{"id":210278,"date":"2019-02-19T09:00:15","date_gmt":"2019-02-19T03:30:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=210278"},"modified":"2019-03-07T14:51:05","modified_gmt":"2019-03-07T09:21:05","slug":"nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/","title":{"rendered":"NCLAT | Shareholder of company has locus standi to file petition under S. 252(3) of Companies Act for revival of the company"},"content":{"rendered":"

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): <\/strong>The Bench of Justice A.I.S Cheema, Member (Judicial) and Balvinder Singh, Member (Technical) observed that a shareholder of a company is entitled to file a petition for the revival of the company.<\/p>\n

The name of one\u00a0“Venku Hospitals (P)Ltd.” was struck off from the Register of Companies in 2005 for non-filing of annual accounts and returns w.e.f. the Financial Year ending 2000-2001. A petition was filed before the National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai for the restoration of the company’s name in the Register under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013. However, the petition was dismissed by NCLT on the ground, inter alia, that Appellant 2 (Director of Venku Hospitals) had no locus standi to file the same. Aggrieved thereby, the present appeal was filed.<\/p>\n

Anandh K., Advocate for the appellants made extensive arguments assailing the order of the Registrar of Companies, Chennai and the subsequent order of NCLT. Per Contra, Registrar of Companies supported its order in the reply filed by it. Sanjiv Kumar Mohanty, Advocate appeared as Amicus Curiae.<\/p>\n

At the outset, the Appellate Tribunal observed that Appellant 2 was also a shareholder of Venku Hospitals and as per Section 252(3), he was entitled to file the petition for the revival of the company. However, on perusing facts of the case, it was held that no relief could be granted to the appellants. It was noted that all the documents filed by Venku Hospitals to support their case were old and irrelevant. Thus, the Appellate Tribunal did not find any occasion to interfere with the impugned order and hence, the appeal was dismissed. [Venku Hospitals (P) Ltd. v. Registrar of Companies, 2019 SCC OnLine NCLAT 7<\/b><\/a>, dated 18-02-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Bench of Justice A.I.S Cheema, Member (Judicial) and Balvinder Singh, Member (Technical) observed that a <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":153604,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[14781,33866,33865,12871],"class_list":["post-210278","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-locus-standi","tag-registrars-of-companies","tag-revival-of-company","tag-shareholder"],"yoast_head":"\nNCLAT | Shareholder of company has locus standi to file petition under S. 252(3) of Companies Act for revival of the company | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NCLAT | Shareholder of company has locus standi to file petition under S. 252(3) of Companies Act for revival of the company\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Bench of Justice A.I.S Cheema, Member (Judicial) and Balvinder Singh, Member (Technical) observed that a\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-02-19T03:30:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-07T09:21:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"844\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/\",\"name\":\"NCLAT | Shareholder of company has locus standi to file petition under S. 252(3) of Companies Act for revival of the company | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-19T03:30:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-07T09:21:05+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":844},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NCLAT | Shareholder of company has locus standi to file petition under S. 252(3) of Companies Act for revival of the company\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCLAT | Shareholder of company has locus standi to file petition under S. 252(3) of Companies Act for revival of the company | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NCLAT | Shareholder of company has locus standi to file petition under S. 252(3) of Companies Act for revival of the company","og_description":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Bench of Justice A.I.S Cheema, Member (Judicial) and Balvinder Singh, Member (Technical) observed that a","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-02-19T03:30:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-07T09:21:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":844,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/","name":"NCLAT | Shareholder of company has locus standi to file petition under S. 252(3) of Companies Act for revival of the company | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","datePublished":"2019-02-19T03:30:15+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-07T09:21:05+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","width":1330,"height":844},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NCLAT | Shareholder of company has locus standi to file petition under S. 252(3) of Companies Act for revival of the company"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":254758,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/27\/on-not-finding-flaws-in-the-nclt-order-abstains-from-interfering\/","url_meta":{"origin":210278,"position":0},"title":"NCLAT | On not finding flaws in the NCLT order, abstains from interfering- Petitioner not being authorised under S.7 IBC, lacks locus standi","author":"Editor","date":"September 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)- The Coram of Justice Jarat Kumar Jain (Judicial Member), Ashok Kumar Mishra (Technical Member), and Alok Srivastava (Technical Member) while dismissing an appeal summarily without notice to the Respondent was of the opinion, that there was no need to interfere with the impugned order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287006,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/16\/financial-creditor-application-section-7-cirp-corporate-debtor-nclat-shareholder-no-locus-standi-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":210278,"position":1},"title":"Do Third-party\/shareholders have locus to challenge initiation of CIRP against Corporate Debtor? NCLAT answers","author":"Ritu","date":"March 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT held that there is no law which allows a third party or shareholders to settle the claims of Financial Creditor on behalf of the Corporate Debtor, M\/s McDowell Holdings Limited.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":199784,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-board-of-india-not-an-aggrieved-person-has-no-locus-standi-to-file-appeal-under-section-61-ib-code-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":210278,"position":2},"title":"IBBI not an \u2018aggrieved person\u2019; has no locus standi to file appeal under Section 61 I&B Code: NCLAT","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial), while dismissing an appeal filed under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 held that Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India had no locus standi to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":315343,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/26\/nclt-issues-notice-on-allegations-of-mismanagement-and-oppression-by-ashneer-grover-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":210278,"position":3},"title":"Explained |Ashneer Grover seeks waiver of conditions under Companies Act to pursue case against BharatPe; NCLT issues notice","author":"Ritu","date":"February 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLT issued a notice and sought BharatPe\u2019s response and fixed the next date of hearing on 04-04-2024.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/National-Company-Law-Tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/National-Company-Law-Tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/National-Company-Law-Tribunal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/National-Company-Law-Tribunal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237751,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/nclat-if-objections-raised-in-regard-to-scheme-under-s-230-of-companies-act-2013-are-procedural-in-nature-can-they-be-overruled-tribunal-expounds\/","url_meta":{"origin":210278,"position":4},"title":"NCLAT | If objections raised in regard to “Scheme” under S. 230 of Companies Act, 2013 are procedural in nature, can they be overruled? Tribunal expounds","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):\u00a0A Division Bench of Justice Jarat Kumar Jain (Judicial Member) and Balvinder Singh (Technical Member) while addressing the present appeal observed that, Scheme under Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013 cannot be used as method of rectification of the actions already taken. Appellant preferred\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294234,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/nclat-allows-revival-of-cirp-process-scc-blog-legal-news-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":210278,"position":5},"title":"Insolvency proceeding can be restored when Consent term entered between parties includes a revival clause: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"June 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen consent term itself contains clause for revival, non-giving liberty specifically for revival by the Adjudicating Authority is inconsequential\u201d, held NCLAT","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210278","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=210278"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210278\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/153604"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=210278"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=210278"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=210278"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}