{"id":212082,"date":"2019-03-15T17:30:54","date_gmt":"2019-03-15T12:00:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=212082"},"modified":"2019-03-16T14:56:05","modified_gmt":"2019-03-16T09:26:05","slug":"jha-hc-court-abstains-from-interfering-on-finding-no-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-under-the-garb-of-article-227","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/jha-hc-court-abstains-from-interfering-on-finding-no-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-under-the-garb-of-article-227\/","title":{"rendered":"Jha HC | Court abstains from interfering on finding no error apparent on the face of record under the garb of Article 227"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court:<\/strong> The Bench of Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. disposed of a petition seeking to make amendment in the plaint as stipulated under schedule to the petition.<\/p>\n

To state the facts briefly the petitioner had filed for declaration of right and title over the suit property in which the respondents had appeared and filed written statements. Also a petition under Order 6 Rule 17 has been filed for incorporating in the plaint: \u201cduring the pendency of the suit the defendant on the strength of lathis and muscle man encroached suit land and constructed house over the portion of the suit land illegally which is liable to be removed by the process of the court.\u201d<\/p>\n

The trial Court was of the opinion that such amendment would change the nature of the suit since the amendment that was sought for was in the nature of seeking a direction for removing the defendant from the land while the suit was for a declaration of right and title over the land in question. Also, the fact that the petitioner had knowledge of the said encroachment was considered by the Court.<\/p>\n

