{"id":209862,"date":"2019-02-13T10:10:37","date_gmt":"2019-02-13T04:40:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=209862"},"modified":"2019-02-18T11:38:03","modified_gmt":"2019-02-18T06:08:03","slug":"kar-hc-writ-court-cannot-interfere-with-decision-of-returning-officer-of-cooperative-society-as-equally-efficacious-statutory-remedy-available","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/13\/kar-hc-writ-court-cannot-interfere-with-decision-of-returning-officer-of-cooperative-society-as-equally-efficacious-statutory-remedy-available\/","title":{"rendered":"Kar HC | Writ court cannot interfere with decision of Returning Officer of cooperative society as equally efficacious statutory remedy available"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karnataka High Court:<\/strong> The Single Judge Bench of S. Sujatha, J. dismissed a petition challenging the decision of\u00a0 Returning Officer of Kadaragundi Milk Producers Co-operative Society whereby petitioner\u2019s nomination for contesting elections to Board of Directors of the said society, was rejected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The ground for Returning Officer\u2019s decision was that petitioner was in default of loan taken from the bank. Aggrieved thereby, petitioner filed the instant petition submitting that he was required to pay the loan taken from bank by March 2019 but he had already paid the said loan by January, 2019. Hence, rejection on the said ground was unsustainable. He further contended that his nomination paper had been scrutinized and accepted by the respondent Returning Officer in his presence, but was rejected behind his back later on without providing him an opportunity of hearing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that rejection of petitioner\u2019s nomination behind his back was a disputed question of fact which could not be determined in writ jurisdiction. Relying on the judgment in <em>Umesh Shivappa Ambi v. Angadi Shekara Basappa<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/b8rfXdm6\">(1998) 4 SCC 529<\/a> it was opined that the Court will not ordinarily interfere in matters where an equally efficacious remedy is available under the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, the petition was dismissed granting liberty to the petitioner to resort to appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.[Jayaram K.P. v. State of Karnataka, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/zJC7gQ0D\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Kar 91<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 01-02-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court: The Single Judge Bench of S. Sujatha, J. dismissed a petition challenging the decision of\u00a0 Returning Officer of Kadaragundi <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30292,33773,32199,32552],"class_list":["post-209862","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-loan","tag-returning-officer","tag-statutory-remedy","tag-writ-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Kar HC | Writ court cannot interfere with decision of Returning Officer of cooperative society as equally efficacious statutory remedy available | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/13\/kar-hc-writ-court-cannot-interfere-with-decision-of-returning-officer-of-cooperative-society-as-equally-efficacious-statutory-remedy-available\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kar HC | Writ court cannot interfere with decision of Returning Officer of cooperative society as equally efficacious statutory remedy available\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: The Single Judge Bench of S. Sujatha, J. dismissed a petition challenging the decision of\u00a0 Returning Officer of Kadaragundi\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/13\/kar-hc-writ-court-cannot-interfere-with-decision-of-returning-officer-of-cooperative-society-as-equally-efficacious-statutory-remedy-available\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-02-13T04:40:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-18T06:08:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/13\/kar-hc-writ-court-cannot-interfere-with-decision-of-returning-officer-of-cooperative-society-as-equally-efficacious-statutory-remedy-available\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/13\/kar-hc-writ-court-cannot-interfere-with-decision-of-returning-officer-of-cooperative-society-as-equally-efficacious-statutory-remedy-available\/\",\"name\":\"Kar HC | Writ court cannot interfere with decision of Returning Officer of cooperative society as equally efficacious statutory remedy available | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-13T04:40:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-18T06:08:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/13\/kar-hc-writ-court-cannot-interfere-with-decision-of-returning-officer-of-cooperative-society-as-equally-efficacious-statutory-remedy-available\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/13\/kar-hc-writ-court-cannot-interfere-with-decision-of-returning-officer-of-cooperative-society-as-equally-efficacious-statutory-remedy-available\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/13\/kar-hc-writ-court-cannot-interfere-with-decision-of-returning-officer-of-cooperative-society-as-equally-efficacious-statutory-remedy-available\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kar HC | Writ court cannot interfere with decision of Returning Officer of cooperative society as equally efficacious statutory remedy available\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kar HC | Writ court cannot interfere with decision of Returning Officer of cooperative society as equally efficacious statutory remedy available | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/13\/kar-hc-writ-court-cannot-interfere-with-decision-of-returning-officer-of-cooperative-society-as-equally-efficacious-statutory-remedy-available\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kar HC | Writ court cannot interfere with decision of Returning Officer of cooperative society as equally efficacious statutory remedy available","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: The Single Judge Bench of S. Sujatha, J. dismissed a petition challenging the decision of\u00a0 Returning Officer of Kadaragundi","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/13\/kar-hc-writ-court-cannot-interfere-with-decision-of-returning-officer-of-cooperative-society-as-equally-efficacious-statutory-remedy-available\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-02-13T04:40:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-18T06:08:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/13\/kar-hc-writ-court-cannot-interfere-with-decision-of-returning-officer-of-cooperative-society-as-equally-efficacious-statutory-remedy-available\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/13\/kar-hc-writ-court-cannot-interfere-with-decision-of-returning-officer-of-cooperative-society-as-equally-efficacious-statutory-remedy-available\/","name":"Kar