{"id":209053,"date":"2019-01-31T18:15:04","date_gmt":"2019-01-31T12:45:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=209053"},"modified":"2019-02-02T13:11:55","modified_gmt":"2019-02-02T07:41:55","slug":"del-hc-not-allowed-to-blow-hot-and-cold-in-same-breath-party-who-knowingly-accepts-benefits-of-an-order-not-permitted-to-assail-it-later","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/del-hc-not-allowed-to-blow-hot-and-cold-in-same-breath-party-who-knowingly-accepts-benefits-of-an-order-not-permitted-to-assail-it-later\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | Not allowed to blow hot and cold in same breath: Party who knowingly accepts benefits of an order not permitted to assail it later"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>The Bench of Vinod Goel, J. dismissed a revision petition filed against the order of Civil Judge (II), Central Districts, Tis Hazari courts by which respondent’s application\u00a0under Order 9 Rule 1 read Section 151 CPC was allowed.<\/p>\n

Respondent was a defendant in the subject civil suit. He filed an application before Civil Judge for setting aside the ex-parte judgment and decree passed in the suit. The application was allowed by order of Civil Judge which was challenged by the petitioners (plaintiffs) in the present revision petition.<\/p>\n

J.H. Jafri, Advocate for the petitioners admitted that the cost of Rs 10,000 subject to which the ex-parte judgment and decree was set aside was accepted by the counsel appearing for the petitioner.<\/p>\n

