{"id":211439,"date":"2019-03-06T14:00:54","date_gmt":"2019-03-06T08:30:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=211439"},"modified":"2019-03-11T18:04:39","modified_gmt":"2019-03-11T12:34:39","slug":"tri-hc-while-framing-of-charge-compliance-of-ss-211-212-and-213-crpc-is-mandatory","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/tri-hc-while-framing-of-charge-compliance-of-ss-211-212-and-213-crpc-is-mandatory\/","title":{"rendered":"Tri HC | While framing of charge, compliance of Ss. 211, 212 and 213 CrPC is mandatory"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Tripura High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Bench of S. Talapatra and Arindam Lodh, JJ., exercised powers under Section 464 (2) CrPC and directed the trial court to frame the charge against the appellants properly keeping in mind the compliance of Sections 211, 212 and 213 CrPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appellants were convicted under Section 376-D IPC and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. Notably, rape was committed on two victims. The charges in respect to both the victims were framed separately on the same day against the appellants. However, one of the charges was not read over to one of the appellants and the other charge was not read over to the other appellant in conformity with the provisions of Sections 211, 212 and 213 CrPC. But they were convicted by the trial court for committing rape on both the victims.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ratan Datta, Advocate for the appellants urged for their acquittal submitting that the framing of charge itself gave leverage to their claim for acquittal. Per contra, B. Choudhary, Public Prosecutor strenuously argued that such defect was mere irregularity within the meaning\u00a0of Section 464\u00a0<em>(Effect of omission to frame, or absence of, or error in, charge).<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Having carefully considering the rival submissions, the High Court was of the view that the appellants claimed prejudice rightfully. It was observed,\u00a0<strong>&#8220;An accused must know the substance of the charge in as much as Section 211 obligates the trial court to frame the charge by providing the distinct content in terms of Section 211 as well as the particulars of time and place of the alleged offence and the every statement regarding the manner of committing the offence under Sections 212 and 213, so that the accused does notice the substance and he can sufficiently have his opportunity to defend.&#8221;\u00a0<\/strong>The Court observed that compliance of Sections 211, 212 and 213 CrPC is mandatory. Accordingly, the exercised power under Section 464 (2) and set aside the impugned order for a limited purpose.\u00a0 The trial court was directed to frame the charge properly on the basis of the police report. [Naresh Jamatia v. State of Tripura, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/gzLLPXLp\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Tri 75<\/b><\/a>, decided on 28-02-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tripura High Court:\u00a0A Bench of S. Talapatra and Arindam Lodh, JJ., exercised powers under Section 464 (2) CrPC and directed the trial <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34150,34153,34152,34154,34151,34149,34148],"class_list":["post-211439","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-212-and-213-crpc","tag-opportunity-to-defend","tag-section-376-d-ipc","tag-section-464-2-crpc","tag-section-6-of-protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act","tag-sections-211","tag-substance-of-the-charge"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Tri HC | While framing of charge, compliance of Ss. 211, 212 and 213 CrPC is mandatory | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/tri-hc-while-framing-of-charge-compliance-of-ss-211-212-and-213-crpc-is-mandatory\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tri HC | While framing of charge, compliance of Ss. 211, 212 and 213 CrPC is mandatory\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tripura High Court:\u00a0A Bench of S. Talapatra and Arindam Lodh, JJ., exercised powers under Section 464 (2) CrPC and directed the trial\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/tri-hc-while-framing-of-charge-compliance-of-ss-211-212-and-213-crpc-is-mandatory\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-06T08:30:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-11T12:34:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/tri-hc-while-framing-of-charge-compliance-of-ss-211-212-and-213-crpc-is-mandatory\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/tri-hc-while-framing-of-charge-compliance-of-ss-211-212-and-213-crpc-is-mandatory\/\",\"name\":\"Tri HC | While framing of charge, compliance of Ss. 211, 212 and 213 CrPC is mandatory | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-06T08:30:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-11T12:34:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/tri-hc-while-framing-of-charge-compliance-of-ss-211-212-and-213-crpc-is-mandatory\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/tri-hc-while-framing-of-charge-compliance-of-ss-211-212-and-213-crpc-is-mandatory\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/tri-hc-while-framing-of-charge-compliance-of-ss-211-212-and-213-crpc-is-mandatory\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tri HC | While framing of charge, compliance of Ss. 211, 212 and 213 CrPC is mandatory\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tri HC | While framing of charge, compliance of Ss. 211, 212 and 213 CrPC is mandatory | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/tri-hc-while-framing-of-charge-compliance-of-ss-211-212-and-213-crpc-is-mandatory\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tri HC | While framing of charge, compliance of Ss. 211, 212 and 213 CrPC is mandatory","og_description":"Tripura High Court:\u00a0A Bench of S. Talapatra and Arindam Lodh, JJ., exercised powers under Section 464 (2) CrPC and directed the