{"id":207931,"date":"2019-01-11T09:00:24","date_gmt":"2019-01-11T03:30:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=207931"},"modified":"2019-01-16T13:15:57","modified_gmt":"2019-01-16T07:45:57","slug":"jk-hc-evidence-is-required-to-show-that-notice-to-all-persons-having-a-right-to-prior-purchase-is-given-under-section-18-of-the-jk-right-of-prior-purchase-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/jk-hc-evidence-is-required-to-show-that-notice-to-all-persons-having-a-right-to-prior-purchase-is-given-under-section-18-of-the-jk-right-of-prior-purchase-act\/","title":{"rendered":"J&K HC | Evidence is required to show that notice to all persons having a right to prior purchase is given under Section 18 of the J&K Right of Prior Purchase Act"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jammu and Kashmir High Court:<\/strong> A Bench of Dhiraj Singh Thakur, J. allowed a petition involving suit for pre-emption.\u00a0 The controversy arose from a suit for pre-emption filed by the respondent who was the plaintiff before the Trial Court. The suit was dismissed by the Trial Court, however, in the first appeal, the plaintiff\/appellant succeeded. The miscellaneous appeal thus came to be filed by defendants\/petitioners in terms of Order 43, Rule 1(U) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which was also dismissed.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case revolve around the compliance of Section 18 of the Jammu & Kashmir Right of Prior Purchase Act, 1993 where it is provided that if any person proposes to sell any agricultural land or village immovable property or urban immovable property, or to foreclose the right to redeem any village immovable property, or urban immovable property, in respect of which any person have a right of prior purchase, he may give notice to all such persons of the price at which he proposes to sell such land or property, or of the amount due in respect of mortgage, as the case may be. The aforesaid section further envisaged that notice shall be given through any Court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction such land or property is situated.<\/p>\n

A coordinate Bench of this Court came to the conclusion that the provisions of Section 18 of the Act had not been complied with. The appellate court held that any offer made by the seller without the offered price would be a failure on the part of the seller to comply with the requirement of the service in terms of Section 18 of the Act.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the petitioners urged that the right of pre-emption was a weak right, as a universally accepted principle of law in the jurisprudence of the pre-emption laws.<\/p>\n

The Court allowed the petition.\u00a0 [Mohd. Amin v. Krishan Lal, 2018 SCC OnLine J&K 1043<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 27-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Bench of Dhiraj Singh Thakur, J. allowed a petition involving suit for pre-emption.\u00a0 The controversy arose <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2521,33178,33180,33181,33179],"class_list":["post-207931","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Evidence","tag-jk-right-of-prior-purchase-act","tag-order-43-rule-1u-of-the-code-of-civil-procedure","tag-right-of-pre-emption","tag-right-to-prior-purchase"],"yoast_head":"\nJ&K HC | Evidence is required to show that notice to all persons having a right to prior purchase is given under Section 18 of the J&K Right of Prior Purchase Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/jk-hc-evidence-is-required-to-show-that-notice-to-all-persons-having-a-right-to-prior-purchase-is-given-under-section-18-of-the-jk-right-of-prior-purchase-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"J&K HC | Evidence is required to show that notice to all persons having a right to prior purchase is given under Section 18 of the J&K Right of Prior Purchase Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Bench of Dhiraj Singh Thakur, J. allowed a petition involving suit for pre-emption.\u00a0 The controversy arose\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/jk-hc-evidence-is-required-to-show-that-notice-to-all-persons-having-a-right-to-prior-purchase-is-given-under-section-18-of-the-jk-right-of-prior-purchase-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-11T03:30:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-16T07:45:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/jk-hc-evidence-is-required-to-show-that-notice-to-all-persons-having-a-right-to-prior-purchase-is-given-under-section-18-of-the-jk-right-of-prior-purchase-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/jk-hc-evidence-is-required-to-show-that-notice-to-all-persons-having-a-right-to-prior-purchase-is-given-under-section-18-of-the-jk-right-of-prior-purchase-act\/\",\"name\":\"J&K HC | Evidence is required to show that notice to all persons having a right to prior purchase is given under Section 18 of the J&K Right of Prior Purchase Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-11T03:30:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-16T07:45:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/jk-hc-evidence-is-required-to-show-that-notice-to-all-persons-having-a-right-to-prior-purchase-is-given-under-section-18-of-the-jk-right-of-prior-purchase-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/jk-hc-evidence-is-required-to-show-that-notice-to-all-persons-having-a-right-to-prior-purchase-is-given-under-section-18-of-the-jk-right-of-prior-purchase-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/jk-hc-evidence-is-required-to-show-that-notice-to-all-persons-having-a-right-to-prior-purchase-is-given-under-section-18-of-the-jk-right-of-prior-purchase-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"J&K HC | Evidence is required to show that notice to all persons having a right to prior purchase is given under Section 18 of the J&K Right of Prior Purchase Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"J&K HC | Evidence is required to show that notice to all persons having a right to prior purchase is given under Section 18 of the J&K Right of Prior Purchase Act | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/jk-hc-evidence-is-required-to-show-that-notice-to-all-persons-having-a-right-to-prior-purchase-is-given-under-section-18-of-the-jk-right-of-prior-purchase-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"J&K HC | Evidence is required to show that notice to all persons having a right to prior purchase is given under Section 18 of the J&K Right of Prior Purchase Act","og_description":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Bench of Dhiraj Singh Thakur, J. allowed a petition involving suit for pre-emption.