{"id":209547,"date":"2019-02-06T13:00:00","date_gmt":"2019-02-06T07:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=209547"},"modified":"2019-02-08T14:26:23","modified_gmt":"2019-02-08T08:56:23","slug":"del-hc-in-laws-discharged-of-s-498-ipc-where-complainant-roped-in-all-family-members-without-ascribing-specific-rules","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/06\/del-hc-in-laws-discharged-of-s-498-ipc-where-complainant-roped-in-all-family-members-without-ascribing-specific-rules\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | In-laws discharged of S. 498-A IPC where complainant roped in all family members without ascribing specific roles"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. dismissed a petition filed against the judgment of Revisional Court whereby petitioner’s \/ complainant’s in-laws were discharged of the offences under \u00a0Sections 498-A and 34 IPC.<\/p>\n

In 2013, petitioner had filed an FIR against her husband and in-laws alleging harassment. It was alleged that her husband used to come late and beat the petitioner and when she complained to her in-laws, they behaved in the same manner. She was thrown out of the matrimonial house and was threatened not to enter again.<\/p>\n

Anuj Kr Ranjan, Advocate for the petitioner submitted that there was sufficient material on record to substantiate framing of charge under Section 498-A. Per contra, Kishan N. Rana, Advocate for in-laws submitted that allegations against them were bald and even the investigation did not ravel any incriminating material.<\/p>\n

