{"id":209162,"date":"2019-02-01T12:59:36","date_gmt":"2019-02-01T07:29:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=209162"},"modified":"2019-02-04T10:27:14","modified_gmt":"2019-02-04T04:57:14","slug":"bom-hc-issues-of-constitutionality-of-a-statute-not-be-decided-for-mere-academic-purpose","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/01\/bom-hc-issues-of-constitutionality-of-a-statute-not-be-decided-for-mere-academic-purpose\/","title":{"rendered":"Bom HC | Issues of constitutionality of a statute not to be decided for mere academic purpose"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court at Goa:\u00a0<\/strong>The Division Bench of M.S. Sonak & Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ. dismissed a set of petitions holding that the present was not an appropriate case to entertain a constitutional challenge to Section 33(3) of Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968.<\/p>\n

Vires of Section 33(3) were challenged in the present petition. The petitioners claimed to be agricultural tenants of the properties subject to demolition by State Authorities. He had earlier prayed for an interim relief in the matter which was refused by the High Court.<\/p>\n

Presently, the Court was informed that the structures in question had been already demolished. It was noted that the petitioners failed to state with clarity as to who had put up the structures and whether they were put up by permission of Authorities. The Court was of the view that it was incumbent on the petitioners, claiming to be agricultural tenants to disclose the genesis of such structures. It was held that in the absence of such disclosures, the Court was not in a position to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 and Article 227 to extend any relief to the petitioners.<\/p>\n

