{"id":207908,"date":"2019-01-10T15:00:33","date_gmt":"2019-01-10T09:30:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=207908"},"modified":"2019-01-14T11:28:49","modified_gmt":"2019-01-14T05:58:49","slug":"jk-hc-further-investigation-under-section-1738-crpc-allowed-on-ground-that-relevant-evidences-were-left-out","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/jk-hc-further-investigation-under-section-1738-crpc-allowed-on-ground-that-relevant-evidences-were-left-out\/","title":{"rendered":"J&#038;K HC | Further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC allowed on ground that relevant evidences were left out"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Jammu and Kashmir High Court:<\/strong> A Bench of Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J. allowed this petition seeking a direction to the official respondents for reinvestigation because of shoddy, incomplete and unreasoned investigation conducted in a perfunctory manner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The facts of the case are that the father, brother of the petitioner and the petitioner himself were criminally abused, beaten up and restrained by the accused persons. An FIR was lodged but the police refused to take any actions against the accused persons. It was stated that the Challan in the aforesaid FIR was produced before the Court of Learned Munsiff only under Sections 341\/323\/34 RPC and only against a few of the respondents and left over the serious offences and rest of the accused persons. The petitioners further contended that the criminal case under the FIR whose challan was presented in the Court of Munsiff required a reinvestigation as the medical record which had been annexed with the petition was not considered by the Investigating Officer during the investigation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court allowed the petition and ordered for further investigation. [Mohd. Arif v. State of J&amp;K,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/66mzOUze\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine J&amp;K 1046<\/b><\/a>, decided on\u00a0 24-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Bench of Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J. allowed this petition seeking a direction to the official respondents <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[22614,2583,33164,13651],"class_list":["post-207908","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-investigating-officer","tag-Investigation","tag-reinvestigation","tag-section-1738-crpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>J&amp;K HC | Further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC allowed on ground that relevant evidences were left out | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/jk-hc-further-investigation-under-section-1738-crpc-allowed-on-ground-that-relevant-evidences-were-left-out\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"J&amp;K HC | Further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC allowed on ground that relevant evidences were left out\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Bench of Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J. allowed this petition seeking a direction to the official respondents\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/jk-hc-further-investigation-under-section-1738-crpc-allowed-on-ground-that-relevant-evidences-were-left-out\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-10T09:30:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-14T05:58:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/jk-hc-further-investigation-under-section-1738-crpc-allowed-on-ground-that-relevant-evidences-were-left-out\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/jk-hc-further-investigation-under-section-1738-crpc-allowed-on-ground-that-relevant-evidences-were-left-out\/\",\"name\":\"J&K HC | Further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC allowed on ground that relevant evidences were left out | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-10T09:30:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-14T05:58:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/jk-hc-further-investigation-under-section-1738-crpc-allowed-on-ground-that-relevant-evidences-were-left-out\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/jk-hc-further-investigation-under-section-1738-crpc-allowed-on-ground-that-relevant-evidences-were-left-out\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/jk-hc-further-investigation-under-section-1738-crpc-allowed-on-ground-that-relevant-evidences-were-left-out\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"J&#038;K HC | Further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC allowed on ground that relevant evidences were left out\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"J&K HC | Further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC allowed on ground that relevant evidences were left out | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/jk-hc-further-investigation-under-section-1738-crpc-allowed-on-ground-that-relevant-evidences-were-left-out\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"J&K HC | Further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC allowed on ground that relevant evidences were left out","og_description":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Bench of Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J. allowed this petition seeking a direction to the official respondents","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/jk-hc-further-investigation-under-section-1738-crpc-allowed-on-ground-that-relevant-evidences-were-left-out\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-10T09:30:33+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-14T05:58:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/jk-hc-further-investigation-under-section-1738-crpc-allowed-on-ground-that-relevant-evidences-were-left-out\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/jk-hc-further-investigation-under-section-1738-crpc-allowed-on-ground-that-relevant-evidences-were-left-out\/","name":"J&K HC | Further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC