{"id":211740,"date":"2019-03-11T14:50:39","date_gmt":"2019-03-11T09:20:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=211740"},"modified":"2019-03-28T16:34:12","modified_gmt":"2019-03-28T11:04:12","slug":"all-hc-principles-of-natural-justice-cannot-be-applied-where-opportunity-of-hearing-would-make-no-difference-to-outcome","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/11\/all-hc-principles-of-natural-justice-cannot-be-applied-where-opportunity-of-hearing-would-make-no-difference-to-outcome\/","title":{"rendered":"All HC | Principles of natural justice cannot be applied where opportunity of hearing would make no difference to outcome"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Allahabad High Court: <\/strong>The writ petition was filed before a Division Bench of Abhinava Upadhya and Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, JJ., challenging the order passed by Territory Manager, Bharat Petroleum Corporation where petitioner\u2019s candidature for the award of LPG Distributorship under open category was rejected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioner had shown an amount of Rs 10,84,049 in his savings bank accounts in his application form whereas during the process of &#8220;Field Verification of Credentials&#8221;, it was found that the amount in question was in the current account and not in savings bank accounts, and in view of the variance and the fact that the petitioner did not fulfill the required eligibility criteria as per Clause 7.1 and Clause 11 of the Guidelines under the Brochure petitioner was not entitled to the award.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was submitted that in the application form under Item 11 the amount present in savings bank account in a scheduled bank as on the date of application in the name of the applicant and members of &#8216;family unit&#8217; was required to be provided. Further, it was not a case of deficiency or a curable defect which could be rectified as per the procedure under Clause 9.5 of the guideline.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court observed that in view of the legal position that the principles of natural justice cannot be applied in straitjacket formula and in a case where the opportunity of hearing would have made no difference to the outcome, it may not be necessary to strike down the decision.\u00a0 Court observed that the petition failed to point out any error or illegality in the order under challenge or any fundamental procedure defect leading to any injustice. Therefore, this petition was dismissed. [Parvez Hussain v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/1rNuzbk8\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine All 1606<\/b><\/a>, order dated 23-01-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court: The writ petition was filed before a Division Bench of Abhinava Upadhya and Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, JJ., challenging the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34247,34246,11611,34248],"class_list":["post-211740","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-open-category","tag-opportunity-of-hearing","tag-principles-of-natural-justice","tag-savings-bank-account"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>All HC | Principles of natural justice cannot be applied where opportunity of hearing would make no difference to outcome | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/11\/all-hc-principles-of-natural-justice-cannot-be-applied-where-opportunity-of-hearing-would-make-no-difference-to-outcome\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"All HC | Principles of natural justice cannot be applied where opportunity of hearing would make no difference to outcome\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court: The writ petition was filed before a Division Bench of Abhinava Upadhya and Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, JJ., challenging the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/11\/all-hc-principles-of-natural-justice-cannot-be-applied-where-opportunity-of-hearing-would-make-no-difference-to-outcome\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-11T09:20:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-28T11:04:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/11\/all-hc-principles-of-natural-justice-cannot-be-applied-where-opportunity-of-hearing-would-make-no-difference-to-outcome\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/11\/all-hc-principles-of-natural-justice-cannot-be-applied-where-opportunity-of-hearing-would-make-no-difference-to-outcome\/\",\"name\":\"All HC | Principles of natural justice cannot be applied where opportunity of hearing would make no difference to outcome | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-11T09:20:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-28T11:04:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/11\/all-hc-principles-of-natural-justice-cannot-be-applied-where-opportunity-of-hearing-would-make-no-difference-to-outcome\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/11\/all-hc-principles-of-natural-justice-cannot-be-applied-where-opportunity-of-hearing-would-make-no-difference-to-outcome\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/11\/all-hc-principles-of-natural-justice-cannot-be-applied-where-opportunity-of-hearing-would-make-no-difference-to-outcome\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"All HC | Principles of natural justice cannot be applied where opportunity of hearing would make no difference to outcome\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"All HC | Principles of natural justice cannot be applied where opportunity of hearing would make no difference to outcome | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/11\/all-hc-principles-of-natural-justice-cannot-be-applied-where-opportunity-of-hearing-would-make-no-difference-to-outcome\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"All HC | Principles of natural justice cannot be applied where opportunity of hearing would make no difference to outcome","og_description":"Allahabad High Court: The writ petition was filed before a Division Bench of Abhinava Upadhya and Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, JJ., challenging the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/11\/all-hc-principles-of-natural-justice-cannot-be-applied-where-opportunity-of-hearing-would-make-no-difference-to-outcome\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-11T09:20:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-28T11:04:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/11\/all-hc-principles-of-natural-justice-cannot-be-applied-where-opportunity-of-hearing-would-make-no-difference-to-outcome\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/11\/all-hc-principles-of-natural-justice-cannot-be-applied-where-opportunity-of-hearing-would-make-no-difference-to-outcome\/","name":"All