{"id":209629,"date":"2019-02-07T10:04:27","date_gmt":"2019-02-07T04:34:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=209629"},"modified":"2019-02-12T13:31:28","modified_gmt":"2019-02-12T08:01:28","slug":"tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/","title":{"rendered":"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tripura High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>S. Talapatra, J., relying on the Supreme Court decision in\u00a0Azghar Khan v. State of U.P.,\u00a0<\/em>1981 Supp SCC 78<\/a>, dismissed a criminal revision petition filed against the order of Additional Sessions Judge.<\/p>\n

Genesis of the grievance was noted in a complaint filed by\u00a0petitioner alleging that respondent\u00a0stole the cheque in controversy which was dishonoured in due course. A case was registered and after investigation, the police submitted the report of terminating the investigation as there was no foundation for allegations made in the complaint. Petitioner challenged the report by filing a protest petition but Sub-Divisional Magistrate refused to direct further investigation. Being aggrieved, the petitioner preferred a criminal revision petition which was dismissed by Additional Sessions Judge observing that there was no ground to interfere in the report. This order was challenged\u00a0in the present revision petition under Section 482 CrPC.<\/p>\n

At the outset, the High Court observed,\u00a0“By all traits, this is a second revision petition. On the face of it, it is barred by sub-section (3) of Section 397 CrPC.”\u00a0<\/strong>Reliance was placed on\u00a0Azghar Khan\u00a0<\/em>case which laid down\u00a0that a second revision petition would not be competent in view of Section 397(3). Moreover, the High Court did not find any failure of justice which could persuade it to interfere in the matter. [Bikash Chandra v. State of Tripura, 2019 SCC OnLine Tri 40<\/b><\/a>, dated 01-02-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tripura High Court:\u00a0S. Talapatra, J., relying on the Supreme Court decision in\u00a0Azghar Khan v. State of U.P.,\u00a01981 Supp SCC 78, dismissed a <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33675,33674,13021],"class_list":["post-209629","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-failure-of-justice","tag-section-397-3-crpc","tag-section-482-crpc"],"yoast_head":"\nTri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tripura High Court:\u00a0S. Talapatra, J., relying on the Supreme Court decision in\u00a0Azghar Khan v. State of U.P.,\u00a01981 Supp SCC 78, dismissed a\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-02-07T04:34:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-12T08:01:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/07\\\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/07\\\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-07T04:34:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-12T08:01:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/07\\\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":241,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"Failure of Justice\",\"Section 397 (3) CrPC\",\"section 482 crpc\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/07\\\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/07\\\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/07\\\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-07T04:34:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-12T08:01:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/07\\\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/07\\\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/07\\\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated","og_description":"Tripura High Court:\u00a0S. Talapatra, J., relying on the Supreme Court decision in\u00a0Azghar Khan v. State of U.P.,\u00a01981 Supp SCC 78, dismissed a","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-02-07T04:34:27+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-12T08:01:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated","datePublished":"2019-02-07T04:34:27+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-12T08:01:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/"},"wordCount":241,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["Failure of Justice","Section 397 (3) CrPC","section 482 crpc"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/","name":"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-02-07T04:34:27+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-12T08:01:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":237755,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/kar-hc-court-in-exercise-of-its-powers-under-s-397-crpc-cannot-re-appreciate-the-evidence-and-arrive-at-a-different-conclusion-even-if-a-different-view-is-possible-from-the-evidence-petition-dism\/","url_meta":{"origin":209629,"position":0},"title":"Kar HC | Court in exercise of its powers under S. 397 CrPC cannot re-appreciate evidence and arrive at a different conclusion, even if a different view is possible from the evidence; Petition dismissed \u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"October 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: John Michael Cunha J., while rejecting the present criminal revision petition, elaborated on scope and ambit of Section 397 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and further rejected the argument of the petitioner that the lower courts have erred in appreciating the evidence. Brief Facts The present Revision Petition\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":223429,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/21\/bom-hc-s-143-a-ni-act-not-available-where-complaint-filed-before-the-provision-came-into-force-restated\/","url_meta":{"origin":209629,"position":1},"title":"Bom HC | S. 143-A NI Act not available where complaint filed before the provision came into force, restated","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Vibha Kankanwadi, J., dismissed a writ petition filed against the order of the Sessions Judge whereby he had reversed the decision of the Magistrate who had directed the respondent herein to deposit 10% of the cheque amount. The petitioner had filed a complaint against\u00a0the respondent alleging the commission\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":308475,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/05\/directions-for-investigation-u-s-1563-crpc-cannot-be-given-mechanically-by-magistrate-application-of-mind-must-dhc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":209629,"position":2},"title":"Directions for investigation u\/s 156(3) CrPC cannot be given mechanically by Magistrate; application of mind necessary: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"December 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMagistrate is not bound to direct investigation by police even if all allegations made in complaint disclose ingredients of cognizable offence. Each case must be viewed depending upon facts and circumstances involved therein.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224452,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/23\/cal-hc-rejection-of-complaint-under-s-1563-crpc-by-magistrate-without-taking-cognizance-under-s-1901a-is-an-error-in-law-correct-approach-explained\/","url_meta":{"origin":209629,"position":3},"title":"Cal HC | Rejection of complaint under S. 156(3) CrPC by Magistrate without taking cognizance under S. 190(1)(a) is an error in law; correct approach explained","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 23, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Madhumati Mitra, J., allowed a criminal revision application filed against the order of the Magistrate whereby he had rejected the petitioner's prayer under Section 156(3) CrPC to send the petition of complaint to the officer-in-charge of the police station for treating the same as first information report. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206969,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/18\/petition-in-nature-of-second-revision-not-a-proper-case-in-which-inherent-power-could-be-invoked-under-section-482-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":209629,"position":4},"title":"Petition in nature of second revision not a proper case in which inherent power could be invoked under Section 482 CrPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This Criminal Case was filed before a Single Judge Bench of Rajendra Kumar Srivastava, J., by petitioner under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code for quashing the charge sheet pending before the JMFC and order passed by Additional Sessions Judge under Section 3 and 22\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":271959,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/20\/delhi-high-court-directs-registration-of-fir-in-alleged-rape-by-bjp-leader-shahnawaz-hussain-after-noticing-complete-reluctance-on-part-of-police-authorities\/","url_meta":{"origin":209629,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court directs registration of FIR in an alleged rape by BJP Leader Shahnawaz Hussain after noticing complete reluctance on part of police authorities","author":"Editor","date":"August 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a case of allegations of rape and sexual assault leveled against the BJP leader Syed Shehanawaz Hussain (\u2018petitioner'), Asha Menon, J. upheld decisions of Metropolitan Magistrate and Special Judge further directing registration of FIR immediately and to submit the final report under Section 173 Criminal Procedure\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209629","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209629"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209629\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209629"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209629"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209629"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}