{"id":208946,"date":"2019-01-29T11:00:34","date_gmt":"2019-01-29T05:30:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=208946"},"modified":"2019-01-30T13:31:29","modified_gmt":"2019-01-30T08:01:29","slug":"megh-hc-accused-under-pocso-act-denied-bail-for-harassing-the-victim-minor-girl-opining-that-there-was-reasonable-apprehension-of-witness-tampering","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/29\/megh-hc-accused-under-pocso-act-denied-bail-for-harassing-the-victim-minor-girl-opining-that-there-was-reasonable-apprehension-of-witness-tampering\/","title":{"rendered":"Megh HC | Accused under POCSO Act denied bail for harassing victim minor girl opining that there was reasonable apprehension of witness tampering"},"content":{"rendered":"

Meghalaya High Court:<\/strong> The Bench of H.S. Thangkhiew, J. hearing a bail application filed by an accused under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, denied grant of bail opining that the accused was a threat to the victim.<\/p>\n

First Information Report was lodged against the accused for committing offence punishable under Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012. He was in custody since the date of his arrest as successive bail applications filed by him were rejected by the Special Judge.<\/p>\n

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the investigation against accused had been completed and hence his further detention was not necessary. Whereas, learned counsel for the respondent submitted that bail should be denied as there were no new facts or materials warranting consideration of grant of bail. Also, the accused was trying to cast undue influence and harassment on the victim by coercing her to enter into a compromise. The said fact of coercion was also recorded in the Special Judge\u2019s order rejecting bail.<\/p>\n

The Court opined that normally, after chargesheet is filed, custody of the accused is not needed as the investigation is complete, and since evidence is already collected by the police, there are fewer chances of destruction or concealment of evidence. However, chances of threatening of witnesses may still exist. In the instant case, there was a reasonable apprehension of the witness being tampered with as there were threats to the complainant and the minor victim girl.<\/p>\n

