{"id":211070,"date":"2019-02-28T10:00:39","date_gmt":"2019-02-28T04:30:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=211070"},"modified":"2019-02-28T12:05:34","modified_gmt":"2019-02-28T06:35:34","slug":"ker-hc-return-of-gold-ornaments-of-wife-allowed-despite-absence-of-specific-details-thereto-in-view-of-husbands-contradictory-statements","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/28\/ker-hc-return-of-gold-ornaments-of-wife-allowed-despite-absence-of-specific-details-thereto-in-view-of-husbands-contradictory-statements\/","title":{"rendered":"Ker HC | Return of gold ornaments of wife allowed despite absence of specific details thereto, in view of husband\u2019s contradictory statements"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court: <\/strong>The Division Bench of A.M. Shaffique and A.M.Babu, JJ. dismissed an appeal against the judgment of Family Court directing the husband to pay an amount of Rs 2,25,000 to his wife.<\/p>\n

In the present case, the appellant and respondent were a married couple. The grievance of the respondent-wife was that at the time of her marriage she was given 25 sovereigns of gold ornaments which was appropriated by the appellant for his business purpose. But, appellant-husband denied the allegation of having appropriated any of her gold ornaments. The Family Court decreed return of respondent’s ornaments. Aggrieved thereby, the instant appeal was filed.<\/p>\n

The appellant submitted that being from a poor family, respondent did not have the capacity to purchase any gold ornaments. Therefore his family had purchased the ornaments from a gold merchant. But the same was returned to merchant later since they did not have enough money to pay for it. However, later he vacillated from his statement and contended that the ornaments were imitation gold. Respondent argued that if the ornaments were imitation gold, then, in that case, the appellant\u2019s contention that the ornaments were returned to the seller, itself was wrong.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that though specific details regarding appropriation of gold ornaments had not been given by the respondent-wife; but she had specifically stated in her petition that her gold ornaments were taken and invested for appellant\u2019s business purpose. It was opined that as far as a wife is concerned when her husband demands gold ornaments for his business it may not be possible for her to refuse. Therefore, there was every reason to believe the version of the respondent in view of contradictory contentions taken by appellant. In view thereof, no infirmity was found in the impugned order.[Muraleedharan Pillai v. Ambili Chellappan, 2019 SCC OnLine Ker 688<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 22-02-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of A.M. Shaffique and A.M.Babu, JJ. dismissed an appeal against the judgment of Family Court directing <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34023,2864,34022,2641,2642],"class_list":["post-211070","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appropriation","tag-family_court","tag-gold-ornaments","tag-husband","tag-wife"],"yoast_head":"\nKer HC | Return of gold ornaments of wife allowed despite absence of specific details thereto, in view of husband\u2019s contradictory statements | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/28\/ker-hc-return-of-gold-ornaments-of-wife-allowed-despite-absence-of-specific-details-thereto-in-view-of-husbands-contradictory-statements\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ker HC | Return of gold ornaments of wife allowed despite absence of specific details thereto, in view of husband\u2019s contradictory statements\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of A.M. Shaffique and A.M.Babu, JJ. dismissed an appeal against the judgment of Family Court directing\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/28\/ker-hc-return-of-gold-ornaments-of-wife-allowed-despite-absence-of-specific-details-thereto-in-view-of-husbands-contradictory-statements\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-02-28T04:30:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-28T06:35:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/28\/ker-hc-return-of-gold-ornaments-of-wife-allowed-despite-absence-of-specific-details-thereto-in-view-of-husbands-contradictory-statements\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/28\/ker-hc-return-of-gold-ornaments-of-wife-allowed-despite-absence-of-specific-details-thereto-in-view-of-husbands-contradictory-statements\/\",\"name\":\"Ker HC | Return of gold ornaments of wife allowed despite absence of specific details thereto, in view of husband\u2019s contradictory statements | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-28T04:30:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-28T06:35:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/28\/ker-hc-return-of-gold-ornaments-of-wife-allowed-despite-absence-of-specific-details-thereto-in-view-of-husbands-contradictory-statements\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/28\/ker-hc-return-of-gold-ornaments-of-wife-allowed-despite-absence-of-specific-details-thereto-in-view-of-husbands-contradictory-statements\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/28\/ker-hc-return-of-gold-ornaments-of-wife-allowed-despite-absence-of-specific-details-thereto-in-view-of-husbands-contradictory-statements\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ker HC | Return of gold ornaments of wife allowed despite absence of specific details thereto, in view of husband\u2019s contradictory statements\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ker HC | Return of gold ornaments of wife allowed despite absence of specific details thereto, in view of husband\u2019s contradictory statements | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/28\/ker-hc-return-of-gold-ornaments-of-wife-allowed-despite-absence-of-specific-details-thereto-in-view-of-husbands-contradictory-statements\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ker HC | Return of gold ornaments of wife allowed despite absence of specific details thereto, in view of husband\u2019s contradictory statements","og_description":"Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of A.M. Shaffique and A.M.Babu, JJ. dismissed an appeal against the judgment of Family Court directing","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/28\/ker-hc-return-of-gold-ornaments-of-wife-allowed-despite-absence-of-specific-details-thereto-in-view-of-husbands-contradictory-statements\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-02-28T04:30:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-28T06:35:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/28\/ker-hc-return-of-gold-ornaments-of-wife-allowed-despite-absence-of-specific-details-thereto-in-view-of-husbands-contradictory-statements\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/28\/ker-hc-return-of-gold-ornaments-of-wife-allowed-despite-absence-of-specific-details-thereto-in-view-of-husbands-contradictory-statements\/","name":"Ker