HC | Principles of natural justice cannot be applied where opportunity of hearing would make no difference to outcome | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-03-11T09:20:39+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-28T11:04:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/11\/all-hc-principles-of-natural-justice-cannot-be-applied-where-opportunity-of-hearing-would-make-no-difference-to-outcome\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/11\/all-hc-principles-of-natural-justice-cannot-be-applied-where-opportunity-of-hearing-would-make-no-difference-to-outcome\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/11\/all-hc-principles-of-natural-justice-cannot-be-applied-where-opportunity-of-hearing-would-make-no-difference-to-outcome\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"All HC | Principles of natural justice cannot be applied where opportunity of hearing would make no difference to outcome"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":289114,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/10\/supreme-courts-judgment-on-classifying-borrowers-accounts-fraudulent-by-lender-banks-vis-a-vis-audi-alteram-partem-legal-research-legal-updates-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":211740,"position":0},"title":"Explained| Supreme Court&#8217;s judgment on classifying borrower&#8217;s accounts \u2018fraudulent\u2019 by Lender Banks vis-a-vis Audi Alteram Partem","author":"Aastha","date":"April 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018Audi alteram partem application cannot be impliedly excluded under the Master Directions on Frauds.\u2019","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"fraudulent","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1070.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1070.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1070.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1070.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288115,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/29\/banks-must-hear-borrowers-before-classifying-them-as-fraud-civil-death-supreme-court-rbi-reserve-bank-india-legal-research-knowledge-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":211740,"position":1},"title":"Banks must hear borrowers before classifying their accounts as fraud as it may lead to its \u2018civil death\u2019: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court observed that principles of natural justice should be necessarily read into the provisions of the Master Directions on Frauds, to save it from the vice of arbitrariness.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"fraud","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-911.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-911.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-911.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-911.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297798,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/27\/delhi-hc-sets-aside-order-for-violating-the-principles-of-natural-justice-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":211740,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Telephonic conversations for brief period cannot be construed as hearing\u2019; Delhi High Court sets aside order passed in violation of S. 75 of CGST Act","author":"Editor","date":"July 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe opportunity of hearing, which the Officer is statutorily required to give to the person against whom an adverse decision is contemplated, is not an empty formality, and is a well-recognised principle of audi alteram partem, which has rightly been incorporated in Section 75(3) and 75(4) of the CGST Act.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":363263,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/bom-hc-upholds-sbi-order-declaring-accounts-of-anil-ambani-and-rcom-as-fraud\/","url_meta":{"origin":211740,"position":3},"title":"Bombay HC upholds order passed by SBI, declaring accounts of Anil Ambani and Reliance Communication Ltd (RCOM) as &#8216;Fraud&#8217;","author":"Editor","date":"October 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cPersonal hearing cannot be demanded as a matter of right, unless specifically mandated by statute or rules. The principles of natural justice cannot be applied in a straitjacket formula; their application depends on the facts and circumstances of each case\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Anil Ambani RCOM","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Anil-Ambani-RCOM.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Anil-Ambani-RCOM.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Anil-Ambani-RCOM.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Anil-Ambani-RCOM.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":305869,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/27\/delhi-high-court-quashes-ex-parte-proceedings-ed-violation-principles-natural-justice-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":211740,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court quashes proceedings under S. 56 FERA for violation of principles of natural justice","author":"Arunima","date":"October 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"It is for violation of Section 18(2) and Section 18(3) of the FERA that would entail action under Section 56 FERA, but the intervening threshold of issuance of show cause notice\/opportunity notice and hearing the notice before passing the decision upon such mandatory application of principles of natural justice alone\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313154,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/05\/calcutta-high-court-provides-procedural-guidelines-for-fraud-allegations-under-rbi-master-directions-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":211740,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Strike balance between Compliance and Natural Justice\u2019; Calcutta High Court provides procedural guidelines for fraud allegations under RBI Master Directions","author":"Ritu","date":"February 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court stated that show-cause notices are analogous to a First Information Report (FIR) and are not required to detail the probative value of the Forensic Audit Report at this stage.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211740","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211740"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211740\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211740"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211740"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211740"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}