{"id":209661,"date":"2019-02-07T15:30:12","date_gmt":"2019-02-07T10:00:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=209661"},"modified":"2019-02-08T14:47:27","modified_gmt":"2019-02-08T09:17:27","slug":"raj-hc-despite-order-of-canadian-court-high-court-refuses-to-allow-the-return-of-10-year-old-boy-to-canada-considering-it-would-not-be-in-his-interest","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/raj-hc-despite-order-of-canadian-court-high-court-refuses-to-allow-the-return-of-10-year-old-boy-to-canada-considering-it-would-not-be-in-his-interest\/","title":{"rendered":"Raj HC | Despite order of Canadian Court, HC refuses to allow the return of\u00a0 10-year-old boy to Canada considering it would not be in his interest"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court:<\/strong> The Division Bench of Mohammad Rafiq and Goverdhan Bardhar, JJ. dismissed a habeas corpus Petition filed by the petitioner-husband praying for a direction to the respondent- wife to produce before the court the minor child who was a permanent resident of Canada and a citizen of US and cause his return along with the respondent-wife to the jurisdiction of the Court of Canada in compliance of the orders passed by the Superior Court of Justice, Family Court Hamilton, Ontario.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case are that the petitioner-husband had alleged that the respondent-wife had wrongly removed their son from his custody. The wife had moved from Ontario, Canada, the place where the three of them were residing at that time, to New York. She then shifted to New Jersey and finally to India along with the son, who was 4 years old at that time. The petitioner challenged this and sought for his custody and his documents like passport, etc. A habeas corpus petition was filed by the husband petitioner, demanding that the wife be directed to produce before the court their son, who was a permanent resident of Canada and was a US citizen, in compliance with orders passed by the Superior Court of Justice, Family Court Hamilton, Ontario. The Canadian Court had also directed various law enforcement agencies including INTERPOL to enforce the custody order. A warrant was also issued against the wife, with imposition of cost of $30,000 upon her.<\/p>\n

The High Court, upholding the previously settled law observed that the law has sufficiently developed to rule that despite a pre-existing order for return of a child by a foreign court, the High Court may decline relief for such return. The Court further asserted that the issue should be considered bearing in mind the welfare of the child.<\/p>\n

The High Court dismissed the petition of the father stating that the child’s return would not be in his best interests. It observed that if he was forced to go back to Canada in the sole care of his father, it is likely to psychologically disturb him, particularly when he will be required to now adapt to an education system of that country. This would adversely affect his overall growth and grooming as in the absence of his mother.<\/p>\n

The Court while dismissing the petition held that\u00a0 the Court in India are free to decline the relief of return of the child brought within its jurisdiction, if it is satisfied that the child is now settled in its new environment or if it would expose the child to physical or psychological harm or otherwise place the child in an intolerable position or if the child is quite mature and objects to its return. The removal of the child from Ajmer, after he has stayed there for a few years now, would not be in his best interests, especially in view of the fact that he is suffering from chronic asthma and amblyopia. It further opined that it cannot hold the wife guilty of contempt as she cannot be solely held responsible for violation of the settlement terms. The Court gave directions allowing the father to maintain contact with his son. Till the time the child attains majority he shall be kept in the custody of his mother in India. [Naveen Sharma v. State of Rajasthan, 2019 SCC OnLine Raj 63<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 11-01-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: The Division Bench of Mohammad Rafiq and Goverdhan Bardhar, JJ. dismissed a habeas corpus Petition filed by the petitioner-husband <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33686,2564,3227,2554,32815],"class_list":["post-209661","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-canada","tag-Contempt","tag-custody","tag-Jurisdiction","tag-permanent-resident"],"yoast_head":"\nRaj HC | Despite order of Canadian Court, HC refuses to allow the return of\u00a0 10-year-old boy to Canada considering it would not be in his interest | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/raj-hc-despite-order-of-canadian-court-high-court-refuses-to-allow-the-return-of-10-year-old-boy-to-canada-considering-it-would-not-be-in-his-interest\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raj HC | Despite order of Canadian Court, HC refuses to allow the return of\u00a0 10-year-old boy to Canada considering it would not be in his interest\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: