{"id":211346,"date":"2019-03-05T11:00:57","date_gmt":"2019-03-05T05:30:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=211346"},"modified":"2019-03-08T11:58:27","modified_gmt":"2019-03-08T06:28:27","slug":"cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/","title":{"rendered":"Cal HC | Rejecting adjournment prayer is not a breach of principles of natural justice"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Calcutta High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>Debangsu Basak, J., dismissed a petition filed by State Fisheries Development Corporation relating to a land dispute with the State.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner was a Government of W.B. undertaking engaged in the business of pisciculture. It obtained land from the District Administration. According to the petitioner, the State was now wrongfully seeking to resume possession of land. It was stated that the State was not entitled to do so in view of Section 8 of the W.B. Inland Fisheries Act, 1984. However, the District Magistrate initiated proceedings for eviction of the petitioner. The petitioner filed a writ petition that resulted in requiring the DM to give fresh hearing to the petitioners. Accordingly, the DM heard the parties afresh. The petitioner was represented before the DM. A prayer for adjournment was made which was rejected. Thereafter, the DM ordered the eviction of the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0Shanti Das, Advocate for the petitioner submitted that the said rejection resulted in the violation of principles of natural justice and therefore the order of the DM was not sustainable. Per contra, Sakya Sen, Advocate appearing for the respondent supported the eviction order passed by the DM.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Having regard to the rival submissions, the Court found that the State required the subject land for the purpose of eco-tourism project. It was noted that the petitioner was afforded a reasonable opportunity of hearing. Holding that there was no infirmity in rejection of the prayer, the Court observed,\u00a0<strong>&#8220;An adjudicating authority is entitled to reject adjudicating authority did not allow the petitioners\u2019 prayer for adjournment. There is no infirmity in the rejection of such prayer. Merely, because the adjudicating authority rejected a prayer for adjournment ipso facto does not mean that, the proceeding stands vitiated by breach of principles of natural justice. The petitioner was afforded a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The petitioner did not avail of the same. That does not tantamount to the adjudicating authority acting in breach of the principles of natural justice warranting intervention by the Writ Court.&#8221;\u00a0<\/strong>Finding no reason to interfere in the decision of the DM, the Court dismissed\u00a0the present petition. [State Fisheries Development Corpn. Ltd. v. DM, Purba Medinipur, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/X1sghpdh\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Cal 295<\/b><\/a>, dated 01-03-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Debangsu Basak, J., dismissed a petition filed by State Fisheries Development Corporation relating to a land dispute with the State. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":52131,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34120,33289,34121,2805],"class_list":["post-211346","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-adjournment-prayer","tag-adjudicating-authority","tag-eco-tourism","tag-natural_justice"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Cal HC | Rejecting adjournment prayer is not a breach of principles of natural justice | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cal HC | Rejecting adjournment prayer is not a breach of principles of natural justice\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Debangsu Basak, J., dismissed a petition filed by State Fisheries Development Corporation relating to a land dispute with the State.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-05T05:30:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-08T06:28:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/\",\"name\":\"Cal HC | Rejecting adjournment prayer is not a breach of principles of natural justice | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-05T05:30:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-08T06:28:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cal HC | Rejecting adjournment prayer is not a breach of principles of natural justice\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cal HC | Rejecting adjournment prayer is not a breach of principles of natural justice | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cal HC | Rejecting adjournment prayer is not a breach of principles of natural justice","og_description":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Debangsu Basak, J., dismissed a petition filed by State Fisheries Development Corporation relating to a land dispute with the State.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-05T05:30:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-08T06:28:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/","name":"Cal HC | Rejecting adjournment prayer is not a breach of principles of natural justice | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","datePublished":"2019-03-05T05:30:57+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-08T06:28:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cal HC | Rejecting adjournment prayer is not a breach of principles of natural justice"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":305265,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/19\/disputed-question-of-fact-cannot-be-decided-in-writ-petition-calcutta-high-court-scc-blog-legal-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":211346,"position":0},"title":"Writ Court cannot resolve Private\/Contractual Disputes or Questions of Ownership in Land Dispute Cases: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"October 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court opined that such disputes should be resolved by the Civil Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282518,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/27\/reassessment-order-issued-after-petitioner-was-unable-to-get-form-f-owing-to-covid-19-lockout-constitutes-violation-of-natural-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":211346,"position":1},"title":"Inability to produce required documents due to COVID-19 lockdown; Gujarat High Court quashes reassessment order","author":"Editor","date":"January 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court observed that due to COVID-19 lockdown it was impossible for the petitioner to get Form-F and denying adjournment after taking note of this fact results in breach of principle of natural justice.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Gujarat High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image10.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":299622,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/18\/allahabad-high-court-imposes-10000-cost-cit-violation-principles-of-natural-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":211346,"position":2},"title":"Allahabad High Court imposes Rs. 10, 000 cost on CIT for passing order in violation of principles of natural justice","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court has said that notice under Section 263 was prepared and uploaded on 28-03-2022 and the same was received on the fixed date and the impugned order dated 31-03-2022 has been passed in gross violation of the principles of natural justice.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298884,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/08\/calcutta-high-court-directs-notional-appointment-for-pensionary-benefit-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":211346,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Affected individuals should not lose pensionary benefits due to delay in appointment by authorities\u2019; Calcutta High Court directs notional appointment","author":"Ritu","date":"August 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe petitioner cannot be penalised for the delay caused by the respondent authorities in appointing the petitioner to the post in question.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238877,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/09\/utt-hc-court-rejects-plea-of-bias-against-the-enquiry-officer-dismisses-petition-in-the-matter-of-departmental-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":211346,"position":4},"title":"Utt HC | Court rejects Plea of bias against the Enquiry officer; Dismisses petition in the matter of departmental proceedings","author":"Editor","date":"November 9, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: The Division Bench of Sudhanshu Dhulia and Alok Kumar Verma, JJ., dismissed a writ petition which was filed in the nature of certiorari and mandamus for quashing of certain orders passed by the enquiry officer and with a prayer to change the enquiry officer on grounds of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":243054,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/30\/restitution-of-conjugal-rights-read-how-supreme-court-imparted-justice-to-a-woman-despite-rejecting-her-transfer-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":211346,"position":5},"title":"Restitution of conjugal rights| Read how Supreme Court imparted justice to a woman despite rejecting her Transfer Petition","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 30, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhile the hardship, both social and financial, pleaded by the petitioner deserves favourable consideration, the transfer of the case at this stage of the proceeding may not be appropriate.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211346","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211346"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211346\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/52131"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211346"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211346"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211346"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}