{"id":212235,"date":"2019-03-18T10:20:15","date_gmt":"2019-03-18T04:50:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=212235"},"modified":"2019-04-04T16:15:07","modified_gmt":"2019-04-04T10:45:07","slug":"pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/","title":{"rendered":"Pak SC | Cantonments Rent Restriction Act does not prohibit periodical increase in rent agreed between parties"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court of Pakistan: <\/strong>The Three-Judge Bench of Mushir Alam, Faisal Arab and Ijaz ul Ahsan allowed an appeal filed by a landlord and directed the tenant to vacate premises for failure to pay rent in terms of the tenancy agreement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Respondent herein was inducted as a tenant in the appellant\u2019s premises at a fixed monthly rent. The tenancy agreement was for a period of eleven months, and clause 15 thereof stipulated that rent shall be increased by seven per cent after every eleven months. However, after the lapse of eleven months, respondent remitted rent which was less than the amount stipulated under the agreement. Appellant (landlord) demanded the same, and on refusal, by respondent, he filed an eviction application before the Controller of Rents, who ordered respondent-tenant\u2019s eviction. Respondent filed an appeal before the learned High Court wherein the learned Single Judge held that Section 7(5) of the Cantonments Rent Restriction Act, 1963 prohibits increase in rent beyond what is determined under the tenancy agreement unless a period of three years has elapsed, therefore, no default in the payment of rent had been committed. Aggrieved thereby, the appellant-landlord filed the instant appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court opined that the tenancy agreement provided that the rent of the premises shall be increased by seven per cent after every eleven months. Under the urban rent laws tenancy continues even after the expiry of the term provided under the tenancy agreement. Hence where the tenant continues to occupy the tenement after the expiry of the term mentioned in the agreement the covenants of the agreement continue to apply except such covenants that are in conflict with the provisions of the applicable rent law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was held that the periodical increase in rent agreed between the parties under the tenancy agreement must be regarded as the rent determined by an agreement between the landlord and the tenant within the meaning of Section 7(5) of the Act. Section 7(5) of the Act prohibits any unilateral increase in rent, which surprises the tenant, before the expiry of three years. An increase, which is not unilateral but with the consent of both the parties cannot be subsequently disputed by the tenant unless it is called in question through an application made for fixation of fair rent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, it was concluded that the respondent had failed to pay rent in terms of the tenancy agreement and thus the impugned judgment was set aside.[Abdul Latif v. Parmacie Plus, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/M93TMhsh\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Pak SC 4<\/b><\/a>, Order dated\u00a0 25-02- 2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court of Pakistan: The Three-Judge Bench of Mushir Alam, Faisal Arab and Ijaz ul Ahsan allowed an appeal filed by a <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":66141,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[34456,34458,34457,34459],"class_list":["post-212235","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-cantonments-rent-restriction-act","tag-periodical-increase","tag-rent","tag-tenancy-agreement"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Pak SC | Cantonments Rent Restriction Act does not prohibit periodical increase in rent agreed between parties | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pak SC | Cantonments Rent Restriction Act does not prohibit periodical increase in rent agreed between parties\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of Pakistan: The Three-Judge Bench of Mushir Alam, Faisal Arab and Ijaz ul Ahsan allowed an appeal filed by a\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-18T04:50:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-04-04T10:45:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/\",\"name\":\"Pak SC | Cantonments Rent Restriction Act does not prohibit periodical increase in rent agreed between parties | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-18T04:50:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-04T10:45:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pak SC | Cantonments Rent Restriction Act does not prohibit periodical increase in rent agreed between parties\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pak SC | Cantonments Rent Restriction Act does not prohibit periodical increase in rent agreed between parties | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pak SC | Cantonments Rent Restriction Act does not prohibit periodical increase in rent agreed between parties","og_description":"Supreme Court of Pakistan: The Three-Judge Bench of Mushir Alam, Faisal Arab and Ijaz ul Ahsan allowed an appeal filed by a","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-18T04:50:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-04-04T10:45:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/","name":"Pak SC | Cantonments Rent Restriction Act does not prohibit periodical increase in rent agreed between parties | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg","datePublished":"2019-03-18T04:50:15+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-04T10:45:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pak SC | Cantonments Rent Restriction Act does not prohibit periodical increase in rent agreed between parties"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":242863,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/27\/uttar-pradesh-regulation-of-urban-premises-tenancy-ordinance-2021-establishment-of-rent-authority-and-tribunals-read-ordinance\/","url_meta":{"origin":212235,"position":0},"title":"Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Urban Premises Tenancy Ordinance, 2021: Establishment of Rent Authority and Tribunals [Read Ordinance]","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Governor of Uttar Pradesh promulgates the Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Urban Premises Tenancy Ordinance, 2021 Purpose of the Ordinance: To establish Rent Authority and Rent Tribunals to regulate renting of premises and to protect the interests of landlords and tenants and to provide speedy adjudication mechanism for resolution of disputes\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/up-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/up-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/up-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/up-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/up-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255266,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/07\/the-model-tenancy-act-2021-a-step-forward\/","url_meta":{"origin":212235,"position":1},"title":"The Model Tenancy Act, 2021: A Step Forward","author":"Editor","date":"October 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Abhishek Gulatee[1]","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-122-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-122-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-122-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-122-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-122-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":360489,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/17\/ph-hc-considers-admitted-rate-of-rent-to-determine-tenants-arrears\/","url_meta":{"origin":212235,"position":2},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court upholds eviction petition; considers admitted rate of rent to determine tenant\u2019s arrears","author":"Editor","date":"September 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the case at hand, the demised premises had been taken for rent by the tenant at Rs 5500 per month in August 2003 with a 10% increase in the existing rent after every three years. The tenancy commenced in September 2004, and the tenant was stated to be in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"admitted rate of rent","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/admitted-rate-of-rent.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/admitted-rate-of-rent.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/admitted-rate-of-rent.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/admitted-rate-of-rent.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233816,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/12\/lease-renewal-thereof\/","url_meta":{"origin":212235,"position":3},"title":"Lease: Renewal Thereof","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 12, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Achal Gupta*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Lease.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Lease.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Lease.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Lease.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Lease.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267440,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/once-tenant-starts-paying-rent-can-he-she-turn-around-and-challenge-title-of-landlord-delhi-high-court-law-legalnews-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":212235,"position":4},"title":"Once tenant starts paying rent, can he\/she turn around and challenge title of landlord? Del HC examines","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a matter with regard to the grant of leave to defend, Subramonium Prasad, J., expressed that, the tenant cannot merely make allegations that the landlord has other premises without producing some material to substantiate the same. On being aggrieved by the order of the Additional Rent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/DelRent.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/DelRent.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/DelRent.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/DelRent.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/DelRent.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240987,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/20\/why-are-landlord-tenant-disputes-under-tp-act-arbitrable-but-those-under-rent-acts-non-arbitrable-vidya-drolia-explainer-by-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":212235,"position":5},"title":"Why are Landlord-tenant disputes under TP Act arbitrable but those under Rent Acts non-arbitrable? [&#8216;Vidya Drolia&#8217; explainer by Supreme Court]","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Three days after the Court overruled the ratio in\u00a0Himangni Enterprises v. Kamaljeet Singh Ahluwalia,\u00a0(2017) 10 SCC 706\u00a0wherein it was held that landlord-tenant disputes governed by the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, are not arbitrable as this would be contrary to public policy, the 3-judge bench\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212235","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212235"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212235\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/66141"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212235"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212235"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212235"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}