{"id":210959,"date":"2019-02-26T12:09:09","date_gmt":"2019-02-26T06:39:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=210959"},"modified":"2019-03-04T12:37:58","modified_gmt":"2019-03-04T07:07:58","slug":"breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/","title":{"rendered":"Should Ayodhya dispute be decided by mediation? SC to decide on March 6 [Full Report]"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court<\/strong>: The 5-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and\u00a0SA Bobde, Dr. DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ said that\u00a0it will pass order on March 6, 2019 on whether the case may be sent for court-monitored mediation to save time.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">At the outset of the hearing, CJI said that the Court will start hearing only when all the contesting parties tell it clearly whether official translated copies of records done by State of Uttar Pradesh is acceptable to all as it did not want any dispute over it in the midst of hearing. The State of Uttar Pradesh has submitted translation of the oral evidence in the case which runs into about 13000 pages.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">CJI Gogoi said:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cWe are not going to waste our time and of this Court if disputes are going to be raised regarding translation of the documents.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court, hence, directed:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cWe direct the parties to satisfy themselves with regard to the accuracy, correctness, relevance, etc. of the translation filed in the Registry by the State of Uttar Pradesh as well as the translated copies of the Exhibits made available by the parties and point out their respective agreements\/objections stating precisely the part of the translations on which objections\/disagreements are being raised. Once the said process is completed, which we expect the parties to do within eight weeks from today, further orders will follow so that hearing of the cases can begin in the right earnest.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court, also suggested that during this 8 weeks\u2019 time a Court appointed and Court monitored mediation with utmost confidentiality could be initiated to bring a permanent solution to the issues raised in the cases. It, however, made clear that:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cthe mediation suggested is only to effectively utilize the time of eight weeks that would be taken to make the cases ready for hearing.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bobde, J said:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cWe may decide a property dispute but we are thinking more about healing relationships.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The bench, however, refrained from passing any order on the said suggestion for now and said that it will pass order on March 6, 2019 on the issue whether Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute be referred to Court appointed mediator.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[M. Siddiq v. Mahant Suresh Das, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/g1WSMt6B\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine SC 272<\/b><\/a>, order dated 26.02.2019]<\/p>\n<h6 style=\"text-align: justify;\">(With inputs from The Leaflet)<\/h6>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: The 5-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and\u00a0SA Bobde, Dr. DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ said that\u00a0it <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[16201,3033,20801,31077],"class_list":["post-210959","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-ayodhya","tag-Babri_Masjid","tag-ram-janmabhoomi","tag-ram-mandir-babri-masjid"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Should Ayodhya dispute be decided by mediation? SC to decide on March 6 [Full Report] | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Should Ayodhya dispute be decided by mediation? SC to decide on March 6 [Full Report]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: The 5-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and\u00a0SA Bobde, Dr. DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ said that\u00a0it\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-02-26T06:39:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-04T07:07:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/\",\"name\":\"Should Ayodhya dispute be decided by mediation? SC to decide on March 6 [Full Report] | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-26T06:39:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-04T07:07:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Should Ayodhya dispute be decided by mediation? SC to decide on March 6 [Full Report]\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Should Ayodhya dispute be decided by mediation? SC to decide on March 6 [Full Report] | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Should Ayodhya dispute be decided by mediation? SC to decide on March 6 [Full Report]","og_description":"Supreme Court: The 5-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and\u00a0SA Bobde, Dr. DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ said that\u00a0it","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-02-26T06:39:09+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-04T07:07:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/","name":"Should Ayodhya dispute be decided by mediation? SC to decide on March 6 [Full Report] | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2019-02-26T06:39:09+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-04T07:07:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/breaking-should-ayodhya-dispute-be-decided-by-mediation-sc-to-decide-on-march\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Should Ayodhya dispute be decided by mediation? SC to decide on March 6 [Full Report]"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":220900,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/16\/ayodhya-hearing-this-matter-will-be-over-by-5pm-today-enough-is-enough-cji\/","url_meta":{"origin":210959,"position":0},"title":"Ayodhya Hearing| This matter will be over by 5pm today; enough is enough: CJI","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: On the 40th day of the Ayodhya Title dispute hearing, Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi said that the daily hearing on the Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid land dispute will end by 5 pm today. \"By 5 pm this matter is going to be over. Enough is enough,\" Justice\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221922,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/08\/ayodhya-verdict-cji-meets-up-chief-secretary-dgp-to-take-stock-of-law-and-order-situation-in-the-state\/","url_meta":{"origin":210959,"position":1},"title":"Ayodhya verdict| CJI meets UP Chief Secretary, DGP to take stock of law and order situation in the State","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Ahead of the impending verdict in the Ayodhya case, Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi held a meeting on Friday with Uttar Pradesh Chief Secretary Rajendra Kumar Tiwari and state DGP\u00a0Om Prakash Singh to take stock of law and order situation in the state, sources said. The officials\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217646,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/02\/ayodhya-dispute-sc-to-hold-day-to-day-hearing-from-aug-6-after-mediation-committee-fails\/","url_meta":{"origin":210959,"position":2},"title":"Ayodhya Dispute: SC to hold day-to-day hearing from Aug 6 after Mediation Committee &#8216;fails&#8217;","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: After the the Justice F.M. Ibrahim Kalifulla led Mediation Committee submitted the mediation report before the \u00a05-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and SA Bobde, Dr. DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ, the Court observed that the mediation panel has failed to achieve any final settlement\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218681,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/ayodhya-hearing-there-was-a-temple-in-the-inner-courtyard-of-the-disputed-site-nirmohi-akhara\/","url_meta":{"origin":210959,"position":3},"title":"Ayodhya Hearing| There was a temple in the inner courtyard of the disputed site: Nirmohi Akhara","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Senior counsel appearing for Nirmohi Akhara, one of the parties in the Ayodhya title dispute case, told the Supreme Court that there was a temple in the inner courtyard of the disputed site. Senior Advocate S K Jain told a bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220035,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/ayodhya-hearing-wont-hear-the-matter-for-even-a-single-extra-day-after-october-18-sc-to-all-counsels\/","url_meta":{"origin":210959,"position":4},"title":"Ayodhya hearing| Won&#8217;t hear the matter for even a single extra day after October 18: SC to all counsels","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Indicating that judgment in Ayodhya dispute case is likely to be delivered before CJI Ranjan Gogoi's retirement in November, the 5-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and SA Bobde, Dr. DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ has said that it cannot grant even a single extra\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217876,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/09\/ayodhya-hearing-day-4-sr-adv-rajeev-dhavan-calls-the-decision-to-hear-the-case-5-days-in-a-week-is-inhuman\/","url_meta":{"origin":210959,"position":5},"title":"Ayodhya hearing| SC rejects Sr Adv Rajeev Dhavan&#8217;s plea against 5-days a week hearing","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court:\u00a0 On the fourth day of hearing in the Ayodhya title dispute case, the counsel appearing for one of the Muslim parties, raised objection over the Supreme Court's decision to hear the appeals on five days in a week rather than three. The Court, however, refused\u00a0 to conduct a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210959","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=210959"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210959\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=210959"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=210959"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=210959"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}