{"id":211195,"date":"2019-03-02T12:00:34","date_gmt":"2019-03-02T06:30:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=211195"},"modified":"2019-03-02T10:51:11","modified_gmt":"2019-03-02T05:21:11","slug":"pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material\/","title":{"rendered":"PMLA | Adjudicating Authority does not have jurisdiction to direct filing of fresh application on the basis of same material"},"content":{"rendered":"

Appellate Tribunal for Prevention of Money Laundering Act:<\/strong> The Bench of Manmohan Singh, J. and G.C. Mishra (Member) allowed an appeal filed against the order of Adjudicating Authority directing freezing of accounts.<\/p>\n

Respondent herein had filed an application under Section 17(4) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 for extending the debit freeze on 49 accounts which were involved in money laundering in order to locate proceed of crime for the purpose of further investigation. The said application was rejected holding that the same was beyond the scope of Sections 17(1-A) and 17(4) of PMLA.<\/p>\n

Section 17(1-A) of the Act states that \u201cwhere it is not practicable to seize such record or property, the authorized officer may make an order to freeze such property whereupon the property shall not be transferred or otherwise dealt with, except with the prior permission of the officer\u201d<\/em>. It is well settled that if the statute requires a thing to be done in a particular manner, it must be in that manner otherwise the action is vitiated. On realizing its mistake about freezing, the Adjudicating Authority directed respondent to file a fresh application, and in that application, it passed a fresh order directing freezing of accounts. The present appeal has been filed against this fresh order of the Adjudicating Authority under Section 26 of PMLA.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal opined that the Adjudicating Authority had exceeded its jurisdiction in directing the respondent to file a fresh application. Such jurisdiction was not within its domain as the previous application of respondent was decided on merits. \u00a0It was concluded that the second application filed by the respondent was not maintainable on the basis of the same material. In view thereof, the impugned order was held to be not sustainable in law and the same was set-aside.[Abhishek Paddar Haripoddar v. Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Patna, FPA-PMLA-2323\/PTN\/2018, decided on 01-02-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Appellate Tribunal for Prevention of Money Laundering Act: The Bench of Manmohan Singh, J. and G.C. Mishra (Member) allowed an appeal filed <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":209880,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[33289,34081,2554],"class_list":["post-211195","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-adjudicating-authority","tag-freezing-of-accounts","tag-Jurisdiction"],"yoast_head":"\nPMLA | Adjudicating Authority does not have jurisdiction to direct filing of fresh application on the basis of same material | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"PMLA | Adjudicating Authority does not have jurisdiction to direct filing of fresh application on the basis of same material\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Appellate Tribunal for Prevention of Money Laundering Act: The Bench of Manmohan Singh, J. and G.C. Mishra (Member) allowed an appeal filed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-02T06:30:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material\/\",\"name\":\"PMLA | Adjudicating Authority does not have jurisdiction to direct filing of fresh application on the basis of same material | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-02T06:30:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"PMLA | Adjudicating Authority does not have jurisdiction to direct filing of fresh application on the basis of same material\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"PMLA | Adjudicating Authority does not have jurisdiction to direct filing of fresh application on the basis of same material | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"PMLA | Adjudicating Authority does not have jurisdiction to direct filing of fresh application on the basis of same material","og_description":"Appellate Tribunal for Prevention of Money Laundering Act: The Bench of Manmohan Singh, J. and G.C. Mishra (Member) allowed an appeal filed","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-03-02T06:30:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material\/","name":"PMLA | Adjudicating Authority does not have jurisdiction to direct filing of fresh application on the basis of same material | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg","datePublished":"2019-03-02T06:30:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/pmla-adjudicating-authority-does-not-have-jurisdiction-to-direct-filing-of-fresh-application-on-the-basis-of-same-material\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"PMLA | Adjudicating Authority does not have jurisdiction to direct filing of fresh application on the basis of same material"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":243361,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/04\/explained-scope-of-eds-power-to-freeze-bank-accounts-under-prevention-of-money-laundering-act-2002\/","url_meta":{"origin":211195,"position":0},"title":"Explained: Scope of ED’s power to freeze bank accounts under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of SA Bobde, CJ and AS Bopanna* and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ has held that \u00a0under the Prevention of Money \u00adLaundering Act, 2002, though the Directorate of Enforcement is vested with sufficient power to freeze the accounts; such power is circumscribed by a procedure laid down\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209861,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/13\/pmla-prevention-of-money-laundering-act-a-special-act-with-stringent-provisions-must-be-interpreted-strictly-in-the-absence-of-ambiguity\/","url_meta":{"origin":211195,"position":1},"title":"PMLA | Prevention of Money Laundering Act: A special Act with stringent provisions \u2013 must be interpreted strictly in the absence of ambiguity","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 13, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal for Prevention of Money Laundering Act: The Bench of Manmohan Singh, J. (Chairman) and G.C. Mishra (Member) set aside Adjudicating Authority\u2019s order allowing retention of property seized from appellant. An Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) was filed against the appellant, for acting as a mediator and helping two\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216961,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/17\/pmla-appeal-challenging-a-show-cause-notice-passed-by-the-adjudicating-authority-maintainable-if-any-hardship-is-caused-to-a-concerned-party\/","url_meta":{"origin":211195,"position":2},"title":"PMLA | Appeal challenging a show-cause notice passed by Adjudicating Authority, maintainable if any hardship is caused to party concerned","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal for SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT Act: Justice Manmohan Singh (Chairman), dismissed an appeal filed by a company challenging a show-cause notice for retention of its property, on the ground that no hardship was caused to the appellant-company by the impugned notice. In the present case, FIR\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250902,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/10\/directorate-of-enforcement\/","url_meta":{"origin":211195,"position":3},"title":"The Real and Present Danger of Arbitrary Seizures by the Directorate of Enforcement","author":"Editor","date":"July 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Jai Anant Dehadrai* and Md. Tasnimul Hassan**","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214296,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/03\/pmla-appellate-tribunal-no-extension-of-time-for-investigation-when-time-period-mentioned-in-the-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":211195,"position":4},"title":"PMLA Appellate Tribunal |\u00a0 No extension of time for investigation when time period mentioned in the Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 3, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal for Prevention of Money Laundering: The Coram comprising of Manmohan Singh, J. (Chairperson) and G.C. Mishra (Member) allowed the appeal against the order under Section 26(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.\u00a0 The brief facts of the case are that the police report against G.S. Sawhney\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/pmla.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":375402,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/mp-hc-dismisses-plea-in-sknl-bank-fraud-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":211195,"position":5},"title":"Read Why Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed plea challenging ED search in SKNL bank fraud case","author":"Editor","date":"February 11, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The respondent stated the petition is premature since ED already filed proper applications about search, seizure, and property attachment. Therefore, the Court stated that petitioner can raise all objections, including legality, before the adjudicating authority under PMLA.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SKNL bank fraud case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/SKNL-bank-fraud-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/SKNL-bank-fraud-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/SKNL-bank-fraud-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/SKNL-bank-fraud-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211195","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211195"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211195\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/209880"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211195"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211195"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211195"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}