{"id":212249,"date":"2019-03-18T16:00:04","date_gmt":"2019-03-18T10:30:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=212249"},"modified":"2019-03-26T10:32:20","modified_gmt":"2019-03-26T05:02:20","slug":"jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/","title":{"rendered":"Jha HC | Evidence found prejudiced due to non-examination of IO and doctor, benefit of doubt extended"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court:<\/strong>\u00a0The Bench of H.C. Mishra and Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, JJ. allowed the appeals while setting aside the judgment of conviction and order of sentence convicting and sentencing the appellants.<\/p>\n

In the pertinent case, the dispute was over land and its illegal possession wherein the accused were held guilty of murder under Section 302 of the Penal Code and the Trial Court even sentenced the accused accordingly. The Court was approached because there were discrepancies in the FIR and the statements provided by the prosecution witnesses, where they first stated that the occurrence had taken place in the hut and they could not see which accused was armed with what weapon. Subsequently, in evidence, the place was changed to the land in question and improvements were made on the details as to which accused was armed with what weapon and the person who assaulted. Also, the Investigation Officer (IO) was not examined because of which the necessary implications could not be taken from the IO. Even the Doctor conducting the post-mortem examination was not examined in the case.<\/p>\n

The Court in the interest of justice looked into the case diary with the help of the learned senior counsel, Mr V.P. Singh, where it became apparent that the non-examination of the IO has vitally prejudiced the defence in the case and even the place of occurrence has not been properly proved in the case. The Court further believed that, the benefit of doubt should be extended to the appellants in the absence of the evidence of the IO and the Doctor. Therefore, the Court set aside the conviction and sentence ordered by the 1st<\/sup> Additional Sessions Judge and discharged the appellants from their respective liabilities.[Manik Singh v. State of Jharkhand, 2019 SCC OnLine Jhar 244<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 11-03-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court:\u00a0The Bench of H.C. Mishra and Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, JJ. allowed the appeals while setting aside the judgment of conviction <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[26894,3468,2521,3067,34467,34468],"class_list":["post-212249","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-benefit-of-doubt","tag-conviction","tag-Evidence","tag-FIR","tag-non-examination-of-io","tag-section-302-penal-code"],"yoast_head":"\nJha HC | Evidence found prejudiced due to non-examination of IO and doctor, benefit of doubt extended | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jha HC | Evidence found prejudiced due to non-examination of IO and doctor, benefit of doubt extended\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court:\u00a0The Bench of H.C. Mishra and Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, JJ. allowed the appeals while setting aside the judgment of conviction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-18T10:30:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-26T05:02:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/\",\"name\":\"Jha HC | Evidence found prejudiced due to non-examination of IO and doctor, benefit of doubt extended | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-18T10:30:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-26T05:02:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jha HC | Evidence found prejudiced due to non-examination of IO and doctor, benefit of doubt extended\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jha HC | Evidence found prejudiced due to non-examination of IO and doctor, benefit of doubt extended | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jha HC | Evidence found prejudiced due to non-examination of IO and doctor, benefit of doubt extended","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court:\u00a0The Bench of H.C. Mishra and Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, JJ. allowed the appeals while setting aside the judgment of conviction","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-18T10:30:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-26T05:02:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/","name":"Jha HC | Evidence found prejudiced due to non-examination of IO and doctor, benefit of doubt extended | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-03-18T10:30:04+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-26T05:02:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/jha-hc-evidence-found-prejudiced-due-to-non-examination-of-io-and-doctor-benefit-of-doubt-extended\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jha HC | Evidence found prejudiced due to non-examination of IO and doctor, benefit of doubt extended"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":226889,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/12\/jhar-hc-conviction-for-murder-reversed-for-non-corroboration-of-unreliable-and-untrustworthy-testimony-of-deceaseds-daughter\/","url_meta":{"origin":212249,"position":0},"title":"Jhar HC | Conviction for murder reversed for non-corroboration of unreliable and untrustworthy testimony of deceased’s daughter","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 12, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Division Bench of\u00a0Shree Chandrashekhar and Ratnaker Bhengra, JJ. acquitted the accused-appellant of the charge under Section 302 of the Penal Code, 1860 on the ground that the prosecution has failed to prove by leading cogent and reliable evidence that the appellant has committed the crime. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":379195,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/24\/mad-hc-strained-marriage-not-proof-of-wifes-murder-husband-conviction-set-aside\/","url_meta":{"origin":212249,"position":1},"title":"Strained marriage and alcohol addiction not enough to presume husband\u2019s guilt in wife\u2019s murder: Madras HC","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"March 24, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cEven a strong suspicion was not enough to convict a person and that the prosecution had to necessarily prove each circumstance in the chain beyond reasonable doubt.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Strained marriage not proof of wife's murder","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Strained-marriage-not-proof-of-wifes-murder.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Strained-marriage-not-proof-of-wifes-murder.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Strained-marriage-not-proof-of-wifes-murder.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Strained-marriage-not-proof-of-wifes-murder.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298956,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/09\/sc-acquits-murder-convicts-as-prosecution-failed-to-prove-incriminating-circumstances-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":212249,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Prosecution utterly failed to prove incriminating circumstances beyond reasonable doubt\u2019; SC acquits three murder convicts","author":"Editor","date":"August 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court said that the evidence regarding the last seen theory was totally unreliable and the evidence regarding the Call Detail Records also did not inspire any confidence.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"sc acquits murder convicts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/sc-acquits-murder-convicts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/sc-acquits-murder-convicts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/sc-acquits-murder-convicts.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/sc-acquits-murder-convicts.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":339569,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/22\/sc-upheld-conviction-killing-co-villager-turned-conviction-from-302-to-304-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":212249,"position":3},"title":"Read why Supreme Court turned conviction of two brothers from S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC in 23-year-old co-villager\u2019s murder case","author":"Editor","date":"January 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe requirement of law in criminal trials is not to prove the case beyond all doubt but beyond reasonable doubt and such doubt cannot be imaginary, fanciful, trivial or merely a possible doubt but a fair doubt based on reason and common sense.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Convert conviction from S. 302 to S. 304","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302-to-S.-304.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302-to-S.-304.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302-to-S.-304.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302-to-S.-304.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216110,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/26\/pak-sc-dying-declaration-exception-to-direct-rule-of-evidence-requires-demonstration-of-no-extraneous-prompting-by-anyone-to-the-declarant\/","url_meta":{"origin":212249,"position":4},"title":"Pak SC | Dying Declaration: Exception to direct rule of evidence \u2013 requires demonstration of no extraneous prompting by anyone to declarant","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of Pakistan: A Full Bench of Manzoor Ahmad Malik, Syed Mansoor Ali Shah and Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, JJ. set aside the impugned judgment and conviction of the appellant by extending the benefit of doubt. The prosecution\u2019s case was hinged on the dying declaration made by the deceased\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":271021,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/02\/tripura-high-court-mere-presence-of-the-accused-person-and-last-seen-of-the-offence-cannot-draw-an-inference-to-committing-of-the-crime-conviction-reversed\/","url_meta":{"origin":212249,"position":5},"title":"Tripura High Court | Mere presence of the accused person and last seen of the offence cannot draw an inference to committing of the crime ; Conviction reversed","author":"Editor","date":"August 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Tripura High Court: The Division Bench of Amarnath Goud and Arindam Lodh, JJ. allowed an appeal which was filed against the judgment of Sessions Judge convicting the appellant under Section 302 of the Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). Marriage ceremony was solemnized in between the deceased Sima and the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212249","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212249"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212249\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212249"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212249"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212249"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}