{"id":212080,"date":"2019-03-15T16:30:09","date_gmt":"2019-03-15T11:00:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=212080"},"modified":"2019-03-19T12:47:18","modified_gmt":"2019-03-19T07:17:18","slug":"hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation\/","title":{"rendered":"HP HC | Court denies to treat departmental appeal as \u201cpurported communication\u201d, considers the intent of the representation"},"content":{"rendered":"

Himachal Pradesh High Court: <\/strong>\u00a0The Bench of Surya Kant, CJ and Sandeep Sharma, J. allowed the petition questioning the authority of the General Manager in deciding the appeal.<\/p>\n

In the pertinent case, petitioner joined as a Junior Clerk-cum-Cashier on 20-5-1983 and was subsequently promoted in the Officers Category, Scale-I. He was served with a charge sheet under the Himachal Pradesh Gramin Bank (Officers & Employees) Service Regulations, 2010 and after holding a regular enquiry, he was compulsorily retired from service. Being aggrieved, the petitioner filed a departmental appeal on 27-12-2017 of which the Appellate Authority under the regulations was the Chairman of the Bank. The same was declined by an Officer in the rank of General Manager. Subsequently, another appeal on 12-5-2018 was filed which was not responded to.<\/p>\n

The respondents countered it by stating that the first appeal was a purported communication and the second was time-barred.<\/p>\n

The Court was of the opinion that the intent of the representation made on 27-12-2017 was to submit an appeal, which was well within time. And the subsequent appeal-cum-representation was an elaboration of the grounds. And even if the appeal was filed on 12-05-2018, it was not hopelessly time barred. Thus the Court allowed the petition to the extent that the order of the General Manager was annulled.[Dharam Chand Sharma v. H.P. Gramin Bank, 2019 SCC OnLine HP 283<\/b><\/a>, decided on 12-03-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Himachal Pradesh High Court: \u00a0The Bench of Surya Kant, CJ and Sandeep Sharma, J. allowed the petition questioning the authority of the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":222107,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34396,34395,34393,34397,34394],"class_list":["post-212080","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal-cum-representation","tag-compulsorily-retired-from-service","tag-departmental-appeal","tag-himachal-pradesh-gramin-bank-officers-employees-service-regulations-2010","tag-purported-communication"],"yoast_head":"\nHP HC | Court denies to treat departmental appeal as \u201cpurported communication\u201d, considers the intent of the representation | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"HP HC | Court denies to treat departmental appeal as \u201cpurported communication\u201d, considers the intent of the representation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court: \u00a0The Bench of Surya Kant, CJ and Sandeep Sharma, J. allowed the petition questioning the authority of the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-15T11:00:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-19T07:17:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation\/\",\"name\":\"HP HC | Court denies to treat departmental appeal as \u201cpurported communication\u201d, considers the intent of the representation | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-15T11:00:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-19T07:17:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"HP HC | Court denies to treat departmental appeal as \u201cpurported communication\u201d, considers the intent of the representation\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"HP HC | Court denies to treat departmental appeal as \u201cpurported communication\u201d, considers the intent of the representation | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"HP HC | Court denies to treat departmental appeal as \u201cpurported communication\u201d, considers the intent of the representation","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: \u00a0The Bench of Surya Kant, CJ and Sandeep Sharma, J. allowed the petition questioning the authority of the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-15T11:00:09+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-19T07:17:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation\/","name":"HP HC | Court denies to treat departmental appeal as \u201cpurported communication\u201d, considers the intent of the representation | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","datePublished":"2019-03-15T11:00:09+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-19T07:17:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/hp-hc-court-denies-to-treat-departmental-appeal-as-purported-communication-considers-the-intent-of-the-representation\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"HP HC | Court denies to treat departmental appeal as \u201cpurported communication\u201d, considers the intent of the representation"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":259585,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/06\/delinquent-employee-departmental-proceedings-representation\/","url_meta":{"origin":212080,"position":0},"title":"Delinquent employee doesn’t have an absolute right to be represented in departmental proceedings by the agent of his choice: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where the Rajasthan High Court had permitted the respondent employee who is facing disciplinary proceedings to represent through ex-employee of the Bank, the bench of MR Shah* and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ has interpreted Regulation 44 of the Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank (Officers and Employees) Service\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-19.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-19.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-19.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-19.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-19.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":344532,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/himachal-pradesh-hc-grants-pensionary-benefits-daily-wage-worker-less-than-10-years-service\/","url_meta":{"origin":212080,"position":1},"title":"Himachal Pradesh HC grants pensionary benefits to daily wage worker with less than 10 years of service","author":"Editor","date":"March 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that the petitioner had rendered more than 8 years but less than 10 years of service, thus, his service was to be treated as 10 years, which qualified him for pensionary benefits.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Himachal Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":211376,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/","url_meta":{"origin":212080,"position":2},"title":"MP HC | High Court under writ jurisdiction doesn’t act as appellate body but examines only illegality in decision making process","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 5, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This petition was filed before the Bench of Prakash Shrivastava, J., under Article 226 of the Constitution where petitioner challenged an order by which the punishment of dismissal from service was imposed and also the order which dismissed the appeal and affirmed the order of punishment.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":278735,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/29\/uttar-pradesh-housing-development-board-function-fixing-conditions-service-on-employees-preetam-singh-modified-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":212080,"position":3},"title":"UP Housing and Development Board’s function does not include fixing its employees’ service conditions; SC modifies 2014’s Preetam Singh verdict","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"On 10.02.2020, a division bench had come to the conclusion that the view taken by this Court in Preetam Singh\u2019s case needs reconsideration after it prima facie found that the functions of the Board contemplated under Section 15 of the 1965 Act were wide enough even to cover the act\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-308.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":6225,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/17\/delay-in-promotion-violates-the-fundamental-right-under-article-16-of-the-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":212080,"position":4},"title":"Delay in promotion violates the fundamental right under Article 16 of the Constitution","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 17, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: In a writ petition relating to the delay in promotion of a Head Master, a single bench comprising of Rajiv Sharma, J, reiterated the legal position as laid down by the Supreme Court that the right of eligible employees to be considered for promotion is virtually\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "High Courts"","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300717,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/04\/sikkim-hc-dismisses-plea-of-itbpf-constable-challenging-his-order-of-compulsory-retirement-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":212080,"position":5},"title":"‘In a Force constituted for ensuring security of borders of India, discipline is paramount’; Sikkim HC dismisses plea of ITBPF constable challenging his order of compulsory retirement","author":"Simranjeet","date":"September 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe authorities are best judges to maintain the discipline of the Force. Unless gross violation of natural justice or perversity in the quantum of punishment compared to the quantum specified is seen, it will not be wise to interfere in writ jurisdiction although the power of this Court is sufficiently\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Sikkim-High-Court-1-886x590-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Sikkim-High-Court-1-886x590-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Sikkim-High-Court-1-886x590-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Sikkim-High-Court-1-886x590-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212080","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212080"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212080\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/222107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212080"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212080"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212080"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}