{"id":209802,"date":"2019-02-12T15:45:41","date_gmt":"2019-02-12T10:15:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=209802"},"modified":"2019-02-13T13:39:27","modified_gmt":"2019-02-13T08:09:27","slug":"utt-hc-question-regarding-instrumentality-of-state-cannot-be-decided-in-intra-court-appeal-interference-wherein-is-limited","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/12\/utt-hc-question-regarding-instrumentality-of-state-cannot-be-decided-in-intra-court-appeal-interference-wherein-is-limited\/","title":{"rendered":"Utt HC | Question regarding \u201cinstrumentality of state\u201d cannot be decided in intra-court appeal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Uttaranchal High Court:<\/strong> The Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, CJ and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J. dismissed a petition for it being raised for the first time in an intra-court appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appellant has filed the said writ petition questioning the \u201cScience &amp; Technology Entrepreneurship Park\u201d (STEP) in terminating their services. The counsel has contended that STEP was initially established and funded by the respondent and consequently \u201cSTEP\u201d would fall within the ambit of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. On the other hand, the respondent pressed upon the fact that STEP is a self-financing body whose funds were initially granted by the Government of India to establish the above plus there was no allocation of funds towards the same for more than 15 years now. Also, STEP was a society registered under the Societies Registration Act which further corroborates their submission. The case of <em>Pradeep Kumar Biswas <\/em>v.<em> Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/864zHiN5\">(2002) 5 SCC 111<\/a> was referred to wherein it was stated that to prove instrumentality it has to be proved that financially, functionally and administratively there existed governmental control but if the control was found to be regulatory then body was not a \u201cState\u201d within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Now the question that arose before the Court was whether termination of the services of the petitioners under the Indian Contract Act necessitates examination in writ proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Here the Court said that the scope of interference in an intra-court appeal was extremely limited so accordingly the question cannot be decided here that too after permitting the parties to amend their respective pleadings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence appeal was disposed of with a liberty to file a fresh appeal. [Hasibur Rahmaan v. Union of India,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/czSFrI0p\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Utt 28<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 03-01-2019]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Uttaranchal High Court: The Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, CJ and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J. dismissed a petition for it being raised for <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33747,33743,33744,33745,4501,33746],"class_list":["post-209802","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-12-of-constitution-of-india","tag-instrumentality-of-state","tag-intra-court-appeal","tag-science-technology-entrepreneurship-park","tag-services","tag-terminating"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Utt HC | Question regarding \u201cinstrumentality of state\u201d cannot be decided in intra-court appeal | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/12\/utt-hc-question-regarding-instrumentality-of-state-cannot-be-decided-in-intra-court-appeal-interference-wherein-is-limited\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Utt HC | Question regarding \u201cinstrumentality of state\u201d cannot be decided in intra-court appeal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Uttaranchal High Court: The Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, CJ and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J. dismissed a petition for it being raised for\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/12\/utt-hc-question-regarding-instrumentality-of-state-cannot-be-decided-in-intra-court-appeal-interference-wherein-is-limited\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-02-12T10:15:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-13T08:09:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/12\/utt-hc-question-regarding-instrumentality-of-state-cannot-be-decided-in-intra-court-appeal-interference-wherein-is-limited\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/12\/utt-hc-question-regarding-instrumentality-of-state-cannot-be-decided-in-intra-court-appeal-interference-wherein-is-limited\/\",\"name\":\"Utt HC | Question regarding \u201cinstrumentality of state\u201d cannot be decided in intra-court appeal | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-12T10:15:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-13T08:09:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/12\/utt-hc-question-regarding-instrumentality-of-state-cannot-be-decided-in-intra-court-appeal-interference-wherein-is-limited\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/12\/utt-hc-question-regarding-instrumentality-of-state-cannot-be-decided-in-intra-court-appeal-interference-wherein-is-limited\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/12\/utt-hc-question-regarding-instrumentality-of-state-cannot-be-decided-in-intra-court-appeal-interference-wherein-is-limited\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Utt HC | Question regarding \u201cinstrumentality of state\u201d cannot be decided in intra-court appeal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Utt HC | Question regarding \u201cinstrumentality of state\u201d cannot be decided in intra-court appeal | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/12\/utt-hc-question-regarding-instrumentality-of-state-cannot-be-decided-in-intra-court-appeal-interference-wherein-is-limited\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Utt HC | Question regarding \u201cinstrumentality of state\u201d cannot be decided in intra-court appeal","og_description":"Uttaranchal High Court: The Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, CJ and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J. dismissed a petition for it being raised for","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/12\/utt-hc-question-regarding-instrumentality-of-state-cannot-be-decided-in-intra-court-appeal-interference-wherein-is-limited\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-02-12T10:15:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-13T08:09:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/12\/utt-hc-question-regarding-instrumentality-of-state-cannot-be-decided-in-intra-court-appeal-interference-wherein-is-limited\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/12\/utt-hc-question-regarding-instrumentality-of-state-cannot-be-decided-in-intra-court-appeal-interference-wherein-is-limited\/","name":"Utt