{"id":207960,"date":"2019-01-11T16:00:48","date_gmt":"2019-01-11T10:30:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=207960"},"modified":"2019-01-14T11:40:32","modified_gmt":"2019-01-14T06:10:32","slug":"owner-of-land-whose-land-is-acquired-for-construction-of-railway-track-cannot-claim-job-in-railways-as-a-matter-of-right-in-the-absence-of-policy-to-that-effect-patna-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/owner-of-land-whose-land-is-acquired-for-construction-of-railway-track-cannot-claim-job-in-railways-as-a-matter-of-right-in-the-absence-of-policy-to-that-effect-patna-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Pat HC | Landlord, whose land is acquired for construction of railway track, cannot claim job in railways as a matter of right in absence of policy to that effect"},"content":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court:<\/b> The Bench of Prabhat Kumar Jha, J. dismissed a civil writ petition claiming employment in lieu of acquisition of land on the ground that there was no policy of the Indian Railways for the same.<\/p>\n

The instant petition sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to grant appointment to the petitioner in Group-C or Group-D post in the East Central Railway as per her educational qualification since her land had been acquired for construction of Neura Daniyama rail line.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that petitioner was granted a compensation of Rs 5,26,687.92 after acquisition of her land. She never raised any objection or filed any petition before the concerned authority for providing her a job. Also, she had moved this court after long delay of more than ten years from the date of acquisition of her land without any plausible explanation.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Reliance was placed on the judgment of Apex Court in Umesh Kumar Nagpal v. State of Haryana<\/i>, (1994) 4 SCC 138<\/a> where it was held that petitioner has no fundamental right to claim job in lieu of acquisition of his land for the purpose of completion of project, besides compensation for acquisition of the land. Admittedly, there was no policy for providing employment to the landlord whose lands had been acquired for completion of the aforesaid rail line project. In view thereof, it was held that the petitioner could not claim employment in lieu of acquisition of her land as a matter of right.[Neera Devi v. Union of India,\u00a02018 SCC OnLine Pat 2328<\/b><\/a>, decided on 05-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court: The Bench of Prabhat Kumar Jha, J. dismissed a civil writ petition claiming employment in lieu of acquisition of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[15971,28744,32758,33192],"class_list":["post-207960","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-acquisition","tag-employment","tag-job","tag-owner-of-land"],"yoast_head":"\nPat HC | Landlord, whose land is acquired for construction of railway track, cannot claim job in railways as a matter of right in absence of policy to that effect | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/owner-of-land-whose-land-is-acquired-for-construction-of-railway-track-cannot-claim-job-in-railways-as-a-matter-of-right-in-the-absence-of-policy-to-that-effect-patna-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pat HC | Landlord, whose land is acquired for construction of railway track, cannot claim job in railways as a matter of right in absence of policy to that effect\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court: The Bench of Prabhat Kumar Jha, J. dismissed a civil writ petition claiming employment in lieu of acquisition of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/owner-of-land-whose-land-is-acquired-for-construction-of-railway-track-cannot-claim-job-in-railways-as-a-matter-of-right-in-the-absence-of-policy-to-that-effect-patna-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-11T10:30:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-14T06:10:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/owner-of-land-whose-land-is-acquired-for-construction-of-railway-track-cannot-claim-job-in-railways-as-a-matter-of-right-in-the-absence-of-policy-to-that-effect-patna-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/owner-of-land-whose-land-is-acquired-for-construction-of-railway-track-cannot-claim-job-in-railways-as-a-matter-of-right-in-the-absence-of-policy-to-that-effect-patna-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Pat HC | Landlord, whose land is acquired for construction of railway track, cannot claim job in railways as a matter of right in absence of policy to that effect | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-11T10:30:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-14T06:10:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/owner-of-land-whose-land-is-acquired-for-construction-of-railway-track-cannot-claim-job-in-railways-as-a-matter-of-right-in-the-absence-of-policy-to-that-effect-patna-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/owner-of-land-whose-land-is-acquired-for-construction-of-railway-track-cannot-claim-job-in-railways-as-a-matter-of-right-in-the-absence-of-policy-to-that-effect-patna-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/owner-of-land-whose-land-is-acquired-for-construction-of-railway-track-cannot-claim-job-in-railways-as-a-matter-of-right-in-the-absence-of-policy-to-that-effect-patna-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pat HC | Landlord, whose land is acquired for construction of railway track, cannot claim job in railways as a matter of right in absence of policy to that effect\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pat HC | Landlord, whose land is acquired for construction of railway track, cannot claim job in railways as a matter of right in absence of policy to that effect | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/owner-of-land-whose-land-is-acquired-for-construction-of-railway-track-cannot-claim-job-in-railways-as-a-matter-of-right-in-the-absence-of-policy-to-that-effect-patna-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pat HC | Landlord, whose land is acquired for construction of railway track, cannot claim job in railways as a matter of right in absence of policy to that effect","og_description":"Patna High Court: The Bench of Prabhat Kumar Jha, J. dismissed a civil writ petition claiming employment in lieu of acquisition