{"id":208341,"date":"2019-01-18T09:40:24","date_gmt":"2019-01-18T04:10:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=208341"},"modified":"2019-01-21T11:30:28","modified_gmt":"2019-01-21T06:00:28","slug":"tripura-hc-suspension-order-quashed-for-non-compliance-of-rule-106-and-7-of-central-civil-services-cca-rules","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/tripura-hc-suspension-order-quashed-for-non-compliance-of-rule-106-and-7-of-central-civil-services-cca-rules\/","title":{"rendered":"Tripura HC | Suspension order quashed for non-compliance of Rule 10(6) and (7) of Central Civil services (CCA) Rules"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Tripura High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>The Bench Arindam Lodh, J. set aside petitioner&#8217;s suspension order in view of Rule 10(6) and (7) of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioner, a State Veterinary Officer (TVS, Grade V) was placed under suspension by order dated 12-04-2018. The seminal issue to be determined in the present petition was whether the suspension order could be continued even if not reviewed before the expiry of 90 days from the effective date of suspension in view of the rules mentioned above?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A. Bhowmik, Advocate appearing for the petitioner prayed for setting aside of the suspension order passed by the Joint Secretary, Animal Resource and Development Department, Government of Tripura.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court noted that Rule 10(6) and (7) obligates the appointing authority to constitute a committee review whether the extension of suspension order is necessary. in the present case, no review committee was formed even after expiry of 6 months after the expiry of 90 days. Relying on\u00a0<em>Union of India v. Dipak Mali,\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7Sy2PaY8\">(2010) 2 SCC 222<\/a> the Court held that in such cases the suspension order lapses after the period of 90 days. Further, it was clarified that the matter has to be reviewed before the expiry of 90 days from the date of suspension. In such view of the matter, petitioner&#8217;s suspension order was set aside.[Ankur Debnath v. State of Tripura,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/8uT8DJ8c\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Tri 19<\/b><\/a>, decided on 08-01-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tripura High Court:\u00a0The Bench Arindam Lodh, J. set aside petitioner&#8217;s suspension order in view of Rule 10(6) and (7) of the Central <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33284,30681,2897,32354],"class_list":["post-208341","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-central-civil-services-cca-rules","tag-non-compliance","tag-Review","tag-suspension-order"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Tripura HC | Suspension order quashed for non-compliance of Rule 10(6) and (7) of Central Civil services (CCA) Rules | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/tripura-hc-suspension-order-quashed-for-non-compliance-of-rule-106-and-7-of-central-civil-services-cca-rules\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tripura HC | Suspension order quashed for non-compliance of Rule 10(6) and (7) of Central Civil services (CCA) Rules\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tripura High Court:\u00a0The Bench Arindam Lodh, J. set aside petitioner&#8217;s suspension order in view of Rule 10(6) and (7) of the Central\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/tripura-hc-suspension-order-quashed-for-non-compliance-of-rule-106-and-7-of-central-civil-services-cca-rules\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-18T04:10:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-21T06:00:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/tripura-hc-suspension-order-quashed-for-non-compliance-of-rule-106-and-7-of-central-civil-services-cca-rules\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/tripura-hc-suspension-order-quashed-for-non-compliance-of-rule-106-and-7-of-central-civil-services-cca-rules\/\",\"name\":\"Tripura HC | Suspension order quashed for non-compliance of Rule 10(6) and (7) of Central Civil services (CCA) Rules | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-18T04:10:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-21T06:00:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/tripura-hc-suspension-order-quashed-for-non-compliance-of-rule-106-and-7-of-central-civil-services-cca-rules\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/tripura-hc-suspension-order-quashed-for-non-compliance-of-rule-106-and-7-of-central-civil-services-cca-rules\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/tripura-hc-suspension-order-quashed-for-non-compliance-of-rule-106-and-7-of-central-civil-services-cca-rules\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tripura HC | Suspension order quashed for non-compliance of Rule 10(6) and (7) of Central Civil services (CCA) Rules\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tripura HC | Suspension order quashed for non-compliance of Rule 10(6) and (7) of Central Civil services (CCA) Rules | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/tripura-hc-suspension-order-quashed-for-non-compliance-of-rule-106-and-7-of-central-civil-services-cca-rules\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tripura HC | Suspension order quashed for non-compliance of Rule 10(6) and (7) of Central Civil services (CCA) Rules","og_description":"Tripura High Court:\u00a0The Bench Arindam Lodh, J. set aside petitioner&#8217;s suspension order in view of Rule 10(6) and (7) of the Central","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/tripura-hc-suspension-order-quashed-for-non-compliance-of-rule-106-and-7-of-central-civil-services-cca-rules\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-18T04:10:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-21T06:00:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/tripura-hc-suspension-order-quashed-for-non-compliance-of-rule-106-and-7-of-central-civil-services-cca-rules\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/tripura-hc-suspension-order-quashed-for-non-compliance-of-rule-106-and-7-of-central-civil-services-cca-rules\/","name":"Tripura HC | Suspension