{"id":209629,"date":"2019-02-07T10:04:27","date_gmt":"2019-02-07T04:34:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=209629"},"modified":"2019-02-12T13:31:28","modified_gmt":"2019-02-12T08:01:28","slug":"tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/","title":{"rendered":"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tripura High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>S. Talapatra, J., relying on the Supreme Court decision in\u00a0Azghar Khan v. State of U.P.,\u00a0<\/em>1981 Supp SCC 78<\/a>, dismissed a criminal revision petition filed against the order of Additional Sessions Judge.<\/p>\n

Genesis of the grievance was noted in a complaint filed by\u00a0petitioner alleging that respondent\u00a0stole the cheque in controversy which was dishonoured in due course. A case was registered and after investigation, the police submitted the report of terminating the investigation as there was no foundation for allegations made in the complaint. Petitioner challenged the report by filing a protest petition but Sub-Divisional Magistrate refused to direct further investigation. Being aggrieved, the petitioner preferred a criminal revision petition which was dismissed by Additional Sessions Judge observing that there was no ground to interfere in the report. This order was challenged\u00a0in the present revision petition under Section 482 CrPC.<\/p>\n

At the outset, the High Court observed,\u00a0“By all traits, this is a second revision petition. On the face of it, it is barred by sub-section (3) of Section 397 CrPC.”\u00a0<\/strong>Reliance was placed on\u00a0Azghar Khan\u00a0<\/em>case which laid down\u00a0that a second revision petition would not be competent in view of Section 397(3). Moreover, the High Court did not find any failure of justice which could persuade it to interfere in the matter. [Bikash Chandra v. State of Tripura, 2019 SCC OnLine Tri 40<\/b><\/a>, dated 01-02-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tripura High Court:\u00a0S. Talapatra, J., relying on the Supreme Court decision in\u00a0Azghar Khan v. State of U.P.,\u00a01981 Supp SCC 78, dismissed a <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33675,33674,13021],"class_list":["post-209629","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-failure-of-justice","tag-section-397-3-crpc","tag-section-482-crpc"],"yoast_head":"\nTri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tripura High Court:\u00a0S. Talapatra, J., relying on the Supreme Court decision in\u00a0Azghar Khan v. State of U.P.,\u00a01981 Supp SCC 78, dismissed a\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-02-07T04:34:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-12T08:01:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/07\\\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/07\\\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-07T04:34:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-12T08:01:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/07\\\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":241,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"Failure of Justice\",\"Section 397 (3) CrPC\",\"section 482 crpc\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/07\\\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/07\\\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/07\\\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-07T04:34:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-12T08:01:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/07\\\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/07\\\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/07\\\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated","og_description":"Tripura High Court:\u00a0S. Talapatra, J., relying on the Supreme Court decision in\u00a0Azghar Khan v. State of U.P.,\u00a01981 Supp SCC 78, dismissed a","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-02-07T04:34:27+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-12T08:01:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated","datePublished":"2019-02-07T04:34:27+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-12T08:01:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/"},"wordCount":241,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["Failure of Justice","Section 397 (3) CrPC","section 482 crpc"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/","name":"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-02-07T04:34:27+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-12T08:01:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209629","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209629"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209629\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209629"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209629"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209629"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}