{"id":208994,"date":"2019-01-30T08:04:42","date_gmt":"2019-01-30T02:34:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=208994"},"modified":"2019-02-04T18:16:23","modified_gmt":"2019-02-04T12:46:23","slug":"sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/","title":{"rendered":"SC| Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 doesn\u2019t prohibit ADM from passing orders"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court<\/strong>: In the case where it was being contended that the Additional District Magistrate had no jurisdiction to pass order under the Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990, the bench of Ashok Bhushan and KM Joseph, JJ held that in the Statutory Scheme of the Adhiniyam, 1990, there is no provision, which prohibit passing an order by an officer lower than the rank of District Magistrate<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Noticing that the Scheme of the Adhiniyam, 1990 clearly contemplate exercise of the power of District Magistrate under Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 by an Additional District Magistrate or Sub -Divisional Magistrate, the bench said:<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cunder Section 13 there is no limitation on the State Government while specially empowering an officer of the State to exercise the power of District Magistrate under Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 and further under Section 18, the powers and duties of District Magistrate can be directed to be exercised or performed by Additional District Magistrate or Sub -Divisional Magistrate for such areas as may be specified in the order.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The Court was hearing the appeal against the order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in which it was held that the Additional District Magistrate, Gwalior had no jurisdiction to pass an order externing the respondent for a period of one year from the district concerned. The High Court had relied upon the Constitution Bench verdict in Ajaib Singh Vs. Gurbachan Singh, (1965) 2 SCR 845<\/a><\/em> , wherein it was held that the order could not have been passed by any authority lower than the rank of District Magistrate<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Holding this reliance to be erroneous, the Court explained that the said case dealt with the Statutory Scheme under the Defence of India Act, 1962 according to which detention order can be passed by the authority empowered by the rules to apprehend or detain with restriction that the authority empowered to detain not being lower in rank than that of a District Magistrate. Hence, in that case the Constitution Bench had held that Additional District Magistrate being not the District Magistrate was incompetent to pass the impugned order.<\/p>\n

Considering that in the present case the Adhiniyam, 1990, in fact, empowered the Additional District Magistrate to pass orders, the Court said that the Constitution Bench verdict in Ajaib Singh<\/em><\/a> Case was not applicable and hence, the judgment of the High Court was set aside. [State of Madhya Pradesh v. Dharmendra Rathore,\u00a02019 SCC OnLine SC 93<\/b><\/a>, decided on 29.01.2019]<\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: In the case where it was being contended that the Additional District Magistrate had no jurisdiction to pass order under <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[33488,2780,33487,33489],"class_list":["post-208994","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-additional-district-magistrate","tag-exercise_of_power","tag-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam","tag-power-to-pass-order"],"yoast_head":"\nSC| Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 doesn\u2019t prohibit ADM from passing orders | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SC| Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 doesn\u2019t prohibit ADM from passing orders\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: In the case where it was being contended that the Additional District Magistrate had no jurisdiction to pass order under\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-30T02:34:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-04T12:46:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/\",\"name\":\"SC| Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 doesn\u2019t prohibit ADM from passing orders | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-30T02:34:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-04T12:46:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SC| Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 doesn\u2019t prohibit ADM from passing orders\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC| Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 doesn\u2019t prohibit ADM from passing orders | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SC| Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 doesn\u2019t prohibit ADM from passing orders","og_description":"Supreme Court: In the case where it was being contended that the Additional District Magistrate had no jurisdiction to pass order under","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-30T02:34:42+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-04T12:46:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/","name":"SC| Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 doesn\u2019t prohibit ADM from passing orders | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2019-01-30T02:34:42+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-04T12:46:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SC| Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 doesn\u2019t prohibit ADM from passing orders"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":340422,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/04\/mp-hc-imposes-cost-of-50000-on-state-for-harassment-directs-chief-secretary-to-caution-dms-against-decisions-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":208994,"position":0},"title":"MP High Court imposes cost of \u20b950,000\/- on State for harassment; directs Chief Secretary to caution DMs against politically influenced decisions","author":"Ritu","date":"February 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that lodging an FIR does not equate to conviction as per the requirements of the M.P. Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":344653,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":208994,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Attempt to curtail individual\u2019s personal freedom\u2019; MP High Court quashes Externment order; directs State to pay \u20b9 25,000\/- in litigation costs","author":"Ritu","date":"March 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is unfortunate that even the Divisional Commissioner, Shahdol has chosen to merely countersign an order of rejection of appeal, without application of mind.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":286616,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/09\/mp-high-court-erred-in-declaring-lapse-under-s-54-of-adhiniyam-adopted-narrow-meaning-during-interpretation-supreme-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates-public-purpose-land-acquisit\/","url_meta":{"origin":208994,"position":2},"title":"Land Acquisition| In public purpose schemes, Authority should be given the time allotted to it by the Statute for doing certain things: Supreme Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court held that Madhya Pradesh High Court was not justified in quashing the entire Scheme providing for other connected land use, on the ground that the same has lapsed under Section 54 of the Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-676.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-676.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-676.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-676.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209098,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-january-2019\/","url_meta":{"origin":208994,"position":3},"title":"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup – January 2019","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"TOP STORIES Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code upheld in entirety The provisions contained in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 pass the constitutional muster. The Code is a beneficial legislation which puts the corporate debtor back on its feet, not being a mere recovery legislation for creditors. Maharashtra Dance Bars Law\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":205499,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/19\/state-government-has-power-under-section-91-of-the-panchayat-raj-and-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam-1993-to-interfere-with-an-order-passed-by-an-authority-under-the-adhiniyam\/","url_meta":{"origin":208994,"position":4},"title":"State Government has power under Section 91 of the Panchayat Raj and Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 to interfere with an order passed by an authority under the Adhiniyam","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A review petition was filed before a Single Judge Bench of Sujoy Paul, J., to review an order passed by this court. Respondent had availed all the remedies available to him under M.P. Panchayat Service (D&A) Rules, 1999 where these rules were created under Section 70\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":208390,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/mp-hc-order-in-excess-of-powers-under-section-391a-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-avam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam-is-illegal\/","url_meta":{"origin":208994,"position":5},"title":"MP HC | Order in excess of powers under Section 39(1)(a) of M.P. Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam is illegal","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This case was filed before a Bench of Rohit Arya, J., where petitioner who was a sarpanch was suspended. Petitioner contended that he was suspended by the impugned order on the ground that a case had been registered for the commission of offence under Sections 7,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208994","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208994"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208994\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208994"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208994"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208994"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}