The Division Bench of Mohammad Rafiq and Goverdhan Bardhar, JJ. dismissed a habeas corpus Petition filed by the petitioner-husband\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/raj-hc-despite-order-of-canadian-court-high-court-refuses-to-allow-the-return-of-10-year-old-boy-to-canada-considering-it-would-not-be-in-his-interest\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-02-07T10:00:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-08T09:17:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/raj-hc-despite-order-of-canadian-court-high-court-refuses-to-allow-the-return-of-10-year-old-boy-to-canada-considering-it-would-not-be-in-his-interest\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/raj-hc-despite-order-of-canadian-court-high-court-refuses-to-allow-the-return-of-10-year-old-boy-to-canada-considering-it-would-not-be-in-his-interest\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC | Despite order of Canadian Court, HC refuses to allow the return of\u00a0 10-year-old boy to Canada considering it would not be in his interest | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-07T10:00:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-08T09:17:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/raj-hc-despite-order-of-canadian-court-high-court-refuses-to-allow-the-return-of-10-year-old-boy-to-canada-considering-it-would-not-be-in-his-interest\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/raj-hc-despite-order-of-canadian-court-high-court-refuses-to-allow-the-return-of-10-year-old-boy-to-canada-considering-it-would-not-be-in-his-interest\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/raj-hc-despite-order-of-canadian-court-high-court-refuses-to-allow-the-return-of-10-year-old-boy-to-canada-considering-it-would-not-be-in-his-interest\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raj HC | Despite order of Canadian Court, HC refuses to allow the return of\u00a0 10-year-old boy to Canada considering it would not be in his interest\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC | Despite order of Canadian Court, HC refuses to allow the return of\u00a0 10-year-old boy to Canada considering it would not be in his interest | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/raj-hc-despite-order-of-canadian-court-high-court-refuses-to-allow-the-return-of-10-year-old-boy-to-canada-considering-it-would-not-be-in-his-interest\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raj HC | Despite order of Canadian Court, HC refuses to allow the return of\u00a0 10-year-old boy to Canada considering it would not be in his interest","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: The Division Bench of Mohammad Rafiq and Goverdhan Bardhar, JJ. dismissed a habeas corpus Petition filed by the petitioner-husband","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/raj-hc-despite-order-of-canadian-court-high-court-refuses-to-allow-the-return-of-10-year-old-boy-to-canada-considering-it-would-not-be-in-his-interest\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-02-07T10:00:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-08T09:17:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/raj-hc-despite-order-of-canadian-court-high-court-refuses-to-allow-the-return-of-10-year-old-boy-to-canada-considering-it-would-not-be-in-his-interest\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/raj-hc-despite-order-of-canadian-court-high-court-refuses-to-allow-the-return-of-10-year-old-boy-to-canada-considering-it-would-not-be-in-his-interest\/","name":"Raj HC | Despite order of Canadian Court, HC refuses to allow the return of\u00a0 10-year-old boy to Canada considering it would not be in his interest | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-02-07T10:00:12+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-08T09:17:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/raj-hc-despite-order-of-canadian-court-high-court-refuses-to-allow-the-return-of-10-year-old-boy-to-canada-considering-it-would-not-be-in-his-interest\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/raj-hc-despite-order-of-canadian-court-high-court-refuses-to-allow-the-return-of-10-year-old-boy-to-canada-considering-it-would-not-be-in-his-interest\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/raj-hc-despite-order-of-canadian-court-high-court-refuses-to-allow-the-return-of-10-year-old-boy-to-canada-considering-it-would-not-be-in-his-interest\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raj HC | Despite order of Canadian Court, HC refuses to allow the return of\u00a0 10-year-old boy to Canada considering it would not be in his interest"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":346793,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/30\/ph-hc-grants-custody-canadian-woman-husband-allegedly-abducted-brought-child-to-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":209661,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Indian Courts not for sidestepping jurisdictional proceedings by foreign nationals\u2019; P&H HC grants custody to Canadian woman whose husband allegedly abducted their son","author":"Editor","date":"April 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cPermitting the husband to retain the custody of the minor son, despite an unequivocal foreign custody order to the contrary, would be antithetical not only to the legal rights of the petitioner but also to the rule of law, international comity, and, above all, the welfare of the child.