{"id":207902,"date":"2019-01-10T17:00:03","date_gmt":"2019-01-10T11:30:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=207902"},"modified":"2019-01-14T15:59:14","modified_gmt":"2019-01-14T10:29:14","slug":"delhi-hc-defect-of-non-compliance-of-section-195-crpc-cannot-be-cured-by-filling-subsequent-chargesheet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/delhi-hc-defect-of-non-compliance-of-section-195-crpc-cannot-be-cured-by-filling-subsequent-chargesheet\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | Defect of non-compliance of Section 195 CrPC cannot be cured by filling subsequent chargesheet"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>The Bench of Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. allowed a petition filed against order of the trial court whereby it has taken cognizance of offence under Section 188 IPC (disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant) against the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The District Disaster Management Authority carried out an inspection of &#8220;M Cinemas&#8221; of the petitioner and identified certain shortcomings. The premised was directed to be closed for visitors. On petitioner&#8217;s failure to comply with the directions, CEO of the Authority filed a complaint with SHO of the police station concerned. An FIR was registered and chargesheet was assailed by the police, based on which cognizance was taken by the Magistrate vide the impugned order. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner was before the High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner was represented by Nina R. Nariman with Vrinda Bhandari and Geetika Kapur, Advocates. It was submitted that in terms of Section 195 CrPC, no Court can take cognizance of an offence under Section 188 IPC except on complaint of public servant concerned. It was contended that no complaint satisfying requirements of Section 2(d) CrPC was filed in the present case.\u00a0<em>As per Section 2(d), a &#8220;complaint&#8221; has to be in writing to the Magistrate.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court held that the complaint made by CEO of the Authority was a\u00a0<i>complaint made to SHO which\u00a0could not be treated as a complaint to the\u00a0<\/i><i>Magistrate\u00a0<\/i>so as to satisfy the requirements of Section 195 (1)(a)(i) CrPC. It was observed,\u00a0<strong>&#8220;Non-compliance of Section 195 is a defect which cannot be cured\u00a0subsequently as was sought\u00a0to be\u00a0done by the prosecution by filing a\u00a0<\/strong><b>supplementary\u00a0chargesheet or by way of a complaint given by\u00a0the public servant\u00a0after cognizance has been taken.&#8221;\u00a0<\/b>Holding that the present proceedings suffered from infraction of Section 195, the Court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order. [Mohan Kukreja v. State (NCT of Delhi), <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/L3MuEgV1\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Del 6398<\/b><\/a>, decided on 08-1-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court:\u00a0The Bench of Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. allowed a petition filed against order of the trial court whereby it has taken <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[6881,33170,2675,33171,20141],"class_list":["post-207902","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-complaint","tag-defect-of-non-compliance","tag-public_servant","tag-section-188-ipc","tag-section-195-crpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Del HC | Defect of non-compliance of Section 195 CrPC cannot be cured by filling subsequent chargesheet | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/delhi-hc-defect-of-non-compliance-of-section-195-crpc-cannot-be-cured-by-filling-subsequent-chargesheet\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | Defect of non-compliance of Section 195 CrPC cannot be cured by filling subsequent chargesheet\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0The Bench of Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. allowed a petition filed against order of the trial court whereby it has taken\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/delhi-hc-defect-of-non-compliance-of-section-195-crpc-cannot-be-cured-by-filling-subsequent-chargesheet\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-10T11:30:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-14T10:29:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/delhi-hc-defect-of-non-compliance-of-section-195-crpc-cannot-be-cured-by-filling-subsequent-chargesheet\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/delhi-hc-defect-of-non-compliance-of-section-195-crpc-cannot-be-cured-by-filling-subsequent-chargesheet\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | Defect of non-compliance of Section 195 CrPC cannot be cured by filling subsequent chargesheet | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-10T11:30:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-14T10:29:14+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/delhi-hc-defect-of-non-compliance-of-section-195-crpc-cannot-be-cured-by-filling-subsequent-chargesheet\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/delhi-hc-defect-of-non-compliance-of-section-195-crpc-cannot-be-cured-by-filling-subsequent-chargesheet\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/delhi-hc-defect-of-non-compliance-of-section-195-crpc-cannot-be-cured-by-filling-subsequent-chargesheet\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | Defect of non-compliance of Section 195 CrPC cannot be cured by filling subsequent chargesheet\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | Defect of non-compliance of Section 195 CrPC cannot be cured by filling subsequent chargesheet | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/delhi-hc-defect-of-non-compliance-of-section-195-crpc-cannot-be-cured-by-filling-subsequent-chargesheet\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | Defect of non-compliance of Section 195 CrPC cannot be cured by filling subsequent chargesheet","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0The Bench of Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. allowed a petition filed against order of the trial court whereby it has taken","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/delhi-hc-defect-of-non-compliance-of-section-195-crpc-cannot-be-cured-by-filling-subsequent-chargesheet\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-10T11:30:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-14T10:29:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/delhi-hc-defect-of-non-compliance-of-section-195-crpc-cannot-be-cured-by-filling-subsequent-chargesheet\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/delhi-hc-defect-of-non-compliance-of-section-195-crpc-cannot-be-cured-by-filling-subsequent-chargesheet\/","name":"Del