allowed on ground that relevant evidences were left out | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-01-10T09:30:33+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-14T05:58:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/jk-hc-further-investigation-under-section-1738-crpc-allowed-on-ground-that-relevant-evidences-were-left-out\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/jk-hc-further-investigation-under-section-1738-crpc-allowed-on-ground-that-relevant-evidences-were-left-out\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/jk-hc-further-investigation-under-section-1738-crpc-allowed-on-ground-that-relevant-evidences-were-left-out\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"J&#038;K HC | Further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC allowed on ground that relevant evidences were left out"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":275567,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/13\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-person-cannot-be-branded-as-suspect-in-final-report-in-absence-of-incriminating-material\/","url_meta":{"origin":207908,"position":0},"title":"Himachal Pradesh High Court | Person cannot be branded as \u2018Suspect\u2019 in Final Report in absence of incriminating material","author":"Editor","date":"October 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\"When in the course of investigation, the Investigating Officer has not found anything incriminating against someone, then reflecting him or her as a \u2018suspect\u2019 in the Investigation Report, is not acceptable in law, as the word \u2018suspect\u2019 undoubtedly casts a stigma on such a person.\"","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Himachal Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296754,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/13\/orissa-hc-orders-fresh-probe-into-birendra-lakras-friends-death-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":207908,"position":1},"title":"Setback for Former Hockey Player Birendra Lakra; Orissa HC orders fresh Probe into Friend&#8217;s Death","author":"Editor","date":"July 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court said that proper and fair investigation is sine qua non of criminal jurisprudence and directed the CID-Crime Branch to reinvestigate the case.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"orissa high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":211493,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/sc-acquits-6-falsely-implicated-death-row-convicts-in-a-16-year-old-crime-orders-reinvestigation\/","url_meta":{"origin":207908,"position":2},"title":"SC acquits 6 falsely implicated death row convicts in a 16 year old crime; orders reinvestigation","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Dr. AK Sikri, SA Nazeer and MR Shah, JJ has acquitted 6 death row convicts and has directed reinvestigation in a crime that was committed in June, 2003. The Court was hearing the case where 5 people were brutally killed and a woman was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257104,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/15\/hc-quashes-proceedings-based-on-draft-charge-sheet-yet-to-be-placed-before-the-magistrate-clear-abuse-of-s-482-crpc-says-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":207908,"position":3},"title":"HC quashes proceedings based on \u201cdraft charge-sheet\u201d yet to be placed before Magistrate! Clear abuse of S. 482 CrPC, holds SC\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 15, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where the Gujarat High Court had quashed criminal proceedings at the behest of persons who were not named in the FIR purely on the basis of their names appearing in the draft charge-sheet, the bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has found\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253369,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/27\/section-482-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":207908,"position":4},"title":"J&#038;K and Ladakh HC | Can FIR containing allegations which set police in motion, be quashed at threshold stage? HC answers","author":"Editor","date":"August 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: Ali Mohammad Magrey, J., held that FIR under Section 482 of CrPC cannot be quashed at the threshold stage. The Bench stated, \u201cIt is not proper to scuttle away the investigation at its thresh-hold stage, if FIR discloses the commission of offences; High\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":341370,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/14\/sc-quashes-s-306-ipc-proceedings-and-constitutes-sit-for-reinvestigation-in-girl-suicide\/","url_meta":{"origin":207908,"position":5},"title":"\u2018One-sided, partial and inimical investigation\u2019; SC quashes S. 306 IPC proceedings, constitutes SIT for reinvestigating girl\u2019s suicide after alleged boyfriend\u2019s killing","author":"Editor","date":"February 14, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWas there anything more sinister? Even if it was suicide what was the real cause? Was the deceased girl distraught with what happened to her friend? Considering the under-currents and the disapproval of the relationship, was there any instigation for the suicide from any other quarter?\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SIT reinvestigation in suicide","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/SIT-reinvestigation-in-suicide.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/SIT-reinvestigation-in-suicide.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/SIT-reinvestigation-in-suicide.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/SIT-reinvestigation-in-suicide.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207908","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207908"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207908\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207908"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207908"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207908"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}