Insofar as a challenge to Section 33(3) was concerned, the Court observed that,\u00a0“it is settled position in law that issues on the constitutionality of a statute are not to be decided for mere academic purpose.”<\/strong> In the present case, the petitioners made out no case whatsoever for grant of any reliefs or for extending any protection to the structures in question. As such the Court held that it will not be appropriate to entertain any constitutional challenge to Section 33(3) at the behest of present petitioners. Such challenge can perhaps be considered in the appropriate case instituted by appropriate petitioner. Consequently, the petitions were dismissed. [Jose Manuel Monteiro v. State of Goa, 2019 SCC OnLine Bom 121<\/a>,<\/b> dated 29-01-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court at Goa:\u00a0The Division Bench of M.S. Sonak & Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ. dismissed a set of petitions holding that <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33552,33553,3274,24864,33551],"class_list":["post-209162","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-academic-purpose","tag-agricultural-tenants","tag-constitutionality","tag-issues","tag-section-333-of-goa-land-revenue-code"],"yoast_head":"\nBom HC | Issues of constitutionality of a statute not to be decided for mere academic purpose | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/01\/bom-hc-issues-of-constitutionality-of-a-statute-not-be-decided-for-mere-academic-purpose\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bom HC | Issues of constitutionality of a statute not to be decided for mere academic purpose\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court at Goa:\u00a0The Division Bench of M.S. Sonak & Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ. dismissed a set of petitions holding that\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/01\/bom-hc-issues-of-constitutionality-of-a-statute-not-be-decided-for-mere-academic-purpose\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-02-01T07:29:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-04T04:57:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/goabombayhighcourt1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"768\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/01\/bom-hc-issues-of-constitutionality-of-a-statute-not-be-decided-for-mere-academic-purpose\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/01\/bom-hc-issues-of-constitutionality-of-a-statute-not-be-decided-for-mere-academic-purpose\/\",\"name\":\"Bom HC | Issues of constitutionality of a statute not to be decided for mere academic purpose | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-01T07:29:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-04T04:57:14+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/01\/bom-hc-issues-of-constitutionality-of-a-statute-not-be-decided-for-mere-academic-purpose\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/01\/bom-hc-issues-of-constitutionality-of-a-statute-not-be-decided-for-mere-academic-purpose\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/01\/bom-hc-issues-of-constitutionality-of-a-statute-not-be-decided-for-mere-academic-purpose\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bom HC | Issues of constitutionality of a statute not to be decided for mere academic purpose\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bom HC | Issues of constitutionality of a statute not to be decided for mere academic purpose | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/01\/bom-hc-issues-of-constitutionality-of-a-statute-not-be-decided-for-mere-academic-purpose\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bom HC | Issues of constitutionality of a statute not to be decided for mere academic purpose","og_description":"Bombay High Court at Goa:\u00a0The Division Bench of M.S. Sonak & Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ. dismissed a set of petitions holding that","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/01\/bom-hc-issues-of-constitutionality-of-a-statute-not-be-decided-for-mere-academic-purpose\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-02-01T07:29:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-04T04:57:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":768,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/goabombayhighcourt1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/01\/bom-hc-issues-of-constitutionality-of-a-statute-not-be-decided-for-mere-academic-purpose\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/01\/bom-hc-issues-of-constitutionality-of-a-statute-not-be-decided-for-mere-academic-purpose\/","name":"Bom HC | Issues of constitutionality of a statute not to be decided for mere academic purpose | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-02-01T07:29:36+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-04T04:57:14+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/01\/bom-hc-issues-of-constitutionality-of-a-statute-not-be-decided-for-mere-academic-purpose\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/01\/bom-hc-issues-of-constitutionality-of-a-statute-not-be-decided-for-mere-academic-purpose\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/01\/bom-hc-issues-of-constitutionality-of-a-statute-not-be-decided-for-mere-academic-purpose\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bom HC | Issues of constitutionality of a statute not to be decided for mere academic purpose"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":359951,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/sam-meditab-specialities-supreme-court-goa-settlement\/","url_meta":{"origin":209162,"position":0},"title":"SAM represents Meditab Specialities in landmark Supreme Court settlement with State of Goa and Goa Industrial Development Corporation","author":"Editor","date":"September 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The matter was settled before the Supreme Court of India on August 29, 2025. The amount of the deal was INR 33 crore.","rel":"","context":"In "Law Firms News"","block_context":{"text":"Law Firms News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/law-firms-news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Meditab Specialities Supreme Court settlement","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Meditab-Specialities-Supreme-Court-settlement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Meditab-Specialities-Supreme-Court-settlement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Meditab-Specialities-Supreme-Court-settlement.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Meditab-Specialities-Supreme-Court-settlement.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220402,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-september-2019\/","url_meta":{"origin":209162,"position":1},"title":"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 September 2019","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"TOP STORIES AYODHYA HEARING SC issues notice to 2 for threatening senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan Won\u2019t hear the matter for even a single extra day after October 18: SC to all counsels SC asks parties to come up with tentative timeline for conclusion of arguments We don\u2019t want any mediation:\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":104571,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/07\/goa-bench-of-bombay-high-court-refuses-to-interfere-in-guidelines-issued-by-eci-until-a-detailed-reply-is-filed\/","url_meta":{"origin":209162,"position":2},"title":"Goa Bench of Bombay High Court refuses to interfere in guidelines issued by ECI until a detailed reply is filed","author":"Saba","date":"February 7, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Bombay at Goa:\u00a0The Election Commission had issued certain guidelines for conducting exit polls on 4th February, 2017, that was the day of polling in Goa. The petitioners, a local media news channel had filed a writ petition challenging the guidelines of Election Commission. The counsel on behalf\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":195901,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/09\/gujarat-hc-issues-notice-to-union-state-govt-over-constitutionality-of-national-state-gst-appellate-tribunals\/","url_meta":{"origin":209162,"position":3},"title":"Gujarat HC issues notice to Union & State Govt over constitutionality of National & State GST Appellate Tribunals","author":"Saba","date":"May 9, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: The Court\u00a0 heard a petition filed by two Chartered Accountants, challenging the constitutionality of the National and State\/ Regional Goods and Services Tax (GST) Appellate Tribunals, which are to be established as per guidelines in Section 109 of the Central GST Act. It was argued by the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313997,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/explained-supreme-court-tenants-right-to-pre-emption-urban-immovable-property-punjab-pre-emption-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":209162,"position":4},"title":"Explained | Supreme Court verdict on Tenants right to pre-emption in the ‘urban immovable property’ under Punjab Pre-Emption Act","author":"Apoorva","date":"February 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The notification dated 08-10-1985 limits its application for taking away the right of pre-emption only with reference to sale of land falling in the areas of any municipality.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"right to pre-emption","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/right-to-pre-emption.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/right-to-pre-emption.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/right-to-pre-emption.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/right-to-pre-emption.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":41911,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/04\/constitutional-validity-of-land-acquisition-goa-amendment-act-2009-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":209162,"position":5},"title":"Constitutional validity of Land Acquisition (Goa Amendment) Act, 2009 upheld","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 4, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where the Constitutional validity of the Land Acquisition (Goa Amendment) Act, 2009 was challenged, the bench of Ranjan Gogoi and PC Pantt, JJ held that a judicial pronouncement, either declaratory or conferring rights on the citizens cannot be set at naught by a subsequent legislative\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209162","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209162"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209162\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209162"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209162"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209162"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}