{"id":211376,"date":"2019-03-05T17:15:31","date_gmt":"2019-03-05T11:45:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=211376"},"modified":"2019-03-05T14:27:45","modified_gmt":"2019-03-05T08:57:45","slug":"mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/","title":{"rendered":"MP HC | High Court under writ jurisdiction doesn&#8217;t act as appellate body but examines only illegality in decision making process"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madhya Pradesh High Court: <\/strong>This petition was filed before the Bench of Prakash Shrivastava, J., under Article 226 of the Constitution where petitioner challenged an order by which the punishment of dismissal from service was imposed and also the order which dismissed the appeal and affirmed the order of punishment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Facts of the case were that petitioner, a Clerk-cum-Cashier in Bank was charge-sheeted for misconduct for unauthorized absence for a period of 537 days and was issued show cause notice and thus was dismissed from his post challenged by petitioner in the appeal which was also dismissed. Petitioner submitted that he was ill and could not have attended the office thus when he joined he had submitted medical documents. He stated that he was ready to forego the backwages and prayed for his reinstatement. In terms of Regulation 22 of Nimar Kshetriya Gramin Bank (Officers &amp; Employees) Service Regulation, 2001 the unauthorized absence of an officer or employee was misconduct liable for disciplinary action and in terms of the Regulation 38 dismissal is one of the major penalty if the misconduct is proved.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court was of the view that enquiry officer had applied all due process and given petitioner reasonable opportunity. It was found that petitioner had not submitted any medical documents and charge against him was duly proved. Hence, the punishment of dismissal from the post of Clerk was a reasoned order where petitioner was given opportunity. Since, misconduct by petitioner was proved his dismissal from his post was rightly imposed on him as a penalty. The Court, it was observed, under its writ jurisdiction does not act as an appellate body but examines only the illegality in the decision-making process. Therefore, this petition was dismissed. [Pushpa Shukla v. State of M.P., WP No. 2819 of 2005, dated 28-02-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madhya Pradesh High Court: This petition was filed before the Bench of Prakash Shrivastava, J., under Article 226 of the Constitution where <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34129,34130,23224,7272],"class_list":["post-211376","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appellate-body","tag-decision-making-process","tag-dismissal-from-service","tag-writ-jurisdiction"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>MP HC | High Court under writ jurisdiction doesn&#039;t act as appellate body but examines only illegality in decision making process | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP HC | High Court under writ jurisdiction doesn&#039;t act as appellate body but examines only illegality in decision making process\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This petition was filed before the Bench of Prakash Shrivastava, J., under Article 226 of the Constitution where\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-05T11:45:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/05\\\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/05\\\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"MP HC | High Court under writ jurisdiction doesn&#8217;t act as appellate body but examines only illegality in decision making process\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-05T11:45:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/05\\\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":317,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"Appellate Body\",\"Decision Making Process\",\"dismissal from service\",\"writ jurisdiction\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/05\\\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/05\\\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/05\\\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\\\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC | High Court under writ jurisdiction doesn't act as appellate body but examines only illegality in decision making process | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-05T11:45:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/05\\\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/05\\\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/05\\\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP HC | High Court under writ jurisdiction doesn&#8217;t act as appellate body but examines only illegality in decision making process\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC | High Court under writ jurisdiction doesn't act as appellate body but examines only illegality in decision making process | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP HC | High Court under writ jurisdiction doesn't act as appellate body but examines only illegality in decision making process","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This petition was filed before the Bench of Prakash Shrivastava, J., under Article 226 of the Constitution where","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-05T11:45:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"MP HC | High Court under writ jurisdiction doesn&#8217;t act as appellate body but examines only illegality in decision making process","datePublished":"2019-03-05T11:45:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/"},"wordCount":317,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["Appellate Body","Decision Making Process","dismissal from service","writ jurisdiction"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/","name":"MP HC | High Court under writ jurisdiction doesn't act as appellate body but examines only illegality in decision making process | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-03-05T11:45:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP HC | High Court under writ jurisdiction doesn&#8217;t act as appellate body but examines only illegality in decision making process"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":200926,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/31\/order-of-dismissal-from-service-under-rule-82b-of-u-p-police-officers-of-subordinate-ranks-rules-quashed-in-absence-of-justification\/","url_meta":{"origin":211376,"position":0},"title":"Order of dismissal from service under Rule 8(2)(b) of U.P. Police Officers of Subordinate Ranks Rules quashed in absence of justification","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 31, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J., addressed a writ petition where petitioner was dismissed from service. The facts of the case are that the petitioner was dismissed from service by an order passed under Rule 8(2)(b) of the U.P. Police Officers of Subordinate\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":208882,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/28\/mp-hc-court-refuses-to-exercise-writ-jurisdiction-in-light-of-alternate-remedy-of-appeal-before-stat\/","url_meta":{"origin":211376,"position":1},"title":"MP HC | Court refuses to exercise writ jurisdiction in light of alternate remedy of appeal before STAT","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: An application filed before a Bench of Sheel Nagu, J., by petitioner for grant of permit for the corridor route, i.e. Narsinghgarh to Barai via specified places was dismissed by respondent, i.e. Secretary, State Transport Authority. Hence, petitioner filed this petition under Article 227 of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":219764,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/sl-coa-decision-of-inspector-general-of-police-held-within-the-powers-vested-in-him-dismissal-of-petitioner-on-grounds-of-misconduct-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":211376,"position":2},"title":"SL CoA | Decision of Inspector General of Police held within the powers vested in him; dismissal of petitioner on grounds of misconduct upheld","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 20, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Court of Appeal of Sri Lanka: Application under Article 140 of the Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka was contemplated by Yasantha Kodagoda and Arjuna Obeyesekere, JJ.\u00a0 for issuance of Writs of Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus. The factual matrix of the case was that the petitioner filed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254522,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/21\/factual-issue\/","url_meta":{"origin":211376,"position":3},"title":"Tri HC | Factual issue in absence of any material produced not acceptable; Court dismisses appeal","author":"Editor","date":"September 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: Akil Kureshi, CJ., dismissed a petition which was filed challenging an order passed by the disciplinary authority imposing punishment of reduction of the petitioner\u2019s pay by three stages for a period of four years with future effect. Petitioner was working as Junior Engineer (Civil) with Border Road\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":220947,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/17\/pat-hc-principles-of-natural-justice-could-not-be-put-in-a-straight-jacket-formula-so-as-to-defeat-the-larger-public-interest\/","url_meta":{"origin":211376,"position":4},"title":"Pat HC | Principles of natural justice could not be put in a straight jacket formula so as to defeat the larger public interest","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J. dismissed the writ application on the grounds that the settled proposition of law was that the writ of certiorari should not be issued only for making out a legal point. The petitioner, aggrieved by the order dated passed by the Additional Chief Secretary,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":274588,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/27\/manipur-high-court-natural-justice-disciplinary-proceedings-enquiry-officer-presiding-officer-central-reserve-police-force-departmental-enquiry-writ-petition-legal-research-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":211376,"position":5},"title":"Absence from duty without leave under CRPF is a gravest misconduct; Manipur High Court upheld order of Disciplinary Authority of dismissal from service","author":"Editor","date":"September 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Manipur High Court: In a writ petition filed to quash the dismissal order dated 18.1.2005 on the ground that it has violated the principles of natural justice and during the departmental enquiry, the Enquiry Officer proceeded the disciplinary proceedings without the Presiding Officer, thus, not affording a reasonable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Manipur High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-23-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-23-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-23-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-23-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-23-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211376","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211376"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211376\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211376"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211376"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211376"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}