{"id":209068,"date":"2019-01-31T12:45:14","date_gmt":"2019-01-31T07:15:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=209068"},"modified":"2019-02-02T11:28:59","modified_gmt":"2019-02-02T05:58:59","slug":"ph-hc-claim-of-fraudulently-obtaining-signature-on-agreement-to-sell-must-be-supported-with-sufficient-evidence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/ph-hc-claim-of-fraudulently-obtaining-signature-on-agreement-to-sell-must-be-supported-with-sufficient-evidence\/","title":{"rendered":"P&H HC | Claim of fraudulently obtaining signature on agreement to sell must be supported with sufficient evidence"},"content":{"rendered":"

Punjab & Haryana HC<\/span><\/b>: The Bench of Raj Mohan Singh, J. dismissed a revision petition on the ground of insufficient evidence but granted liberty to file a fresh revision petition with better particulars.<\/span><\/p>\n

The present matter pertained to the validity of an agreement of sale executed by petitioner and one Sukhchain Singh, being contested before the lower court. The petitioner\u2019s submission before lower court was that one Girdhari Lal had obtained her signatures on some blank papers and the said agreement of sale was the outcome of such fraud. She filed an application for leading examination of handwriting and fingerprint expert as additional evidence in order to prove the said forgery. However, the trial court dismissed the application on the premise that the petitioner had admitted her signature on the agreement. Comparison of the signature was not sought to be made with any other document. The handwriting and fingerprint expert cannot opine whether the signatures appended on blank papers were prior in point of time or subsequent thereof. Aggrieved by the said order, the instant revision petition was filed.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Court observed that the petitioner could not furnish any explanation as to how Sukhchain Singh\u2019s signatures came to be appended on an agreement to sell. The story advanced by her was in the context of her signing the blank papers and not by Sukhchain Singh in the presence of any witness. In view thereof, it was held that the impugned order did not suffer from any error of jurisdiction or perversity of any type.<\/span>[Jaspal Kaur v. Girdhari Lal,\u00a02019 SCC OnLine P&H 56<\/b><\/a>, decided on 15-01-2019]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Punjab & Haryana HC: The Bench of Raj Mohan Singh, J. dismissed a revision petition on the ground of insufficient evidence but <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33522,2590,33523,30635],"class_list":["post-209068","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-agreement-to-sell","tag-Claim","tag-error-of-jurisdiction","tag-fraudulent"],"yoast_head":"\nP&H HC | Claim of fraudulently obtaining signature on agreement to sell must be supported with sufficient evidence | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/ph-hc-claim-of-fraudulently-obtaining-signature-on-agreement-to-sell-must-be-supported-with-sufficient-evidence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P&H HC | Claim of fraudulently obtaining signature on agreement to sell must be supported with sufficient evidence\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab & Haryana HC: The Bench of Raj Mohan Singh, J. dismissed a revision petition on the ground of insufficient evidence but\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/ph-hc-claim-of-fraudulently-obtaining-signature-on-agreement-to-sell-must-be-supported-with-sufficient-evidence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-31T07:15:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-02T05:58:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/ph-hc-claim-of-fraudulently-obtaining-signature-on-agreement-to-sell-must-be-supported-with-sufficient-evidence\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/ph-hc-claim-of-fraudulently-obtaining-signature-on-agreement-to-sell-must-be-supported-with-sufficient-evidence\/\",\"name\":\"P&H HC | Claim of fraudulently obtaining signature on agreement to sell must be supported with sufficient evidence | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-31T07:15:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-02T05:58:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/ph-hc-claim-of-fraudulently-obtaining-signature-on-agreement-to-sell-must-be-supported-with-sufficient-evidence\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/ph-hc-claim-of-fraudulently-obtaining-signature-on-agreement-to-sell-must-be-supported-with-sufficient-evidence\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/ph-hc-claim-of-fraudulently-obtaining-signature-on-agreement-to-sell-must-be-supported-with-sufficient-evidence\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P&H HC | Claim of fraudulently obtaining signature on agreement to sell must be supported with sufficient evidence\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P&H HC | Claim of fraudulently obtaining signature on agreement to sell must be supported with sufficient evidence | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/ph-hc-claim-of-fraudulently-obtaining-signature-on-agreement-to-sell-must-be-supported-with-sufficient-evidence\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P&H HC | Claim of fraudulently obtaining signature on agreement to sell must be supported with sufficient evidence","og_description":"Punjab & Haryana HC: The Bench of Raj Mohan Singh, J. dismissed a revision petition on the ground of insufficient evidence but","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/ph-hc-claim-of-fraudulently-obtaining-signature-on-agreement-to-sell-must-be-supported-with-sufficient-evidence\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-31T07:15:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-02T05:58:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/ph-hc-claim-of-fraudulently-obtaining-signature-on-agreement-to-sell-must-be-supported-with-sufficient-evidence\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/ph-hc-claim-of-fraudulently-obtaining-signature-on-agreement-to-sell-must-be-supported-with-sufficient-evidence\/","name":"P&H HC | Claim of fraudulently obtaining signature on agreement to sell must be supported with sufficient evidence | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-01-31T07:15:14+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-02T05:58:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/ph-hc-claim-of-fraudulently-obtaining-signature-on-agreement-to-sell-must-be-supported-with-sufficient-evidence\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/ph-hc-claim-of-fraudulently-obtaining-signature-on-agreement-to-sell-must-be-supported-with-sufficient-evidence\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/ph-hc-claim-of-fraudulently-obtaining-signature-on-agreement-to-sell-must-be-supported-with-sufficient-evidence\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P&H HC | Claim of fraudulently obtaining signature on agreement to sell must be supported with sufficient evidence"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":335664,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/del-hc-dismisses-revision-petition-to-challenge-order-performance-oral-agreement-to-sell-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":209068,"position":0},"title":"Delhi HC dismisses Revision Petition to challenge Order by ADJ holding suit for specific performance of oral agreement to sell maintainable","author":"Editor","date":"November 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018It is no longer res integra that to determine an application under Order VII Rule 11 of Civil Procedure Code, it is only averments made in the plaint that can be considered.\u2019","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":289603,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/15\/unregistered-agreement-to-sell-shall-be-admissible-in-evidence-in-suit-for-specific-performance-supreme-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":209068,"position":1},"title":"Unregistered agreement to sell an admissible evidence in a suit for specific performance; Supreme Court upholds Madras High Court Judgment","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court said that as per proviso to Section 49 of the Registration Act, 1908 an unregistered document affecting immovable property may be received as evidence of a contract in a suit for specific performance under Chapter-II of the Specific Relief Act, 1877, or as evidence of any collateral transaction\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"unregistered agreement to sell as evidence","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/unregistered-agreement-to-sell-as-evidence.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/unregistered-agreement-to-sell-as-evidence.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/unregistered-agreement-to-sell-as-evidence.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/unregistered-agreement-to-sell-as-evidence.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214689,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/15\/kar-hc-evidence-not-to-be-re-appreciated-at-revisional-stage-if-lower-courts-return-concurrent-findings\/","url_meta":{"origin":209068,"position":2},"title":"Kar HC | Evidence not to be re-appreciated at revisional stage if lower courts return concurrent findings","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court:\u00a0K. Natarajan, J. upheld the decision of the lower courts against the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881.\u00a0 The facts of the case were that the accused availed the credit facility from the complainant board by executing the documents like Hundi Agreement etc. according to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":237755,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/kar-hc-court-in-exercise-of-its-powers-under-s-397-crpc-cannot-re-appreciate-the-evidence-and-arrive-at-a-different-conclusion-even-if-a-different-view-is-possible-from-the-evidence-petition-dism\/","url_meta":{"origin":209068,"position":3},"title":"Kar HC | Court in exercise of its powers under S. 397 CrPC cannot re-appreciate evidence and arrive at a different conclusion, even if a different view is possible from the evidence; Petition dismissed \u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"October 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: John Michael Cunha J., while rejecting the present criminal revision petition, elaborated on scope and ambit of Section 397 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and further rejected the argument of the petitioner that the lower courts have erred in appreciating the evidence. Brief Facts The present Revision Petition\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":258461,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/14\/explained-can-karta-alienate-joint-hindu-family-property-without-coparceners-signature\/","url_meta":{"origin":209068,"position":4},"title":"Explained| Can Karta alienate Joint Hindu family property without coparcener’s signature?","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 14, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a suit where the Karta of a Joint Hindu Family, consisting of himself, his wife and his son, had alienated a property due to legal necessity without the signature of his son, the bench of MR Shah and Sanjiv Khanna*, JJ that the Karta was entitled to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291061,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-refuses-relief-in-case-of-a-determinable-contract-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":209068,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court refuses to grant relief in a contract being determinable in nature and hence, not enforceable","author":"Arunima","date":"May 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court observed that that the Sole Arbitrator was well within its jurisdiction to declare the Agreement dated 23-03-2001 as determinable agreement in view of the statement of claim of the respondent and Terms of the said Agreement.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209068","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209068"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209068\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209068"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209068"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209068"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}