{"id":211935,"date":"2019-03-13T12:00:15","date_gmt":"2019-03-13T06:30:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=211935"},"modified":"2019-03-16T12:44:22","modified_gmt":"2019-03-16T07:14:22","slug":"cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/13\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\/","title":{"rendered":"Cal HC | Authorised signatory not to be prosecuted under S. 138 NI Act if the company not arraigned as accused"},"content":{"rendered":"

Calcutta High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>Asha Arora, J., allowed a criminal revision petition filed against the order of conviction and sentence awarded to the petitioners for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (dishonour of cheque).<\/em><\/p>\n

To cut the matter short, the present\u00a0was a cheque bounce matter. The complainants had filed under Section 138 against the petitioners alleging that Alok Bhagat (Petitioner 2), who was the authorised signatory of Adeptics, a partnership firm, issued a cheque for Rs 1.5 lakhs for receiving goods from complainant’s factory. However, when presented\u00a0to the bank, the said cheque got dishonoured with the endorsement–payment stopped by the drawer. A demand notice was sent but the petitioners failed to make payment. The matter went to trial and the petitioners were convicted and sentenced. In the appeal, their conviction was maintained but the sentence was modified. Aggrieved still, the petitioners filed the present revision petition.<\/p>\n

The petitioners were represented by Ayan Bhattacharya, Ozair Elahi and Sharequl Haque, Advocates. It was pointed out that the cheque was issued by the firm and signed by Mr Bhagat as an authorised signatory. It was argued that to fasten liability upon the partners\/directors of a firm\/company, impleading it as an accused is imperative. Per contra, Kajal Mukherjee, Surajit Basu and Bikash Chakraborty, Advocates appearing for the complainant opposed the present petition.<\/p>\n

The High Court noted that the cheque does not show that it was issued by Mr Bhagat\u00a0in his personal capacity. It was signed on behalf of the firm as authorised signatory. After discussing Sections 7 and 138 along with\u00a0Aneeta Hada v. Godfather Travels and tours (P) Ltd.,\u00a0<\/em>(2012) 5 SCC 661<\/a>, the High Court observed,\u00a0“Curiously enough, though the cheque clearly shows that it was issued on behalf of Adeptees, no notice of demand was served on the said firm and the complaint was filed only against the petitioners without the mandatory\u00a0requirement of impleading the company\/firm as one of the accused.”\u00a0<\/strong>Complainants argued that no such plea was taken before the trial court or the lower appellate court. However, relying\u00a0on Ajit Balse v. Ranga Karkare,\u00a0<\/em>(2015) 15 SCC 748<\/a>, the High Court rejected the argument. Resultantly, the revision petition was allowed and the impugned judgments were set aside. [N.K.Bhagat v. Biswanath Dey, 2019 SCC OnLine Cal 326<\/b><\/a>, dated 11-03-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Asha Arora, J., allowed a criminal revision petition filed against the order of conviction and sentence awarded to the petitioners <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":52131,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34304,2862,33230],"class_list":["post-211935","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cheque-bounce-matter","tag-dishonour_of_cheque","tag-section-138-of-the-negotiable-instruments-act"],"yoast_head":"\nCal HC | Authorised signatory not to be prosecuted under S. 138 NI Act if the company not arraigned as accused | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/13\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cal HC | Authorised signatory not to be prosecuted under S. 138 NI Act if the company not arraigned as accused\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Asha Arora, J., allowed a criminal revision petition filed against the order of conviction and sentence awarded to the petitioners\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/13\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-13T06:30:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-16T07:14:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/13\\\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/13\\\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"Cal HC | Authorised signatory not to be prosecuted under S. 138 NI Act if the company not arraigned as accused\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-13T06:30:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-16T07:14:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/13\\\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":398,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/13\\\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/06\\\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Cheque bounce matter\",\"dishonour of cheque\",\"Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/13\\\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/13\\\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/13\\\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cal HC | Authorised signatory not to be prosecuted under S. 138 NI Act if the company not arraigned as accused | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/13\\\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/13\\\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/06\\\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-13T06:30:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-16T07:14:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/13\\\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/13\\\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/13\\\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/06\\\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/06\\\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/13\\\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cal HC | Authorised signatory not to be prosecuted under S. 138 NI Act if the company not arraigned as accused\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cal HC | Authorised signatory not to be prosecuted under S. 138 NI Act if the company not arraigned as accused | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/13\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cal HC | Authorised signatory not to be prosecuted under S. 138 NI Act if the company not arraigned as accused","og_description":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Asha Arora, J., allowed a criminal revision petition filed against the order of conviction and sentence awarded to the petitioners","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/13\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-13T06:30:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-16T07:14:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/13\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/13\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"Cal HC | Authorised signatory not to be prosecuted under S. 138 NI Act if the company not arraigned as accused","datePublished":"2019-03-13T06:30:15+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-16T07:14:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/13\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\/"},"wordCount":398,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/13\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","keywords":["Cheque bounce matter","dishonour of cheque","Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/13\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/13\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/13\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\/","name":"Cal HC | Authorised signatory not to be prosecuted under S. 138 NI Act if the company not arraigned as accused | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/13\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/13\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","datePublished":"2019-03-13T06:30:15+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-16T07:14:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/13\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/13\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/13\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/13\/cal-hc-authorised-signatory-not-to-be-prosecuted-under-s-138-ni-act-if-the-company-not-arraigned-as-accused\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cal HC | Authorised signatory not to be prosecuted under S. 138 NI Act if the company not arraigned as accused"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211935","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211935"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211935\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/52131"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211935"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211935"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211935"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}