{"id":208583,"date":"2019-01-22T12:30:22","date_gmt":"2019-01-22T07:00:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=208583"},"modified":"2019-01-23T12:35:52","modified_gmt":"2019-01-23T07:05:52","slug":"pat-hc-documents-sought-to-be-produced-by-defendant-must-be-filed-with-written-statement-leave-of-court-required-for-subsequent-production-thereof","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/22\/pat-hc-documents-sought-to-be-produced-by-defendant-must-be-filed-with-written-statement-leave-of-court-required-for-subsequent-production-thereof\/","title":{"rendered":"Pat HC | Documents sought to be produced by defendant must be filed with written statement \u2013 leave of Court required for subsequent production thereof"},"content":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court:<\/strong> The Bench of Ashwani Kumar Singh, J. dismissed an application filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying for quashing of trial court\u2019s order vide which petitioner\u2019s (defendant before the trial court) application under Order 8 Rule 1A(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was rejected.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the aforesaid application had been filed praying to mark certified copies of Tirjiya Khatiyan of Khata no. 167 and Khatiyan of Khata No. 5 as exhibits. However, it was dismissed by the trial court on the ground that the documents sought to be exhibited by the petitioner were filed much after the settlement of issues and no permission to admit the same in evidence had been taken.<\/p>\n

It was opined that under Order 8 Rule 1A(3) of the CPC, documents which have not been produced by the defendant along with the written statement, cannot be produced to the court later on without leave of the court. Subsequent production of the document can be done only if the court is satisfied with the grounds explained for non-production of the documents at the time of filing of the written statement.<\/p>\n

In the instant case, there was no explanation as to why the proposed documents which the petitioners intended to be taken into evidence were not produced earlier. Therefore it was held that there was no illegality in the impugned order. [Dewanti Devi v. Radheshyam Tiwary, 2019 SCC OnLine Pat 28<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 04-01-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court: The Bench of Ashwani Kumar Singh, J. dismissed an application filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33362,33363,33364,30796],"class_list":["post-208583","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-227-of-the-constitution-of-india","tag-leave-of-court","tag-order-8-rule-1a3-of-code-of-civil-procedure","tag-written-statement"],"yoast_head":"\nPat HC | Documents sought to be produced by defendant must be filed with written statement \u2013 leave of Court required for subsequent production thereof | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/22\/pat-hc-documents-sought-to-be-produced-by-defendant-must-be-filed-with-written-statement-leave-of-court-required-for-subsequent-production-thereof\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pat HC | Documents sought to be produced by defendant must be filed with written statement \u2013 leave of Court required for subsequent production thereof\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court: The Bench of Ashwani Kumar Singh, J. dismissed an application filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/22\/pat-hc-documents-sought-to-be-produced-by-defendant-must-be-filed-with-written-statement-leave-of-court-required-for-subsequent-production-thereof\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-22T07:00:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-23T07:05:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/22\/pat-hc-documents-sought-to-be-produced-by-defendant-must-be-filed-with-written-statement-leave-of-court-required-for-subsequent-production-thereof\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/22\/pat-hc-documents-sought-to-be-produced-by-defendant-must-be-filed-with-written-statement-leave-of-court-required-for-subsequent-production-thereof\/\",\"name\":\"Pat HC | Documents sought to be produced by defendant must be filed with written statement \u2013 leave of Court required for subsequent production thereof | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-22T07:00:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-23T07:05:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/22\/pat-hc-documents-sought-to-be-produced-by-defendant-must-be-filed-with-written-statement-leave-of-court-required-for-subsequent-production-thereof\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/22\/pat-hc-documents-sought-to-be-produced-by-defendant-must-be-filed-with-written-statement-leave-of-court-required-for-subsequent-production-thereof\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/22\/pat-hc-documents-sought-to-be-produced-by-defendant-must-be-filed-with-written-statement-leave-of-court-required-for-subsequent-production-thereof\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pat HC | Documents sought to be produced by defendant must be filed with written statement \u2013 leave of Court required for subsequent production thereof\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pat HC | Documents sought to be produced by defendant must be filed with written statement \u2013 leave of Court required for subsequent production thereof | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/22\/pat-hc-documents-sought-to-be-produced-by-defendant-must-be-filed-with-written-statement-leave-of-court-required-for-subsequent-production-thereof\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pat HC | Documents sought to be produced by defendant must be filed with written statement \u2013 leave of Court required for subsequent production thereof","og_description":"Patna High Court: The Bench of Ashwani Kumar Singh, J. dismissed an application filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/22\/pat-hc-documents-sought-to-be-produced-by-defendant-must-be-filed-with-written-statement-leave-of-court-required-for-subsequent-production-thereof\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-22T07:00:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-23T07:05:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/22\/pat-hc-documents-sought-to-be-produced-by-defendant-must-be-filed-with-written-statement-leave-of-court-required-for-subsequent-production-thereof\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/22\/pat-hc-documents-sought-to-be-produced-by-defendant-must-be-filed-with-written-statement-leave-of-court-required-for-subsequent-production-thereof\/","name":"Pat HC | Documents sought to be produced by defendant must be filed with written statement \u2013 leave of Court required for subsequent production thereof | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-01-22T07:00:22+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-23T07:05:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/22\/pat-hc-documents-sought-to-be-produced-by-defendant-must-be-filed-with-written-statement-leave-of-court-required-for-subsequent-production-thereof\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/22\/pat-hc-documents-sought-to-be-produced-by-defendant-must-be-filed-with-written-statement-leave-of-court-required-for-subsequent-production-thereof\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/22\/pat-hc-documents-sought-to-be-produced-by-defendant-must-be-filed-with-written-statement-leave-of-court-required-for-subsequent-production-thereof\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pat HC | Documents sought to be produced by defendant must be filed with written statement \u2013 leave of Court required for subsequent production thereof"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":329489,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/28\/o-vi-r-17-does-not-limit-application-for-amendment-pleadings-at-any-stage-of-proceedings-sikkim-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":208583,"position":0},"title":"\u2018O. VI R. 17 does not limit amendment of pleadings at any stage of proceedings, if it is necessary for determining the real questions in controversy\u2019: Sikkim HC","author":"Editor","date":"August 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The amendments were imperative for the proper and effective adjudication of the dispute; refusal to allow the amendment application would have caused injustice or resulted in multiple litigations; and the amendments did not constitutionally or fundamentally change the nature of the case.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sikkim High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331095,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/19\/filing-written-statement-after-expiry-30-days-can-accepted-if-there-is-application-writing-for-condonation-of-delay-madras-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":208583,"position":1},"title":"Filing of written statement after expiry of 30 days can be accepted only if there is an application in writing for condonation of delay: Madras HC","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"If the power is given to do a certain thing in a certain way, the thing must be done in that way.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313276,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/06\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-amendment-to-written-statement-under-order-vi-rule-17-cpc-for-effective-adjudication-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":208583,"position":2},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds amendment to written statement under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, emphasising necessity for effective adjudication","author":"Ritu","date":"February 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court noted that the amendment did not change the suit's nature fundamentally and would not cause undue prejudice to the petitioner.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206325,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/right-to-begin-under-order-18-rule-1-cpc-can-be-given-to-defendant-under-certain-circumstances\/","url_meta":{"origin":208583,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Right to begin\u2019 under Order 18 Rule 1 CPC can be given to defendant under certain circumstances","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of A.K. Rath, J., dismissed the petition under Article 227 of the Constitution which challenged the order by the Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Puri whereby the trial court allowed the application of the plaintiff under Order 18 Rule 1 CPC and directed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":260477,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/21\/law-on-rejection-of-plaint\/","url_meta":{"origin":208583,"position":4},"title":"Law on Rejection of Plaint | Contents of plaint or Examining sufficiency of plaint? Del HC explains the bounden duty of Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Prateek Jalan, J., expressed that, For the purposes of an order under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC, the Court must come to the conclusion that the plaint is required to be rejected. Present petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution for directing against\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202271,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/27\/application-for-discovery-of-documents-under-order-xi-rule-12-of-cpc-filed-after-the-stage-of-settlement-of-issues-is-non-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":208583,"position":5},"title":"Application for discovery of documents under Order XI Rule 12 of CPC filed after the stage of settlement of issues is non-maintainable","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 27, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge bench comprising of Chandrashekhar, J. dismissed a civil writ petition filed against the order of trial court dismissing petitioner\u2019s application for discovery of documents. In the present case, the petitioner was the defendant in suit in trial court; where he had filed an application\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208583","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208583"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208583\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208583"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208583"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208583"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}