\u00a0 The controversy arose","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/jk-hc-evidence-is-required-to-show-that-notice-to-all-persons-having-a-right-to-prior-purchase-is-given-under-section-18-of-the-jk-right-of-prior-purchase-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-11T03:30:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-16T07:45:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/jk-hc-evidence-is-required-to-show-that-notice-to-all-persons-having-a-right-to-prior-purchase-is-given-under-section-18-of-the-jk-right-of-prior-purchase-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/jk-hc-evidence-is-required-to-show-that-notice-to-all-persons-having-a-right-to-prior-purchase-is-given-under-section-18-of-the-jk-right-of-prior-purchase-act\/","name":"J&K HC | Evidence is required to show that notice to all persons having a right to prior purchase is given under Section 18 of the J&K Right of Prior Purchase Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-01-11T03:30:24+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-16T07:45:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/jk-hc-evidence-is-required-to-show-that-notice-to-all-persons-having-a-right-to-prior-purchase-is-given-under-section-18-of-the-jk-right-of-prior-purchase-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/jk-hc-evidence-is-required-to-show-that-notice-to-all-persons-having-a-right-to-prior-purchase-is-given-under-section-18-of-the-jk-right-of-prior-purchase-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/jk-hc-evidence-is-required-to-show-that-notice-to-all-persons-having-a-right-to-prior-purchase-is-given-under-section-18-of-the-jk-right-of-prior-purchase-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"J&K HC | Evidence is required to show that notice to all persons having a right to prior purchase is given under Section 18 of the J&K Right of Prior Purchase Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":312052,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":207931,"position":0},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds Appellate Court\u2019s order on pre-emption rights and limitation","author":"Ritu","date":"January 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that issue of limitation being a question of fact ought to have been raised before trial court and evidence ought to have been adduced.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237407,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/13\/is-right-to-pre-emption-a-recurring-right-or-exercisable-only-the-first-time-sc-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":207931,"position":1},"title":"Is right to pre-emption a recurring right or exercisable only the first time? SC answers","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court analyses whether the right of pre-emption can be enforced for an indefinite number of transactions or it is exercisable only the first time.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313997,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/explained-supreme-court-tenants-right-to-pre-emption-urban-immovable-property-punjab-pre-emption-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":207931,"position":2},"title":"Explained | Supreme Court verdict on Tenants right to pre-emption in the ‘urban immovable property’ under Punjab Pre-Emption Act","author":"Apoorva","date":"February 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The notification dated 08-10-1985 limits its application for taking away the right of pre-emption only with reference to sale of land falling in the areas of any municipality.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"right to pre-emption","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/right-to-pre-emption.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/right-to-pre-emption.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/right-to-pre-emption.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/right-to-pre-emption.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310260,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/28\/cal-hc-overturns-temporary-injunction-in-pre-emption-case-under-section-236-of-the-mahomedan-law-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":207931,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court overturns temporary injunction in Pre-emption case due to delay in immediate demand under Section 236 of the Mahomedan Law","author":"Ritu","date":"December 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court acknowledged the importance of strict compliance with the requirements of Section 236 of the Mahomedan Law in pre-emption cases.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/under-indian-law-neither-consideration-nor-agreement-is-necessary-to-constitute-waiver-of-rights\/","url_meta":{"origin":207931,"position":4},"title":"Under Indian law neither consideration nor agreement is necessary to constitute waiver of rights","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Asha Arora, J. dismissed a revisional application filed by the petitioner assailing the order of the learned Additional District Judge who reversed the order of the learned Civil Judge granting a decree of pre-emption in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220346,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/hp-hc-scope-of-interference-by-high-court-in-second-appeal-under-s-100-of-cpc-is-only-if-a-substantial-question-of-law-involved-in-appeal-appeal-dismissed-as-no-perversity-in-earlier-orders\/","url_meta":{"origin":207931,"position":5},"title":"HP HC | Scope of interference by High Court in Second Appeal under S. 100 of CPC is only if a substantial question of law involved; Appeal dismissed as no perversity in earlier orders","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Ajay Mohan Goel, J. dismissed the appeal on finding no substantial question of law involved in the appeal. Factual matrix of the case was that the plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of a certain amount along with the interest rate; the contract was based on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207931"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207931\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}