Noting such facts, the High Court was of the view that, “the petitioners cannot ‘blow hot and cold’, ‘fast and loose’ or ‘approbate and reprobate’. Where the petitioners have knowingly accepted the benefits of an order, they cannot be permitted to assail the same. This rule is applied to do equity.”\u00a0<\/strong>In the present case, as the petitioners had already accepted the costs, therefore they were estopped by their act, conduct and acquiescence to continue the petition. The revision was dismissed. [Mustaqeem v. Faiyaz, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6751<\/b><\/a>, dated 21-1-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0The Bench of Vinod Goel, J. dismissed a revision petition filed against the order of Civil Judge (II), Central Districts, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33537,33535,33536],"class_list":["post-209053","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-ex-parte-judgment","tag-order-9-rule-1","tag-section-151-cpc"],"yoast_head":"\nDel HC | Not allowed to blow hot and cold in same breath: Party who knowingly accepts benefits of an order not permitted to assail it later | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/del-hc-not-allowed-to-blow-hot-and-cold-in-same-breath-party-who-knowingly-accepts-benefits-of-an-order-not-permitted-to-assail-it-later\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | Not allowed to blow hot and cold in same breath: Party who knowingly accepts benefits of an order not permitted to assail it later\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0The Bench of Vinod Goel, J. dismissed a revision petition filed against the order of Civil Judge (II), Central Districts,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/del-hc-not-allowed-to-blow-hot-and-cold-in-same-breath-party-who-knowingly-accepts-benefits-of-an-order-not-permitted-to-assail-it-later\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-31T12:45:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-02T07:41:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/del-hc-not-allowed-to-blow-hot-and-cold-in-same-breath-party-who-knowingly-accepts-benefits-of-an-order-not-permitted-to-assail-it-later\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/del-hc-not-allowed-to-blow-hot-and-cold-in-same-breath-party-who-knowingly-accepts-benefits-of-an-order-not-permitted-to-assail-it-later\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | Not allowed to blow hot and cold in same breath: Party who knowingly accepts benefits of an order not permitted to assail it later | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-31T12:45:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-02T07:41:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/del-hc-not-allowed-to-blow-hot-and-cold-in-same-breath-party-who-knowingly-accepts-benefits-of-an-order-not-permitted-to-assail-it-later\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/del-hc-not-allowed-to-blow-hot-and-cold-in-same-breath-party-who-knowingly-accepts-benefits-of-an-order-not-permitted-to-assail-it-later\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/del-hc-not-allowed-to-blow-hot-and-cold-in-same-breath-party-who-knowingly-accepts-benefits-of-an-order-not-permitted-to-assail-it-later\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | Not allowed to blow hot and cold in same breath: Party who knowingly accepts benefits of an order not permitted to assail it later\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | Not allowed to blow hot and cold in same breath: Party who knowingly accepts benefits of an order not permitted to assail it later | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/del-hc-not-allowed-to-blow-hot-and-cold-in-same-breath-party-who-knowingly-accepts-benefits-of-an-order-not-permitted-to-assail-it-later\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | Not allowed to blow hot and cold in same breath: Party who knowingly accepts benefits of an order not permitted to assail it later","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0The Bench of Vinod Goel, J. dismissed a revision petition filed against the order of Civil Judge (II), Central Districts,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/del-hc-not-allowed-to-blow-hot-and-cold-in-same-breath-party-who-knowingly-accepts-benefits-of-an-order-not-permitted-to-assail-it-later\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-31T12:45:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-02T07:41:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/del-hc-not-allowed-to-blow-hot-and-cold-in-same-breath-party-who-knowingly-accepts-benefits-of-an-order-not-permitted-to-assail-it-later\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/del-hc-not-allowed-to-blow-hot-and-cold-in-same-breath-party-who-knowingly-accepts-benefits-of-an-order-not-permitted-to-assail-it-later\/","name":"Del HC | Not allowed to blow hot and cold in same breath: Party who knowingly accepts benefits of an order not permitted to assail it later | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-01-31T12:45:04+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-02T07:41:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/del-hc-not-allowed-to-blow-hot-and-cold-in-same-breath-party-who-knowingly-accepts-benefits-of-an-order-not-permitted-to-assail-it-later\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/del-hc-not-allowed-to-blow-hot-and-cold-in-same-breath-party-who-knowingly-accepts-benefits-of-an-order-not-permitted-to-assail-it-later\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/del-hc-not-allowed-to-blow-hot-and-cold-in-same-breath-party-who-knowingly-accepts-benefits-of-an-order-not-permitted-to-assail-it-later\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | Not allowed to blow hot and cold in same breath: Party who knowingly accepts benefits of an order not permitted to assail it later"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":238505,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/04\/kar-hc-whether-entering-appearance-by-advocate-but-not-contesting-the-case-be-considered-as-ex-parte-proceedings-under-order-9-rule-13-cpc-court-explains\/","url_meta":{"origin":209053,"position":0},"title":"Kar HC | Whether entering \u2018appearance\u2019 by Advocate but not contesting the case be considered as Ex-parte proceedings under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC? Court explains","author":"Editor","date":"November 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: M. I. Arun J. dismissed the petition without interfering in the discretion exercised by the Appellate Court in the impugned judgment. \u00a0The facts of the case are that an original suit was filed before Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kolar for a decree of partition and separate\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":263412,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/11\/lower-courts-to-deal-with-entire-process-expeditiously-after-receipt-of-the-application-under-s-151-read-with-or-20-r-6-a-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":209053,"position":1},"title":"Megh HC | Lower Courts to deal with entire process expeditiously after receipt of the application under S. 151 read with Or. 20 R. 6-A CPC","author":"Editor","date":"March 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court: H.S. Thangkhiew, J. while hearing a revision application allowed the same and directed the lower court to deal with the entire process expeditiously immediately on receipt of the application under Section 151 read with Order 20 Rule 6-A CPC. The revision application under Article 227 of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":238707,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/06\/utt-hc-ex-parte-decree-set-aside-considering-sufficient-cause-under-or-9-r-13-of-the-code-of-civil-procedure-1908-court-allows-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":209053,"position":2},"title":"Utt HC | Ex-parte decree set aside considering \u201csufficient cause\u201d under Or. 9 R. 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Court allows appeal","author":"Editor","date":"November 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: The Division Bench of Sudhanshu Dhulia and Alok Kumar Verma, JJ., allowed an appeal which was filed challenging an order passed by Judge, Family Court whereby, the application filed by the appellant, under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for setting aside\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":213911,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/24\/ori-hc-order-21-rule-29-cpc-cannot-come-to-the-rescue-unless-sufficient-cause-is-shown-to-stay-the-execution-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":209053,"position":3},"title":"Ori HC | Order 21 Rule 29 CPC cannot come to the rescue unless sufficient cause is shown to stay the execution case","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: The Bench of A.K. Rath, J. dismissed the petition filed against the order which rejected the application of the petitioner filed under Order 21 Rule 29 CPC to stay the further proceeding in an execution case till the disposal of another civil suit.\u00a0 The facts of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":267027,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/18\/application-under-s-151-of-cpc-maintainable-despite-the-fact-that-order-allowing-the-application-under-or-7-r-11-of-cpc-is-appealable\/","url_meta":{"origin":209053,"position":4},"title":"MP HC | Application under S. 151 of CPC maintainable despite the fact that order allowing the application under Or. 7 R. 11 of CPC is appealable; Trial Court directed to restore civil suit","author":"Editor","date":"May 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Dwarka Dhish Bansal, J. allowed a civil revision under Section 115 of CPC against the order rejecting application filed under Section 151 of CPC holding that the same was not maintainable. Order sheet of the trial Court showed that respondent 2 was not present when the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":295285,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/23\/rented-shop-belonging-to-third-party-cannot-be-accepted-as-security-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":209053,"position":5},"title":"Rented Shop belonging to Third Party cannot be accepted as Security by surety: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"June 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In the case at hand, the Security was a \u2018shop\u2019, which was not owned by the surety, but by the Municipal Corporation, Lucknow.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"security by surety","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/security-by-surety.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/security-by-surety.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/security-by-surety.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/security-by-surety.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209053","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209053"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209053\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209053"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209053"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209053"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}