{"id":211459,"date":"2019-03-06T16:15:48","date_gmt":"2019-03-06T10:45:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=211459"},"modified":"2019-03-11T15:37:32","modified_gmt":"2019-03-11T10:07:32","slug":"ph-hc-selling-of-plots-merely-ancillary-activity-carried-out-for-improvement-of-area-cannot-be-equated-with-carrying-of-business","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/ph-hc-selling-of-plots-merely-ancillary-activity-carried-out-for-improvement-of-area-cannot-be-equated-with-carrying-of-business\/","title":{"rendered":"P&H HC | Selling of plots merely ancillary activity carried out for improvement of area cannot be equated with carrying of business"},"content":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court: <\/strong>This order disposed of five appeals filed by revenue under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 before a Division Bench of Ajay Kumar Mittal and Avneesh Jhingan, JJ., against the order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal where the Tribunal had quashed the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT), canceling the registration of assessee-Trust.<\/p>\n

Facts of the case are that the assessee i.e. Improvement Trust, was a Trust constituted under the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 and was granted registration under Section 12-AA of the Act. The definition of \u2018charitable purpose\u2019 under Section 2(15) of the Act was\u00a0amended by Finance Act, 2008 after which a show cause notice was issued to the assessee-Trust to show cause as to why registration should not be cancelled. CIT had held that the activities of the assessee were not for charitable purpose within the amended provision of Section 2(15) of the Act and thus its registration was cancelled. Hence, the appeal was filed before the Tribunal but the same was dismissed.<\/p>\n

Assessee contended that though they were earning some profits the same were used for public utilities. Whereas Revenue submitted that assessee\u2019s activities do not fall under charitable purposes but of a developer and builder.<\/p>\n

