{"id":211197,"date":"2019-03-02T13:00:39","date_gmt":"2019-03-02T07:30:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=211197"},"modified":"2019-03-04T11:31:02","modified_gmt":"2019-03-04T06:01:02","slug":"ker-hc-claim-filed-under-mv-act-withdrawn-after-interim-award-subsequent-proceedings-under-workmens-compensation-act-not-barred","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/ker-hc-claim-filed-under-mv-act-withdrawn-after-interim-award-subsequent-proceedings-under-workmens-compensation-act-not-barred\/","title":{"rendered":"Ker HC | Claim filed under MV Act withdrawn after interim award \u2013 subsequent proceedings under Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act not barred"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Kerala High Court:<\/strong> The Division Bench of K. Harilal and Annie John, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed by an insurance company against the order of Commissioner for Workmen\u2019s Compensation (WCC) directing it to pay a certain sum of money to the respondent herein.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Respondent herein had filed an application under Section 22 of the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act, 1923 seeking compensation for the death of one driver Xavier while driving a car owned by one Trissa, on collision with a lorry. WCC allowed the said application. Aggrieved thereby, the present appeal was filed by insurance company.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Appellant company challenged this award contending that the respondent had already been awarded compensation by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Therefore, she was estopped from filing the application under Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court noted that as per Section 167 of the MV Act, the aggrieved party can claim compensation either under the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act or under Chapter 10 of the MV Act. One cannot proceed under both the statutes for compensation. However, in the instant case, though the respondent received interim compensation under MV Act, she subsequently withdrew her case under MV Act and WCC deducted the amount awarded by MACT. Thus, at the time of passing the impugned award, there was no proceeding under the MV Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was opined that merely for the reason that earlier the claimants proceeded under the MV Act and later, withdrew the said proceedings and filed for compensation under the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act, it cannot be held that the subsequent claim was barred by Section 167 of the MV Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Thus, it was held that there was no illegality or impropriety in the impugned award granting compensation under the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act after deducting the interim award granted by MACT.[United India Insurance Company Limited v. Mary, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/VN90Krh5\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine Ker 8199<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 14-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of K. Harilal and Annie John, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed by an insurance company against <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34083,2728,19791,34082],"class_list":["post-211197","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-commissioner-for-workmens-compensation","tag-compensation","tag-motor-vehicles-act","tag-workmens-compensation-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Ker HC | Claim filed under MV Act withdrawn after interim award \u2013 subsequent proceedings under Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act not barred | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/ker-hc-claim-filed-under-mv-act-withdrawn-after-interim-award-subsequent-proceedings-under-workmens-compensation-act-not-barred\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ker HC | Claim filed under MV Act withdrawn after interim award \u2013 subsequent proceedings under Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act not barred\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of K. Harilal and Annie John, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed by an insurance company against\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/ker-hc-claim-filed-under-mv-act-withdrawn-after-interim-award-subsequent-proceedings-under-workmens-compensation-act-not-barred\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-02T07:30:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-04T06:01:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/ker-hc-claim-filed-under-mv-act-withdrawn-after-interim-award-subsequent-proceedings-under-workmens-compensation-act-not-barred\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/ker-hc-claim-filed-under-mv-act-withdrawn-after-interim-award-subsequent-proceedings-under-workmens-compensation-act-not-barred\/\",\"name\":\"Ker HC | Claim filed under MV Act withdrawn after interim award \u2013 subsequent proceedings under Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act not barred | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-02T07:30:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-04T06:01:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/ker-hc-claim-filed-under-mv-act-withdrawn-after-interim-award-subsequent-proceedings-under-workmens-compensation-act-not-barred\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/ker-hc-claim-filed-under-mv-act-withdrawn-after-interim-award-subsequent-proceedings-under-workmens-compensation-act-not-barred\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/ker-hc-claim-filed-under-mv-act-withdrawn-after-interim-award-subsequent-proceedings-under-workmens-compensation-act-not-barred\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ker HC | Claim filed under MV Act withdrawn after interim award \u2013 subsequent proceedings under Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act not barred\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ker HC | Claim filed under MV Act withdrawn after interim award \u2013 subsequent proceedings under Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act not barred | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/ker-hc-claim-filed-under-mv-act-withdrawn-after-interim-award-subsequent-proceedings-under-workmens-compensation-act-not-barred\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ker HC | Claim filed under MV Act withdrawn after interim award \u2013 subsequent proceedings under Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act not barred","og_description":"Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of K. Harilal and Annie John, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed by an insurance company