{"id":208711,"date":"2019-01-24T17:30:56","date_gmt":"2019-01-24T12:00:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=208711"},"modified":"2019-01-28T17:51:02","modified_gmt":"2019-01-28T12:21:02","slug":"kar-hc-karnataka-gram-swaraj-and-panchayat-raj-act-1993-no-confidence-motion-moved-against-adhyaksha-within-first-30-months-of-election-is-invalid","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/24\/kar-hc-karnataka-gram-swaraj-and-panchayat-raj-act-1993-no-confidence-motion-moved-against-adhyaksha-within-first-30-months-of-election-is-invalid\/","title":{"rendered":"Kar HC | Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993: No-confidence motion moved against Adhyaksha within first 30 months of election is invalid"},"content":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court:<\/b> The Bench comprising of S. Sunil Dutt Yadav, J. hearing a petition challenging motion of no-confidence moved against President of Hallare Gram Panchayat, held the same to be invalid for not being in accordance with law.<\/p>\n

Petitioner, the President of Hallare Gram Panchayat, was issued a notice issued by respondent whereby motion of no-confidence was sought to be initiated against him for his alleged misconduct. He challenged the said notice in the instant petition contending that as per Section 49(1) Proviso 2 of the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 a resolution expressing want of confidence cannot be moved within first thirty months from the date of the election. Since he was elected on 22-03-2018 and the motion was moved on 25-09-2018, therefore the respondent ought not to have entertained the no-confidence motion in view of prohibition given under proviso to Section 49(1).<\/p>\n

The Court held that proceedings initiated by respondent infracted the prohibition contained in proviso to Section 49(1) of the Act and hence was liable to be set aside. It was observed that the only exception for moving a motion of no-confidence against a President of Gram Panchayat was if it is initiated with allegations under Section 49(2) of the Act. However, in view of the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Lakshmamma v. State of Karnataka<\/i>, 2018 SCC OnLine Kar 1750<\/a> the said option also could not be exercised until fresh rules in that regard were framed.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Accordingly, the petition was allowed and respondents were granted liberty to pursue an action for removal of petitioner for alleged acts of misconduct under Sections 43-A and 48(4) of the Act. [Preethi v. Assistant Commissioner, Mysore Sub-Division, 2018 SCC OnLine Kar 2788<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 13-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court: The Bench comprising of S. Sunil Dutt Yadav, J. hearing a petition challenging motion of no-confidence moved against President <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33417,5051,33416],"class_list":["post-208711","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-karnataka-gram-swaraj-and-panchayat-raj-act","tag-misconduct","tag-no-confidence-motion"],"yoast_head":"\nKar HC | Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993: No-confidence motion moved against Adhyaksha within first 30 months of election is invalid | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/24\/kar-hc-karnataka-gram-swaraj-and-panchayat-raj-act-1993-no-confidence-motion-moved-against-adhyaksha-within-first-30-months-of-election-is-invalid\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kar HC | Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993: No-confidence motion moved against Adhyaksha within first 30 months of election is invalid\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: The Bench comprising of S. Sunil Dutt Yadav, J. hearing a petition challenging motion of no-confidence moved against President\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/24\/kar-hc-karnataka-gram-swaraj-and-panchayat-raj-act-1993-no-confidence-motion-moved-against-adhyaksha-within-first-30-months-of-election-is-invalid\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-24T12:00:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-28T12:21:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/24\/kar-hc-karnataka-gram-swaraj-and-panchayat-raj-act-1993-no-confidence-motion-moved-against-adhyaksha-within-first-30-months-of-election-is-invalid\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/24\/kar-hc-karnataka-gram-swaraj-and-panchayat-raj-act-1993-no-confidence-motion-moved-against-adhyaksha-within-first-30-months-of-election-is-invalid\/\",\"name\":\"Kar HC | Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993: No-confidence motion moved against Adhyaksha within first 30 months of election is invalid | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-24T12:00:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-28T12:21:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/24\/kar-hc-karnataka-gram-swaraj-and-panchayat-raj-act-1993-no-confidence-motion-moved-against-adhyaksha-within-first-30-months-of-election-is-invalid\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/24\/kar-hc-karnataka-gram-swaraj-and-panchayat-raj-act-1993-no-confidence-motion-moved-against-adhyaksha-within-first-30-months-of-election-is-invalid\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/24\/kar-hc-karnataka-gram-swaraj-and-panchayat-raj-act-1993-no-confidence-motion-moved-against-adhyaksha-within-first-30-months-of-election-is-invalid\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kar HC | Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993: No-confidence motion moved against Adhyaksha within first 30 months of election is invalid\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kar HC | Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993: No-confidence motion moved against Adhyaksha within first 30 months of election is invalid | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/24\/kar-hc-karnataka-gram-swaraj-and-panchayat-raj-act-1993-no-confidence-motion-moved-against-adhyaksha-within-first-30-months-of-election-is-invalid\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kar HC | Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993: No-confidence motion moved against Adhyaksha within first 30 months of election is invalid","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: The Bench comprising of S. Sunil Dutt Yadav, J. hearing a petition challenging motion of no-confidence moved against