of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/owner-of-land-whose-land-is-acquired-for-construction-of-railway-track-cannot-claim-job-in-railways-as-a-matter-of-right-in-the-absence-of-policy-to-that-effect-patna-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-11T10:30:48+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-14T06:10:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/owner-of-land-whose-land-is-acquired-for-construction-of-railway-track-cannot-claim-job-in-railways-as-a-matter-of-right-in-the-absence-of-policy-to-that-effect-patna-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/owner-of-land-whose-land-is-acquired-for-construction-of-railway-track-cannot-claim-job-in-railways-as-a-matter-of-right-in-the-absence-of-policy-to-that-effect-patna-hc\/","name":"Pat HC | Landlord, whose land is acquired for construction of railway track, cannot claim job in railways as a matter of right in absence of policy to that effect | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-01-11T10:30:48+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-14T06:10:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/owner-of-land-whose-land-is-acquired-for-construction-of-railway-track-cannot-claim-job-in-railways-as-a-matter-of-right-in-the-absence-of-policy-to-that-effect-patna-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/owner-of-land-whose-land-is-acquired-for-construction-of-railway-track-cannot-claim-job-in-railways-as-a-matter-of-right-in-the-absence-of-policy-to-that-effect-patna-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/owner-of-land-whose-land-is-acquired-for-construction-of-railway-track-cannot-claim-job-in-railways-as-a-matter-of-right-in-the-absence-of-policy-to-that-effect-patna-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pat HC | Landlord, whose land is acquired for construction of railway track, cannot claim job in railways as a matter of right in absence of policy to that effect"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":329113,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/22\/no-fundamental-right-violated-over-non-acquisition-of-land-mp-high-court-dismisses-plea-challenging-land-exclusion-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":207960,"position":0},"title":"\u201cNo fundamental right violated over non-acquisition of land”; MP High Court dismisses plea challenging land exclusion","author":"Ritu","date":"August 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court noted that the land's exclusion was based on expert recommendations and legal restrictions, including Regulation 119, which prohibits acquiring land within 45 meters of a railway or highway.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":204135,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/challenge-to-arbitrators-award-in-a-writ-court-not-maintainable-if-statutory-remedy-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-not-exhausted\/","url_meta":{"origin":207960,"position":1},"title":"Challenge to Arbitrator\u2019s award in a writ court not maintainable if statutory remedy under Section 34 of A&C Act not exhausted","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 24, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: A Single judge bench comprising of Birendra Kumar, J. while hearing a civil writ petition against an Arbitrator\u2019s order held that since the statutory remedy provided under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 had not been exhausted, the High Court could not exercise its writ jurisdiction. The respondent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":111701,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/09\/mp-high-court-refuses-to-interfere-in-land-acquisition-matter-as-petitioner-approached-the-court-too-late\/","url_meta":{"origin":207960,"position":2},"title":"MP High Court refuses to interfere in land acquisition matter as petitioner approached the Court too late","author":"Saba","date":"March 9, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court:\u00a0Before the Court, a Public Interest Litigation was filed by Gram Sabha Kunda to challenge the land acquisition process initiated in the year 2011, for establishment of a Nuclear Power Project in District Mandla and writ petition for the same was filed after 6 years. The Court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":308378,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/calcutta-high-court-directs-collector-to-issue-formal-order-of-de-requisition-scc-blog-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":207960,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court affirms right to seek de-requisition; directs Collector to issue formal order of de-requisition","author":"Ritu","date":"December 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court establishes the legal consequences of a court order setting aside requisition and its impact on subsequent attempts to acquire or lease the land.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":249748,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/14\/do-rule-of-attribution-which-is-relevant-to-the-functioning-of-a-limited-company-be-applied-in-the-case-of-organizational-structure-like-railways-orissa-hc-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":207960,"position":4},"title":"Do \u201crule of attribution\u201d which is relevant to the functioning of a limited company be applied in the case of organizational structure like Railways? Orissa HC answers","author":"Editor","date":"June 14, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of S. Muralidhar, CJ and B.P. Routray, J. dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. Aggrieved by the refusal of the General Manager, South Eastern Railways, Kolkata (OP 2) to accord him a right of passage over railway land in order to gain access\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":342566,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/bombay-hc-dismisses-speculative-plea-challenging-land-acquisition-after-77-years\/","url_meta":{"origin":207960,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Writ Petitions can’t be filed by raising mutually destructive pleas without any sense of responsibility\u2019; Bombay HC dismisses speculative plea against land acquisition after 77 years","author":"Editor","date":"February 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cDelay, laches, and disputed questions of fact are all matters that cannot be ignored when it comes to exercising discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207960","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207960"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207960\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207960"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207960"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207960"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}