HC | Question regarding \u201cinstrumentality of state\u201d cannot be decided in intra-court appeal | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-02-12T10:15:41+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-13T08:09:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/12\/utt-hc-question-regarding-instrumentality-of-state-cannot-be-decided-in-intra-court-appeal-interference-wherein-is-limited\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/12\/utt-hc-question-regarding-instrumentality-of-state-cannot-be-decided-in-intra-court-appeal-interference-wherein-is-limited\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/12\/utt-hc-question-regarding-instrumentality-of-state-cannot-be-decided-in-intra-court-appeal-interference-wherein-is-limited\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Utt HC | Question regarding \u201cinstrumentality of state\u201d cannot be decided in intra-court appeal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":355000,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/jhar-hc-intra-court-appeal-not-available-to-make-new-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":209802,"position":0},"title":"Intra-court appeal not available to take new ground by making a totally new case: Jharkhand HC","author":"Editor","date":"July 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is settled position of law that if there is no pleading having been taken before the writ court, then it is not available for the party concerned to come out totally with the new case for the purpose of scrutinising the order passed by the Single Judge on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"intra-court appeal not available to make new case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/intra-court-appeal-not-available-to-make-new-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/intra-court-appeal-not-available-to-make-new-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/intra-court-appeal-not-available-to-make-new-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/intra-court-appeal-not-available-to-make-new-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320538,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/22\/manohar-parrikar-institute-for-defence-studies-and-analyses-is-an-instrumentality-of-state-under-art12-dhc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":209802,"position":1},"title":"Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses is an \u2018instrumentality of State\u2019 under Article 12 of the Constitution: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"April 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"An entity is required to be tested on three parameters namely, (a) financial, (b) functional, and (c) administration for its inclusion as \u2018other authority\u2019 in Article 12 of the Constitution.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":373432,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/del-hc-bar-association-not-state-article-12\/","url_meta":{"origin":209802,"position":2},"title":"Bar Association Not &#8216;State&#8217;, No Writ of Mandamus maintainable for alleged trespass in Court Chamber: Delhi High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"January 22, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cBar Association is a body of private individual lawyers and in normal discharge of its functions, it does not perform any function which can be said to be a public function\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bar Association not State","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Bar-Association-not-State.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Bar-Association-not-State.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Bar-Association-not-State.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Bar-Association-not-State.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":302787,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/02\/orissa-association-for-blind-not-state-within-article-12-orissa-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":209802,"position":3},"title":"Orissa Association for Blind not \u2018State\u2019 within meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution: Orissa HC","author":"Editor","date":"October 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The tests laid down in Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi, (1981) 1 SCC 722 were not fulfilled, hence, the Association is not \u2018State\u2019 within Article 12.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"orissa high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":198186,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/06\/rule-of-fair-play-and-natural-justice-are-part-of-rule-of-law-applicable-to-actions-taken-by-state-instrumentality\/","url_meta":{"origin":209802,"position":4},"title":"Rule of fair play and natural justice are part of rule of law applicable to actions taken by State Instrumentality","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: A Division Bench comprising I.P. Mukerjee and Amrita Sinha, JJ. decided an appeal filed against the order of learned Single Judge directing the appellant- Indian Oil Corpn. to renew the license and continue the supply of kerosene oil to the respondent firm. The respondent was a partnership\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242043,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/09\/chh-hc-is-it-essential-for-the-appointing-authority-to-re-consult-psc-before-terminating-services-of-a-judicial-officer-in-light-of-art-235-of-the-constitution-of-india-hc-explains\/","url_meta":{"origin":209802,"position":5},"title":"Chh HC | Is it essential for the appointing authority to re-consult PSC before terminating services of a judicial officer in light of Art. 235 of the Constitution of India? HC explains","author":"Editor","date":"January 9, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: A Division Bench of P. R. Ramchandra Menon and Parth Prateem Sahu, JJ.,\u00a0 dismissed the appeal being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are such that the appellant appointed as Civil Judge, Class II and posted as 1st Civil Judge, Class II and Judicial Magistrate,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209802","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209802"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209802\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209802"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209802"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209802"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}