against","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/ker-hc-claim-filed-under-mv-act-withdrawn-after-interim-award-subsequent-proceedings-under-workmens-compensation-act-not-barred\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-02T07:30:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-04T06:01:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/ker-hc-claim-filed-under-mv-act-withdrawn-after-interim-award-subsequent-proceedings-under-workmens-compensation-act-not-barred\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/ker-hc-claim-filed-under-mv-act-withdrawn-after-interim-award-subsequent-proceedings-under-workmens-compensation-act-not-barred\/","name":"Ker HC | Claim filed under MV Act withdrawn after interim award \u2013 subsequent proceedings under Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act not barred | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-03-02T07:30:39+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-04T06:01:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/ker-hc-claim-filed-under-mv-act-withdrawn-after-interim-award-subsequent-proceedings-under-workmens-compensation-act-not-barred\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/ker-hc-claim-filed-under-mv-act-withdrawn-after-interim-award-subsequent-proceedings-under-workmens-compensation-act-not-barred\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/ker-hc-claim-filed-under-mv-act-withdrawn-after-interim-award-subsequent-proceedings-under-workmens-compensation-act-not-barred\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ker HC | Claim filed under MV Act withdrawn after interim award \u2013 subsequent proceedings under Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act not barred"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":261060,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/chh-hc-limited-jurisdiction-has-been-given-to-the-high-court-confined-to-the-substantial-question-of-law-only\/","url_meta":{"origin":211197,"position":0},"title":"Chh HC | Limited jurisdiction has been given to the High Court confined to the substantial question of law only","author":"Editor","date":"February 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Anoop Kumar Dhand J. dismissed the appeal as it does not fulfill the requirement mandated under Section 30 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. Brief facts of the case are that the claimant-respondent filed a claim petition under the provisions of Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act, claiming compensation on account\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222788,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/03\/kar-hc-commissioner-for-workmens-compensation-committed-an-error-of-law-in-applying-provisions-of-workmens-compensation-act-a-repealed-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":211197,"position":1},"title":"Kar HC | Commissioner for Workmen\u2019s Compensation committed an error of law in applying provisions of &#8220;Workmen&#8217;s Compensation Act&#8221; &#8212; a repealed Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 3, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: The Division Bench of Alok Aradhe and P.G.M. Patil, JJ. while allowing the appeal set aside the award of the Commissioner as he committed an error of law in applying the provisions of the Act, which was already repealed. In the instant case, the appeal under Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":259567,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/06\/can-minor-who-succumbed-to-an-accident-during-course-of-employment-be-compensated-under-employees-compensation-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":211197,"position":2},"title":"Can \u2018minor\u2019 who succumbed to an accident during course of employment be compensated under Employees Compensation Act or Insurance Company will be absolved of its liability? Bom HC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Bharati Dangre, J., Whether the Insurance Company can be absolved of its liability to pay compensation under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923, if the employee who has succumbed to an accident which took place during the course of employment, is a minor? Appellants filed a claim based\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268480,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/bom-hc-%e2%94%82whether-the-compensation-granted-under-chapter-x-of-motor-vehicle-act-forfeits-the-right-of-the-employee-to-claim-the-compensation-under-s-3-of-the-employees-compensation-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":211197,"position":3},"title":"Bom  HC \u2502Whether the compensation granted under chapter X of Motor Vehicle Act forfeits the right of the employee to claim compensation under S. 3 of the Employees Compensation Act?","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: S.G. Mehare, J. allowed an appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner for Workmen\u2019s Compensation and Judge Labour Court dated July 30, 2001.\u00a0 Appellant was a driver with respondent 1 who owned a truck which was insured with respondent 2. He met with a vehicular accident\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218133,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/16\/utt-hc-comprehensive-policy-covers-liability-of-insurer-for-payment-of-compensation-in-cases-of-car-accidents-such-claims-are-not-barred-by-s-167-of-mv-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":211197,"position":4},"title":"Utt HC | \u2018Comprehensive policy\u2019 covers liability of insurer for payment of compensation in cases of car accidents; such claims are not barred by S. 167 of MV Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. remanded a matter pertaining to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and directed them to decide on the matter expeditiously.\u00a0 The appeal was filed as the appellant as she was aggrieved by the order passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The appellant\u2019s husband, Bhupesh\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":44611,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/22\/widow-of-the-deceased-employee-only-on-account-of-her-subsequent-remarriage-cannot-be-precluded-from-receiving-compensation-so-determined-by-the-commissioner\/","url_meta":{"origin":211197,"position":5},"title":"Widow of the deceased employee, only on account of her subsequent remarriage, cannot be precluded from receiving compensation so determined by the Commissioner","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 22, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court:\u00a0Deciding on an appeal wherein the issue arose as to whether in the absence of lodging of any claim, a widow of the deceased employee, only on account of her subsequent remarriage, is precluded from receiving compensation so determined by the Commissioner under Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act, 1923\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211197","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211197"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211197\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211197"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211197"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211197"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}