{"id":209753,"date":"2019-02-11T09:55:36","date_gmt":"2019-02-11T04:25:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=209753"},"modified":"2019-02-13T18:20:37","modified_gmt":"2019-02-13T12:50:37","slug":"jk-hc-proceedings-stayed-since-act-was-committed-before-it-became-punishable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/11\/jk-hc-proceedings-stayed-since-act-was-committed-before-it-became-punishable\/","title":{"rendered":"J&#038;K HC | Proceedings stayed since act was committed before it became punishable\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Jammu and Kashmir High Court:<\/strong> The Bench of Dhiraj Singh Thakur, J, allowed a petition filed to stay proceedings initiated against the petitioner under Section 7 and 8 of the Jammu &amp; Kashmir Protection of Children from Sexual Violence Act, 2012 on the ground that when the offence was alleged to have been committed by the petitioner, the Act had not come into force and even the ordinance, which had been issued on 16-05-2018 had lived its life.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The facts of the case are that the petitioner was booked under Section 7 and 8 of the Jammu &amp; Kashmir Protection of Children from Sexual Violence Act, 2012 read with Section 452, 354, 323 &amp; 506 of RPC.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>The contention of the petitioner was that the ordinance in question was not placed before either House of the Legislature, which was not convened in terms of Section 53 of the State Constitution and, therefore, had lived its life. The offence would be an offence only after the date of enactment.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court stayed the proceedings. [Masood Ahmed v. State of J&amp;K,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/M6qneUYN\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine J&amp;K 1030<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 31-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jammu and Kashmir High Court: The Bench of Dhiraj Singh Thakur, J, allowed a petition filed to stay proceedings initiated against the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-209753","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>J&amp;K HC | Proceedings stayed since act was committed before it became punishable\u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/11\/jk-hc-proceedings-stayed-since-act-was-committed-before-it-became-punishable\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"J&amp;K HC | Proceedings stayed since act was committed before it became punishable\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: The Bench of Dhiraj Singh Thakur, J, allowed a petition filed to stay proceedings initiated against the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/11\/jk-hc-proceedings-stayed-since-act-was-committed-before-it-became-punishable\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-02-11T04:25:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-13T12:50:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/11\/jk-hc-proceedings-stayed-since-act-was-committed-before-it-became-punishable\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/11\/jk-hc-proceedings-stayed-since-act-was-committed-before-it-became-punishable\/\",\"name\":\"J&K HC | Proceedings stayed since act was committed before it became punishable\u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-11T04:25:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-13T12:50:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/11\/jk-hc-proceedings-stayed-since-act-was-committed-before-it-became-punishable\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/11\/jk-hc-proceedings-stayed-since-act-was-committed-before-it-became-punishable\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/11\/jk-hc-proceedings-stayed-since-act-was-committed-before-it-became-punishable\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"J&#038;K HC | Proceedings stayed since act was committed before it became punishable\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"J&K HC | Proceedings stayed since act was committed before it became punishable\u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/11\/jk-hc-proceedings-stayed-since-act-was-committed-before-it-became-punishable\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"J&K HC | Proceedings stayed since act was committed before it became punishable\u00a0","og_description":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: The Bench of Dhiraj Singh Thakur, J, allowed a petition filed to stay proceedings initiated against the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/11\/jk-hc-proceedings-stayed-since-act-was-committed-before-it-became-punishable\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-02-11T04:25:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-13T12:50:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/11\/jk-hc-proceedings-stayed-since-act-was-committed-before-it-became-punishable\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/11\/jk-hc-proceedings-stayed-since-act-was-committed-before-it-became-punishable\/","name":"J&K HC | Proceedings stayed since act was committed before it became punishable\u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-02-11T04:25:36+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-13T12:50:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/11\/jk-hc-proceedings-stayed-since-act-was-committed-before-it-became-punishable\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/11\/jk-hc-proceedings-stayed-since-act-was-committed-before-it-became-punishable\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/11\/jk-hc-proceedings-stayed-since-act-was-committed-before-it-became-punishable\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"J&#038;K HC | Proceedings stayed since act was committed before it became punishable\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":260959,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/01\/instead-of-filing-an-appeal-before-the-sessions-court-petitioner-rushed-to-this-court-invoking-its-inherent-power\/","url_meta":{"origin":209753,"position":0},"title":"Instead of filing an appeal before the Sessions Court petitioner rushed to this Court invoking its inherent power. Can High Court exercise its inherent power? Read J&#038;K and Ladakh HC\u2019s decision","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 1, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: Mohd. Akram Chowdhury, J., reiterated the settled position of law that if an alternate efficacious remedy is available under the statute, the inherent power of this Court cannot be invoked. A complaint was filed against the petitioner under the provisions of the Jammu\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":273287,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/08\/jammu-kashmir-ladakh-high-court-separatism-college-profeesor-youtube-videos-fir-quashment-section-482-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":209753,"position":1},"title":"J&#038;K and Ladakh HC refuses to quash FIR against College Professor allegedly promoting separatism through YouTube videos","author":"Editor","date":"September 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: Sanjay Dhar, J. dismissed a petition which was filed challenging FIR registered under Sections 153, 353 Ranbir Penal Code, 1989 and 13 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (ULA(P) Act). Petitioner was working as Assistant Professor, Geography, at Government Degree College and it\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293922,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/06\/jk-and-ladakh-hc-sympathy-matters-involving-unnatural-offences-misplaced-sympathy-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":209753,"position":2},"title":"Sympathy in matters involving unnatural offences against a child is a case of misplaced sympathy: J&#038;K and Ladakh HC","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The High Court was deliberating over a bail application wherein the accused was charged under S. 377, IPC and POCSO act for commission of fiendish crime against a child.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jammu and kashmir and ladakh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\/","url_meta":{"origin":209753,"position":3},"title":"Quashing of complaint refused as husband failed to prove that cases filed by wife were frivolous","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 15, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J., dismissed the petition of the husband as he failed to provide any ground that the cases filed by wife were frivolous and were only to harass him. The petition was filed under Section 561-A CrPC\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":201979,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/19\/compulsory-retirement-on-mere-ground-of-fir-registered-against-petitioner-not-to-be-sustained\/","url_meta":{"origin":209753,"position":4},"title":"Compulsory retirement on mere ground of FIR registered against petitioner not to be sustained","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of M. K. Hanjura, J., dealt with a petition where the question before Court was whether government order given by Government of Jammu and Kashmir under Article 226(2) of the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services Regulations where petitioner was given\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":233412,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/05\/jk-hc-notice-issued-on-plea-challenging-100-domicile-reservation-for-public-employment-in-jk\/","url_meta":{"origin":209753,"position":5},"title":"J&#038;K HC | 100% domicile reservation for public employment in J&#038;K, challenged; Notice issued to centre","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Tashi Rabstan, J. addressed a matter wherein 100 % reservation in public employment for J&K domiciles in the UT has been challenged. Petitioner's 1 and 3 are domiciles of the State of Haryana and Petitioner 2 a permanent resident of the erstwhile State of Jammu\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209753","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209753"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209753\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209753"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209753"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209753"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}