HC | Defect of non-compliance of Section 195 CrPC cannot be cured by filling subsequent chargesheet | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-01-10T11:30:03+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-14T10:29:14+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/delhi-hc-defect-of-non-compliance-of-section-195-crpc-cannot-be-cured-by-filling-subsequent-chargesheet\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/delhi-hc-defect-of-non-compliance-of-section-195-crpc-cannot-be-cured-by-filling-subsequent-chargesheet\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/delhi-hc-defect-of-non-compliance-of-section-195-crpc-cannot-be-cured-by-filling-subsequent-chargesheet\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | Defect of non-compliance of Section 195 CrPC cannot be cured by filling subsequent chargesheet"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":299124,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/11\/delhi-hc-emphasizes-on-non-compliance-of-s195-of-crpc-directs-issuance-of-guidelines\/","url_meta":{"origin":207902,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court directs issuance of guidelines to address non-compliance of Section 195 of CrPC","author":"Editor","date":"August 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe concerned public servant should have prepared a complaint under Section 195 CrPC and the same should have been filed before the Magistrate or the same could have been forwarded along with the chargesheet to the concerned Court.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310981,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":207902,"position":1},"title":"No cognizance of offence u\/S. 188 IPC unless DM makes a complaint to Judicial Magistrate under S. 195 CrPC: Gurgaon District Court","author":"Editor","date":"January 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNo Court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under Section 172-188 of the IPC, except on the complaint in writing of the public servant concerned or of some other public servant to whom he is administratively subordinate\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Gurgaon District Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Gurgaon-District-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Gurgaon-District-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Gurgaon-District-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Gurgaon-District-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233658,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/chh-hc-s-195-crpc-is-a-limitation-on-powers-of-magistrate-to-take-cognizance-for-an-offence-under-s-188-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":207902,"position":2},"title":"Chh HC | S. 195 CrPC is a limitation on powers of Magistrate to take cognizance for an offence under S. 188 IPC","author":"Editor","date":"August 10, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":338392,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/03\/non-mentioning-of-vital-facts-assault-in-fir-vitiate-cognizance-taken-by-cjm-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":207902,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Non-mentioning of vital facts of assault or criminal force in FIR\/ Complaint, would vitiate cognizance taken by CJM\u2019; SC quashes proceedings under S. 353 &amp; 186 of IPC","author":"Editor","date":"January 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA written complaint by a public servant before the Court takes cognizance is sine qua non, absence of which would vitiate such cognizance being taken for any offence punishable under Section 186 of the IPC.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"vital facts in FIR","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/vital-facts-in-FIR.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/vital-facts-in-FIR.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/vital-facts-in-FIR.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/vital-facts-in-FIR.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":231829,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/06\/madras-hc-police-failed-to-state-how-anti-caa-protest-by-accused-was-unlawful-court-quashes-criminal-case-against-accused-booked-for-anti-caa-protest\/","url_meta":{"origin":207902,"position":4},"title":"Madras HC | Police failed to state how anti-CAA protest by accused was unlawful: Court quashes criminal case against accused booked for anti-CAA protest","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, J., allowed a criminal petition and quashed proceedings in the criminal case filed against the petitioner protesting against Citizenship Amendment Act. Case of the prosecution Petitioner along with other accused persons protested in the public road against the implementation of the Citizenship Amendment Act and further\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":352708,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/07\/jk-court-on-waheed-rehman-parras-mcc-violation-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":207902,"position":5},"title":"Read why J&amp;K Court did not take cognizance against PDP MLA Waheed ur Rehman Parra for violating Model Code of Conduct","author":"Editor","date":"July 7, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court opined that Waheed ur Rehman Parra is charged with violation of Model Code of Conduct which cannot be classified as an order under Section 188 IPC as it lacked statutory backing and many of its provisions are not legally enforceable.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Waheed ur Rehman Parra MCC violation case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Waheed-ur-Rehman-Parra-MCC-violation-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Waheed-ur-Rehman-Parra-MCC-violation-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Waheed-ur-Rehman-Parra-MCC-violation-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Waheed-ur-Rehman-Parra-MCC-violation-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207902","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207902"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207902\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207902"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207902"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207902"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}