{"id":211823,"date":"2019-03-12T13:50:39","date_gmt":"2019-03-12T08:20:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=211823"},"modified":"2019-03-13T11:38:58","modified_gmt":"2019-03-13T06:08:58","slug":"hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution\/","title":{"rendered":"HP HC | Court gives consideration to retirement and age, abstains from ordering criminal prosecution"},"content":{"rendered":"

Himachal Pradesh High Court:<\/strong> The Bench of Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. dismissed a petition being devoid of merit and also finding a gross abuse of process of the Court.<\/p>\n

In the pertinent case the petitioner after his retirement from the service, filed for correction of his date of birth in the official order. The petitioner originally worked under the administrative control of Beas Control Board (BCB) where at the time of joining he got recorded his date of birth as 15-04-1950. The cases referred to by the Court were Bharat Coking Coal<\/em> Ltd. v. Chhota Birsa Uranw, <\/em>(2014) 12 SCC 570<\/a> and Union of India v. Harnam Singh, <\/em>(1993) 2 SCC 162<\/a> wherein the issue was expressly dealt with. The petitioner in return produced his school leaving certificate, where the date of birth according to him was 15-4-1954 and not 15-4-1950.<\/p>\n

The Court noted certain material facts:<\/p>\n

– if the date of birth was 15-04-1954 and not 15-4-1950, as is being vehemently claimed by the petitioner, then it is impossible to fathom as to how his services could have been engaged by BCB at the age of about 15 years and he being minor at that time, under no circumstances, he could have been legally appointed.<\/p>\n

-the petitioner, while in service of BCB, did not take any steps\u00a0 whatsoever to get his date of birth corrected and the reason for the same is obvious because in case his service record would have been corrected on the basis of date of birth, then obviously his services were bound to be terminated being a minor.<\/p>\n

-after attaining the age of superannuation on completion of 55 years, was granted three successive continuations and even during this period, he did not object to the date of birth.<\/p>\n

The Court found this to be normally a fit case where the criminal prosecution should have been ordered against the petitioner for tampering with the official record, however, it refrained from passing any order to this effect taking into consideration that the petitioner has not only retired from service of the respondents, but is currently a senior citizen of about 65 years of age. Thus the petition was dismissed.[Dhani Ram v. Bhakra Beas Management Board, 2019 SCC OnLine HP 251<\/b><\/a>, decided on 05-03-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Himachal Pradesh High Court: The Bench of Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. dismissed a petition being devoid of merit and also finding a <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":222107,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33115,34276,34277,34275,6852],"class_list":["post-211823","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-abuse-of-process-of-court","tag-beas-control-board","tag-criminal-prosecution","tag-retirement-of-service","tag-superannuation"],"yoast_head":"\nHP HC | Court gives consideration to retirement and age, abstains from ordering criminal prosecution | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"HP HC | Court gives consideration to retirement and age, abstains from ordering criminal prosecution\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court: The Bench of Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. dismissed a petition being devoid of merit and also finding a\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-12T08:20:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-13T06:08:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution\/\",\"name\":\"HP HC | Court gives consideration to retirement and age, abstains from ordering criminal prosecution | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-12T08:20:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-13T06:08:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"HP HC | Court gives consideration to retirement and age, abstains from ordering criminal prosecution\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"HP HC | Court gives consideration to retirement and age, abstains from ordering criminal prosecution | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"HP HC | Court gives consideration to retirement and age, abstains from ordering criminal prosecution","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: The Bench of Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. dismissed a petition being devoid of merit and also finding a","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-12T08:20:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-13T06:08:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution\/","name":"HP HC | Court gives consideration to retirement and age, abstains from ordering criminal prosecution | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","datePublished":"2019-03-12T08:20:39+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-13T06:08:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/hp-hc-court-gives-consideration-to-retirement-and-age-abstains-from-ordering-criminal-prosecution\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"HP HC | Court gives consideration to retirement and age, abstains from ordering criminal prosecution"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":346087,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/19\/employee-service-interruption-retirement-benefits-madras-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":211823,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Employee not at fault for service interruption; entitled to all service benefits\u2019; Madras HC directs authorities to grant retirement benefits to former Village Administrative Officer","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe respondents cannot take a stand that since the petitioner did not serve during the period, on the percept of 'no work no pay' his pay was fixed notionally to enable him to get pensionary benefits. The said contention of the respondents is untenable and unsustainable in the eye of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238922,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/09\/hp-hc-whether-an-employee-who-retired-on-31st-of-a-month-is-entitled-to-increment-which-would-have-fallen-due-on-1st-of-the-next-month-hc-elucidates\/","url_meta":{"origin":211823,"position":1},"title":"HP HC | Whether an employee who retired on 31st of a month is entitled to increment which would have fallen due on 1st of the next month; HC elucidates","author":"Editor","date":"November 9, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of Tarlok Singh Chauhan and Jyotsna Rewal Dua, JJ., dismissing the present claim against the increment accrued post-retirement, reiterated the effect of relevant Pension Rules and settled precedents. Brief Facts Petitioner was appointed as Technical Assistant in the Department of Industries (Geological wing)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217391,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/27\/pat-hc-prosecution-based-on-statement-of-co-accused-not-substantiated-by-evidence-would-amount-to-abuse-of-process-of-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":211823,"position":2},"title":"Pat HC | Prosecution based on statement of\u00a0co-accused not substantiated by evidence, would amount to abuse of process of Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: Birendra Kumar, J. allowed the application to quash the proceedings against the petitioner as it was an abuse of the process of the Court since no material evidence was found against him. The petitioner was put to trial, for an offence under Section 7 of the Essential\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":318939,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/31\/taking-away-withholding-retiral-benefits-amounts-to-denial-of-right-to-life-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":211823,"position":3},"title":"Taking away\/withholding retiral benefits amounts to denial of \u2018Right to life\u2019: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court held that retiral benefits are earned by employees for their services and should not be deprived due to non-job-related legal matters.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311242,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/calcutta-high-court-rejects-post-retirement-regularisation-of-service-due-to-irregular-appointment-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":211823,"position":4},"title":"Calcutta High Court rejects Post-Retirement Regularisation due to irregular appointment and lack of sanctioned post","author":"Ritu","date":"January 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court rejected the claim of discrimination based on the regularisation of other employees.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323600,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/jhc-retirement-benefits-is-constitutional-and-fundamental-right-of-employee-with-no-legal-impediment-scctimes\/","url_meta":{"origin":211823,"position":5},"title":"Retirement benefits a Constitutional and fundamental right of an employee with no legal impediment: Jharkhand High Court","author":"Arushi","date":"June 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that the respondent took filmsy stand which was not acceptable and this was another glaring example of delay and laches on the respondents\u2019 part for not extending the retirement benefits.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211823","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211823"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211823\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/222107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211823"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211823"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211823"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}