HC | Return of gold ornaments of wife allowed despite absence of specific details thereto, in view of husband\u2019s contradictory statements | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-02-28T04:30:39+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-28T06:35:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/28\/ker-hc-return-of-gold-ornaments-of-wife-allowed-despite-absence-of-specific-details-thereto-in-view-of-husbands-contradictory-statements\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/28\/ker-hc-return-of-gold-ornaments-of-wife-allowed-despite-absence-of-specific-details-thereto-in-view-of-husbands-contradictory-statements\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/28\/ker-hc-return-of-gold-ornaments-of-wife-allowed-despite-absence-of-specific-details-thereto-in-view-of-husbands-contradictory-statements\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ker HC | Return of gold ornaments of wife allowed despite absence of specific details thereto, in view of husband\u2019s contradictory statements"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":346999,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/kerala-hc-stridhan-gold-ornaments-legal-proof\/","url_meta":{"origin":211070,"position":0},"title":"Gold Ornaments given to bride constitute ‘stridhan’; Rigid legal proof not required in claims for its return: Kerala High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe gold given to a bride at the time of marriage is often kept by the husband or his family under the guise of safekeeping of family customs. The woman rarely gets a written record or receipt for such transfers and the woman's access to her own ornaments can be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267318,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/24\/would-pledge-of-ornaments-kept-for-marriage-of-a-daughter-and-use-for-self-without-knowledge-of-husband-would-amount-to-cruelty-chhattisgarh-high-court-law-legal-news-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":211070,"position":1},"title":"Would pledge of ornaments kept for marriage of a daughter and use for self without knowledge of husband would amount to cruelty? Chh HC decodes","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: In a matter pertaining to mental cruelty, the Division Bench of Goutam Bhaduri and N.K. Chandravanshi, JJ., expressed that, if a spouse by her own conduct, without caring about the future of the daughter, parts with ornaments which were meant for the marriage, it will be within\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":268753,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/21\/ker-hc-whether-husband-going-abroad-for-employment-amount-to-desertion-and-cruelty-hc-decides\/","url_meta":{"origin":211070,"position":2},"title":"Kerala HC | Whether husband going abroad for employment amount to desertion and cruelty? HC decides","author":"Editor","date":"June 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: The Division Bench comprising A. Muhamed Mustaque and Sophy Thomas, JJ., held that cruelty has to be assessed from the perspective of a spouse, i.e., how he\/she would perceive the conduct of the other spouse. Reversing the impugned judgment of the Family Court, the Court held, \u201cMere\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":235048,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/29\/utt-hc-mental-cruelty-is-no-less-than-physical-cruelty-wife-causing-mental-cruelty-to-husband-valid-ground-for-dissolution-of-marriage-court-dismisses-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":211070,"position":3},"title":"Utt HC | Mental cruelty is no less than physical cruelty, wife causing mental cruelty to husband valid ground for dissolution of marriage; Court dismisses appeal","author":"Editor","date":"August 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ravi Malimath and Narayan Singh Dhanik, JJ., dismissed and appeal which was filed aggrieved by the judgment and order of the Principal Judge, Family Court whereby the suit of the plaintiff-husband (respondent herein) for dissolution of marriage was decreed. The marriage of Rajesh\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":353255,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/","url_meta":{"origin":211070,"position":4},"title":"No Strict proof needed for married woman claiming return of gold from In-Laws: Kerala High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA newly wedded woman would not be in a position to demand receipts or independent witnesses while handing over the jewellery to the husband or in-laws.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"married woman’s gold return claim","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/married-woman8217s-gold-return-claim.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/married-woman8217s-gold-return-claim.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/married-woman8217s-gold-return-claim.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/married-woman8217s-gold-return-claim.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257045,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/12\/if-a-wife-is-able-to-maintain-herself-and-continue-with-the-same-lifestyle-as-she-was-in-prior-to-divorce-can-she-still-be-granted-maintenance\/","url_meta":{"origin":211070,"position":5},"title":"If a wife is able to maintain herself and continue with same lifestyle as she was accustomed to in matrimonial home, can she still be granted maintenance? Court deciphers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bangalore: Krishnamurthy R. Padasalgi, LV Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge upheld the order of the trial court which had refused to grant maintenance to the petitioner-wife. Petitioner wife preferred the present appeal on being aggrieved by the orders passed for an application filed under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/City-Civil-Court-Bengaluru.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/City-Civil-Court-Bengaluru.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/City-Civil-Court-Bengaluru.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/City-Civil-Court-Bengaluru.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/City-Civil-Court-Bengaluru.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211070","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211070"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211070\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211070"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211070"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211070"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}