High Court was of the view that CIT was not correct in canceling the registration under Section 12-AA of the Act as the funds were used for charitable purpose. It was found that the selling of the plots was merely an ancillary activity carried out for the improvement of the area and the same cannot be equated with carrying of the business of colonizer or developer. Further, there was no provision that the activities of charitable purposes have to be undertaken only by donations or by financial aid of the government. The Court favoured the assessee-Trust and stated the activities of Trust to be of charitable purposes. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed. [CIT v. Improvement Trust, 2018 SCC OnLine P&H 3861<\/b><\/a>, dated 01-08-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court: This order disposed of five appeals filed by revenue under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34159,31242,34160,34161,9013,34162,34158],"class_list":["post-211459","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-ancillary-activity","tag-assessee","tag-charitable-purposes","tag-commissioner-of-income-tax","tag-income-tax-appellate-tribunal","tag-section-260-a-of-income-tax-act","tag-selling-of-plots"],"yoast_head":"\nP&H HC | Selling of plots merely ancillary activity carried out for improvement of area cannot be equated with carrying of business | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/ph-hc-selling-of-plots-merely-ancillary-activity-carried-out-for-improvement-of-area-cannot-be-equated-with-carrying-of-business\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P&H HC | Selling of plots merely ancillary activity carried out for improvement of area cannot be equated with carrying of business\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court: This order disposed of five appeals filed by revenue under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/ph-hc-selling-of-plots-merely-ancillary-activity-carried-out-for-improvement-of-area-cannot-be-equated-with-carrying-of-business\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-06T10:45:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-11T10:07:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/ph-hc-selling-of-plots-merely-ancillary-activity-carried-out-for-improvement-of-area-cannot-be-equated-with-carrying-of-business\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/ph-hc-selling-of-plots-merely-ancillary-activity-carried-out-for-improvement-of-area-cannot-be-equated-with-carrying-of-business\/\",\"name\":\"P&H HC | Selling of plots merely ancillary activity carried out for improvement of area cannot be equated with carrying of business | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-06T10:45:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-11T10:07:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/ph-hc-selling-of-plots-merely-ancillary-activity-carried-out-for-improvement-of-area-cannot-be-equated-with-carrying-of-business\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/ph-hc-selling-of-plots-merely-ancillary-activity-carried-out-for-improvement-of-area-cannot-be-equated-with-carrying-of-business\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/ph-hc-selling-of-plots-merely-ancillary-activity-carried-out-for-improvement-of-area-cannot-be-equated-with-carrying-of-business\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P&H HC | Selling of plots merely ancillary activity carried out for improvement of area cannot be equated with carrying of business\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P&H HC | Selling of plots merely ancillary activity carried out for improvement of area cannot be equated with carrying of business | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/ph-hc-selling-of-plots-merely-ancillary-activity-carried-out-for-improvement-of-area-cannot-be-equated-with-carrying-of-business\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P&H HC | Selling of plots merely ancillary activity carried out for improvement of area cannot be equated with carrying of business","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: This order disposed of five appeals filed by revenue under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/ph-hc-selling-of-plots-merely-ancillary-activity-carried-out-for-improvement-of-area-cannot-be-equated-with-carrying-of-business\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-06T10:45:48+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-11T10:07:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/ph-hc-selling-of-plots-merely-ancillary-activity-carried-out-for-improvement-of-area-cannot-be-equated-with-carrying-of-business\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/ph-hc-selling-of-plots-merely-ancillary-activity-carried-out-for-improvement-of-area-cannot-be-equated-with-carrying-of-business\/","name":"P&H HC | Selling of plots merely ancillary activity carried out for improvement of area cannot be equated with carrying of business | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-03-06T10:45:48+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-11T10:07:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/ph-hc-selling-of-plots-merely-ancillary-activity-carried-out-for-improvement-of-area-cannot-be-equated-with-carrying-of-business\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/ph-hc-selling-of-plots-merely-ancillary-activity-carried-out-for-improvement-of-area-cannot-be-equated-with-carrying-of-business\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/ph-hc-selling-of-plots-merely-ancillary-activity-carried-out-for-improvement-of-area-cannot-be-equated-with-carrying-of-business\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P&H HC | Selling of plots merely ancillary activity carried out for improvement of area cannot be equated with carrying of business"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":256839,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/08\/will-hostel-facility-which-is-incidental-to-providing-education-as-per-object-of-assessee-be-a-charitable-purpose-exempted\/","url_meta":{"origin":211459,"position":0},"title":"Will hostel facility which is incidental to providing education as per object of assessee be a charitable purpose exempted under S. 11 of Income Tax Act? ITAT answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT): Coram of Anil Chaturvedi (Accountant Member) and Suchitra Kamble (Judicial Member) allowed the appeal filed by the assessee challenging the assessment order made by the Income Tax authorities. The assessee society was duly registered, and the renewal was granted for the period of 5 years.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254908,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/registration-of-a-religious-or-charitable-trust-under-s-12aa-of-income-tax-act-on-what-basis-is-registration-granted-or-denied-to-trust\/","url_meta":{"origin":211459,"position":1},"title":"ITAT | Registration of a Religious or Charitable Trust under S. 12AA of Income Tax Act | On what basis is registration granted or denied to Trust? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 30, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT): The Bench of Inturi Rama Rao (Accountant Member) and Partha Sarathi Chaudhary (Judicial Member), decided whether registration under Section 12 AA can be denied for non-payment of taxes on donations received. Instant appeal emanated from the Order of the CIT (Exemption), Pune passed under Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320414,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/","url_meta":{"origin":211459,"position":2},"title":"S. 269-SS of Income Tax Act not applicable to receipt of sale consideration of immovable property in cash but only on loan or deposit: ITAT, Delhi","author":"Editor","date":"April 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSection 269-SS of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has a specific bar on receiving a sum more than 20,000\/- from any other persons by way of loan or deposit.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":359216,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/06\/itat-notice-to-deceased-assessee-to-be-served-on-legal-heirs-first\/","url_meta":{"origin":211459,"position":3},"title":"Notice to deceased assessee must first be served on legal heirs; once on record, legal heirs represent deceased assessee: ITAT","author":"Ekta","date":"September 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the present case, notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1861 is not served on legal heir of the assessee. The said notice is served on the assessee, even after the knowledge that the assessee is deceased.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"notice to deceased assessee","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/notice-to-deceased-assessee.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/notice-to-deceased-assessee.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/notice-to-deceased-assessee.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/notice-to-deceased-assessee.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":234553,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/22\/kar-hc-deductions-falling-under-s-10-b-of-income-tax-act-cannot-be-computed-without-setting-off-brought-forward-business-losses-and-unabsorbed-depreciation\/","url_meta":{"origin":211459,"position":4},"title":"Kar HC | Deductions falling under S. 10-B of Income Tax Act cannot be computed without setting off brought forward business losses and unabsorbed depreciation","author":"Editor","date":"August 22, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of Alok Aradhe and H.T. Narendra Prasad, JJ. set aside the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in favour of the assessee. The present appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act) wherein an order passed by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":281300,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/09\/bombay-high-court-held-pan-consequential-to-transfer-order-of-jurisdiction-assessee-pan-follows-the-jurisdiction-not-vice-versa-legalnews-legalresearch-legalawareness\/","url_meta":{"origin":211459,"position":5},"title":"Transfer of PAN is consequential to the Order of transfer of jurisdiction; Bombay High Court holds PAN follows the jurisdiction not vice versa","author":"Editor","date":"January 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Bombay High Court: In the present appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 preferred against the order dated 09-08-2017, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune Bench wherein the Tribunal held that the order passed by Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Mumbai on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211459","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211459"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211459\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211459"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211459"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211459"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}