{"id":210607,"date":"2019-02-22T17:30:06","date_gmt":"2019-02-22T12:00:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=210607"},"modified":"2019-02-22T16:25:13","modified_gmt":"2019-02-22T10:55:13","slug":"sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected\/","title":{"rendered":"SAT | Appellant failed to produce any documents to show that he had resigned as director; application at a belated stage rejected\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

Securities Appellate Tribunal: <\/b>The Bench of <\/b>Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer and Dr C.K.G. Nair, Member rejected an application filed at a later stage wherein the applicant had failed to provide documents so as to prove that he had resigned as a director from two other companies.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The facts of the case are that the applicant had prayed for rectification of the order passed in 2004 by Securities Appellate Tribunal. By the rectification application, the applicant sought that an error had crept in the order which needed rectification. It was stated that the appellant was a director of various companies whereas the applicant urged that he was the director of only one company and not in the other two companies, and, therefore, this error which was apparent on the face of the record needed to be rectified.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The Tribunal found out that the Securities and Exchange Board of India had initiated proceedings under Section 11C(2) of the Act which required the appellant to produce the books, registers and other documents and records relating to the company. In this proceeding, the appellant failed to produce any documents to show that he had resigned as director or was never appointed as a director of the two other companies. The Tribunal held that at a belated stage, it was not open to the applicant to file a rectification application which amounted to reviewing the order of 2004. [Anil D. Doshi v. SEBI, Misc. Application No. 253 of 2018, Order dated 19-02-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Securities Appellate Tribunal: The Bench of Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer and Dr C.K.G. Nair, Member rejected an application filed at a later <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":209781,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[32228,33972,2563,33973],"class_list":["post-210607","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-director","tag-resign","tag-SEBI","tag-section-11c2"],"yoast_head":"\nSAT | Appellant failed to produce any documents to show that he had resigned as director; application at a belated stage rejected\u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SAT | Appellant failed to produce any documents to show that he had resigned as director; application at a belated stage rejected\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Securities Appellate Tribunal: The Bench of Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer and Dr C.K.G. Nair, Member rejected an application filed at a later\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-02-22T12:00:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected\/\",\"name\":\"SAT | Appellant failed to produce any documents to show that he had resigned as director; application at a belated stage rejected\u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-22T12:00:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SAT | Appellant failed to produce any documents to show that he had resigned as director; application at a belated stage rejected\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SAT | Appellant failed to produce any documents to show that he had resigned as director; application at a belated stage rejected\u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SAT | Appellant failed to produce any documents to show that he had resigned as director; application at a belated stage rejected\u00a0","og_description":"Securities Appellate Tribunal: The Bench of Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer and Dr C.K.G. Nair, Member rejected an application filed at a later","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-02-22T12:00:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected\/","name":"SAT | Appellant failed to produce any documents to show that he had resigned as director; application at a belated stage rejected\u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","datePublished":"2019-02-22T12:00:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/sat-appellant-failed-to-produce-any-documents-to-show-that-he-had-resigned-as-director-application-at-a-belated-stage-rejected\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SAT | Appellant failed to produce any documents to show that he had resigned as director; application at a belated stage rejected\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":300573,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/","url_meta":{"origin":210607,"position":0},"title":"NCLAT dismisses appeal due to delayed defect rectification and insufficient justification for delay","author":"Ritu","date":"September 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn application for condonation of delay in refiling of appeal, the applicant\/appellant has to give sufficient reason for not re-filing the appeal within the time prescribed.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372147,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/09\/valid-share-certificate-cannot-be-issued-under-s-59-companies-act-2013-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":210607,"position":1},"title":"Valid Share Certificate cannot be issued under Section 59 of Companies Act, 2013: NCLAT","author":"Shikha","date":"January 9, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe pre-condition for invoking Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 is that the Applicant must already be a valid holder of a share certificate prior to invoking the provision.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"share certificate under Section 59 Companies Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/share-certificate-under-Section-59-Companies-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/share-certificate-under-Section-59-Companies-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/share-certificate-under-Section-59-Companies-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/share-certificate-under-Section-59-Companies-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218651,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/bom-hc-director-who-resigned-before-issuing-of-cheques-held-not-liable-under-s-138-r-w-s-141-of-ni-act-for-dishonour-thereof\/","url_meta":{"origin":210607,"position":2},"title":"Bom HC | Director who resigned before issuing of cheques held not liable under S. 138 r\/w S. 141 of NI Act for dishonour thereof","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0S.S. Shinde, J. allowed a criminal application filed against the order of the Magistrate whereby he rejected the application filed by the applicant for recalling the issuance of process under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, against him. The applicant was one of the accused in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224562,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/27\/nclat-nclts-order-directing-liquidation-of-corporate-debtor-upheld-where-resolution-applicant-was-a-related-party-and-thus-not-eligible-under-s-29-a-ibc\/","url_meta":{"origin":210607,"position":3},"title":"NCLAT | NCLT’s order directing liquidation of corporate debtor upheld where resolution applicant was a ‘related party’ and thus not eligible under S. 29-A IBC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 27, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):\u00a0A Bench of Justice Venugopal M., Member (Judicial) and Balvider Singh and Ashok Kumar Mishra, Members (Technical) dismissed an appeal filed against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal. Chandigarh, whereby the resolution plan submitted by the appellant was rejected and liquidation of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237751,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/nclat-if-objections-raised-in-regard-to-scheme-under-s-230-of-companies-act-2013-are-procedural-in-nature-can-they-be-overruled-tribunal-expounds\/","url_meta":{"origin":210607,"position":4},"title":"NCLAT | If objections raised in regard to “Scheme” under S. 230 of Companies Act, 2013 are procedural in nature, can they be overruled? Tribunal expounds","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):\u00a0A Division Bench of Justice Jarat Kumar Jain (Judicial Member) and Balvinder Singh (Technical Member) while addressing the present appeal observed that, Scheme under Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013 cannot be used as method of rectification of the actions already taken. Appellant preferred\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222103,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/cestat-an-arbitrary-show-cause-notice-which-is-held-to-be-correct-in-principle-cannot-become-a-ground-to-re-open-a-case-under-guise-of-rectification-of-mistake\/","url_meta":{"origin":210607,"position":5},"title":"CESTAT | An arbitrary show cause notice which is held to be correct in principle cannot become a ground to re-open a case under guise of rectification of mistake","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Custom, Excise and Service Tax Appellant Tribunal (CESTAT): A Division Bench of Rachna Gupta (Judicial Member) and C.L. Mahar (Technical Member) dismissed a rectification appeal filed by the applicant. The applicant had submitted that the Tribunal in the impugned order had committed an error by not dealing with the following\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210607","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=210607"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210607\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/209781"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=210607"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=210607"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=210607"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}