{"id":212024,"date":"2019-03-14T14:00:39","date_gmt":"2019-03-14T08:30:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=212024"},"modified":"2019-03-18T11:47:21","modified_gmt":"2019-03-18T06:17:21","slug":"ori-hc-the-court-should-not-take-cognizance-if-the-act-complained-of-appears-to-have-inseparable-nexus-with-the-discharge-of-the-official-duty","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/14\/ori-hc-the-court-should-not-take-cognizance-if-the-act-complained-of-appears-to-have-inseparable-nexus-with-the-discharge-of-the-official-duty\/","title":{"rendered":"Ori HC | Court should not take cognizance if the act complained of appears to have inseparable nexus with discharge of official duty"},"content":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court<\/strong>: The Bench of Dr A. K. Mishra, J., allowed a petition filed to quash the order passed taking cognizance of the offences under Sections 448, 427, 380, 506 and 149 IPC.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case were that a complaint was filed against the petitioner stating that the Executive Officer of Phulbani NAC and Tahasildar, accompanied by their staff and police, demolished the toilet and room of the complainant\u2019s house. Getting the said news, when opposite party 2 arrived at the spot and made a protest, the accused persons abused and threatened him. After demolition, they took away the belongings kept in that house for construction purpose. His report in this regard was not accepted by the police. Later on when a case was registered and investigation was conducted police filed the final report. The Court, vide an earlier order observed that the act complained of appeared to have inseparable nexus with the discharge of the official duty and as such the Court should not have taken cognizance of the offences against the petitioner in the absence of sanction order under Section 197 CrPC. The Court quashed the proceeding in the case against two other accused persons. The act complained of was found to have integrally connected to the duty of the officers like that of the petitioner.<\/p>\n

The Court held that the present petitioner stood at equal footing with that of the co-accused persons against whom proceeding was already quashed for want of sanction under Section 197 CrPC. Hence the proceeding against present petitioner was also ordered to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC. [Rabindranath Mohanty v. State of Orissa, 2019 SCC OnLine Ori 107<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 07-03-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court: The Bench of Dr A. K. Mishra, J., allowed a petition filed to quash the order passed taking cognizance <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3726,34361,2583,4131,34362],"class_list":["post-212024","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cognizance","tag-inseparable-nexus","tag-Investigation","tag-official-duty","tag-section-197-crpc"],"yoast_head":"\nOri HC | Court should not take cognizance if the act complained of appears to have inseparable nexus with discharge of official duty | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/14\/ori-hc-the-court-should-not-take-cognizance-if-the-act-complained-of-appears-to-have-inseparable-nexus-with-the-discharge-of-the-official-duty\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ori HC | Court should not take cognizance if the act complained of appears to have inseparable nexus with discharge of official duty\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Orissa High Court: The Bench of Dr A. K. Mishra, J., allowed a petition filed to quash the order passed taking cognizance\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/14\/ori-hc-the-court-should-not-take-cognizance-if-the-act-complained-of-appears-to-have-inseparable-nexus-with-the-discharge-of-the-official-duty\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-14T08:30:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-18T06:17:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/14\/ori-hc-the-court-should-not-take-cognizance-if-the-act-complained-of-appears-to-have-inseparable-nexus-with-the-discharge-of-the-official-duty\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/14\/ori-hc-the-court-should-not-take-cognizance-if-the-act-complained-of-appears-to-have-inseparable-nexus-with-the-discharge-of-the-official-duty\/\",\"name\":\"Ori HC | Court should not take cognizance if the act complained of appears to have inseparable nexus with discharge of official duty | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-14T08:30:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-18T06:17:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/14\/ori-hc-the-court-should-not-take-cognizance-if-the-act-complained-of-appears-to-have-inseparable-nexus-with-the-discharge-of-the-official-duty\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/14\/ori-hc-the-court-should-not-take-cognizance-if-the-act-complained-of-appears-to-have-inseparable-nexus-with-the-discharge-of-the-official-duty\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/14\/ori-hc-the-court-should-not-take-cognizance-if-the-act-complained-of-appears-to-have-inseparable-nexus-with-the-discharge-of-the-official-duty\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ori HC | Court should not take cognizance if the act complained of appears to have inseparable nexus with discharge of official duty\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ori HC | Court should not take cognizance if the act complained of appears to have inseparable nexus with discharge of official duty | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/14\/ori-hc-the-court-should-not-take-cognizance-if-the-act-complained-of-appears-to-have-inseparable-nexus-with-the-discharge-of-the-official-duty\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ori HC | Court should not take cognizance if the act complained of appears to have inseparable nexus with discharge of official duty","og_description":"Orissa High Court: The Bench of Dr A. K. Mishra, J., allowed a petition filed to quash the order passed taking cognizance","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/14\/ori-hc-the-court-should-not-take-cognizance-if-the-act-complained-of-appears-to-have-inseparable-nexus-with-the-discharge-of-the-official-duty\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-14T08:30:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-18T06:17:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/14\/ori-hc-the-court-should-not-take-cognizance-if-the-act-complained-of-appears-to-have-inseparable-nexus-with-the-discharge-of-the-official-duty\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/14\/ori-hc-the-court-should-not-take-cognizance-if-the-act-complained-of-appears-to-have-inseparable-nexus-with-the-discharge-of-the-official-duty\/","name":"Ori