After perusing the FIR, it was noted by the High Court that\u00a0“in one breath, the petitioner named all the family members without specific role ascribed to any one of them.”<\/strong>Though instances were mentioned vis-a-vis her mother-in-law and brother of father-in-law, however, no specifics about date, time or place were given. Omnibus allegations were made which according to the Court did not justify framing a charge under Section 498-A as\u00a0“for a change to be framed, the evidence gathered by the prosecution should not only give rise to suspicion but there should be grave suspicion that the accused have committed the offence.”\u00a0<\/strong>Consequently, the petition was dismissed. It may be noted that in the present case, a charge was framed against the husband who was facing trial. [Anju v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6865<\/b><\/a>, dated 04-02-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. dismissed a petition filed against the judgment of Revisional Court whereby petitioner’s \/ complainant’s in-laws were discharged <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3067,3000,33163,33651,11381],"class_list":["post-209547","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-FIR","tag-harassment","tag-in-laws","tag-section-498-ipc","tag-suspicion"],"yoast_head":"\nDel HC | In-laws discharged of S. 498-A IPC where complainant roped in all family members without ascribing specific roles | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/06\/del-hc-in-laws-discharged-of-s-498-ipc-where-complainant-roped-in-all-family-members-without-ascribing-specific-rules\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | In-laws discharged of S. 498-A IPC where complainant roped in all family members without ascribing specific roles\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. dismissed a petition filed against the judgment of Revisional Court whereby petitioner’s \/ complainant’s in-laws were discharged\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/06\/del-hc-in-laws-discharged-of-s-498-ipc-where-complainant-roped-in-all-family-members-without-ascribing-specific-rules\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-02-06T07:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-08T08:56:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/06\/del-hc-in-laws-discharged-of-s-498-ipc-where-complainant-roped-in-all-family-members-without-ascribing-specific-rules\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/06\/del-hc-in-laws-discharged-of-s-498-ipc-where-complainant-roped-in-all-family-members-without-ascribing-specific-rules\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | In-laws discharged of S. 498-A IPC where complainant roped in all family members without ascribing specific roles | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-06T07:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-08T08:56:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/06\/del-hc-in-laws-discharged-of-s-498-ipc-where-complainant-roped-in-all-family-members-without-ascribing-specific-rules\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/06\/del-hc-in-laws-discharged-of-s-498-ipc-where-complainant-roped-in-all-family-members-without-ascribing-specific-rules\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/06\/del-hc-in-laws-discharged-of-s-498-ipc-where-complainant-roped-in-all-family-members-without-ascribing-specific-rules\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | In-laws discharged of S. 498-A IPC where complainant roped in all family members without ascribing specific roles\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | In-laws discharged of S. 498-A IPC where complainant roped in all family members without ascribing specific roles | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/06\/del-hc-in-laws-discharged-of-s-498-ipc-where-complainant-roped-in-all-family-members-without-ascribing-specific-rules\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | In-laws discharged of S. 498-A IPC where complainant roped in all family members without ascribing specific roles","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. dismissed a petition filed against the judgment of Revisional Court whereby petitioner’s \/ complainant’s in-laws were discharged","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/06\/del-hc-in-laws-discharged-of-s-498-ipc-where-complainant-roped-in-all-family-members-without-ascribing-specific-rules\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-02-06T07:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-08T08:56:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/06\/del-hc-in-laws-discharged-of-s-498-ipc-where-complainant-roped-in-all-family-members-without-ascribing-specific-rules\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/06\/del-hc-in-laws-discharged-of-s-498-ipc-where-complainant-roped-in-all-family-members-without-ascribing-specific-rules\/","name":"Del HC | In-laws discharged of S. 498-A IPC where complainant roped in all family members without ascribing specific roles | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-02-06T07:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-08T08:56:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/06\/del-hc-in-laws-discharged-of-s-498-ipc-where-complainant-roped-in-all-family-members-without-ascribing-specific-rules\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/06\/del-hc-in-laws-discharged-of-s-498-ipc-where-complainant-roped-in-all-family-members-without-ascribing-specific-rules\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/06\/del-hc-in-laws-discharged-of-s-498-ipc-where-complainant-roped-in-all-family-members-without-ascribing-specific-rules\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | In-laws discharged of S. 498-A IPC where complainant roped in all family members without ascribing specific roles"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":212057,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/del-hc-mere-bickering-doesnt-constitute-offence-under-ss-304-b-and-498-a-ipc-in-laws-living-in-separate-house-discharged\/","url_meta":{"origin":209547,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | Mere bickering doesn’t constitute offence under Ss. 304-B and 498-A IPC; in laws living in separate house discharged","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Sanjeev Sachdeva, J., allowed a petition filed by in-laws of the deceased (wife) against the order of the trial court in pursuance of which charges were framed against them under Sections 304-B (dowry death) and 498-A\u00a0(husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty)\u00a0IPC. As\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215167,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/30\/del-hc-charges-under-ss-306-and-498-a-ipc-are-independent-of-each-other-discharge-under-one-does-not-ipso-facto-amount-to-acquittal-for-another\/","url_meta":{"origin":209547,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Charges under Ss. 306 and 498-A IPC are independent of each-other; discharge under one does not ipso facto amount to acquittal for another","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. dismissed a criminal revision petition filed against the order of the trial court whereby charge under Section 498-A\u00a0(husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty)\u00a0IPC was framed against the petitioner. Petitioner was married to the deceased who committed suicide on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":297718,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/26\/second-wife-complaint-section-498-a-penal-code-not-maintainable-karnataka-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":209547,"position":2},"title":"Complaint under S. 498-A, IPC filed by the second wife against the husband and in-laws cannot be maintainable: Karnataka High Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court pointed out that \u2018woman\u2019 as per S. 498-A, IPC means and includes a legally wedded wife.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"karnataka high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":158024,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/18\/scrutinize-the-allegations-carefully-against-close-relatives-of-husband-when-fir-is-filed-under-s-498-a-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":209547,"position":3},"title":"Scrutinize the allegations carefully against close relatives of husband when FIR is filed under S. 498-A IPC","author":"Saba","date":"September 18, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: The High Court recently addressed the case of petitioners under Section 482 CrPC for quashing the FIR filed under Sections 323, 406, 498-A, 420, 506 and 120-B IPC on the ground that they had been falsely implicated in the case. Petitioner 1\u00a0 was the mother-in-law\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":276290,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":209547,"position":4},"title":"Bombay High Court | Mere use of the word harassment ‘mentally and physically’ not sufficient to attract ingredients of S. 498-A IPC","author":"Editor","date":"October 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Bombay High Court: In an application filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) for quashing the FIR for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), a Division Bench of Vibha Kankanwadi and Rajesh S Patil,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":344050,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/quarrels-not-cruelty-s-498a-gauhati-hc-quashes-proceedings-against-husband-in-laws\/","url_meta":{"origin":209547,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Quarrels between husband & wife not cruelty under S. 498-A IPC\u2019; Gauhati HC quashes proceedings against husband and in-laws","author":"Editor","date":"March 21, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSubjecting a married woman to cruelty for want of dowry was the reason for which our legislature has inserted Section 498-A in the Penal Code. In the case at hand, there is no allegation of demand of dowry.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Gauhati High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209547","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209547"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209547\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209547"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209547"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209547"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}