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237484,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/ker-hc-in-matrimonial-matters-preference-is-to-be-given-to-convenience-and-welfare-of-children-over-wife-hc-dismisses-application-for-transfer-of-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":209661,"position":1},"title":"Ker HC | In matrimonial matters preference is to be given to convenience and welfare of children over wife; HC dismisses application for transfer of case","author":"Editor","date":"October 15, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: While deciding an application for transfer of two cases from one jurisdiction to another, R. Narayana Pisharadi, J., disposed of the same finding no reason to pass an order to that effect. The factual matrix in the present case is that the respondent has filed O.P. No.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":237619,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/17\/del-hc-husband-citizen-and-domicile-of-usa-can-he-raise-objections-on-divorce-proceedings-filed-by-wife-in-india-court-decrypts-the-law-in-light-of-catena-of-scs-decisions\/","url_meta":{"origin":209661,"position":2},"title":"Del HC | Husband citizen and domicile of USA, Can he raise objections on divorce proceedings filed by wife in India? Court decrypts the law in light of catena of SC’s decisions","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Hima Kohli and Subramonium Prasad, JJ., while observing a matrimonial application, observed that, The plaint must be read as a whole to determine as to whether it discloses a cause of action. In the instant matter, the husband\/appellant sought to challenge the Order passed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":220869,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/15\/bom-hc-magistrates-court-at-mumbai-held-to-have-jurisdiction-to-try-complaint-under-s-498-ipc-although-alleged-offence-committed-in-usa\/","url_meta":{"origin":209661,"position":3},"title":"Bom HC | Magistrate’s Court at Mumbai held to have jurisdiction to try complaint under S. 498 A IPC although alleged offence committed in USA","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: S.S. Shinde, J. dismissed a petition while reiterating the decisions of the Supreme Court in the case, Nikita v. Yadwinder Singh, Criminal Appeal No. 1096 of 2019, wherein it was held that, \u201cAt the place where the wife takes shelter after leaving or driven away from the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240692,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/15\/mp-hc-custody-of-the-child-with-the-mother-can-not-be-said-to-be-illegal-confinement-court-dismisses-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":209661,"position":4},"title":"MP HC | Custody of the child with the mother can not be said to be illegal confinement; Court dismisses petition","author":"Editor","date":"December 15, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: S.A.Dharmadhikari J., dismissed a writ petition which was filed invoking the jurisdiction of the Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner had alleged that his son (corpus) Ali Khan was in illegal detention of respondent 5 Yasmin Bano who was the wife\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":268431,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/15\/guj-hc-%e2%94%82-custody-of-the-minor-with-the-maternal-grand-parents-does-not-amount-to-illegal-confinement-petition-by-father-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":209661,"position":5},"title":"Guj HC \u2502 Custody of the minor with the maternal grand-parents does not amount to illegal confinement; Petition by father dismissed","author":"Editor","date":"June 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: The Division Bench Vipul M. Pancholi and Rajendra M. Sareen, JJ., dismissed a petition filed by the father under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for custody of the minor. \u00a0 Respondent 4&5 were maternal grandparents and \u00a0the marriage of the petitioner was solemnized in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Gujarat High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-259.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-259.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-259.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-259.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-259.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209661","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209661"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209661\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209661"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209661"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209661"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}