{"id":208417,"date":"2019-01-19T09:47:16","date_gmt":"2019-01-19T04:17:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=208417"},"modified":"2019-01-22T12:58:23","modified_gmt":"2019-01-22T07:28:23","slug":"bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal\/","title":{"rendered":"Bom HC | 2011 Mumbai Blasts | Court refuses to discharge Hawala Operator who transferred money to Yasin Bhatkal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Bombay High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>The Division Bench of Sarang V. Kotwal and Indrajit Mohanty, JJ. upheld the order of the trial court whereby it had dismissed the appellant&#8217;s application preferred under Section 227 CrPC for being discharged in the 2011 Mumbai Blasts case. The appellant was Accused 3 in the case who was charge-sheeted for the offences punishable under various Sections of IPC, Explosive Substances Act, Prevention of Damages to Public Properties Act, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>The incident<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On 13-7-2011, 3 bomb blasts took place in Mumbai at Zaveri Bazar, Opera House and Dadar, Bombs were placed in vehicles near the vicinity of crowded localities which caused large scale destruction killing 27 people and injuring 127 others.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>Role of the appellant<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As per the prosecution, the appellant was a\u00a0<em>Hawala Operator\u00a0<\/em>based in Delhi on whose instructions, his servant handed over Rs 10 lakh to one Sivananad. Actually, this Sivanand was Yasin Bhatkal, one of the main accused. The money was routed through Dubai on instructions of Haroon Rashid Abdul Hameed Naik of Indian Mujahidiin.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>High Court&#8217;s decision<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">After the refusal of discharge application by the trial court, the appellant challenged it before the High Court. After listening to Senior Advocate A.P. Mudargi appearing for the appellant and Ajay Patil, Additional Public Prosecutor, the Court was of the opinion that the trial court&#8217;s order doesn&#8217;t require interference. After referring to Sections 3 and 22 of MCOCA, the Court noted that\u00a0<strong>there was\u00a0a presumption of committing the offence running against the\u00a0petitioner which could be rebutted by him only at the stage of trial only after\u00a0the prosecution gets an opportunity to lead evidence in\u00a0that behalf.\u00a0<\/strong>It was held that at the present stage it was not possible to record a finding for purpose of discharging the appellant. Furthermore, submission of not making another person as accused rejected. In such view of the matter, trial court&#8217;s order was upheld and the appeal was dismissed. [Kawalnayan Wazirchand Pathreja v. State of Maharashtra,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/6ICmlul1\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Bom 61<\/b><\/a>, dated 17-01-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court:\u00a0The Division Bench of Sarang V. Kotwal and Indrajit Mohanty, JJ. upheld the order of the trial court whereby it <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33309,33310,33308,33311],"class_list":["post-208417","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-2011-mumbai-blasts","tag-hawala-operator","tag-indian-mujahidiin","tag-section-227-crpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bom HC | 2011 Mumbai Blasts | Court refuses to discharge Hawala Operator who transferred money to Yasin Bhatkal | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bom HC | 2011 Mumbai Blasts | Court refuses to discharge Hawala Operator who transferred money to Yasin Bhatkal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court:\u00a0The Division Bench of Sarang V. Kotwal and Indrajit Mohanty, JJ. upheld the order of the trial court whereby it\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-19T04:17:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-22T07:28:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal\/\",\"name\":\"Bom HC | 2011 Mumbai Blasts | Court refuses to discharge Hawala Operator who transferred money to Yasin Bhatkal | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-19T04:17:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-22T07:28:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bom HC | 2011 Mumbai Blasts | Court refuses to discharge Hawala Operator who transferred money to Yasin Bhatkal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bom HC | 2011 Mumbai Blasts | Court refuses to discharge Hawala Operator who transferred money to Yasin Bhatkal | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bom HC | 2011 Mumbai Blasts | Court refuses to discharge Hawala Operator who transferred money to Yasin Bhatkal","og_description":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0The Division Bench of Sarang V. Kotwal and Indrajit Mohanty, JJ. upheld the order of the trial court whereby it","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-19T04:17:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-22T07:28:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal\/","name":"Bom HC | 2011 Mumbai Blasts | Court refuses to discharge Hawala Operator who transferred money to Yasin Bhatkal | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2019-01-19T04:17:16+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-22T07:28:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/bom-hc-2011-mumbai-blasts-court-refuses-to-discharge-hawala-operator-who-transferred-money-to-yasin-bhatkal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bom HC | 2011 Mumbai Blasts | Court refuses to discharge Hawala Operator who transferred money to Yasin Bhatkal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":359711,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/bom-hc-grants-bail-to-accused-in-2012-pune-serial-blasts-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":208417,"position":0},"title":"Bombay HC grants bail to accused in 2012 Pune serial blasts case, citing 12.5 years of pre-trial custody and remote chance of trial completion","author":"Editor","date":"September 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe prosecution had examined only 27 witnesses by 11-8-2025 out of 170 witnesses cited by it. Thus, the possibility of concluding of the trial in the near future appeared remote while the accused had already served more than a decade in prison.