{"id":209090,"date":"2019-01-31T17:45:16","date_gmt":"2019-01-31T12:15:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=209090"},"modified":"2019-02-02T12:22:36","modified_gmt":"2019-02-02T06:52:36","slug":"guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order\/","title":{"rendered":"Guj HC | Simple registration of FIR not sufficient to establish breach of maintenance of public order"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Gujarat High Court<\/strong>: A Bench of S.H. Vora, J. allowed the special leave petition and quashed the impugned order of detention by the respondent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present case the petitioner was detained by the respondent under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 as a \u2018bootlegger\u2019 as defined under Section 2(b) of the said Act. It was contended that the alleged activity could be a breach of law and order but cannot be breach of maintenance of public order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held that the offences alleged in the FIRs are dealt under relevant penal laws but do not fall within the ambit of the Act mentioned. Further, it referred to <em>Pushker Mukherjee<\/em> v. <em>State of W.B.,<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/3G6G6W6I\"> (1969) 1 SCC 10<\/a> to distinguish between \u2018law and order\u2019 and \u2018public order\u2019. And since except general statements there was no relevant and cogent material on record to show that all social apparatus was in peril disturbing public order at the instance of such person, it does not fall within the definition under Section 2(b) of the Act. [Vijaypal Sudarshanpal Pal v. State, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/b9J5d7i5\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Guj 159<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 29-01-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court: A Bench of S.H. Vora, J. allowed the special leave petition and quashed the impugned order of detention by <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":206146,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33529,3067,33530,17941],"class_list":["post-209090","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-breach-of-maintenance","tag-FIR","tag-gujarat-prevention-of-anti-social-activities-act","tag-public-order"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Guj HC | Simple registration of FIR not sufficient to establish breach of maintenance of public order | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Guj HC | Simple registration of FIR not sufficient to establish breach of maintenance of public order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gujarat High Court: A Bench of S.H. Vora, J. allowed the special leave petition and quashed the impugned order of detention by\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-31T12:15:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-02T06:52:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order\/\",\"name\":\"Guj HC | Simple registration of FIR not sufficient to establish breach of maintenance of public order | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-31T12:15:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-02T06:52:36+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Guj HC | Simple registration of FIR not sufficient to establish breach of maintenance of public order\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Guj HC | Simple registration of FIR not sufficient to establish breach of maintenance of public order | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Guj HC | Simple registration of FIR not sufficient to establish breach of maintenance of public order","og_description":"Gujarat High Court: A Bench of S.H. Vora, J. allowed the special leave petition and quashed the impugned order of detention by","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-31T12:15:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-02T06:52:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order\/","name":"Guj HC | Simple registration of FIR not sufficient to establish breach of maintenance of public order | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","datePublished":"2019-01-31T12:15:16+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-02T06:52:36+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/guj-hc-simple-registration-of-fir-not-sufficient-to-establish-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Guj HC | Simple registration of FIR not sufficient to establish breach of maintenance of public order"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":313346,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/07\/mere-registration-of-fir-cannot-have-nexus-with-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":209090,"position":0},"title":"[PASA, 1985] Mere registration of FIR cannot have nexus with breach of maintenance of public order; Gujarat HC quashes preventive detention order against step-father","author":"Editor","date":"February 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A detention order was passed by the Police Commissioner, Surat, against the victim\u2019s step-father and was detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 as a sexual offender for disturbing the \u2018public order\u2019.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"gujarat high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200838,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/act-affecting-public-order-must-affect-the-community-at-large-detenue-under-gujarat-prevention-of-anti-social-activities-act-released\/","url_meta":{"origin":209090,"position":1},"title":"Act affecting public order must affect the community at large; detenue under Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act released","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of S.H. Vora, J., allowed a petition against the detention orders passed under Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985. The petition was directed against order of detention passed by the respondent in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(2) of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":141251,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/07\/gujarat-hc-sets-aside-the-order-of-detention-passed-under-the-gujarat-prevention-of-anti-social-activities-act-1985\/","url_meta":{"origin":209090,"position":2},"title":"Gujarat HC sets aside the order of detention passed under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985","author":"Saba","date":"July 7, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: In a recent judgment, a Single Judge Bench of S.H. Vora, J. passed an order setting aside the detention order passed by the State Government in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985. The petitioner contended that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264751,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/30\/fir-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":209090,"position":3},"title":"Guj HC | Simplicitor registration of FIR\/s by itself cannot have any nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order; Detention order quashed","author":"Editor","date":"March 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: Rajendra M. Sareen, J. allowed a petition which was directed against the detention order passed by respondent\u2013detaining authority in exercise of powers conferred under section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (\u201cthe Act\u201d) by detaining the petitioner-detenue as defined under section 2(b)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236870,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/guj-hc-simplicitor-registration-of-fir-s-by-itself-cannot-have-any-nexus-with-the-breach-of-maintenance-of-public-order-court-orders-detenue-to-be-set-at-liberty\/","url_meta":{"origin":209090,"position":4},"title":"Guj HC | Simplicitor registration of FIR\/s by itself cannot have any nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order; Court orders detenue to be set at liberty","author":"Editor","date":"October 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: S.H. Vohra, J., allowed a petition which was filed aggrieved against the order of detention passed by the respondent \u2013 detaining authority in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 detaining the petitioner \u2013 detenue as defined\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253902,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/08\/detention-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":209090,"position":5},"title":"Guj HC | Detaining authority fell in error in interpreting \u201cdangerous person\u201d; Court allows petition against detention","author":"Editor","date":"September 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: Paresh Upadhyay, J., allowed a petition which was filed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Surat whereby the petitioner is detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985. Advocate for the petitioner had submitted that, mere filing of five FIRs against\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209090","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209090"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209090\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/206146"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209090"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209090"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209090"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}