{"id":209495,"date":"2019-02-05T14:00:23","date_gmt":"2019-02-05T08:30:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=209495"},"modified":"2019-02-07T10:37:34","modified_gmt":"2019-02-07T05:07:34","slug":"del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/05\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | No reason to stay proceedings under S. 138 NI Act where trial in another FIR involving the parties is pending"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court: <\/strong>R.K. Gauba, J. allowed a petition filed against the order of Sessions Court whereby proceedings in a case filed under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 were stayed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioner had filed a case against respondents alleging commission\u00a0of an offence under Section 138. It was alleged that he had advanced a loan to the respondents, for the repayment of which, the respondents had issued a cheque in his favour drawn on Axis Bank Ltd. However, on presenting the cheque, it was returned unpaid with remarks\u00a0<em>&#8220;payment stopped by drawer.&#8221;\u00a0<\/em>After a preliminary enquiry, Metropolitan Magistrate issued summons to respondents. Thereafter the respondents reached the Sessions Court which granted a stay on summons order till final decision in another case arising out of an FIR filed by respondents against the petitioner. Aggrieved thereby, petitioner filed the present petition under Section 482 CrPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court noted that in the FIR filed, respondents alleged that the cheque in question was stolen and misappropriated by the petitioner. It was also noted that revisional court stayed the proceedings under Section 138 on the ground that the same would\u00a0<em>unnecessarily prejudice\u00a0<\/em>the trial in the case arising out of the FIR. The High Court held this to be totally unjust and unfair. It was stated\u00a0<strong>&#8220;Though questions would arise in the criminal case under Section 138 NI Act as to whether cheque in question had come in the hands of the petitioner legitimately or not, the contentions of the respondents are a matter of defence which will have to be raised by them, the burden of proof of the requisite facts in such regard being placed on them. There is no reason why the case arising out of above-mentioned FIR should have primacy or priority over the case of the petitioner against the opposite party.&#8221;<\/strong> The petition was thus allowed and the impugned stay order was allowed. [Mukesh Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi), <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/G9D0M124\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Del 6843<\/b><\/a>, decided on 28-01-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: R.K. Gauba, J. allowed a petition filed against the order of Sessions Court whereby proceedings in a case filed <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[28514,3067,30292,23584,13021,4571],"class_list":["post-209495","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cheque","tag-FIR","tag-loan","tag-section-138-ni-act","tag-section-482-crpc","tag-trial"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Del HC | No reason to stay proceedings under S. 138 NI Act where trial in another FIR involving the parties is pending | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/05\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | No reason to stay proceedings under S. 138 NI Act where trial in another FIR involving the parties is pending\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: R.K. Gauba, J. allowed a petition filed against the order of Sessions Court whereby proceedings in a case filed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/05\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-02-05T08:30:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-07T05:07:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/05\\\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/05\\\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"Del HC | No reason to stay proceedings under S. 138 NI Act where trial in another FIR involving the parties is pending\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-05T08:30:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-07T05:07:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/05\\\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":346,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"cheque\",\"FIR\",\"loan\",\"Section 138 NI Act\",\"section 482 crpc\",\"trial\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/05\\\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/05\\\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/05\\\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\\\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | No reason to stay proceedings under S. 138 NI Act where trial in another FIR involving the parties is pending | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-05T08:30:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-07T05:07:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/05\\\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/05\\\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/05\\\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | No reason to stay proceedings under S. 138 NI Act where trial in another FIR involving the parties is pending\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | No reason to stay proceedings under S. 138 NI Act where trial in another FIR involving the parties is pending | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/05\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | No reason to stay proceedings under S. 138 NI Act where trial in another FIR involving the parties is pending","og_description":"Delhi High Court: R.K. Gauba, J. allowed a petition filed against the order of Sessions Court whereby proceedings in a case filed","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/05\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-02-05T08:30:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-07T05:07:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/05\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/05\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"Del HC | No reason to stay proceedings under S. 138 NI Act where trial in another FIR involving the parties is pending","datePublished":"2019-02-05T08:30:23+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-07T05:07:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/05\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\/"},"wordCount":346,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["cheque","FIR","loan","Section 138 NI Act","section 482 crpc","trial"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/05\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/05\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/05\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\/","name":"Del HC | No reason to stay proceedings under S. 138 NI Act where trial in another FIR involving the parties is pending | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-02-05T08:30:23+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-07T05:07:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/05\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/05\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/05\/del-hc-no-reason-to-stay-proceedings-under-s-138-ni-act-where-trial-in-another-fir-involving-the-parties-is-pending\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | No reason to stay proceedings under S. 138 NI Act where trial in another FIR involving the parties is pending"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209495","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209495"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209495\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209495"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209495"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209495"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}