HC | Court should not take cognizance if the act complained of appears to have inseparable nexus with discharge of official duty | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-03-14T08:30:39+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-18T06:17:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/14\/ori-hc-the-court-should-not-take-cognizance-if-the-act-complained-of-appears-to-have-inseparable-nexus-with-the-discharge-of-the-official-duty\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/14\/ori-hc-the-court-should-not-take-cognizance-if-the-act-complained-of-appears-to-have-inseparable-nexus-with-the-discharge-of-the-official-duty\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/14\/ori-hc-the-court-should-not-take-cognizance-if-the-act-complained-of-appears-to-have-inseparable-nexus-with-the-discharge-of-the-official-duty\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ori HC | Court should not take cognizance if the act complained of appears to have inseparable nexus with discharge of official duty"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":276877,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":212024,"position":0},"title":"Orissa High Court| Sanction must be issued under Section 197 of CrPC for taking cognizance on having \u2018reasonable nexus\u2019 with official duty","author":"Editor","date":"November 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: In a criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (\u2018Code\u2019) challenging the legality and judicial propriety of the impugned order of cognizance, on the ground that it is not tenable in law and hence, liable to be quashed in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":371361,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/","url_meta":{"origin":212024,"position":1},"title":"Jharkhand HC: Sanction under S. 197 CrPC not a shield for corruption; Cognizance against ex-IAS officer upheld","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"December 31, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSanction under section 197 CrPC is only for the acts reasonably connected to official duty, not personal illegal acts even if done by the public servants.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 197 not corruption shield","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Section-197-not-corruption-shield.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Section-197-not-corruption-shield.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Section-197-not-corruption-shield.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Section-197-not-corruption-shield.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253791,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/07\/no-prosecution-against-public-servants\/","url_meta":{"origin":212024,"position":2},"title":"Ker HC | No prosecution against public servants without prior approval of government; HC dismisses CBI\u2019s revision petition","author":"Editor","date":"September 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Narayana Pisharadi, J., dismissed the revision petition filed by CBI due to its failure to obtain prior sanction of government before prosecuting public servants. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had filed the instant revision petition to assail the order of the Special Judge for CBI Cases,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":79981,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/19\/private-complaint-against-public-servant-under-pc-act-1988-need-not-necessarily-be-accompanied-by-sanction-order-but-is-pre-requisite-in-taking-cognizance\/","url_meta":{"origin":212024,"position":3},"title":"Private complaint against public servant under PC Act, 1988 need not necessarily be accompanied by sanction order but, is pre-requisite in taking cognizance","author":"Saba","date":"October 19, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Karnataka: While deciding\u00a0\u00a0the issues raised for consideration of the Court pertaining to the nature of judicial process involved in the Court of the Special Judge directing an investigation by the police under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, when a private complaint is filed against a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":223639,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/27\/all-hc-cognizance-taken-in-a-criminal-case-after-taking-extraneous-material-into-consideration-is-against-the-law-and-not-sustainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":212024,"position":4},"title":"All HC | Cognizance taken in a criminal case after taking extraneous material into consideration, is against the law and not sustainable","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Om Prakash-VII, J. allowed the application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of a summoning order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra in a case filed under Sections 463, 464, 466, 467, 468, 471, 474 of the Penal Code,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":255934,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/22\/gauri-lankesh-murder-direct-role-in-commission-of-an-organized-crime-not-necessary-hc-manifestly-wrong-in-quashing-charges-against-mohan-nayak-n-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":212024,"position":5},"title":"Gauri Lankesh murder| Direct role in commission of an organized crime not necessary. HC “manifestly wrong” in quashing charges against Mohan Nayak N: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a major development in the Gauri Lankesh murder case, the bench of AM Khanwilkar*, Dinesh Maheshwari and CT Ravikumar, JJ has set aside the Karnataka High Court order wherein it had quashed chargesheet filed against one Mohan Nayak.N regarding offences under Section 3(1)(i), 3(2), 3(3) and 3(4)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212024","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212024"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212024\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212024"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212024"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212024"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}