{"id":208368,"date":"2019-01-18T12:45:23","date_gmt":"2019-01-18T07:15:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=208368"},"modified":"2019-02-01T14:56:48","modified_gmt":"2019-02-01T09:26:48","slug":"scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract\/","title":{"rendered":"SCOTUS | Court cannot override the arbitrability clause in a contract"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court of the United States: <\/strong>The appeal lies before the Bench of Kavanaugh, J.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case were such that the respondent Archer and White Sales Inc. sued Henry Schein for the violation of Federal and State anti-trust laws, seeking monetary and injunctive relief. The contract between the parties provided for arbitration to resolve any dispute arising between them except for actions seeking injunctive relief. Schein, therefore, requested the District Court to refer the matter to arbitration while Archer argued that this matter was not subject to arbitration owing to injunctive relief. The Fifth Circuit affirmed with Archer\u2019s view. However, the Supreme Court vacated the judgment of the Fifth Circuit and held that parties to such a contract may refer to an arbitrator to decide the \u2018gateway questions of arbitrability.\u2019 The Court opined that a court cannot override the contract even if it thinks that the arbitrability claim is \u2018wholly groundless.\u2019<\/p>\n

The case was remanded for further proceedings.[Henry Schein Inc. v. Archer and White Sales Inc., 2019 SCC OnLine US SC 1<\/b><\/a>, decided on 08-01-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court of the United States: The appeal lies before the Bench of Kavanaugh, J. The facts of the case were such <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":32691,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[33291,33290,3174,32579],"class_list":["post-208368","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-anti-trust-laws","tag-arbitrability-clause","tag-contract","tag-injunctive-relief"],"yoast_head":"\nSCOTUS | Court cannot override the arbitrability clause in a contract | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SCOTUS | Court cannot override the arbitrability clause in a contract\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of the United States: The appeal lies before the Bench of Kavanaugh, J. The facts of the case were such\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-18T07:15:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-01T09:26:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract\/\",\"name\":\"SCOTUS | Court cannot override the arbitrability clause in a contract | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-18T07:15:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-01T09:26:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"Supreme Court of The United States\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SCOTUS | Court cannot override the arbitrability clause in a contract\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SCOTUS | Court cannot override the arbitrability clause in a contract | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SCOTUS | Court cannot override the arbitrability clause in a contract","og_description":"Supreme Court of the United States: The appeal lies before the Bench of Kavanaugh, J. The facts of the case were such","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-18T07:15:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-01T09:26:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract\/","name":"SCOTUS | Court cannot override the arbitrability clause in a contract | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","datePublished":"2019-01-18T07:15:23+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-01T09:26:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"Supreme Court of The United States"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/scotus-court-cannot-override-the-arbitrability-clause-in-a-contract\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SCOTUS | Court cannot override the arbitrability clause in a contract"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":251774,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/27\/the-curious-case-of-bina-modi-v-lalit-modi-permissibility-of-anti-arbitration-injunctions-in-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":208368,"position":0},"title":"The curious case of Bina Modi v. Lalit Modi: Permissibility of Anti-Arbitration Injunctions in India","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Hiroo Advani\u2020 and Manav Nagpal\u2020\u2020 Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 60","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-120.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-120.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-120.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-120.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-120.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":205686,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/26\/determination-of-age-of-the-suit-property-is-of-no-consequence-in-a-title-suit-praying-for-injunctive-relief-karnataka-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":208368,"position":1},"title":"Determination of age of the suit property is of no consequence in a title suit praying for injunctive relief: Karnataka HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of S.G. Pandit, J. while hearing a petition praying for appointment of Court Commissioner, held that a property dispute seeking injunctive relief does not require determination of age of the suit property. Petitioner, who was plaintiff in a property dispute, filed an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":244544,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/27\/arbitrability-of-fraud\/","url_meta":{"origin":208368,"position":2},"title":"Arbitrability of Fraud: Is the Anomaly Solved","author":"Editor","date":"February 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Shuchi Sejwar* and Arpit Lahoti**","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/arbitration-8.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/arbitration-8.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/arbitration-8.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/arbitration-8.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/arbitration-8.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320247,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/18\/cal-hc-dismisses-application-arbitration-clause-not-incorporated-subcontrator-work-order-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":208368,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses application due to non-existence of arbitration clause in subcontractor’s work order","author":"Editor","date":"April 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018A reference to the document in the contract should be such that shows the intention to incorporate the arbitration clause contained in the document into the contract\u2019","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323776,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/06\/scotus-decides-which-prevails-when-two-executed-contracts-provide-different-dispute-resolution-methods\/","url_meta":{"origin":208368,"position":4},"title":"Courts must decide which contract will prevail when parties execute two contracts providing different dispute resolution mechanisms: SCOTUS","author":"Editor","date":"June 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The instant dispute involved a conflict between two contracts executed by petitioner Coinbase, Inc., operator of a cryptocurrency exchange platform, and the respondents, who used Coinbase.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"two contracts different modes of dispute resolution","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/two-contracts-different-modes-of-dispute-resolution.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/two-contracts-different-modes-of-dispute-resolution.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/two-contracts-different-modes-of-dispute-resolution.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/two-contracts-different-modes-of-dispute-resolution.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6532,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/14\/part-i-of-the-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-not-applicable-when-arbitration-agreement-is-governed-by-laws-of-england\/","url_meta":{"origin":208368,"position":5},"title":"Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 not applicable when arbitration agreement is governed by laws of England","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 14, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In an appeal concerning the maintainability of a petition filed under the\u00a0 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 despite the contract stating that the English Law of Arbitration was to be followed in the case of an arbitration arising out of a dispute, a division bench comprising of Surinder\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Supreme Court"","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208368","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208368"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208368\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/32691"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208368"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208368"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208368"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}