order quashed for non-compliance of Rule 10(6) and (7) of Central Civil services (CCA) Rules | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-01-18T04:10:24+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-21T06:00:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/tripura-hc-suspension-order-quashed-for-non-compliance-of-rule-106-and-7-of-central-civil-services-cca-rules\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/tripura-hc-suspension-order-quashed-for-non-compliance-of-rule-106-and-7-of-central-civil-services-cca-rules\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/tripura-hc-suspension-order-quashed-for-non-compliance-of-rule-106-and-7-of-central-civil-services-cca-rules\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tripura HC | Suspension order quashed for non-compliance of Rule 10(6) and (7) of Central Civil services (CCA) Rules"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":373339,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/21\/suspension-invalid-if-not-reviewed-within-90-days-as-per-rule-106-ccs-cca-rules-hp-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":208341,"position":0},"title":"Suspension becomes invalid if not reviewed within 90 days as per Rule 10(6) of CCS(CCA) Rules; Subsequent review cannot revive it: Himachal Pradesh HC","author":"Sunaina","date":"January 21, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAs per Rule 10(7) of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, the order of suspension made or deemed to be made would not be valid after a period of 90 days unless it was extended after review for a further period of 90 days.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Suspension invalid if not reviewed within 90 days","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Suspension-invalid-if-not-reviewed-within-90-days.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Suspension-invalid-if-not-reviewed-within-90-days.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Suspension-invalid-if-not-reviewed-within-90-days.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Suspension-invalid-if-not-reviewed-within-90-days.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207735,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/08\/manipur-hc-conviction-on-criminal-charge-doesnt-automatically-entail-dismissal-removal-or-reduction-in-rank-of-government-servant-concerned\/","url_meta":{"origin":208341,"position":1},"title":"Manipur HC | Conviction on criminal charge doesn&#8217;t automatically entail dismissal, removal or reduction in rank of Government servant concerned","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Manipur High Court: A Bench of Lanusungkum Jamir, J. set aside petitioner's suspension order and held him to be entitled to full back wages from the date of suspension. The petitioner was a peon in Chandel Treasury under Finance Department, Government of Manipur. While in service, he was convicted in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288025,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/delhi-high-court-sets-aside-on-year-suspension-order-of-mla-delhi-legislative-assembly-vijender-gupta-legal-news-research-awareness-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":208341,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court set aside 1-year suspension of BJP MLA Vijender Gupta of Delhi Legislative Assembly","author":"Arunima","date":"March 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court observed that on perusal of the summary of proceedings, it was clear that there was disturbance caused during the sitting of the House by the petitioner and the ruling party members.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214712,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/16\/jk-hc-suspension-does-not-tantamount-to-punishment-compliance-with-principles-of-natural-justice-held-not-necessary\/","url_meta":{"origin":208341,"position":3},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Suspension does not tantamount to punishment, compliance with principles of natural justice held not necessary","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: Sanjeev Kumar, J. dismissed a petition challenging an order suspending petitioner and ordering an enquiry into his conduct, holding that principles of natural justice are not applicable to matters of suspension from service. The petitioner challenged his suspension order on the grounds that he was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":208242,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/16\/all-hc-suspension-of-employee-incarcerating-in-jail-revoked-on-grant-of-bail\/","url_meta":{"origin":208341,"position":4},"title":"All HC | Suspension of employee incarcerating in jail revoked on grant of bail","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: This petition was filed before the Bench of Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J. against the order passed by the State Government whereby petitioner was suspended due to the fact that he was incarcerated in jail. Petitioner contended that he had already been enlarged on bail and thereby there\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":329810,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/02\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-range-forest-officers-suspension-order-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":208341,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Unwarranted Suspension burdens Public Funds and wastes Government resources\u2019; Rajasthan High Court quashes Range Forest Officer\u2019s suspension order","author":"Ritu","date":"September 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe suspension though is not a punishment but is required to be effected with due caution and vigilance and a civil servant could not be placed under suspension without due application of mind and without examining the need to do so.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208341","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208341"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208341\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208341"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208341"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208341"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}