{"id":210866,"date":"2019-02-25T17:00:52","date_gmt":"2019-02-25T11:30:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=210866"},"modified":"2019-02-27T17:35:51","modified_gmt":"2019-02-27T12:05:51","slug":"del-hc-statement-recorded-immediately-after-incident-is-more-credible-then-the-one-recorded-after-5-months-discharge-of-accused-upheld","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/25\/del-hc-statement-recorded-immediately-after-incident-is-more-credible-then-the-one-recorded-after-5-months-discharge-of-accused-upheld\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | Statement recorded immediately after incident is more credible than the one recorded after 5 months; discharge of accused upheld"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:<\/strong>\u00a0Sanjeev Sachdeva, J., upheld the order of the trial court discharging the respondent who was accused of committing offences punishable under Sections 304 and 323 IPC.<\/p>\n

An FIR was lodged alleging that there was a dispute between families of the complainant and the accused. Consequent to an altercation, his father was assaulted by the accused persons. It was alleged that accused persons\u00a0knew that his father was suffering from a heart ailment and had undergone angioplasty. Knowing the same, the accused persons\u00a0assaulted the complainant’s father which resulted in his death. Immediately after the incident, the complainant along with his family members gave a vivid description and named all persons alleged to have been involved and their names were mentioned in the FIR. It is pertinent to note that the name of the present respondent was not mentioned in the FIR. It was mentioned in a supplementary statement given by the complainant under Section 161 CrPC after a gap of 5 months. Noticing that there was a substantial improvement in complainant’s case, the trial court discharged the respondent as stated above. Aggrieved thereby, the State filed the present revision petition.<\/p>\n

Hirein Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor appeared for the petitioner State. While the respondent accused was represented by Neeraj Anand, Advocate.<\/p>\n

