{"id":211201,"date":"2019-03-02T14:00:58","date_gmt":"2019-03-02T08:30:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=211201"},"modified":"2019-03-05T16:10:10","modified_gmt":"2019-03-05T10:40:10","slug":"bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc\/","title":{"rendered":"Bom HC | S.18 of SC\/ST Act doesn&#8217;t statutorily bar High Court from considering anticipatory bail application under S. 438 CrPC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Bombay High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>K.K. Sonawane, J., while reversing the judgment passed by Additional Sessions Judge, allowed pre-arrest bail applications of appellants filed under Section 438 CrPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appellants were accused of assaulting the complainant and abusing him using filthy language while referring to his caste &#8220;Adiwasi&#8221;. An FIR was lodged and a criminal case was registered under Sections 324, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC and under Section 3 (1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Apprehending arrest by Police, the appellants rushed to the court of Additional Sessions Judge for the relief of anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC. However, he rejected all the applications. This order was the subject matter of present appeals.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">S.K. Chavan and R.J. Nirmal, Advocates representing the appellants submitted that they were students taking education in Agricultural College who had no concern with the alleged crime and were falsely implicated. Per contra, D.S. Jape, Assistant Public Prosecutor\u00a0appearing for the State submitted that Section 18-A of SC\/ST Act puts an embargo on the Court for exercising powers under Section 438 CrPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On perusing the FIR, the High Court was of the view that prima facie, ingredients of Section 3(1)(r)(s) did not match with factual score of the present case. Relying on its earlier decisions, the Court observed,\u00a0<strong>&#8220;in spite of bar under Section 18 of the Act of 1989, for invocation of powers under Section 438 of the CrPC, it is still open to this Court to find out by looking to the FIR of the case itself is as to whether prima facie case is made out by the complainant against appellants.&#8221;\u00a0<\/strong>Opining that incriminating circumstances to show that &#8220;intentional insult&#8221; or &#8220;intimidation with intent to humiliate&#8221; the complainant within public view on the part of appellants were lacking in this case, the High Court held it to be a fit case where anticipatory bail may be granted to them. Hence, the impugned order was quashed and the appeals were allowed. [Krishna v. State of Maharashtra,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/HTo98G57\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Bom 341<\/b><\/a>, decided on 27-02-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court:\u00a0K.K. Sonawane, J., while reversing the judgment passed by Additional Sessions Judge, allowed pre-arrest bail applications of appellants filed under <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34087,13011,3067,34088,29912,11791],"class_list":["post-211201","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-adiwasi","tag-anticipatory-bail","tag-FIR","tag-intentional-insult","tag-sc-st-act","tag-section-438-crpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bom HC | S.18 of SC\/ST Act doesn&#039;t statutorily bar High Court from considering anticipatory bail application under S. 438 CrPC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bom HC | S.18 of SC\/ST Act doesn&#039;t statutorily bar High Court from considering anticipatory bail application under S. 438 CrPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court:\u00a0K.K. Sonawane, J., while reversing the judgment passed by Additional Sessions Judge, allowed pre-arrest bail applications of appellants filed under\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-02T08:30:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-05T10:40:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc\/\",\"name\":\"Bom HC | S.18 of SC\/ST Act doesn't statutorily bar High Court from considering anticipatory bail application under S. 438 CrPC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-02T08:30:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-05T10:40:10+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bom HC | S.18 of SC\/ST Act doesn&#8217;t statutorily bar High Court from considering anticipatory bail application under S. 438 CrPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bom HC | S.18 of SC\/ST Act doesn't statutorily bar High Court from considering anticipatory bail application under S. 438 CrPC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bom HC | S.18 of SC\/ST Act doesn't statutorily bar High Court from considering anticipatory bail application under S. 438 CrPC","og_description":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0K.K. Sonawane, J., while reversing the judgment passed by Additional Sessions Judge, allowed pre-arrest bail applications of appellants filed under","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-02T08:30:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-05T10:40:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc\/","name":"Bom HC | S.18 of SC\/ST Act doesn't statutorily bar High Court from considering anticipatory bail application under S. 438 CrPC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2019-03-02T08:30:58+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-05T10:40:10+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/bom-hc-s-18-of-sc-st-act-doesnt-statutorily-bar-high-court-from-considering-anticipatory-bail-application-under-s-438-crpc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bom HC | S.18 of SC\/ST Act doesn&#8217;t statutorily bar High Court from considering anticipatory bail application under S. 438 CrPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":238572,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/05\/ker-hc-anticipatory-bail-can-be-allowed-in-offences-under-sc-st-poa-act-only-in-event-of-no-prima-facie-case-being-made-out-against-accused-appeal-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":211201,"position":0},"title":"Ker HC | Anticipatory Bail can be allowed in offences under SC\/ST (POA) Act only in event of no prima facie case being made out against accused; Appeal dismissed","author":"Editor","date":"November 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: V.G. Arun J., while dismissing the present appeal clarified on the applicability of Section 438 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 in an offence under SC\/ST (POA) Act. \u00a0Brief Facts Appellants are the accused of offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b) and 506(i) read with Section 34 of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":361894,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/ap-hc-ruling-on-anticipatory-bail-under-sc-st-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":211201,"position":1},"title":"Anticipatory bail maintainable only before High Court in absence of prima facie case under SC\/ST Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court","author":"Editor","date":"September 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The prosecution had raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the petition contending that the Section 14-A(2) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 puts an embargo on the High Court from hearing any anticipatory bail application.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"anticipatory bail under SCST Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/anticipatory-bail-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/anticipatory-bail-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/anticipatory-bail-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/anticipatory-bail-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282623,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/28\/section-438-crpc-bombay-high-court-abuses-given-on-phone-cannot-be-said-to-be-within-public-view-to-attract-the-ingredients-of-offence-punishable-under-atrocities-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":211201,"position":2},"title":"[Section 438 CrPC] Bombay High Court | Abuses given on phone cannot be said to be within public view to attract the ingredients of offence punishable under Atrocities Act","author":"Editor","date":"January 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"When a law-abiding citizen is adopting legal procedure and has gone to the Police Station to lodge a report, but his report has not been taken, then, such a person\/s deserves to be protected. When prima facie the offences are not attracting the provisions under the Atrocities Act, there was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":312399,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/29\/no-absolute-bar-on-grant-of-anticipatory-bail-in-cases-under-sc-and-st-act-orissa-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":211201,"position":3},"title":"Bar on grant of anticipatory bail in cases under SC and ST Act not absolute when alleged offences, prima facie, not made out: Orissa HC reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"January 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Orissa High Court granted anticipatory bail to a doctor for his apprehension of arrest in a case related to medical termination of pregnancy, where a premature baby girl was born.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"orissa high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":369629,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/12\/bar-of-anticipatory-bail-u-s-18-of-sc-st-act-not-applicable-on-application-u-s-482-of-bnss-all-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":211201,"position":4},"title":"Bar on grant of anticipatory bail under S. 18 SC\/ST Act not applicable when application filed under S. 482 of BNSS: Allahabad High Court","author":"Editor","date":"December 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the case at hand, two people met through jeevansathi.com and subsequently physical relations were formed on various occasions on the false pretext of marriage.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bar of anticipatory bail under SCST Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Bar-of-anticipatory-bail-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Bar-of-anticipatory-bail-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Bar-of-anticipatory-bail-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Bar-of-anticipatory-bail-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":329504,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/28\/supreme-court-grants-anticipatory-bail-journalist-shajan-skaria-in-sc-st-act-case-making-derogatory-remarks-against-mla-pv-sreenijin\/","url_meta":{"origin":211201,"position":5},"title":"Supreme Court grants anticipatory bail to journalist Shajan Skaria in SC\/ST Act case for making derogatory remarks against MLA PV Sreenijin","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAll insults or intimidations to a member of the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe will not amount to an offence under the Act, 1989 unless such insult or intimidation is on the ground that the victim belongs to Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Shajan Skaria","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Shajan-Skaria.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Shajan-Skaria.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Shajan-Skaria.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Shajan-Skaria.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211201","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211201"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211201\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211201"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211201"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211201"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}