The Court placed reliance on Mani<\/em> Nariman Daruwala v. Phiroz N. Bhatena<\/em>, (1991) 3 SCC 141<\/a> and Laxmikant Revchand Bhojwani v. Pratapsing Mohansingh Pardeshiv<\/em>, (1995) 6 SCC 576<\/a>, while enumerating the principles of exercising the jurisdiction of superintendence under Article 227 of the Constitution. And further held that, \u201cIn exercise of its power of superintendence High Court cannot interfere to correct mere errors of law or fact or just because another view than the one taken by the tribunals or courts subordinate to it, is a possible view. In other words, the jurisdiction has to be very sparingly exercised\u201d. <\/em>Also opined that, in the scope of Order 6 Rule 17 and the scope of Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the order needs no interference since there is no error apparent on the face of the record. [Shyam Sunder Saw v. Manoj Yadav, 2019 SCC OnLine Jhar 233<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 04-02-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court: The Bench of Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. disposed of a petition seeking to make amendment in the plaint as <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[14471,34400,34398,34399,31861],"class_list":["post-212082","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-227","tag-jurisdiction-of-superintendence","tag-no-error","tag-order-6-rule-17","tag-suit"],"yoast_head":"\nJha HC | Court abstains from interfering on finding no error apparent on the face of record under the garb of Article 227 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/jha-hc-court-abstains-from-interfering-on-finding-no-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-under-the-garb-of-article-227\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jha HC | Court abstains from interfering on finding no error apparent on the face of record under the garb of Article 227\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court: The Bench of Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. disposed of a petition seeking to make amendment in the plaint as\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/jha-hc-court-abstains-from-interfering-on-finding-no-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-under-the-garb-of-article-227\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-15T12:00:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-16T09:26:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/jha-hc-court-abstains-from-interfering-on-finding-no-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-under-the-garb-of-article-227\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/jha-hc-court-abstains-from-interfering-on-finding-no-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-under-the-garb-of-article-227\/\",\"name\":\"Jha HC | Court abstains from interfering on finding no error apparent on the face of record under the garb of Article 227 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-15T12:00:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-16T09:26:05+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/jha-hc-court-abstains-from-interfering-on-finding-no-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-under-the-garb-of-article-227\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/jha-hc-court-abstains-from-interfering-on-finding-no-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-under-the-garb-of-article-227\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/jha-hc-court-abstains-from-interfering-on-finding-no-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-under-the-garb-of-article-227\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jha HC | Court abstains from interfering on finding no error apparent on the face of record under the garb of Article 227\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jha HC | Court abstains from interfering on finding no error apparent on the face of record under the garb of Article 227 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/jha-hc-court-abstains-from-interfering-on-finding-no-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-under-the-garb-of-article-227\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jha HC | Court abstains from interfering on finding no error apparent on the face of record under the garb of Article 227","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court: The Bench of Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. disposed of a petition seeking to make amendment in the plaint as","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/jha-hc-court-abstains-from-interfering-on-finding-no-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-under-the-garb-of-article-227\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-15T12:00:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-16T09:26:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/jha-hc-court-abstains-from-interfering-on-finding-no-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-under-the-garb-of-article-227\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/jha-hc-court-abstains-from-interfering-on-finding-no-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-under-the-garb-of-article-227\/","name":"Jha HC | Court abstains from interfering on finding no error apparent on the face of record under the garb of Article 227 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-03-15T12:00:54+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-16T09:26:05+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/jha-hc-court-abstains-from-interfering-on-finding-no-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-under-the-garb-of-article-227\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/jha-hc-court-abstains-from-interfering-on-finding-no-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-under-the-garb-of-article-227\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/jha-hc-court-abstains-from-interfering-on-finding-no-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-under-the-garb-of-article-227\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jha HC | Court abstains from interfering on finding no error apparent on the face of record under the garb of Article 227"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":260477,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/21\/law-on-rejection-of-plaint\/","url_meta":{"origin":212082,"position":0},"title":"Law on Rejection of Plaint | Contents of plaint or Examining sufficiency of plaint? Del HC explains the bounden duty of Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Prateek Jalan, J., expressed that, For the purposes of an order under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC, the Court must come to the conclusion that the plaint is required to be rejected. Present petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution for directing against\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":158464,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/21\/where-two-remedies-are-available-under-law-one-of-them-should-not-be-taken-as-operating-in-derogation-of-the-other\/","url_meta":{"origin":212082,"position":1},"title":"Where two remedies are available under law, one of them should not be taken as operating in derogation of the other","author":"Saba","date":"September 21, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: While deciding a petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the order passed by the learned trial court whereby the application filed by the petitioner for rejection of the plaint was dismissed, a Single Judge Bench of Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. allowed the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218666,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/mp-hc-plaint-filed-under-or-7-r-11-cpc-can-be-rejected-based-on-grounds-mentioned-in-rule-11-or-if-the-cause-of-action-has-not-been-disclosed\/","url_meta":{"origin":212082,"position":2},"title":"MP HC | Plaint filed under Or. 7 R. 11 CPC can be rejected based on grounds mentioned in Rule 11 or if the cause of action has not been disclosed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Prakash Shrivastava, J., dismissed the revision petition filed by the respondents under Section 115 CPC where they challenged the order of the Trial Court, whereby their application for rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC was rejected. The respondents had filed the suit for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":324679,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/19\/patna-hc-sets-aside-order-refusing-to-amend-pleadings-after-commencement-of-trial\/","url_meta":{"origin":212082,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Necessary to determine real conflict between parties\u2019; Patna HC sets aside order refusing to amend pleadings after commencement of trial","author":"Arushi","date":"June 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that if the amendment was not allowed it would lead to unnecessary multiplicity of litigation, as the amendments appeared to be necessary to determine the real controversy between the parties.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Patna High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":346987,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/hc-exercising-supervisory-jurisdiction-art227-reject-plaint-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":212082,"position":4},"title":"High Court\u2019s supervisory power under Art. 227 can\u2019t be invoked to usurp original jurisdiction of the court which it seeks to supervise: SC","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cShort-circuiting of procedure to reach hasty outcomes is an undesirable propensity of an overburdened judiciary. Such impulses rendering procedural safeguards and substantive rights subvert certainty and consistency in law and need to be discouraged\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"HC supervisory power art. 227","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/HC-supervisory-power-art.-227.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/HC-supervisory-power-art.-227.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/HC-supervisory-power-art.-227.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/HC-supervisory-power-art.-227.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275119,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/delhi-high-court-negligence-of-counsel-not-a-reasonable-ground-within-order-xi-rule-15-cpc-facts-of-the-case-must-disclose-urgency-to-avail-benefit-under-or-xi-r-14-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":212082,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court| Negligence of counsel not a reasonable ground within Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC; Facts of the case must disclose \u2018urgency\u2019 to avail benefit under Or. XI R. 1(4) CPC","author":"Editor","date":"October 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case filed by the petitioner challenging dismissal order in relation to an application filed seeking to place on record, certain additional documents which, according to the application, were a necessary and essential part of the suit, but could not be filed with the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212082","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212082"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212082\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212082"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212082"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212082"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}