{"id":208996,"date":"2019-01-30T08:30:25","date_gmt":"2019-01-30T03:00:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=208996"},"modified":"2019-02-04T18:17:18","modified_gmt":"2019-02-04T12:47:18","slug":"sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/","title":{"rendered":"SC| Appeal against order passed under Section 51 of FERA lies before Appellate Tribunal only"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court<\/strong>: The bench of AM Sapre and Indira Banerjee, JJ has held that the appellate forum for deciding the appeals arising out of the order passed by the Adjudicating Officer under Section 51 of Foreign Exchange\u00a0Regulation\u00a0Act,\u00a01973 (FERA) whether filed prior to 01.06.2000 or filed after 01.06.2000 must be the same, i.e., Appellate Tribunal under Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA)<\/p>\n

Going into the legislative intent behind Section 49 (5)(b) of FEMA, that deals with repeal and saving in relation to the action taken and to be taken under FERA, 1973, the Court noticed that the legislature has equated the Appellate Board constituted under FERA with the Appellate Tribunal constituted under FEMA for disposal of the appeals filed under Section 52(2) of FERA against an order passed under Section 51 of FERA which were\u00a0\u00a0 pending\u00a0\u00a0 before\u00a0\u00a0 the\u00a0\u00a0 Appellate\u00a0\u00a0 Board\u00a0\u00a0 which was dissolved on 01.06.2000.\u00a0 Such appeals stood transferred from the Appellate Board to the Appellate Tribunal for their disposal in accordance with law.<\/em><\/p>\n

The Court noticed that the Special Director (Appeals) is subordinate in hierarchy to the Appellate Tribunal prescribed under Section 49(5)(2) of FEMA<\/em> and hence, said that if the argument that the appellate forum in this case for filing appeal is \u00ad \u201cSpecial Director (Appeals)\u201d and not the \u201cAppellate Tribunal\u201d under FEMA is accepted, then it will result in anomalous situations which will again be incongruous. The Court explained:<\/p>\n

\u201cthe orders passed by the Appellate Tribunal in the appeals, which stood transferred to the Appellate Tribunal by virtue of Section 49 (5)(b), are appealable to the High Court under Section 35 of FEMA whereas the orders passed by the Special Director (Appeals) in the\u00a0\u00a0 appeals\u00a0\u00a0 filed\u00a0\u00a0 after\u00a0\u00a0 01.06.2000 are not appealable to the High Court under Section 35 of FEMA. So, against the same order, one appellant has a right of appeal to the High Court but the other appellant has no such right of appeal because he suffered\u00a0\u00a0 dismissal\u00a0\u00a0 of his appeal from Special Director (Appeals) against whose order appeal does not lie under Section 35 to the High Court.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