trial","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/tri-hc-while-framing-of-charge-compliance-of-ss-211-212-and-213-crpc-is-mandatory\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-06T08:30:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-11T12:34:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/tri-hc-while-framing-of-charge-compliance-of-ss-211-212-and-213-crpc-is-mandatory\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/tri-hc-while-framing-of-charge-compliance-of-ss-211-212-and-213-crpc-is-mandatory\/","name":"Tri HC | While framing of charge, compliance of Ss. 211, 212 and 213 CrPC is mandatory | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-03-06T08:30:54+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-11T12:34:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/tri-hc-while-framing-of-charge-compliance-of-ss-211-212-and-213-crpc-is-mandatory\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/tri-hc-while-framing-of-charge-compliance-of-ss-211-212-and-213-crpc-is-mandatory\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/tri-hc-while-framing-of-charge-compliance-of-ss-211-212-and-213-crpc-is-mandatory\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tri HC | While framing of charge, compliance of Ss. 211, 212 and 213 CrPC is mandatory"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":258826,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/21\/del-hc-convicts-father-friend-under-s-377-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":211439,"position":0},"title":"&#8216;To sexually violate innocent child within filial relationship descends on different path of depravity&#8217;: Del HC convicts father, friend under S. 377 IPC; emphasises on ingredients of &#8216;carnal intercourse against the order of nature&#8217;","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Siddharth Mridul and Anup Jairam Bambhani, JJ., while addressing a very unfortunate incident, involving sexual offences to the extent of rape and carnal intercourse with a child, expressed that, \u201c\u2026to sexually violate an innocent child is in any case an abhorrent act; but,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":93661,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/29\/directions-to-judicial-officers-for-effective-enforcement-of-pocso\/","url_meta":{"origin":211439,"position":1},"title":"Directions to Judicial Officers for effective enforcement of POCSO","author":"Saba","date":"December 29, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: While hearing an appeal against conviction, the Division Bench of Gita Mittal, R.K.\u00a0Guba, JJ. , issued detailed directions on framing of charges, compensation to victims, and exercise of\u00a0jurisdiction by Judicial Officers in relation to the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act,\u00a02012.\u00a0In the instant case, the appellant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":347507,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/10\/supreme-court-quashes-charges-anti-trafficking-activists-rescue-raid\/","url_meta":{"origin":211439,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court quashes criminal charges against anti-human trafficking activists branded as criminals for raid to rescue bonded labourers and minor children from brick kiln","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen profile of the allegations emerging from the factual matrix of the case renders existence of mens rea patently absurd or inherently improbable, such prosecution is liable to be quashed as an abuse of process of law.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rescue raid of bonded labourers","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Rescue-raid-of-bonded-labourers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Rescue-raid-of-bonded-labourers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Rescue-raid-of-bonded-labourers.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Rescue-raid-of-bonded-labourers.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288046,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/28\/164-statement-a-judicial-cloak-of-justice-for-victims\/","url_meta":{"origin":211439,"position":3},"title":"164 Statement: A Judicial Cloak of Justice for Victims","author":"Editor","date":"March 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Tanya Agarwal\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Justice for Victims","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278063,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/delhi-high-court-statement-made-under-sec-164-crpc-disclosing-commission-of-rape-is-sufficient-to-frame-charges-under-sec-376-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":211439,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court | Statement made under Sec 164 CrPC disclosing commission of rape is sufficient to frame charges under Sec 376 IPC","author":"Editor","date":"November 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case where revision petition was filed against the order passed by the Trial Court by which accused persons were discharged under Section 376 of Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the Single Judge Bench of Swarana Kanta Sharma, J. held that an accused should not\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":294595,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/14\/kerala-high-court-explains-same-transaction-under-section-220-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":211439,"position":5},"title":"First rape, then suicide after 6 months; Is it same transaction under Sec 220, CrPC ? Kerala High Court explains","author":"Ridhi","date":"June 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court expressed that \u2018same transaction\u2019 is the essence being vital for deciding whether series of acts in question are connected for a common trial.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"kerala high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211439","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211439"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211439\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211439"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211439"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211439"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}