It was held that the nature and gravity of circumstances of the offence which involved a minor victim girl under the POCSO Act, and the conduct of accused towards the victim and witnesses weighed against the grant of bail. Accordingly, the present application was rejected.[Sumanta Deka v. State of Meghalaya,\u00a02019 SCC OnLine Megh 1<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 07-01-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Meghalaya High Court: The Bench of H.S. Thangkhiew, J. hearing a bail application filed by an accused under Protection of Children from <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2664,31844,3067,13981,33471],"class_list":["post-208946","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bail","tag-chargesheet","tag-FIR","tag-protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act","tag-witness-tampering"],"yoast_head":"\nMegh HC | Accused under POCSO Act denied bail for harassing victim minor girl opining that there was reasonable apprehension of witness tampering | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/29\/megh-hc-accused-under-pocso-act-denied-bail-for-harassing-the-victim-minor-girl-opining-that-there-was-reasonable-apprehension-of-witness-tampering\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Megh HC | Accused under POCSO Act denied bail for harassing victim minor girl opining that there was reasonable apprehension of witness tampering\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Meghalaya High Court: The Bench of H.S. Thangkhiew, J. hearing a bail application filed by an accused under Protection of Children from\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/29\/megh-hc-accused-under-pocso-act-denied-bail-for-harassing-the-victim-minor-girl-opining-that-there-was-reasonable-apprehension-of-witness-tampering\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-29T05:30:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-30T08:01:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Meghalaya-High-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/29\/megh-hc-accused-under-pocso-act-denied-bail-for-harassing-the-victim-minor-girl-opining-that-there-was-reasonable-apprehension-of-witness-tampering\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/29\/megh-hc-accused-under-pocso-act-denied-bail-for-harassing-the-victim-minor-girl-opining-that-there-was-reasonable-apprehension-of-witness-tampering\/\",\"name\":\"Megh HC | Accused under POCSO Act denied bail for harassing victim minor girl opining that there was reasonable apprehension of witness tampering | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-29T05:30:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-30T08:01:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/29\/megh-hc-accused-under-pocso-act-denied-bail-for-harassing-the-victim-minor-girl-opining-that-there-was-reasonable-apprehension-of-witness-tampering\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/29\/megh-hc-accused-under-pocso-act-denied-bail-for-harassing-the-victim-minor-girl-opining-that-there-was-reasonable-apprehension-of-witness-tampering\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/29\/megh-hc-accused-under-pocso-act-denied-bail-for-harassing-the-victim-minor-girl-opining-that-there-was-reasonable-apprehension-of-witness-tampering\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Megh HC | Accused under POCSO Act denied bail for harassing victim minor girl opining that there was reasonable apprehension of witness tampering\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Megh HC | Accused under POCSO Act denied bail for harassing victim minor girl opining that there was reasonable apprehension of witness tampering | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/29\/megh-hc-accused-under-pocso-act-denied-bail-for-harassing-the-victim-minor-girl-opining-that-there-was-reasonable-apprehension-of-witness-tampering\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Megh HC | Accused under POCSO Act denied bail for harassing victim minor girl opining that there was reasonable apprehension of witness tampering","og_description":"Meghalaya High Court: The Bench of H.S. Thangkhiew, J. hearing a bail application filed by an accused under Protection of Children from","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/29\/megh-hc-accused-under-pocso-act-denied-bail-for-harassing-the-victim-minor-girl-opining-that-there-was-reasonable-apprehension-of-witness-tampering\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-29T05:30:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-30T08:01:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Meghalaya-High-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/29\/megh-hc-accused-under-pocso-act-denied-bail-for-harassing-the-victim-minor-girl-opining-that-there-was-reasonable-apprehension-of-witness-tampering\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/29\/megh-hc-accused-under-pocso-act-denied-bail-for-harassing-the-victim-minor-girl-opining-that-there-was-reasonable-apprehension-of-witness-tampering\/","name":"Megh HC | Accused under POCSO Act denied bail for harassing victim minor girl opining that there was reasonable apprehension of witness tampering | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-01-29T05:30:34+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-30T08:01:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/29\/megh-hc-accused-under-pocso-act-denied-bail-for-harassing-the-victim-minor-girl-opining-that-there-was-reasonable-apprehension-of-witness-tampering\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/29\/megh-hc-accused-under-pocso-act-denied-bail-for-harassing-the-victim-minor-girl-opining-that-there-was-reasonable-apprehension-of-witness-tampering\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/29\/megh-hc-accused-under-pocso-act-denied-bail-for-harassing-the-victim-minor-girl-opining-that-there-was-reasonable-apprehension-of-witness-tampering\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Megh HC | Accused under POCSO Act denied bail for harassing victim minor girl opining that there was reasonable apprehension of witness tampering"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":279496,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/12\/legal-update-legal-news-no-leniency-to-person-committing-offence-under-pocso\/","url_meta":{"origin":208946,"position":0},"title":"No leniency to be shown to a person committing offence under POCSO Act; Gujarat High Court rejects bail plea","author":"Editor","date":"December 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court denied showing any leniency while deciding bail application of accused charged with offences under POCSO Act.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Gujarat High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image10.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":238699,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/06\/chh-hc-bail-granted-to-accused-under-pocso-act-on-grounds-of-non-objection-by-the-victim-complainant\/","url_meta":{"origin":208946,"position":1},"title":"Chh HC | Bail granted to accused under POCSO Act on grounds of non-objection by the victim\/ complainant","author":"Editor","date":"November 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Prashant Kumar Mishra J., allowed the application and granted bail in the matter concerning offence under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO). The facts of the case are such that the father of the prosecutrix lodged FIR informing that his daughter left the house\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":299207,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/12\/fir-pocso-sc-st-act-cases-false-criminal-proceedings-victim-initiated-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":208946,"position":2},"title":"Criminal Proceedings against victim must be initiated in cases of false FIRs filed under POCSO and SC\/ST Act: Allahabad High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"It is very unfortunate that now a days, in maximum cases the women are using false rape FIRs as a weapon just to grab money from State, which should be stopped.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":227116,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/16\/utt-hc-bail-granted-in-a-case-registered-under-pocso-act-where-accused-had-no-criminal-history\/","url_meta":{"origin":208946,"position":3},"title":"Utt HC | Bail granted in a case registered under POCSO Act where accused had no criminal history","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 16, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Alok Kumar Verma, J., allowed a bail application filed for grant of regular bail in connection with the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366-A and 376(2)(N) of the Penal Code, 1860 and Section 5(L)\/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012.\u00a0 An FIR\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":277525,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/15\/pocso-meant-to-protect-and-not-criminalize-consensual-relationships-between-young-adults-delhi-court-grants-bail\/","url_meta":{"origin":208946,"position":4},"title":"POCSO meant to protect and not criminalize consensual relationships between young adults; Delhi High Court grants bail","author":"Editor","date":"November 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: While granting bail to the person accused of offences under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO), the Single Judge Bench of Jasmeet Singh, J. held that it was not the case where the girl was forced to be in relationship with the accused after\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":231917,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/08\/bom-hc-pocso-act-overrides-s-14-a-of-sc-st-act-court-while-granting-bail-to-applicant-accused-of-sexual-assault-rape-on-minor-victim-belonging-to-scheduled-caste\/","url_meta":{"origin":208946,"position":5},"title":"Bom HC | POCSO Act overrides S. 14-A of SC\/ST Act: Court while granting bail to applicant accused of sexual assault\/rape on minor victim belonging to scheduled caste\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 8, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Bharati Dangre, J., allowed a bail application and granted bail to the applicant who was accused of committing the offence of sexual assault on a minor victim. The preliminary question before the High Court was whether the present application was maintainable because according to S.V. Gavan, APP,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208946","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208946"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208946\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208946"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208946"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208946"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}