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Pune serial blast","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Pune-serial-blast.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Pune-serial-blast.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Pune-serial-blast.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Pune-serial-blast.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":136971,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/16\/1993-mumbai-serial-blast-tada-court-convicts-abu-salem-5-others\/","url_meta":{"origin":208417,"position":1},"title":"1993 Mumbai serial blast: TADA court convicts Abu Salem, 5 others","author":"Saba","date":"June 16, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"As reported in The Indian Express, a Special Terrorism and Disruptive Activities Act (TADA) Court has found Abu Salem and Mustafa Dossa guilty of criminal conspiracy charges in the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts case. Along with the two gangsters, Firoz Khan, Karimullah Khan, Taher Merchant were also found guilty of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/mumbai.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/mumbai.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/mumbai.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/mumbai.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/mumbai.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321073,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/30\/dhc-dismisses-plea-of-three-members-of-indian-mujahideen-group-against-order-denying-bail-in-2008-delhi-serial-bomb-blasts-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":208417,"position":2},"title":"[2008 Delhi Serial Bomb Blasts] Delhi HC dismisses plea of three members of \u201cIndian Mujahideen\u201d group against the order denying them bail","author":"Simranjeet","date":"April 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellant along with other associates, is alleged to have hatched conspiracy of serial blasts in Delhi, resulting in explosions causing killing of 26 people and injury to 135 people.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273763,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/delhi-high-court-disclosure-of-information-regarding-issuance-of-notification-under-s-45-uapa-can-be-rightfully-exempted-under-rti-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":208417,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court | Disclosure of information regarding issuance of notification under S 45 UAPA can be rightfully exempted under RTI Act","author":"Editor","date":"September 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a petition filed by Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddiqui (\u2018petitioner'), who is a death row convict in 7\/11 Mumbai train serial bomb blasts in Mumbai challenging an order passed by Central Information Commission upholding that information sought regarding disclosure of the proposal and all documents in the Department's\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":354269,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/23\/bom-hc-acquits-all-accused-in-2006-mumbai-train-blast-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":208417,"position":4},"title":"All accused persons in 2006 Mumbai Train Blasts acquitted: Inside Bombay HC ruling","author":"Editor","date":"July 23, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cCreating a false appearance of having solved a case by presenting that the accused had been brought to justice gave a misleading sense of resolution. This deceptive closure undermined public trust and falsely reassured society, while in reality, the true threat remained at large.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"2006 Mumbai Train Blast case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/2006-Mumbai-Train-Blast-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/2006-Mumbai-Train-Blast-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/2006-Mumbai-Train-Blast-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/2006-Mumbai-Train-Blast-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283482,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/09\/delhi-high-court-upheld-cpio-order-rejecting-disclosure-of-information-regarding-investigation-of-terrorist-act-barred-under-right-to-information-act-legalnews-legalresearch-legalawareness\/","url_meta":{"origin":208417,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court | Disclosure of reports and dossiers relating to terrorist acts under investigation is barred by RTI Act","author":"Editor","date":"February 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Mumbai blasts which are the subject matter of the reports, were one of the worst terror attacks on India, leading to hundreds of deaths and hundreds of injured persons. Thus, reports\/dossiers on such investigations can have a major bearing on India's security, sovereignty and integrity.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208417","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208417"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208417\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208417"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208417"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208417"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}