It was, hence, held that it was not possible to hold that one appeal would be maintainable before the Appellate Tribunal and the other appeal arising out of similar order would be maintainable before the Special Director (Appeals),\u00a0 who is subordinate in hierarchy to the Appellate Board.\u00a0 [Union of India v. Premier Ltd., 2019 SCC OnLine SC 95<\/b><\/a>, decided on 29.01.2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: The bench of AM Sapre and Indira Banerjee, JJ has held that the appellate forum for deciding the appeals arising <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[32060,33490,16031,33491,6481,32273],"class_list":["post-208996","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-appeals","tag-appellate-forum","tag-appellate-tribunal","tag-fema","tag-fera","tag-special-director"],"yoast_head":"\nSC| Appeal against order passed under Section 51 of FERA lies before Appellate Tribunal only | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SC| Appeal against order passed under Section 51 of FERA lies before Appellate Tribunal only\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: The bench of AM Sapre and Indira Banerjee, JJ has held that the appellate forum for deciding the appeals arising\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-30T03:00:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-04T12:47:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/\",\"name\":\"SC| Appeal against order passed under Section 51 of FERA lies before Appellate Tribunal only | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-30T03:00:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-04T12:47:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SC| Appeal against order passed under Section 51 of FERA lies before Appellate Tribunal only\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC| Appeal against order passed under Section 51 of FERA lies before Appellate Tribunal only | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SC| Appeal against order passed under Section 51 of FERA lies before Appellate Tribunal only","og_description":"Supreme Court: The bench of AM Sapre and Indira Banerjee, JJ has held that the appellate forum for deciding the appeals arising","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-30T03:00:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-04T12:47:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/","name":"SC| Appeal against order passed under Section 51 of FERA lies before Appellate Tribunal only | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2019-01-30T03:00:25+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-04T12:47:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-appeal-against-order-passed-under-section-51-of-fera-lies-before-appellate-tribunal-only\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SC| Appeal against order passed under Section 51 of FERA lies before Appellate Tribunal only"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":302732,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/30\/enforcement-officer-can-file-complaint-repealed-provisions-fera-sunset-period-after-fema-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":208996,"position":0},"title":"Can Enforcement Officer file complaint under repealed provisions of FERA after enforcement of FEMA? SC answers","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA Statute cannot be interpreted in such a manner that any provision thereof is rendered otiose.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"repealed provisions of FERA","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/repealed-provisions-of-FERA.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/repealed-provisions-of-FERA.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/repealed-provisions-of-FERA.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/repealed-provisions-of-FERA.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":50411,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/03\/videocon-and-its-officers-exonerated-from-proceedings-under-s-18-of-foreign-exchange-regulation-act-1973\/","url_meta":{"origin":208996,"position":1},"title":"Videocon and it\u2019s officers exonerated from proceedings under S. 18 of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 3, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In an appeal filed against the order of the Bombay High Court which had dislodged the order of discharge passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mumbai in the case where the company as well as its officer were facing trial for the offence punishable under Section 56(1)(i) of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220129,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/27\/fema-appellate-tribunal-active-involvement-and-intentional-aiding-must-be-present-in-order-to-constitute-an-offence-of-abetment\/","url_meta":{"origin":208996,"position":2},"title":"FEMA Appellate Tribunal | Active involvement and intentional aiding must be present in order to constitute an offence of abetment","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal for SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT Act: Justice Manmohan Singh (Chairman) allowed an appeal challenging the impugned Judgment wherein the appellants were penalized for abetting illegal transfer of money. In the present case, the respondent had alleged that the appellant-Bank abettor in illegal and unauthorized dealing of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258274,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/motor-vehicle-appellate-tribunals\/","url_meta":{"origin":208996,"position":3},"title":"‘Motor Vehicle Appellate Tribunals\u2019 may soon be a reality? Read SC’s suggestion to Ministry of Law and Justice","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 9, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: With an aim to curtail the pendency before the High Courts and for speedy disposal of the appeals concerning payment of compensation to the victims of road accident, the bench of SA Nazeer* and Krishna Murari, JJ has asked the Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224360,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":208996,"position":4},"title":"FEMA Appellate Tribunal | Delay of 370 days condoned despite not being convinced of \u2018sufficient cause\u2019 for delay, as dismissal of application would bar examination of merits of appeal","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 22, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal (FEMA): Justice G.C. Mishra (Acting Chairman) allowed the application for the condonation of delay in respect to the substitution of the legal representatives (LRs) of the managing director of the deceased Ramesh Babu Muppalaneni of the company Sanjay Agro Traders (P) Ltd. \u00a0In the instant case, the deceased\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-UNDER-SAFEMA-ACT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-UNDER-SAFEMA-ACT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-UNDER-SAFEMA-ACT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-UNDER-SAFEMA-ACT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-UNDER-SAFEMA-ACT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220410,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/fema-appellate-tribunal-tribunal-quashes-eds-order-for-attachment-of-assets-of-the-company-subject-to-furnishing-of-indemnity-bond\/","url_meta":{"origin":208996,"position":5},"title":"Appellate Tribunal | Tribunal quashes ED\u2019s order for attachment of assets of the company, subject to furnishing of indemnity bond","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal for FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT Act: Justice Manmohan Singh, Chairman and G.C. Mishra, Member, quashed provisional orders for attachment of assets of 63 Moon Technologies Limited upon furnishing indemnity bond by the chairman of the company. In the present case, the Appellate Tribunal had decided to decide\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-UNDER-SAFEMA-ACT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-UNDER-SAFEMA-ACT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-UNDER-SAFEMA-ACT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-UNDER-SAFEMA-ACT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-UNDER-SAFEMA-ACT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208996","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208996"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208996\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208996"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208996"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208996"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}