President","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/24\/kar-hc-karnataka-gram-swaraj-and-panchayat-raj-act-1993-no-confidence-motion-moved-against-adhyaksha-within-first-30-months-of-election-is-invalid\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-24T12:00:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-28T12:21:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/24\/kar-hc-karnataka-gram-swaraj-and-panchayat-raj-act-1993-no-confidence-motion-moved-against-adhyaksha-within-first-30-months-of-election-is-invalid\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/24\/kar-hc-karnataka-gram-swaraj-and-panchayat-raj-act-1993-no-confidence-motion-moved-against-adhyaksha-within-first-30-months-of-election-is-invalid\/","name":"Kar HC | Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993: No-confidence motion moved against Adhyaksha within first 30 months of election is invalid | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-01-24T12:00:56+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-28T12:21:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/24\/kar-hc-karnataka-gram-swaraj-and-panchayat-raj-act-1993-no-confidence-motion-moved-against-adhyaksha-within-first-30-months-of-election-is-invalid\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/24\/kar-hc-karnataka-gram-swaraj-and-panchayat-raj-act-1993-no-confidence-motion-moved-against-adhyaksha-within-first-30-months-of-election-is-invalid\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/24\/kar-hc-karnataka-gram-swaraj-and-panchayat-raj-act-1993-no-confidence-motion-moved-against-adhyaksha-within-first-30-months-of-election-is-invalid\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kar HC | Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993: No-confidence motion moved against Adhyaksha within first 30 months of election is invalid"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":221493,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/mp-hc-no-final-order-can-be-passed-without-conducting-enquiry-under-s-89-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-awam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam\/","url_meta":{"origin":208711,"position":0},"title":"MP HC | No final order can be passed without conducting enquiry under S. 89 of M.P. Panchayat Raj Awam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: G. S. Ahluwalia, J., allowed a petition and directed the respondents to not take any coercive step against the petitioner unless and until an enquiry is conducted under Section 89 of\u00a0M.P. Panchayat Raj Awam Gram Swaraj, Adhiniyam, 1993. \u00a0The petitioner has filed the instant petition under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":205499,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/19\/state-government-has-power-under-section-91-of-the-panchayat-raj-and-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam-1993-to-interfere-with-an-order-passed-by-an-authority-under-the-adhiniyam\/","url_meta":{"origin":208711,"position":1},"title":"State Government has power under Section 91 of the Panchayat Raj and Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 to interfere with an order passed by an authority under the Adhiniyam","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A review petition was filed before a Single Judge Bench of Sujoy Paul, J., to review an order passed by this court. Respondent had availed all the remedies available to him under M.P. Panchayat Service (D&A) Rules, 1999 where these rules were created under Section 70\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":208390,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/mp-hc-order-in-excess-of-powers-under-section-391a-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-avam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam-is-illegal\/","url_meta":{"origin":208711,"position":2},"title":"MP HC | Order in excess of powers under Section 39(1)(a) of M.P. Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam is illegal","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This case was filed before a Bench of Rohit Arya, J., where petitioner who was a sarpanch was suspended. Petitioner contended that he was suspended by the impugned order on the ground that a case had been registered for the commission of offence under Sections 7,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":265604,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/19\/if-the-directly-elected-sarpanch-fails-to-call-the-meetings-of-the-panchayat-or-acts-in-a-manner-rendering-the-functioning-of-the-panchayat-at-a-standstill-the-member-of-the-panchayat-would-certainly\/","url_meta":{"origin":208711,"position":3},"title":"If directly elected Sarpanch acts in a manner rendering functioning of Panchayat at a standstill, would member of panchayat get right to move motion of \u2018no confidence\u2019? Bom HC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Stating that in the democratic setup, the will of the majority is the rule, the Division Bench of S.V. Gangapurwala and Shrikant D. Kulkarni, JJ., held that if the directly elected Sarpanch fails to call the meetings of the Panchayat or acts in a manner rendering the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242690,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/23\/j-petition-dismissed-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":208711,"position":4},"title":"J&K HC | Members of Panchayat have the right to issue no-confidence motion against the chairman on the ground of misconduct or neglect of duty; petition dismissed","author":"Editor","date":"January 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sindhu Sharma J., while dismissing the present petition, held, \u201cIn a democratic process, the members of the Panchayat, who were elected members, have been provided with the provisions of issuing a no-confidence motion against the Chairman on the ground of neglect on duty and gross\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":200806,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/constitution-of-proposed-gram-panchayat-quashed-on-failure-of-presence-of-quoram-as-required-under-punjab-panchayat-raj-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":208711,"position":5},"title":"Constitution of proposed Gram Panchayat quashed on failure of presence of quorum as required under Punjab Panchayat Raj Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Shekhar Dhawan, J., addressed a writ petition in nature of certiorari for quashing of a notification for creation of new Panchayats. Facts of the case are that the Punjab Government issued a letter seeking application for forming of new\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208711","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208711"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208711\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208711"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208711"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208711"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}