HC | Writ court cannot interfere with decision of Returning Officer of cooperative society as equally efficacious statutory remedy available | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-02-13T04:40:37+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-18T06:08:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/13\/kar-hc-writ-court-cannot-interfere-with-decision-of-returning-officer-of-cooperative-society-as-equally-efficacious-statutory-remedy-available\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/13\/kar-hc-writ-court-cannot-interfere-with-decision-of-returning-officer-of-cooperative-society-as-equally-efficacious-statutory-remedy-available\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/13\/kar-hc-writ-court-cannot-interfere-with-decision-of-returning-officer-of-cooperative-society-as-equally-efficacious-statutory-remedy-available\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kar HC | Writ court cannot interfere with decision of Returning Officer of cooperative society as equally efficacious statutory remedy available"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":214422,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/08\/madras-hc-writ-petition-filed-against-rejection-of-nomination-for-contesting-election-dismissed-in-light-of-blanket-bar-of-art-329\/","url_meta":{"origin":209862,"position":0},"title":"Madras HC | Writ petition filed against rejection of nomination for contesting election dismissed in light of &#8216;blanket bar&#8217; of Art. 329","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0A Bench of G.R. Swaminathan and T. Krishnavalli, JJ. refused to entertain a writ petition that challenged the decision of the Returning Officer whereby the petitioner's nomination filed for contesting by-election was rejected. The petitioner was a practicing lawyer wanting to contest the by-election for Ottapidaram reserved constituency\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":236755,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/05\/jhar-hc%e2%94%82-loan-by-financial-institutions-is-in-the-nature-of-public-money-writ-petition-not-maintainable-as-alternative-remedy-available-under-s-17-of-sarfaesi-act-if-aggrie\/","url_meta":{"origin":209862,"position":1},"title":"Jhar HC | Loan by financial institutions is in the nature of \u2018public money\u2019; Writ Petition not maintainable as alternative remedy available under S. 17 of SARFAESI Act if aggrieved due to action taken by \u2018State\u2019 under S. 13\/14 of the Act","author":"Editor","date":"October 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Rajesh Shankar, J. dismissed the petition on grounds of non-maintainability. The facts of the case are such that the petitioner took a loan to the tune of Rs 4, 25,000 from the respondent bank namely Allahabad Bank. Due to default in payment of money, a notice was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":214499,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/09\/pat-hc-employers-petition-challenging-labour-courts-compensation-awarded-to-employee-not-maintainable-where-alternative-statutory-remedy-not-exhausted\/","url_meta":{"origin":209862,"position":2},"title":"Pat HC | Employer\u2019s petition challenging Labour Court\u2019s compensation awarded to employee not maintainable, where alternative statutory remedy not exhausted","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The Bench of Shivaji Pandey, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by an employer, challenging the amount of compensation directed to be paid to its employee by the Labour Court, on the ground that the petitioner had not exhausted the alternative statutory remedy. The instant petition was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":353989,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/21\/uttaranchal-hc-stays-disqualification-pradhan-candidate-malfeasance-returning-officer\/","url_meta":{"origin":209862,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Clear case of malfeasance by the Returning Officer\u2019: Uttaranchal HC stays disqualification of Pradhan candidate over toilet location","author":"Editor","date":"July 21, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cRight to contest the elections is a statutorily guaranteed right, and the same cannot be denied in a completely arbitrary manner and which prima facie appears to be illegal.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Disqualification of Pradhan candidate over toilet location","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Disqualification-of-Pradhan-candidate-over-toilet-location.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Disqualification-of-Pradhan-candidate-over-toilet-location.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Disqualification-of-Pradhan-candidate-over-toilet-location.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Disqualification-of-Pradhan-candidate-over-toilet-location.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220862,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/15\/raj-hc%e2%94%82petition-under-art-226-cannot-be-entertained-where-an-alternate-statutory-remedy-is-available\/","url_meta":{"origin":209862,"position":4},"title":"Raj HC | Petition under Art. 226 cannot be entertained where an alternate statutory remedy is available","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Ashok Kumar Gaur, J. dismissed the writ petition filed against the order passed by the Registrar, Cooperative Societies-cum Registrar Institution exercising the powers inferred upon him under Section 24 of the Rajasthan Sports (Registration, Recognition and Regulation of Association) Act, 2005. The respondent had issued a notice\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":212055,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/madras-hc-writ-petition-challenging-sale-certificate-issued-in-proceedings-under-sarfaesi-act-not-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":209862,"position":5},"title":"Madras HC | Writ petition challenging Sale Certificate issued in proceedings under SARFAESI Act not maintainable","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0A Bench of V.K.Tahilramani, CJ and M. Duraiswamy, J. dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking to quash the subject Sale Certificate issued by the Authorised Officer of IDBI Bank. The petition committed default in repaying the loan amount to IDBI Bank. Consequently, his property was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209862","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209862"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209862\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209862"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209862"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209862"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}