The High Court found no merit in the petition. It observed,\u00a0“A statement which is recorded immediately after the incident has to be given greater credence as compared to a statement which is recorded after five months. The trial court has rightly observed in the impugned order that the addition of the name of the respondent appears to be an afterthought.”\u00a0<\/strong>It was also noted as undisputed that during the interregnum of 5 months between the date of the incident and the supplementary statement, no incriminating material was found against the respondent. In the totality of the facts, the Court found no infirmity in trial court’s order discharging the respondent. The petition was thus dismissed. [State (NCT of Delhi) v. Nitin, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 7239<\/b><\/a>, decided on 21-02-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0Sanjeev Sachdeva, J., upheld the order of the trial court discharging the respondent who was accused of committing offences punishable <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[24694,33983,33984,2599],"class_list":["post-210866","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-altercation","tag-discharge-of-accused","tag-incriminating-material","tag-statement"],"yoast_head":"\nDel HC | Statement recorded immediately after incident is more credible than the one recorded after 5 months; discharge of accused upheld | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/25\/del-hc-statement-recorded-immediately-after-incident-is-more-credible-then-the-one-recorded-after-5-months-discharge-of-accused-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | Statement recorded immediately after incident is more credible than the one recorded after 5 months; discharge of accused upheld\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Sanjeev Sachdeva, J., upheld the order of the trial court discharging the respondent who was accused of committing offences punishable\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/25\/del-hc-statement-recorded-immediately-after-incident-is-more-credible-then-the-one-recorded-after-5-months-discharge-of-accused-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-02-25T11:30:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-27T12:05:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/25\/del-hc-statement-recorded-immediately-after-incident-is-more-credible-then-the-one-recorded-after-5-months-discharge-of-accused-upheld\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/25\/del-hc-statement-recorded-immediately-after-incident-is-more-credible-then-the-one-recorded-after-5-months-discharge-of-accused-upheld\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | Statement recorded immediately after incident is more credible than the one recorded after 5 months; discharge of accused upheld | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-25T11:30:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-27T12:05:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/25\/del-hc-statement-recorded-immediately-after-incident-is-more-credible-then-the-one-recorded-after-5-months-discharge-of-accused-upheld\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/25\/del-hc-statement-recorded-immediately-after-incident-is-more-credible-then-the-one-recorded-after-5-months-discharge-of-accused-upheld\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/25\/del-hc-statement-recorded-immediately-after-incident-is-more-credible-then-the-one-recorded-after-5-months-discharge-of-accused-upheld\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | Statement recorded immediately after incident is more credible than the one recorded after 5 months; discharge of accused upheld\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | Statement recorded immediately after incident is more credible than the one recorded after 5 months; discharge of accused upheld | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/25\/del-hc-statement-recorded-immediately-after-incident-is-more-credible-then-the-one-recorded-after-5-months-discharge-of-accused-upheld\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | Statement recorded immediately after incident is more credible than the one recorded after 5 months; discharge of accused upheld","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Sanjeev Sachdeva, J., upheld the order of the trial court discharging the respondent who was accused of committing offences punishable","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/25\/del-hc-statement-recorded-immediately-after-incident-is-more-credible-then-the-one-recorded-after-5-months-discharge-of-accused-upheld\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-02-25T11:30:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-27T12:05:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/25\/del-hc-statement-recorded-immediately-after-incident-is-more-credible-then-the-one-recorded-after-5-months-discharge-of-accused-upheld\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/25\/del-hc-statement-recorded-immediately-after-incident-is-more-credible-then-the-one-recorded-after-5-months-discharge-of-accused-upheld\/","name":"Del HC | Statement recorded immediately after incident is more credible than the one recorded after 5 months; discharge of accused upheld | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-02-25T11:30:52+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-27T12:05:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/25\/del-hc-statement-recorded-immediately-after-incident-is-more-credible-then-the-one-recorded-after-5-months-discharge-of-accused-upheld\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/25\/del-hc-statement-recorded-immediately-after-incident-is-more-credible-then-the-one-recorded-after-5-months-discharge-of-accused-upheld\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/25\/del-hc-statement-recorded-immediately-after-incident-is-more-credible-then-the-one-recorded-after-5-months-discharge-of-accused-upheld\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | Statement recorded immediately after incident is more credible than the one recorded after 5 months; discharge of accused upheld"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":216738,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/11\/jha-hc-special-leave-to-file-acquittal-appeal-cannot-be-granted-where-there-is-no-perversity-of-facts-and-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":210866,"position":0},"title":"Jha HC | Special leave to file acquittal appeal cannot be granted where there is no perversity of facts and law","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. disposed of an interlocutory application filed under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for special leave to file the acquittal appeal. Appellant had filed an acquittal appeal which challenged the acquittal of the accused persons in a complaint case by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":301343,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/delhi-high-court-sets-aside-discharge-order-presumption-gender-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":210866,"position":1},"title":"[Gender Neutrality] Delhi High Court sets aside order discharging female accused persons without any reasonable basis","author":"Arunima","date":"September 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Writing a judicial order in a careless fashion and making presumptions based on gender does not reflect well on the judicial philosophy of treating all genders equally. Any presumption based on gender has no place within our justice delivery system unless provided by law.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278063,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/delhi-high-court-statement-made-under-sec-164-crpc-disclosing-commission-of-rape-is-sufficient-to-frame-charges-under-sec-376-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":210866,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court | Statement made under Sec 164 CrPC disclosing commission of rape is sufficient to frame charges under Sec 376 IPC","author":"Editor","date":"November 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case where revision petition was filed against the order passed by the Trial Court by which accused persons were discharged under Section 376 of Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the Single Judge Bench of Swarana Kanta Sharma, J. held that an accused should not\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":237813,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/21\/chh-hc-statements-of-police-officers-cannot-be-discarded-or-looked-with-suspicion-merely-because-they-are-involved-in-investigation-statements-having-a-ring-of-truth-can-be-relied-upon\/","url_meta":{"origin":210866,"position":3},"title":"Chh HC | Statements of police officers cannot be discarded or looked with suspicion merely because they are involved in investigation, statements having a ring of truth can be relied upon","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Gautam Chourdiya, J., upheld the decision of the trial court in a matter with regard to Section 379 Penal Code, 1860. The present appeal was filed under Section 374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 challenging the legality, validity and propriety of the Judgment passed by the Additional\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":324704,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/19\/can-bail-cancelled-by-same-court-which-granted-it\/","url_meta":{"origin":210866,"position":4},"title":"Can Bail be cancelled by the same Court which granted it in the first place? SC answers","author":"Editor","date":"June 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cBail once granted, ought not to be cancelled in a mechanical manner, however, an unreasoned or perverse order of bail is open to interference by the superior Court.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Can Bail be cancelled by Court granting it","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Can-Bail-be-cancelled-by-Court-granting-it.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Can-Bail-be-cancelled-by-Court-granting-it.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Can-Bail-be-cancelled-by-Court-granting-it.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Can-Bail-be-cancelled-by-Court-granting-it.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196710,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/06\/finding-of-acquittal-is-not-to-be-disturbed-if-there-are-two-views-possible-arising-out-of-the-same-facts\/","url_meta":{"origin":210866,"position":5},"title":"Finding of acquittal is not to be disturbed if there are two views possible arising out of the same facts","author":"Saba","date":"June 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of M.M. Shantanagoudar, J., delivering a judgment for himself and L. Nageswara Rao, J., disposed of a criminal appeal by modifying the conviction of the appellant by setting aside his conviction under Section 302 IPC while upholding the conviction under Section 326. The Appellant (Accused\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210866","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=210866"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210866\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=210866"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=210866"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=210866"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}