{"id":211376,"date":"2019-03-05T17:15:31","date_gmt":"2019-03-05T11:45:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=211376"},"modified":"2019-03-05T14:27:45","modified_gmt":"2019-03-05T08:57:45","slug":"mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/","title":{"rendered":"MP HC | High Court under writ jurisdiction doesn’t act as appellate body but examines only illegality in decision making process"},"content":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court: <\/strong>This petition was filed before the Bench of Prakash Shrivastava, J., under Article 226 of the Constitution where petitioner challenged an order by which the punishment of dismissal from service was imposed and also the order which dismissed the appeal and affirmed the order of punishment.<\/p>\n

Facts of the case were that petitioner, a Clerk-cum-Cashier in Bank was charge-sheeted for misconduct for unauthorized absence for a period of 537 days and was issued show cause notice and thus was dismissed from his post challenged by petitioner in the appeal which was also dismissed. Petitioner submitted that he was ill and could not have attended the office thus when he joined he had submitted medical documents. He stated that he was ready to forego the backwages and prayed for his reinstatement. In terms of Regulation 22 of Nimar Kshetriya Gramin Bank (Officers & Employees) Service Regulation, 2001 the unauthorized absence of an officer or employee was misconduct liable for disciplinary action and in terms of the Regulation 38 dismissal is one of the major penalty if the misconduct is proved.<\/p>\n

High Court was of the view that enquiry officer had applied all due process and given petitioner reasonable opportunity. It was found that petitioner had not submitted any medical documents and charge against him was duly proved. Hence, the punishment of dismissal from the post of Clerk was a reasoned order where petitioner was given opportunity. Since, misconduct by petitioner was proved his dismissal from his post was rightly imposed on him as a penalty. The Court, it was observed, under its writ jurisdiction does not act as an appellate body but examines only the illegality in the decision-making process. Therefore, this petition was dismissed. [Pushpa Shukla v. State of M.P., WP No. 2819 of 2005, dated 28-02-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court: This petition was filed before the Bench of Prakash Shrivastava, J., under Article 226 of the Constitution where <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34129,34130,23224,7272],"class_list":["post-211376","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appellate-body","tag-decision-making-process","tag-dismissal-from-service","tag-writ-jurisdiction"],"yoast_head":"\nMP HC | High Court under writ jurisdiction doesn't act as appellate body but examines only illegality in decision making process | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP HC | High Court under writ jurisdiction doesn't act as appellate body but examines only illegality in decision making process\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This petition was filed before the Bench of Prakash Shrivastava, J., under Article 226 of the Constitution where\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-05T11:45:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC | High Court under writ jurisdiction doesn't act as appellate body but examines only illegality in decision making process | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-05T11:45:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP HC | High Court under writ jurisdiction doesn’t act as appellate body but examines only illegality in decision making process\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC | High Court under writ jurisdiction doesn't act as appellate body but examines only illegality in decision making process | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP HC | High Court under writ jurisdiction doesn't act as appellate body but examines only illegality in decision making process","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This petition was filed before the Bench of Prakash Shrivastava, J., under Article 226 of the Constitution where","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-05T11:45:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/","name":"MP HC | High Court under writ jurisdiction doesn't act as appellate body but examines only illegality in decision making process | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-03-05T11:45:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/mp-hc-high-court-under-writ-jurisdiction-doesnt-act-as-appellate-body-but-examines-only-illegality-in-decision-making-process\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP HC | High Court under writ jurisdiction doesn’t act as appellate body but examines only illegality in decision making process"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":336270,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/30\/ph-hc-upholds-police-constables-dismissal-made-in-1995-for-relations-with-extremist-group\/","url_meta":{"origin":211376,"position":0},"title":"\u2018No reason to interfere with dismissal at belated stage, especially when conduct not above board\u2019; P&H HC upholds police constable\u2019s dismissal made in 1995 for relations with extremist group","author":"Arushi","date":"November 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"From the perusal of the reports received from State of West Bengal, it is observed that the petitioner was misusing his official position. The petitioner went to Kolkata without informing his seniors and without getting prior approval. He was posing himself as Gunman of purported President of District Congress Dal,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200926,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/31\/order-of-dismissal-from-service-under-rule-82b-of-u-p-police-officers-of-subordinate-ranks-rules-quashed-in-absence-of-justification\/","url_meta":{"origin":211376,"position":1},"title":"Order of dismissal from service under Rule 8(2)(b) of U.P. Police Officers of Subordinate Ranks Rules quashed in absence of justification","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 31, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J., addressed a writ petition where petitioner was dismissed from service. The facts of the case are that the petitioner was dismissed from service by an order passed under Rule 8(2)(b) of the U.P. Police Officers of Subordinate\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":308518,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-disciplinary-actions-against-employees-for-proven-misconduct-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":211376,"position":2},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds Bank\u2019s right to take disciplinary action against employees for proven misconduct","author":"Ritu","date":"December 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAny misconduct on the part of the bank employee\/ officer can be meted out with disciplinary action in accordance with the service rules and regulations.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320813,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/26\/mat-suspension-order-corruption-confirmation-dismissed-unjustified-delay-bombay-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":211376,"position":3},"title":"Bombay HC dismisses challenge to Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal\u2019s 2013 order confirming suspension of a Sales Tax clerk on ground of unjustified delay","author":"Editor","date":"April 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court was of the view there was no justification in approaching the Court to challenge the order of 2013 after a period of 5 years.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":355547,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/04\/ph-hc-armed-forces-cannot-retain-indisciplined-member\/","url_meta":{"origin":211376,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Armed forces cannot retain indisciplined member\u2019: Punjab and Haryana HC upholds dismissal of constable for absence beyond leave period","author":"Editor","date":"August 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner went on a week\u2019s leave and did not join duty after completion of the same. It was noticed that he remained absent on 42 occasions during his short service of 12 years. Consequently, he got suspended.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Armed forces cannot retain indisciplined member","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Armed-forces-cannot-retain-indisciplined-member.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Armed-forces-cannot-retain-indisciplined-member.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Armed-forces-cannot-retain-indisciplined-member.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Armed-forces-cannot-retain-indisciplined-member.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":355670,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/ph-hc-armed-forces-cannot-retain-indisciplined-member-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":211376,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Armed forces cannot retain indisciplined member\u2019: Punjab and Haryana HC upholds dismissal of constable for absence beyond leave period","author":"Editor","date":"August 5, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner went on a week\u2019s leave and did not join duty after completion of the same. It was noticed that he remained absent on 42 occasions during his short service of 12 years. Consequently, he got suspended.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Armed forces cannot retain indisciplined member","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/ph-111.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/ph-111.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/ph-111.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/ph-111.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211376","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211376"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211376\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211376"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211376"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211376"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}