_gmt":"2019-03-26T05:02:20","slug":"jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/","title":{"rendered":"Jha HC | Evidence found prejudiced due to non-examination of IO and doctor, benefit of doubt extended"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court:<\/strong>\u00a0The Bench of H.C. Mishra and Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, JJ. allowed the appeals while setting aside the judgment of conviction and order of sentence convicting and sentencing the appellants.<\/p>\n

In the pertinent case, the dispute was over land and its illegal possession wherein the accused were held guilty of murder under Section 302 of the Penal Code and the Trial Court even sentenced the accused accordingly. The Court was approached because there were discrepancies in the FIR and the statements provided by the prosecution witnesses, where they first stated that the occurrence had taken place in the hut and they could not see which accused was armed with what weapon. Subsequently, in evidence, the place was changed to the land in question and improvements were made on the details as to which accused was armed with what weapon and the person who assaulted. Also, the Investigation Officer (IO) was not examined because of which the necessary implications could not be taken from the IO. Even the Doctor conducting the post-mortem examination was not examined in the case.<\/p>\n

The Court in the interest of justice looked into the case diary with the help of the learned senior counsel, Mr V.P. Singh, where it became apparent that the non-examination of the IO has vitally prejudiced the defence in the case and even the place of occurrence has not been properly proved in the case. The Court further believed that, the benefit of doubt should be extended to the appellants in the absence of the evidence of the IO and the Doctor. Therefore, the Court set aside the conviction and sentence ordered by the 1st<\/sup> Additional Sessions Judge and discharged the appellants from their respective liabilities.[Manik Singh v. State of Jharkhand, 2019 SCC OnLine Jhar 244<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 11-03-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court:\u00a0The Bench of H.C. Mishra and Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, JJ. allowed the appeals while setting aside the judgment of conviction <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[26894,3468,2521,3067,34467,34468],"class_list":["post-212249","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-benefit-of-doubt","tag-conviction","tag-Evidence","tag-FIR","tag-non-examination-of-io","tag-section-302-penal-code"],"yoast_head":"\nJha HC | Evidence found prejudiced due to non-examination of IO and doctor, benefit of doubt extended | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jha HC | Evidence found prejudiced due to non-examination of IO and doctor, benefit of doubt extended\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court:\u00a0The Bench of H.C. Mishra and Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, JJ. allowed the appeals while setting aside the judgment of conviction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-18T10:30:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-26T05:02:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/18\\\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/18\\\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"Jha HC | Evidence found prejudiced due to non-examination of IO and doctor, benefit of doubt extended\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-18T10:30:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-26T05:02:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/18\\\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":316,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"benefit of doubt\",\"conviction\",\"Evidence\",\"FIR\",\"Non-Examination of IO\",\"Section 302 Penal Code\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/18\\\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/18\\\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/18\\\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\\\/\",\"name\":\"Jha HC | Evidence found prejudiced due to non-examination of IO and doctor, benefit of doubt extended | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-18T10:30:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-26T05:02:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/18\\\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/18\\\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/18\\\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jha HC | Evidence found prejudiced due to non-examination of IO and doctor, benefit of doubt extended\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jha HC | Evidence found prejudiced due to non-examination of IO and doctor, benefit of doubt extended | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jha HC | Evidence found prejudiced due to non-examination of IO and doctor, benefit of doubt extended","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court:\u00a0The Bench of H.C. Mishra and Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, JJ. allowed the appeals while setting aside the judgment of conviction","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-18T10:30:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-26T05:02:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"Jha HC | Evidence found prejudiced due to non-examination of IO and doctor, benefit of doubt extended","datePublished":"2019-03-18T10:30:04+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-26T05:02:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/"},"wordCount":316,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["benefit of doubt","conviction","Evidence","FIR","Non-Examination of IO","Section 302 Penal Code"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/","name":"Jha HC | Evidence found prejudiced due to non-examination of IO and doctor, benefit of doubt extended | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-03-18T10:30:04+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-26T05:02:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jha HC | Evidence found prejudiced due to non-examination of IO and doctor, benefit of doubt extended"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212249","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212249"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212249\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212249"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212249"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212249"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}